₦airaland Forum

akintom:
So una dey think of sex bah?

St. Matthew 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

And when you find yourself, in the real act in dreams now, you will come here to say wet dream is "demonic".




One night will not sister. Except the king didn't measure up.

Oga Akintom, sexual urges are physiologic, anybody that says otherwise is just deceiving themselves.
No come derail this sweet thread.
I'm enjoying it.

analice107:
Na true nah. You know how many hot guys i don close eyes, bite my teeth waka pass?

you see, in heaven there shall be no sex, but am still here, at least for one night. I go declare vigil try meet up before proceeding to heaven.

Onye nwe anyi ga agba gi ume (Our Lord will give you strength)

analice107:
My dear, even if i been know true true say Jesus go come tomorrow, i go marry today. At least make i no just go heaven without emm you know?

After i don hold body tire, na him sombory go tell me say, no marry Jesus dey come tomorrow, me i go listen to am? Nooooo. At least one night with my king will suffice.

This is just hilarious
Nice thread bennyann. Learning a lot.

Bennyann
Tears almost came to my eyes while reading this your write up.
I've never seen such sincerity in a theist in a long time.
You're right, it's a score to settle between us and God.
Thank you thank you.

KingEbukasBlog:
Here comes the quack doctor .

A narcissist is someone with an over bloated sense of self/talent which you typified with this quip.

I won't be surprised if I find out that I'm informed about this topic way more than you are .

I'm sure you stare at yourself in the mirror and wankkk yourself into a coma while looking at your reflection.
I know you very well, if you had a clue about the topic, you would have started running your mouth and dropping links up and down.
Calling me quack to make yourself​ feel better won't make up for your glaring lack of knowledge, but it might make you sleep better at night.
Let me stop right here before you misquote me again and build another strawman argument because comprehension is clearly a problem for you.

KingEbukasBlog:
I won't be surprised if I find out that I'm informed about this topic way more than you are .

If I call you a narcissist now, they'll say I've started.

KingEbukasBlog:
I see no points being made

Of course you won't see points being made, your bias won't let you.

What does this have to do with anything ? I just told you that Israelites have laws against polytheism which made them unique yet you are asking me irrelevant questions . Every time the culture of polytheism crept in , both the idols representing those gods and their worshipers were destroyed . Its in the bible , its in non-biblical sources .

Still you went to a chapter in the bible that seemed to support your view (cherry-picking ) then overlooked every other evidence in numerous chapters and verses that confute your claim and insisted that your outlandish claims were true while standing on a neutral ground ? Who is this guy ?!

Israel was given to Yahweh as his inheritance, so, he is their god, they had to worship him. That doesn't mean they didn't worship other gods. Pre exile israel was polytheistic.They primarily became a monotheistic people after the return from exile. Like I said, a simple Wikipedia search. There are so much materials apart from the Bible and apologist books.

As for outlandish claims, so because there's no consensus, I should sit on your own side of the fence?

KingEbukasBlog:
I won't be surprised if I find out that I'm informed about this topic way more than you are .

Where is your rebuttal to any of the points I listed?
Okay, let me make it simple, what is the name of the supreme deity in Igbo land?
You're Igbo naa, your name is Ebuka ain't it?

CoolUsername:
Before you jump down this guy's throat, I'll suggest you read "Evolution of God" by Robert Wright - a deist, mind you with a very similar theory with CatfishBilly.

Don't mind KingEbukasBlog. A simple Wikipedia search of Yahweh will put him on his way.
Yahweh has been shown to evolve, absorbing other characteristics of gods in lands where it was exported to just like the character En Sabah Nur in X men Apocalypse. A very simple example of this is in Igbo land, Chukwu (Big god/most High i.e. El Elyon) Okike, the supreme Igbo deity is being praised as Anu kporo nku na eju onu (The tough meat that fills the mouth), Oshimiri ata ata (The ocean that never runs dry) et cetera. Guess what? Yahweh is now called Chukwu in Igbo language, those terms I listed are now being used to praise Yahweh in Igbo land. So the idea that Yahweh absorbed the name of El shouldn't sound strange to him.
But he won't see all these. His bias won't let him.

GloriaNinja:
MUST YOU BLASPHEME AND BLAST THE GOD THAT CREATED YOU?? DO YOU THINK EVERYTHING IN THE BIBLE IS REAL? MODERN DAY BIBLE IS EXCERPT AND EDITED.

Everything in the Bible is not real? That's a new one.
Can you talk more about this point, please?

Mayorall, any update on my order?

KingEbukasBlog:
Stop misinterpretation texts and making outlandish claims . Where you one of the authors of the original Masoretic texts ? You are just a facsimile of 4.kings in intellect : ready and quick to accept anything that appeals to you without skepticism . Reputable Jewish scholars and historians have rubbished these claims over and over again . In short , you can believe whatever you want to believe , its your prerogative .

Reputable Jewish scholars? According to an article I was reading about the Ugarit clay tablets, that chapter of the old testament is the most discussed chapter in all of the old testament and there is still no consensus. They are mostly split in half.
Who is 4.kings?
Of course you won't want to hear what the other side has to say, because it rubbishes everything you were brought up believing in. Your reasoning is clouded by bias. For me, I'm just standing on a neutral ground. I have no bias. If a better article comes out today to prove beyond every reasonable doubt that Yahweh is not one of the sons of El and Israel wasn't given to him as his inheritance, I'll accept wholeheartedly.
Like you said, believe what you want to believe.

KingEbukasBlog:
Catfishbilly is one of those atheists who have been cozened to be believe that the different names of God in the bible are different separate gods . He does not know that Christ said "Eloi Eloi ... " referring to El or Elohim . Israel does not worship a pantheon of gods as it is clearly proscribed in their laws and that was made them special and different from other nations that surrounded them.

Read the original Masoretic texts of Deuteronomy Chapter 32. If you still believe in this your explanation, then I'll just have to leave you to your beliefs now, won't I?
Like I said, I'm not winning souls or evangelizing.
It's just good the read about the origin of a god you worship.

analice107:
And who is EL?
Mr big shot, why not school me here, why send me off? Am ready to get the info here from you.

Nope. I'm not winning any converts neither am I evangelizing. If you want to know, do your research yourself.
Let me give you another hint. Melchizedek was his high priest during the time of Abraham.

felixomor:
Nah.
I only showed u your where you are going.
Have u forgotten


Funny enough the person u r referencing now openly worships flying spaghetti monster.
He is a bit ahead in the same journey with you.



Hmmmm, prove it

If by now you still don't know that flying spaghetti monster is a humorous play on an all powerful deity, then I have nothing else to say to you.

felixomor:
Satan Worship

So, disagreement with Christianity is now Satan worship?
Pointing out the origin of Yahweh is Satan worship?
Like hopefullandlord would say, If you read your Bible very well, you won't be a Christian.

felixomor:
Your career started with criticising religion.
You are finally getting closer to your destination.

Which destination is that, if I may ask?

analice107:
What is this one saying?

Oh. You're just worshipping Yahweh without knowing how he came about?
I'll give you a little hint. He is one if the over 70 children of El. Go and do your own reading.

felixomor:
Wonderful.
Please what are you reading?
Are u sure, you are on the right page?


Make una come see o
Who is talking about "girlfriend" in the middle of scientific talk?
Guy, are u still ok?


LMAO
Hehehehe after only one name made you to shift your goal post 4(four) times?
You must be kidding.


Are u sure you are reading this thread?
You that has changed mouth more than 3 times?
Abeg stop being a comedian.



"Pseudoscientists"
LMAO, another goal post.
I have lost count



I would have brought.
Your goal post is in Togo,
When u have reached here
Alert us


Delusions.
Please, I think you are on the wrong thread.

What is shifting goal posts? I asked you to do just one thing. Provide link of a peer reviewed article. You're just there dancing skelewu. It's a thing about theists anyways, anytime they make a claim and you ask for proof, they start ranting and raving, so I'm not surprised.

analice107:
Every atheist is a satanist.

Sure, every Christian is a pagan. Worshipping Yahweh, one of the sons of El.

Your pastors and prophets visit hospitals.
If you get sick, if you like don't go to a hospital. Be listening to your pastors, you hear?

TPAND:
Doctors dont tell these useless celebs the harm done to their brains when they go through CT scan

What harm exactly?
Ignorant Nigerian.

felixomor:
New goal post shifted:
"He is not a proper scientist as far as evolution is concerned"

Keep shifting your goal post.
When u reach cotonou,
Tell me

Eya, is it paining you? Do you want to run to your girlfriend and cry?
Drop the name of another professor naa. Fear dey catch you? All you people have are pseudoscientists and Bible thumpers. Bring another one of your Professors. Rubbish.
Bringing knives to a gun fight.

felixomor:
Cop out.
Jonathan Wells works are littered everywhere.
Use your google.
At first u said he is not a "proper scientist"
Now your excuse is "peer reviewed article"

After that one you will ask for "his boxers."
And yet u r accusing me of back and forth.

How it works in science is you write an article, then it is peer reviewed, then it is published in a journal. Sure, he has articles about molecular biology.
But when it comes to evolution, he has none. He is not a proper scientist as far as evolution is concerned, he is a pseudoscientific nutjob.
A PhD in molecular biology denying HIV though. That's all shades of strange. Affirms my nutjob position.

felixomor:
Interesting
Oh So now you what they call fallacy of appeal to authority?
I remember when you said "they are authority for a reason"
In an argument in the past.
When I introduced u to "fallacy of authority"

Unfortunately, you are already guilty of it here, even before I asked u that question
You just quoted a mysterious "the scientific community" (that has no name)
And used it as excuse on Jonathan Wells.

So First of all correct your own fallacy.

Ogbeni, this back and forth is not helping matters. Produce his peer reviewed article. That's how it works in science. If you can't do that, then he is just spewing pseudoscientific jargon that wasn't reproduced by anybody else but himself.

felixomor:
And please If I may ask
Who are you to debunk professors?

Please how many papers do you have?

felixomor:
The man is a phd holder
The so called "scientific community" are people like u who don't agree with him.
His critics

Fallacy of appeal to authority.
Fear dey catch you? Drop their names.

felixomor:
And actually that part of the Wikipedia you are quoting is his critic.
That is why there is no name of the "scientific community" that rejected him
Its people who disagree with him that say he is rejected
The man is a phd holder

Where is his peer reviewed article published in a scientific journal, then?

felixomor:
You don't read
The man never said AIDS doesn't exist. Go and read properly what he said.
You just heard of him
Instead of reading everything you went to cherrypick his religious belief and want to use it to fault his works.
Just because you want to continue your argument.

Besides, do you think Jonathan Wells is the only professor who has Disproved evolution ?

So, the scientific community that rejected his works also cherry picked his religious beliefs too abi?
Drop the names and I'll debunk them for you one by one.
Wells is not a professor, he holds a PhD. They are different

felixomor:
Please where are you quoting this from?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Wells_(intelligent_design_advocate)

felixomor:
AIDS remains a controversial topic in the science world till tomorrow
There are many notable scientists who differ on the topic.
Either sides have their reasons and evidences.
Stop talking like a child.

Looking supid is when u that has only MBBS says a professor is not a proper scientist.
That is looking stupid

An infant born with HIV knows it exists, he doesn't need any fancy degrees to make that deduction. He is an insult to his PhD in Molecular Biology and he is not a professor. He is not the first anyways, D.K Olukoya is another example.
Or do you believe AIDS doesn't exist? Yes or No answer please.

felixomor:
THIS IS I ALWAYS USE YES OR NO QUESTIONS FOR YOU
YOUR DISHONESTY SPEAKS TO THE HEAVENS

So Somebody that holds PHD in molecular biology is not a "proper scientist"?
Because He doesn't hold your belief?

I can see

PLEASE WHO IS A PROPER SCIENTIST?
IT MUST BE AN ATHEIST, I GUESS

Just read this quote.

In his book Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? (2000), Wells argues that a number of examples used to illustrate biology textbooks were grossly exaggerated, distorted truth, or were patently false. Wells said that this shows that evolution conflicts with the evidence, and so argued against its teaching in public education.
Some reviewers of Icons of Evolution have said that Wells misquoted experts cited as sources and took minor issues out of context, basing his argument on a flawed syllogism but Wells has responded insisting those accusations are untrue. Wells's views on evolution have been rejected by the scientific community.

At the bolded is where peer review comes into play, you can't​ just bring any rubbish and expect the scientific community to swallow it without any scrutiny.
He also has a PhD in religious studies which clearly explains why he is having issues with everything.

felixomor:
THIS IS I ALWAYS USE YES OR NO QUESTIONS FOR YOU
YOUR DISHONESTY SPEAKS TO THE HEAVENS

So Somebody that holds PHD in molecular biology is not a "proper scientist"?
Because He doesn't hold your belief?

I can see

PLEASE WHO IS A PROPER SCIENTIST?
IT MUST BE AN ATHEIST, I GUESS

A PhD in molecular biology and he denies AIDS exists?
No you yourself, answer it without making the both of us look stupid.