₦airaland Forum

You’re looking for who to subdue and dominate

E go red for you.

You don’t want chores as a duty but I’m sure you will want her financial contribution as a duty. You never start. Life go hard you so.

I didn’t watch it.

I saw the story trending. That’s what I meant.

If never watch that. Ugh.

bukatyne:
You get mind.

I can't watch it.

Mmm okay

grandstar:
Because noodles are heavily processed food, I don't think a soup made from it makes the cut.

Usual ramblings

Toks2008:
Lol! This is strange twist about me.

I'm not the type of man who has the time to even look at another lady IF I GET MY SPEC and she knows how to do me very well in the bedroom...but as I wrote...that is MY CHOICE.

One size never fits all so this is not about me but the reality on ground.

Many pastors have had their ministry destroyed because they try to box themselves into that heresy of one man one woman but no matter how they try many of them get exposed and BOOM the world starts condemning them and they become à laughing stock.

Polygamy is not a sin and I repeat...POLYGAMY IS NOT A SIN.

Adultery and polygamy are two parallel acts.

I could be ìn my 60s and just want a young blood and I could go all out to marry her and pay her bride price even without committing adultery.

That polygamy is not a sin does not mean a man will start sleeping aròund like a mad dog...that is adultery...and it is a grave sin.

One man one woman is heretic?

But you claim you don’t cheat on your woman.

So you’re a heretic. Or you’re naive.

Confused bloke .

Toks2008:
Exactly the issue i just mentioned on the quote of cococandy. I guess he is one of those naive men of GOD who box themselves with the heretic doctrine of one man one woman.

He was just lying about her cheating

When a man like this claims to have divorced based on infidelity on both sides (as if he’s trying to hold himself accountable) then you know he must be really really guilty.

You’re brave efe

I wouldn’t dare watch it.

I only read about it.

EfemenaXY:
Oh lord!

How can I unwatch what I've just watched??

You’re naive if you think men don’t eat shit for money.

Ugh they do.

Stfu? Google is your friend lol.

gypsey:
men are not the ones eating Arab men's shiit. are they? eating men's shiit just for money? Nothing will be ever more Disgusting and degrading than that.


Please what does stfu means? i must be getting old.

Oh stfu

No gender does more disgusting things for money than men. Don’t even go there

gypsey:
After they will come on social media to claim that God have picked their calls or women are wealth creators. wealth creators from eating wealthy men's shiits.

This world is still A man's world. believe or not.

But you respect men living affluently

Do you know how they make their own money? Don’t use this story as excuse for your jealousy towards well to do women.

Brightest04:
Me,I don't envy or respect any lady I saw living prosperously, neither want to have any kind of intimacy with them.
Most of them are less than animals.Even some animals can't do what they do,all in the name of money.
My dog don't even eat poo,vomit or any kind of rubbish wastes.But here,what my dog,an animal can't eat is what some humans are eating just because of money and worldly glamour.

I saw it on Instagram

Almost puked.

$30k is good money but I wouldn’t even do anything remotely remotely remotely resembling what she described. Even if the Arab guy wants to buy me a house in Lexington park.

Pukes again.

PDPGuy:
Jeez! This has to be the grossest video I’ve ever watched!!
I can’t surely debase myself, in this way, for $30,000

@ cococandy: Have you heard this gist?

You’re better than her right?

This is Disappointing.

Oyindidi:
Shameless girl, I know sey you no go last for marriage from day one

darlenese:
why will you regret when all u wanted was a legitimate semen to fertilize your egg so that your child won't be called an illegitimate child.
your plans worked perfectly. I pity guys who think they can convert a LovePeddler to a housewife.

You must have been her love-vendor to know that she was a lovepeddler

Mumu

If they are not careful, he could end up paralyzed

SOUGHT not SEEKED

BOOOMNAIJA:
WELL, THE ONLY THING I ADMIRE ABOUT THE AVERAGE HAUSA MAN IS THEIR DOGGEDNESS...AZIN DEM DEY DIE PUT, LITERALLY....

IF ONLY THEY COULD BE LIKEWISE CIVILIZED, AND FREED FROM THE SHACKLES OF RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM....U NEVER CAN TELL, I COULD AV SEEKED THE HANDS OF ONE OF THEIR DAUGHTERS FOR MARRIAGE.

Oh my goodness.

Oh well have it your way.

The women who experience mansplaining are obviously not sure of what they experienced. Until you tell us what it is that we experienced and what the name is.

I should have ignored you . My bad.

You’re being logical. I am being emotional. As usual

pansophist:
No, you have a need to be right, and I have a need to Make sense. I'm focused on debunking what you wrote, and you're focused on making sure you're the right one. You're projecting. I've noticed how you systematically avoided all my hard points, and keep dismissing. its specious, a red herring, an attempt in sophistry.

To the logical mind in this forum, you've just successfully exposed yourself as someone with no depth, cant corroborate and accept when your arguments are completely false and makes no sense. Mansplaining is a nonsensical term, and I dont care who coined it, probably a man hating feminist and you're here, swallowing it like someone who can't think logically. Smh

You haven’t said something wrong in this post. But again it only applies in a situation of two equals in a debate. All of what you mentioned can happen and is no real problem in an atmosphere of two equals.

But in a situation where a woman clearly knows better and is the superior debater on that subject, asking her to keep quiet because “what do women know?” Is mansplaining. Attempting to dismiss her facts/opinions because the male angle must be logical while hers is automatically emotional is mansplaining.

The fact that you can’t differentiate the two situations and are still arguing like I’m talking about all situations even after I have said otherwise SEVERALLY, shows you’re not listening to me.

You have to be right. There’s a name for it

pansophist:
And does it occurs to you that your opinion was dismissed because its illogical, unsubstantiated, and dont stand up to scrutiny? Does it occur to you that women also can dismiss your opinion ? Does it occur to you that men also dismiss other men? Why genderise it? If your Male teacher corrects you, is it mansplaining? Smh

And men generally can attest to situations when they were told by women to shut up and listen, because somehow, we do not understand the female experience (even though women also dont understand the Male experience, but okay). Now men walk on egg shells just not to offend snowflakes, since any little thing can be interpreted as sexism, misogyny, and treating women as unequal. Stop acting like suffering is a woman only thing. In as much as I understand that victimism can be lucrative for you in this era, its unattractive and a hallmark of a low quality human. The only way to satisfy women that believe in nonsense like mansplaining is just to shut up and say nothing, since dismissing your point that is completely horse shiiit is mansplaining

I agree

PRESENTATION:
Well Peppered stew wont be bad oh

Icon79:
I think you're too Americanized already . Back in the day, it's a status symbol for a naija man to marry many wives. And guess what the divorce rates in those days were? Near zero!


O pari

I think you mean too sensible and able to see through BS masked as normal male behavior

I’m by no means equating those and you know it.


A collation of YouTube videos of women interrupting or dominating a conversation can’t negate the fact it’s predominantly a male trait.

If I hadn’t ever been told to keep quiet because “what do you women know?” Or have my opinion dismissed as emotions when a heated male in the same argument is regarded as logical then I would believe you that I am not thinking for myself.

But as usual, carry on. Tell me all about it.

pansophist:
cococandy


This is a false equivalence, its red-herring. It is a fallacy of inconsistency. You cant compare mansplaining with genocide. seriously? smh.
Since you can't answer my question (because you surely have no answer for it), you are saying these? Should I look for videos on youtube where women are ''womansplaining''? If you want, request and I will give you links to many.

Mansplaining is rubbish, it is nonsensical, and a genderisation of something everyone does (both gender). interrupting others, or dominating them when they talk is something humans do, not just the male gender. Learn to think for yourself, and stop being a disposable sentient to some stupid women creating such terms as mansplaining, manbreathing and manspreading.

The same reasons why there isn’t a white history month, or straight pride or nazi Remembrance Day.

Some things become a necessity because of how the other side of the equation behaves.

Women usually don’t dominate conversations even when they are more knowledgeable much less when the men are more knowledgeable. It’s something that rarely happens.

pansophist:
Ok. So what is the coined name of the term that requires a woman to shut-up when a man is discussing a topic which he is more knowledgable? Because if there is no name for it, then it implies that a woman can not be wrong? In other words, is ignorance a gendered thing applicable to men only?

Story

Talk about how you feel. Don’t tell women how they feel.

Nobody harmoniously shares her husband.

That’s what you tell yourselves to make you feel good about treating women badly

Icon79:
True. I don't condone cheating from any side. But having said that, infidelity on the part of the wife hurts the husbands more ... especially an African man. It's just the way we're built. Think about it this way: an African man can marry two or more women at the same time and live in perfect harmony with all the women, but a woman can't marry two men at the same time.


O pari

If you love your wife you won’t hit her not to mention doing it continuously. Love doesn’t apply in his case.

The same thing applies to women. Cheating on us is disrespectful as fvck. Yet I don’t see people like you lining up to defend women who rage out against unfaithful husbands.

Icon79:
Good point. But sometimes, if you love your wife and children, walking away is easier said than done. And by the way, don't get me wrong, I am not justifying any man hitting his wife for any reasons whatsoever ... but I just wanted to present the other side.

Ladies, cheating on your husband is the worst disrespect you can give a man. It destroys his manhood. Please don't do it.


O pari

You have no clue what you’re talking about. The fact that you think you do on this subject and I actually have to tell you what brought about the term in the first place is the exact definition of mansplaining. Because you’re so clearly wrong about it. However because you’re a man, you think you should be the one to tell me what it means.

Mansplaining doesn’t seek for men to shut up.
it seeks that you shut up and listen when a woman is discussing a topic in which she’s more knowledgeable than you. It doesn’t apply in all situations and has nothing to do with an actual debate between two male and female equals. It applies to situations where the man can benefit from listening but won’t. Because he’s the man and must know it all.

It’s a female experience. Something you have never experienced but think you’re an authority on. Smh.

pansophist:
No, what it means in practice is that a man should not say anything at worse, or at least refrain from negating views espouse by a woman. If there is no female equivalent, then its horse shit. And that's what you're doing here, saying that I proved your point, meanwhile, you're not actually engaging but want me to shut up and just accept your views without questioning.

Mansplaining as well as manspreading (to name a few) are basically nonsense attacking men as a gender, nothing more.

soft boiled and seasoned ponmo. What should we make with this?

It’s not the first time he beat her up either.

So he had ample opportunity to walk away from the marriage.
He’s an absuive monstrous husband.

Icon79:
Thank you, my dear! One of those things that makes you say "Only in Nigeria".

I mean, the stupid judge didn't even consider the mitigating circumstances. That's not to excuse his action, but the woman cheated on him for crying out loud! And it was probably not the first time either. Who knows what else she did to provoke him more

To me, the man should've been convicted of a manslaughter and not murder. But hey, it's Nigeria we're talking about ... life is cheap


O pari

It’s like you read my mind

9jaRealist:
Being a parent is a privilege and not a right, and dude pissed his privilege away.

There is a distinction between being a father and a parent, and while virtually anyone with virile spermatozoa can be a father not everyone can be a parent in the meaningful sense of the term. In this instance, the kids will be better off being orphans than being raised by a father who can kill their mother, who he apparently regularly beats up (most likely in front of the kids or at least to their hearing), and then locked the corpse with the same kids in the house. Meanwhile, it is likely that (like most Nigerian families) there is extended family who can raise the kids (hopefully from the mother’s side rather than the dude’s), for even if he was not sentenced to death he would likely have been sentenced to life imprisonment anyway and the kids would therefore still be likely raised without a father in their lives. Good riddance to bad rubbish!

Good for him.

Those asking about the kids. Do you think it will benefit any child to be raised by the man who killed their mother? God forbid bad thing. He killed their mom and locked them with her corpse and walked away. What a monster. Those children are marred for life by that event. I hope they get adequate psychiatric help.

Killing someone brutally for cheating on you when you can’t even boast of being faithful to the said person.
He deserves to hang.

Same way you’re sitting on gun powder when you cheat on your woman.

Omonigeriarere:
Ladies beware. The moment your man discovered that you fornicates, that is the day you start sitting on gun powder which will explode whether now or later.

He will still squander it with his usual lazy way. She’s definitely better off without him.


Look at his fellow lazy bones men trying to make the woman look like the bad person here when she was actually paying him alimony and supporting his jobless ass. You people will never be satisfied with anything a woman does. If she was the one who was collecting money from him while laying around jobless after a divorce, y’all would be hot behind the ears calling her gold digger and ranting about how ‘the west’ gives women everything a man worked for.

Yes the right thing would be for him to compensate her for supporting his lazy ass.

dingbang:
She said she hopes he does the right thing


Women will always have entitlement mentality in them.. Nonsense

jaxxy:
She said she supported him when he was unemployed/broke so why did they divorce then? Probably made him feel miserable while supporting him or even cheated on him now she says she expects him to do the moral thing?

What moral thing exactly? Depends on how u treated him. That will determine the moral thing.

Arsenalholic:
Lol. I love stories like these!

She talking from both sides of her mouth saying she has morals and all that. But with reference to him "doing the right thing" it shows she's not really what she wants us to believe she is.

Stand tall with your morals and remove eyes from all things concerning your ex husband

MJBOLT:

that's 98 billion naira,i wont be suprised if the woman propose to him

radiokilla:
Murray also said she doesn’t think her ex-husband will reach out to offer her any of the cash, but hopes he “does the right thing.”

Obviously she was the purveyor of badluck to the guy for 15 years of marriage. Look what the young man has become now and she is wishing he gives her some dollars out of his warchest. Some ladies are just badluck, I don't want to talk of my ex.

Oluromantic:
This woman is a thief and a covetous woman. Can u imagine.

The right thing as long as we all know is... An ex is an ex and integrity means standing by ur decision... Simple!

You divorced him decisively and he let you go. Next time, don't take decision by finality...always give a room perhaps there could a turn around. Most young girls too are finalists when they break up a relnshp, later when they acquire understanding, they look foolish to make it up with whom they quitted with.

I like d man's reply sha. He answered wisely!

She’s better off without you.

Kenshinmunac:
Thanks bro. True words I even tried to reconcile with her this morning but gave me very rude response so I just ended the call Nad deleted her number. She can go to hell with her bad character

Some man went out of his way to ‘explain’ to us what women mean by the term mainsplain.

Lmao. And mansplaining isn’t a thing?

When you think you know a term better than the person who came up with it, can someone say mansplain? Thank you for proving my point.

pansophist:
You're making sense until you mention mansplaining. Like what is the Bleep is that? And is there femalespalining too?