₦airaland Forum

chic2pimp: Which Nesta? Nesta that left Serie A last season abi?

Thiago Silva was better than best central defender in the premier league last season KOMPANY. Quote me anywhere.

And If Chiellini is second rate then pretty much every defender in the English league is Second rate too.

chiellini is not better than half-fit vidic. kompany is rubbish, if vidic is fit, you won't hear of kompany. koscielny, shawcross, nastastic and cahill are better than chiellini.

manny4life: As much I like them boys and their music, them guys are very immature and Paul in particular is very irresponsible. If I were the one, I wouldn't even allow the media get such news, can you imagine if it turns out to be the father of the child, people will automatically assume that he's a LIAR. There's nothing he can say nor do to redeem himself in future. A lot of people destroy their own image unintentionally without knowing the future consequence for the today's action.

no class, no decorum.
they are rich, good-looking with the world at their feet. they are not restricted by any culture to marry across the racial line. why not pick a woman out of their multitudes of admirers and marry? they are a poor excuse of a role model - bunch of airheads with no self control.

[quote author=baby_mama]As you dey so,will you allow a strange woman to pin a baby on you ?
Most modern and decent men would willingly call for a DNA test to prove their innocence and those really angered by this will follow up and sue for defamation if the test proves the woman to be a liar.
I think he is guilty[/quote]he's defly guilty.....
when he said the story was an april joke - i believed him and i thought the 19-year old was one of those groupies or social climbers using a celeb to rise. however, this picture tells me paul okoye is a liar.

Realest123: 19 year old Elshama Igbanoi's baby was actually born April 7th in the UK, four days before Paul Okoye and his girlfriend Anita welcomed their son, Andre, in Atlanta.

I spoke with Elshama's mum this morning and she confirmed that P-Square's Paul Okoye is indeed the father of Elshama's son but didn't want to give more details. But contrary to earlier reports that Elshama is stranded in the hospital because she's unable to pay her bills, I can confirm that they are out of the hospital and chilling at home. The child's birth certificate bears Paul Okoye's name but only a DNA test can ultimately prove who the father really is.

The Okoyes are still not saying anything about the issue. In fact, someone from their camp said they do not plan to issue a statement or react to the story in any way.

Source: http://lindaikeji..co.uk/2013/05/paul-okoye-alleged-baby-mama-elshama.html?m=1

paul okoye is such a pathological liar and an irresponsible fellow. didn't he say the chic was an april fool joke?

El Guapo: [color=#0066ff]You guys deserved the Win - Goin' by the Lacklustre display we putted up.

Same great Barcelona that we'd keep at Bay when we Square up for a showdown? We really play to our strength Coog, never waiting on cheap Penalties!

Cared to check the EPL team with most PK this term? I've not checked, but am certain u folks are there in ur Place.[/color]

did the same barcelona not eliminate chelsea in 2009? iniesta's screamer? those penalties are genuine. united have the best strike force in england, they attack more and they get more fouled than their rivals. rooney, RVP, hernandez, etc - you are guaranteed 30 penalties per season with those strikers......

El Guapo: [color=#0066ff]Coog talking about making the UCL finals to meet Barca and get humiliated doesn't make for Healthy Challenge, maybe u guys were waiting on Webb to come fill the 12th Man Position.

Am still of the Opinion that u've benefitted more from the Refs Officiating in England - The Links i stipulated on the previous page are good enuf to serve as Evidences.[/color]

that's the same barcelona - the greatest football team on the planet. which team hasn't barca beaten in the years between 2009 and 2012(guardiola years)? they are so excellent the bulk of that team won the world cup, won 2 euro championships back to back.......

can i also remind you united beat chelsea home and away in the 2011 champions league. let me guess - it was howard webb that officiated the quarter-final tie of that year's champions league!

El Guapo: [color=#0066ff]And here comes my Man...

Those Last lines got me Grinning like a New Orleans kid watching Simpson & Family - Terry did what? Dont lemme bring up the horrendous defending Rio, Wes brown, Oshea, Silvestre etc would put up on a United shirt.

Some Managers, Media outlets and Players believes that Refs help u guys, am not an exception here.[/color]

chelsea have benefitted more from dodgy decisions - to argue otherwise is bordering on desperation!

El Guapo: [color=#0066ff]Still Certain that Chelsea's UCL record from 04 beats that to the dust[/color]

how many finals of the UCL have chelsea played since 2004? moscow and munich!

in that period, united have played in wembley, rome and moscow at a fraction of the amount chelsea spent!

sanniemoe: @coogar

Guy u badt gan o..I can imagine how good looking u r.didnt have my first dose of relationship till 4years after uni and here u r, dating older chics since uni days

4 years after uni? what are you? a monk?
i am sure your spērm cells had become tadpoles by then.

sanniemoe: But when u give them too much of that attention, u might just turn urself to a piece of shit.i would have loved to share a personal experience here but for some reasons, id keep be silent.

you cannot give them everything they want....
the spin is to do some balancing act - don't make yourself too available and don't become totally unavailable. out of 10 requests, fulfill 5 or 6.

El Guapo: [color=#0066ff]The Real Challenge would only Surface when Roman took Over and that's a Fact. And i'd tell you its been a Successful Era.

Credit most of ur Domestic Success to the Refs and Shut It.[/color]

since the roman revolution in 2003.....
chelsea won the league thrice(2005, 2006 and 2010)
united won the league 5 times(2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2013)

the referee stuff is bullshit, chelsea get more favours than any other team domestically. you have won titles by dodgy decisions. your ghost goals cost spurs the fa tie in wembley last season. no team scores ghost goals as much as chelsea and we all remember when terry was the only defender allowed to use his hands to block shots for several seasons.....

fellis: @coogar I used Africa and USA as examples because I wanted to compare two areas with similar land mass.

the analogy is daft at best - one country versus 54 other countries with diversity should never be compared. your responses on this topic further reinforces my beliefs that the average male is more superior to the average female.

1 Gender is not a measure of intelligence so cut it out with that bullshit about men being more intelligent than women. I only posted that research to shut you up about your idiotic claim that men are more intelligent.
There are different types of intelligence and if you can't prove that men surpass women in every single type of intelligence ie linguistic, interpersonal, musical, logical etc, then shut the hell up about men being more intelligent.

there are no different types of intelligence - you are either intelligent or not intelligent. linguistic, interpersonal and musical intelligence are acquired, it's not necessarily in-born. i have listed various inventors, where are their female counterparts?

oh yes - your rebuttal was that women were kept at home for many centuries but it then begs the question - why did the women of those days agree to be kept at home? they did not agree, they rebelled against the decision and their rebellion was crushed by the superior gender!

2. About your Y and X chromosome theory; the Y chromosome you claimed is so superior and magnificient contains less DNA material than the X chromosome is dying away/fading from existence. Why is it disappearing when the X is still going strong? Besides, the Y chromosomes have played virtually the same role as X chromosomes in evolution. I don't know where you get your science 'facts' from.
Read here
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MensHealthNews/story?id=8104217&page=1

you lack cognitive reasoning.....
the DNA content means shyte - what has that gotta do with superiority. a man has X and Y. the X chromosome has compensated the DNA content the Y lacks.

modern science told us that X-chromosomes make us more similar to unevolved animals and Y-chromosomes makes us more similar to the sentient human beings we are.

if you ever did evolutionary psychology, you would notice that of the two genders, the one which behaves more emotionally, impulsively and irrationally - in short like non-sentient animals is the female human gender with double the X-chromosomes.

however, the gender that behaves more rationally, logically and is responsible for 99.9% of all human achievement if not more is the only one with a Y-chromosome in addition to an X(the male)

4. Women have smaller brains on average because they have smaller bodies. Their brains are in proportion to their bodies.
Also, women have more white matter than men in their brains which make them better than men in communicating and problem solving. Read it up.

being better at communicating further reinforces my theory. the presence of large white matter connotes passivity whilst the men's grey matter epitomises superior intelligence in mathematical subjects. mathematics invented 99.99% of what you see around you, not language skills!

men are the superior beings - QED!

how did this beautiful thread degenerate into another tribal war?

redsun: Because nigeria has no driving system.No policies,no formations and no alliances.

Same in everything as a result of gross moral decadence.

this is very harsh!
how can you speak ill of the country that birthed you in such a crude manner. what has gross moral decadence gotta do with it?

maclatunji: Just wondering when you will stop having this debate about men and women. You insist on being treated exactly like a man. We are not the same, I have told you severally, that doesn't make you inferior.

if one is not equal to the other then one is superior than the other(regardless of how much)? 4 is not 5, 5 is superior to 4.

women and men are not the same - even a kid of 9 knows that. 99% of the similarities between a chimp and humans are concentrated on the X chromosomes. however, there's 30% difference in the Y chromosomes of humans and chimps. men are the superior gender!

churific: Come to her rescue? How? Here, once you are convicted of tax evasion, there's no rescue for you. You'll serve your sentence and then you'll still pay those taxes plus penalties. That's why the system works very well. You can evade for years using loopholes but when IRS catches you, you'll definitely pay!

she didnt have to go to prison!
she pleaded guilty - the judge should have fined her, make her pay the cost of the court proceeding and then pay the taxes she evaded. if she was demi moore, she won't be going to prison!

Dee60: One should not attempt to analyze the scriptures as if you are in a word laboratory. If you do, you may end up spreading errors....!

What is wrong a person giving his one-tenth to God? What is wrong with a pastor asking his congregation to offer their one-tenth to God?

it beats me - femi aribisala is jealous of pastor chris.

fellis: My research is not dodgy, neither was it done with crude methodologies. It was carried out by a very prestigious organisation and it involved participants from different countries. The fact that you don't like the test results doesn't mean the test is dodgy.

the test result is inconclusive - there was even a caveat at the end of the article which automatically renders it null and void!

Up untill the early 21st century, women were traditionally expected to stay at home and run the house front and so they didn't have the incentive to invent or discover like the men were doing. It doesn't mean that women were not intelligent. There was the 'Married woman property act' and until it was passed into law, married women were prevented from doing whatever they please with their property and their husbands owned and controlled both them and their property and this was something that decreased the incentive to work in women.

traditionally expected? which traditions? it's because women are not up to the task. the saying - "survival of the fittest" must have flown over your head. only the strong survive. strength is superiority!

Bigger brains does not equal more intelligence. Early humans had bigger brains but were not as intelligent as we are. Also women can conceive and give birth. Men can't. This is a strong point they have over you.

early humans were not as intelligent? says who? how did they survive the hardship in those days without portable water, without electricity. you must be living in a parallel universe.

Abeg military strength is not physical strength. Stop trying to make it seem like it is. Africa as a whole has more population than the USA so why are they not a world power? You need intelligence to gather an army and keep it togethe and you need intelligence to build high tech weapons to advance that army and keep them superior to others.

comparing a continent to one single country - you are proving my assertion on this thread with that single example.

How did humans create the specialized weapons they used to defeat animals? Isn't it with intelligence?
FOH with your desperate and meaningless arguments

there's strength in intelligence - men are more intelligent and are more physically stronger than women. men have a higher threshold of pain than women and that's where the superiority lies!

biologically - i have the X and Y chromosomes whilst you have 2 Xs(a functional X chromosome and another redundant X chromosome). The Y-chromosome is responsible for evolution, adaptation, survival and reproduction to an extremely huge degree. men are the drivers of evolution and women are just a back up foundation of our biological makeup!

Pastor Kun: It is actually pastors that preach tithing that are forcing the idiotic, daft and manipulative opinions on others.

preaching is forcing?
come on - pastors preach what they read in the bible. they are not lifting these verses from the holy quaran or wikipedia. you don't have to tithe if you don't want to.

Nashville: Still doesnt make her a bad mother in law. She has just explained there were several people greeting her. Poster, no need to worry or read meanings that do not exist. I will advice you to respect your mother in law as best as you can. No need to serve punishment and she will naturally respond!

several people greeting her but the OP was the only one on her knees. she must either be partially blind or she woke up from the wrong side of the bed. either way, she's a bad MIL. a good woman is always aware of her immediate environment.

dtolus2006: I'm not a pastor nor a clergy but when I read the gigantic article you put up, I couldn't help but notice the grudge you have for the payment of tithes. From the way you sounded using your choice of words, I could tell you are not a tithe payer yourself. This makes me wonder seeing the jealousy that may have spurred you into putting up such a fight.Sir its such a pity that this write up reveals your level of ignorance as concerned the subject matter. No doubt about it that you have knowledge of Gods word... But its only foolishness sir, to have had the knowledge and not to have experienced the power. I pay my tithes... And I'm glad I do! If you don't believe in tithing in the 21st century, don't impose your falacy on others.... At least, be glad you are not a tither. May God Almighty The Lord- owner of everything forgive your sheer ignorance in Jesus Name. Amen.

don't mind femi aribisala - he's a lunatic!

no one is forcing the other to pay tithes. if he doesn't want to pay, it's entirely his own prerogative. why is he forcing his own idiotic opinion on the others?

omiobo: I enjoy paying tithe,and I will continue paying tithe. No one can command me to pay tithe,I know the benefit that is why I'm doing so. I didn't register as a tithe payer by collecting tithe card in the church because I know it's wrong.
The willingness to pay tithe should come from within not by pressure from the pastor. I understand church needs members' resources to reach out to the lost souls. Preaching the gospel,paying tithes,offerings and making sacrifices are the ways I think a christian can contribute to the growth of God's kingdom.

you are a very intelligent man, sir!

a whole lauryn hill in prison.....
this judge must be crazy.....and to think all those big music corporations couldn't come to her rescue is cringe-worthy. shame on you tommy motolla, shame on you russell simmons!

my guess would be the trado-medical practitioner arranged for the woman to have sëx with another man that produced the babies while deceiving the husband that it was his boosted spërm cells that did the trick.

dederocs: You are lost,God does as he pleases,money you give to a man you do not know where he got his calling from...how does that concern or affect your relationship with God?
What. You quote is in the old testament...think about this-why would "pastors" abandon some old testament sayings and use the ones that benefit their purse.
For example an eye for an eye e.t.c.
People open church these days to make money.

and how does that stop you from doing your own duty? we should not put money in the banks because armed robbers can go there or the banks can liquidate?

arsenal fans should stop buying season tickets because they are promised league titles every season and yet the team does not deliver? your logic makes me want to vomit.

Nashville: Poster, this is why not to ask about the simplest of questions. Now, someone is suggesting if your mother-in-law does not tell you to rise, she may not be good. Forget about all that, kneel down for her and get up. And remember, she is a good mother in law whether or not she tells you to rise.

it's not about telling her to rise - the mother in law did not acknowledge the gesture.

alutacontinua: Some people are to engrossed in the tradition that they wouldn't go all 'rise rise' like that. They even want to notice if the two knees touch the ground very well. It doesn't mean they're bad mother-in-laws, though...that's just how they are.

yes, they are bad mother-in-laws!
such things shouldn't matter in the grand scheme of things. kneeling or not kneeling properly does not show the true content of one's character.

DrummaBoy: Atlast this thread makes front page.

For those who are new to the argument, know that it is probably the most intense subject discussed on the religion section and hundreds of threads can testify to it. My own thread https://www.nairaland.com/1239719/questions-frosbel-tithing on the subject was simply explosive. At the end of the argument I joined the host of those who do not pay tithe and have not payed tithe for two months now, having payed tithe for 15yrs following my conversion to Christianity.

This thread, on Femi Abirisala, writing against tithe, has only rejuvenated the argument against it. Old foes meet here again and the argument will most likely be as it had been on other thread. The only difference now is that we will have a lot of "outsiders" contribute to the discuss.

I predict that the anti-tithers will win (again) bc the idea of couphing out 10% of tones gross pay will never go down well with anyone. But nonetheless let me summarise how the discuss will go:

Pro tithers will say: Jesus supported the tithe in Matthew 23:23 by a single statement "... do not leave the others undone...". They will also say that Malachi 3 is an OT injuction which still applies to NT Christians. ETC.

Anti tithers will say: The law has been abolished in the NT. Tithing today is according to Mosaic law and there is no point tithing when we do not follow other Mosaic injuctions. They argue that Abraham paying tithe is not a basis for arguing for tithe pre-law, as Abraham only payed tithe that once, also he tithed spoil not his income and that after that practice he returned the remaining spoil to the owners. (I add there too that Circumcision, as Abraham practiced, was pre-law but no one circumcizes their children today on the eight day; those who do, do it on medical and hygeine basis).

So welcome to a religious section discuss but ensure that your contribution is according to the word.

you left the peak of intelligence and jumped into the pits of idiocy.

you stopped paying tithes so how progressive have you been since then? what have you done with the 10% you have refused to pay? you probably spent it in beer parlours or in whorehouses?

ask yourself this question - without the funding, would the catholic have reached africa and the other parts of the world? without televangelism, would the gospel have reached everywhere like it is today - what do you think pay for these things? manna from heaven?

alutacontinua: She doesn't have to ask you to rise. Once she answers you, you rise! SIMPLES!

a good mother in law would quickly say "rise rise" even before your knees touch the ground. she doesn't need to ask the wife to rise before she does but i would be worried too if i kneel and the gesture is not acknowledged.

before i write anything on this topic, i'll like to first say femi aribisala is a consummate rėtard.

tithing is essential in the church. it is what expands the church, it pays the salaries of full-time pastors and its the fuel needed to drive the gospel.

coldgate: But she did not ask me to rise! That is the confusing part.

is she educated? was she busy when you knelt down?

kneel down and get up after the greeting has been acknowledged. the mother-in-law should usher you to get up quickly anyways so no biggie! if she's educated, you might not even need to kneel down....

fellis: Calm down.
At first, you said that men are more intelligent than women, you never said anything about level playing field before.
Ok, since you claimed that men are smarter than women in the context of a level playing field then how do you explain this research that shows that women are smarter than men?

for every dodgy research you can scoop out that makes women smarter, i would bring out 10. it's not about research with crude methodologies. just look around you and you would notice that einstein, newton, dalton, nostradamus, alexander graham bell, faraday, archimedes and benjamin franklin never had wombs.

I really don't understand how this statement is related to what I said before. So because there is no future without a past that means we should continue to live the way we lived in the stone ages? We shouldn't advance ourselves or develop ourselves?

we have developed as humans but the female anatomy still remains the same. men are physically stronger, generally taller with a bigger bone mass and a bigger brain size than women. it's a travesty that i have to point this out to you.

Fine, there is no present or future without a past but times change. Attitudes change and cultures change to suit the times. Women are now exposed to the same opportunities as men and have proven themselves capable of doing the things men do (except of course those things that require strength but men cannot bear children like women so I think that balances it out). So why must women remain subjected to men?

that's the thing though - women have proven themselves capable so have animals too - it's just an advancement for both sexes and species. it does not mean men are women are equal. we don't even have the same brain size to start with, how then can we be the same? so the fact that women can bear children means they are stronger than men? you make me laugh!!!

Strongest military does not imply physical strength which you said was the determining factor for superiority. There are many things that makes the US military one of the strongest in the world and physical strength is only a tiny part of them. They have high tech weapons which required intelligence to create and keep secret from allies, they carry out stealth operations and these things also require intelligence.

high tech weaponry is strength.
this is a country of 300 million population with the biggest, tallest people on the planet. how isn't that strength?

Besides, having a strong military is not the only thing that makes the US a world power. They regulate people's opinions with propaganda and they carry out espionage, actively monitor the progress of their rivals and allies and these things require intelligence, not strength.

they can do all that because they are strong!
they have a huge military personnel - the strength gives them the opportunity to make supernova weapons they need to conquer or rule over other countries in the minority.

Strength is not superiority, a number of things should be taken into consideration before you can conclude that one person is superior to another.

strength is superiority
if i am stronger than you then i am superior. the roman empire ruled for 1000 years through sheer strength, capturing slaves and trading them. the british empire also ruled through sheer strength colonising half of the world. it's not like they brainwashed their colonies, they fought them on the battlefield and conquered and it's the reason you and i are communicating in their language till date.

If strength was superiority then lions or elephants will be on top of the food chain today instead of humans

another daft analogy....
humans are more intelligent than animals and with the use of weaponry humans have been able to conquer animals. this is discounting men who have actually faced lions in a combat and killed lions with bare arms.