Cococandy's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Cococandy's Profile › Cococandy's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 (of 1458 pages)
MagpieMonishaa:Thank you ![]() @bold, much hasn’t changed. Instead we usually have 12 hour days. Rarely do we have have 16 hour days. But continuous side education and holding a family together (for some of us) is still part of it . Respect to Mary Mahoney. Respect to merahki. Respect to me . Respect to all of us ![]() |
Arthur2021:mmm okay. What is misogyny?if you are mistaken hatred,contempt or prejudice( for example beating,cheating,marital rape against womenyes that’s misogyny and any man or woman who accepts/minimizes such is a misogynist. I’m not mistaking it for a woman choosing a traditional role. As long as it’s HER CHOICE, I’m down baby. It’s feminist to support other women’s choices. It’s not feminist to look the other way when things such as the above in bold are told to women as stuff they shouldn’t make a big deal of when a man does it. for a lady willfully deciding to submit to her husband or taking traditional roles (like being a housewife) which she loves then we can't agree. Some ladies are angry with just the notion that a lady sees her man as the head,even if she willfully chooses to do so and the couple are living harmoniously . it doesn't have to be when he is beating her black and blue before they belittle herthat’s unusual. Most women don’t care if you call your husband lord. It’s when you tell them that they should do same then it becomes an issue. See the difference? Check out eye.ness post on pickmesha,or various derogatory terms used to describe women that are being traditional.I don’t know that person. However if she’s using that term to describe ladies who are making their own choices without foisting their views as things other women SHOULD do, then she’s wrong. No different from the ones she’s describing I agree there are not those who call others out for marrying that I know But they are ladies that have belittled and accused other ladies for their choices or opinions that aren't even misogynistic on this forum(you are more popular on food section and family son you may not notice it as it is prominent in romance section) . one popular feminist said women that aren't feminists are lesbians. I don't want to derail this thread by calling names.yes!!! at the rest mmm. If you say so. what was I supposed to think when the post of yours was knitted closely to mine?Okay let’s chuck this bit down to miscommunication. |
There ought to be. It would be very interesting. And in a real worldwide scenario? Na real who dash me. Common stop playing ![]() However.....Thanks for the compliment LordKO: |
MagpieMonishaa:Exactly. Like this guy is doing gowonmaharajah: |
MagpieMonishaa:Because it doesn’t happen. I mean I’m not everywhere on Nairaland so maybe in some obscure section where I don’t frequent, it happens. So I can’t swear it basically. But some posters are trying to categorize anti-misogyny posts as anti-marriage posts. Two separate things. Unless there’s an underlying message that misogyny is needed for a marriage to be a good and successful one. |
There’s a real cooking tournament? Oooh. I’ll probably watch. Who dash me representation ![]() LordKO: |
Arthur2021:Except what you’re saying is not entirely true. Some of it is and to respond to you factually without using blanket phrases such as “made bare for all to see” which really means nothing, I’d have to go sifting through posts for you. You erroneously debunked my stance of some feminists and woke women belittling traditional women or women that choose to marry(even on this forum many ladies call others pick mesha or seeking male validation when they express their opinion).women on this forum belittle others for being married? Are you confusing this for posts that push against women who encourage misogyny and practices that benefit men to the detriment of women? If you find one post that says women who choose to get married are this or that (insert something negative) I’ll be the first to the tell the poster to desist. However it is not the same as when a post that encourages misogyny is pushed against. (No reference to anyone in particular.) You went as far as accusing me of prejudice against women in your post to another moniker for pointing out not just some flaws of feminists but also those of traditional women that bully woke women for their choice(I didn't just blame feminists and woke women ,I also blamed traditional women that enforce marriage on all ladies).you singled out the portion were I talked about woke/feminists (I didn't even attack the movement but the radical feminists that go so far with it) but ignored when I called out traditional women for oppressing woke women and called it misinformation and opposition to the movement.You may be taking on the burden of a post addressed to the general clan of those who hate on feminists. Don’t bear it alone. And you never did state what makes this thread anti-marriage. You know why, It’s because it isn’t |
merahki:Kinda makes sense to me |
emmaodet:Yet what’s the correlation between being single and criminals? As for the shaming, Women are gold diggers, bring nothing but sex to the table, stay home moms are lazy leeches who are dependent on the man for survival, etc. is that not broke shaming of women? |
emmaodet:The fact that you’re drawing a parallel between crimes and the choice to stay single tells all the reason why a thread like this is necessary. You folks say you don’t shame single women. But that’s all you do. |
I don’t want to address the raging parts of your post. I believe we are aiming to keeping a level head on this topic. Devoid of rants. So let me address the core of your total posts which is that this thread is anti-marriage. What in your opinion makes it anti-marriage. Where has it said women shouldn’t get married. Fine here’s where I’m coming from, women often get ridiculed for not being married (However they came to be unmarried). They are made to feel like whatever else they have going on for them matters little unless they have a man and a ring to show for it. Which is why a thread like this is important to encourage women to have value in themselves whether married or not. Showing lady icons who went on to achieve good things they can be proud of means a woman can be valued member of the society whether she’s married or not. That is not the same as saying that women should avoid marriage. Why are you redefining the topic? Mind you if any other contributor on this thread says all women should avoid marriage, I disagree with them on that (Just in case you are curious about my stance). Now why do you think the thread is about telling women not to marry. Because it shows women who did well without being married? Arthur2021: |
Grammar again ![]() LordKO: |
bukatyne:Morality = the concept of right and wrong. Doing bad versus doing good. There’s nothing inherently right or wrong about having sex. It just is. A human biological phenomenon. I’d say it’s immoral to use money meant for helping underprivileged children to buy oneself a luxury apartment because one has the power to do so without repercussion but it’s not the same as having sex with someone you’re not married to. That might be a sin based on your religious beliefs but not immoral in a true sense of what’s good and what’s bad. May not be socially acceptable based on your society. Also doesn’t mean it a good or bad thing. Like someone already said. Marriage may produce morally upstanding citizens or it may not. |
mrblessed:glorification? Avoid changing definitions. Stay with the facts. No one said african women ‘should’ be like single women of other cultures. when we know that our women are naturally disposed to getting married and building a home.are they all (all of them) really that way or do you guys (men and women) shame them into it to avoid the name calling and harassment? Be sincere with yourself. You don’t have to respond to that. Just introspection. There should be no shame in desiring marriage as a lady, of course, with the right guy as you correctly noted..I agree. |
Monishaa:Misinformation and changing of definitions is a standard tool of those who oppose feminism. Otherwise what would they really have to oppose? The idea that women and men should be treated with equal considerations? Nah. That would sound bad even to their own ears except for those of them who are actually honest about their prejudices against women. The only way they can find something to oppose is to change definitions and lie about what they think you’re saying. |
Congratulations OP. thank you to the doctor/s who finally made the correct diagnosis. So many people suffer needlessly because they rather believe an unseen being is responsible for whatever is going on. |
Even if the average lady were to open up about being intentionally single, many of you still won’t believe them. In fact you will make extra effort twisting yourselves into unheard of shapes in order to try and prove to them that you know their lives better than they know it themselves. Someone will say they are masking their sadness. And those of you who shame single women will like them for saying such. As long as you have convinced yourself that a woman is nothing without a man, no amount of logic will change you. Logic and ego don’t mix. |
Except that the so called woke/feminist women have never said women should not marry. ![]() Stay on the facts. Arthur2021: |
There’s no way this is true |
You’re on a roll .Nice one GboyegaD: |
pocohantas:I want to eat fresh oha so badly |
Craving something like this or native jollof Mariangeles: |
This your story is waking up some cravings in me. Dry fish rice ![]() BlueRayDick: |
Funny thing is that I don’t even agree with all those accounts on every issue. Some I agree with or disagree with as the case or situation may be. If the accuser wasn’t just merely intent on convincing OP that I’m her enemy, he would have taken more time to go through the account before knowingly stating falsely that they are me. Discernment is key. Liliantalks: |
You’ll get there ![]() Ishilove: |
Ishilove:Aww. Look at me. Inspiring ishi. Me sef I’m proud of myself ![]() |
Congratulations are in order ![]() Ishilove: |
Acidosis:now we agree ![]() |
Since I decided to break my silence I guess I might as well go ahead and state for the record that I am not Fuzzywuzzy Biglittlelois Fountainofyouth Helterkeit ? (hope I spelled that right) Graxie Ornicus Brazenbabe Davangel Scarletmoon Breaststroke Etc. I mean it’s almost ridiculous at this point to go on and list the accounts I’ve been accused of hiding behind to attack the OP. One person is behind most of the accusations anyway so that kind of makes it clear to a discerning eye that this person has an agenda. It’s up to OP to believe what she wants to believe. But for the rest of readers, I am not any of these accounts so don’t take their posts past, present or future as cococandy’s post. I’m not new to this forum and I didn’t start agreeing and disagreeing with OP yesterday. I have always been able to state my opinion with my account (if I deem my response necessary at that time). To the accusers, Please cease and desist. Thank you. |
Well that’s a more traditional belief. It is accurate but at the same time, I think it’s subject to personal opinions. For some people they have more family in folks they have accepted in their hearts as their families than the actual family they have been born into. That’s not to say that I consider both to be the same or equal. But it’s my belief and I won’t see another family is lesser because they aren’t of the same ancestry like mine. Adopted family members are family too. It’s the same way a man and woman (or other genders) who aren’t related can come together and decide to create a family via marriage while having no common ancestry (In fact we hope they don’t have a common ancestor), it’s the same way other people can come together and decide they want to be a family by whatever method they hold dear (may not be marriage). And we must respect that their family means to them what ours means to us. Acidosis: |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 (of 1458 pages)




)