Davidgrey's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Davidgrey's Profile › Davidgrey's Posts
SmellingAnus:[color=#000050] Still waiting for that invitation card. [/color] |
[color=#000050] A long "puzzling" look should do the trick! [/color] |
[color=#000050] No Comment! [/color] |
[color=#000050] While i support free will! I wouldn't advice anyone to marry someone that his/her family Doesn't accept Generally families tend to designate affection to your partner from first impression One of the major reasons why things like this happen is due to poor first impression But........ then again there is a reason why he/she is being rejected and this is where is gets tricky "Is it a cultural thing? Is it vain? Is it personal? Is it something that can be changed?" If the reason why he/she is being rejected is a "Rational reason" communicated to you and "you know" that its not fixable Let go of such a person Aside from the long term effects(dejection and ridicule) your children will be left out totally if your family is unforgiving. [/color] |
[color=#000050] I see! ![]() Anyone with a functional brain knows that it's healthy to shower before bed, it's not just about your skin being clean but its also soothing for your body It takes what? ..... 15mins to take a "quick shower" Why should this even be a problem? [/color] |
[color=#000050] oh this is shallow! ![]() Love will naturally make "anyone" feel insecure, mental maturity and emotional growth limits all that The fear of losing(jealousy and insecurities) someone isn't centered around courtship alone even our parents worry about us Care and worry are closely related, with time and maturity people learn to give freedom to the other person Relating a naive attribute that certain people display due to lack of "mental and emotion growth" to the concept of "love" is shallow and ignorant ...............And you made "Absolutely" no sense #crap [/color] |
[color=#000050] I see! ![]() Most of your points are Questionable and Childish. #Naive [/color] |
Dimples182: ![]() |
Dimples182:[color=#000050] Granted its a lovely thing to see....But women are biologically inclined to be caregivers. The female body is the one equipped to carry a "pregnancy and breastfeed" so its generally expected of them to be predisposed to such chores! The ideologue is simple women enjoy doing these menial chores and since the chores demand mild physical strength averagely. it's a generally accepted concept To me I see it this way …. Men who grew up with many sisters/women tend to be more conservative in relation to issues about Chores and home management Given that women are "generally expected to be neat" it's inadvertently demanded of them to do cleanings and these menial chores. [/color] |
[color=#000050] loll!!!! Dimples182 will love this! [/color] |
Dimples182:[color=#000050] Dimples [/color]
|
RuthDaniels:[b][color=#000050] There is nothing factual about sapiosexuality! Sapiosexuals have been proven to be hypocrites Common examples of sapiosexuals are usually people that are "Conventionally attractive" I expect to see a very beautiful model married to an ugly man for his "mind" then this illusion will be given a second thought The concept of this "hypocritical orientation" is to inadvertently blame someone for their looks Intelligence is "Important" to anyone seeking a non-casual relationship Same way Character, features….etc matter to people These are basic attributes that people value with varying importance Question is ……Given how we all tend to have varying validation for attributes desired from the opposite sex, is there any sense behind sapiosexual ideologue? Society tends blame people for superficial things( looks, money and power ) yet we all crave this things some openly, most in the closet, Guess it’s man's hypocritical way of putting check on things to make them balance themselves out Intelligence is a "basic requirement" that should be desired by anyone seeking a partner saying that it's a "Prioritized attribute" is childish crap! [/color] [/b] |
RuthDaniels:[color=#000050] Sapiosexual ideologue is an illusion that has not be proven to be socially practical We all want to believe that we are not "vain" but the reality is that.....We all are! Your highlighted "blind-man analogy" is flawed because his options are limited(you work with what you have) Same way another optimist will say that he fell in-love with her touch These connections are what we all want to believe in but reality is not an illusion. [/color] |
kimbra:[color=#000050] If expanded your point like this initially, I wouldn’t be having this conversation with you You can only like someone by being Attracted to them and "Attraction is a physical thing" We all try to be civil, pushing the school of thought that its more than that but all hypocrisy aside we all care about the persons physical attributes Case in point, when you meet a guy you don’t see his “character and mindset” you see his features You are instantly drawn to his physical attributes, His character and mindset is what maintains your interest later. [/color] |
kimbra:[color=#000050] That's a very naive thing to say! ![]() When you meet/come across a person the only things that spike your interest are the person's physical attributes What you said isn't socially practical! [/color] |
[color=#000050] It depends on your "Personality"… but yes it's possible. If you have an "unexplainable connection" with the said person and... you believe in "Tv's lovey dovey crap" Well then! Such ideologue will seem practical to you! Alexander Hamilton's widow Elizabeth lived alone for 50 years after his death, devoted to him to the end If the connection is built "over years and bounded by the commitment marriage" then such attachments are justified but if it's a random relationship it's an illusion (You can overtime get pretty good at lying to yourself to preserve those feelings) "When The Desirable is Not Available, The Available Becomes Desirable" There are certain things that are unique to your ex that you got used to hence the (imagined attachment) But.....That's why love is beautiful, it breaks all barriers If you are truly in-love "No one" comes close to your current partner. [/color] |
[color=#000050] Itemized crap! [/color] |
[color=#000050] This makes "absolutely" no sense! [/color] |
[color=#000050] I see! ![]() You made mistakes "yourself" you left your house and decided to jump over a bridge "yourself" Yet somehow "God" is responsible for your (friends aided)change of heart? You Nigerians tend to deflect your "mental failings" and pin it on spirituality This clown is sick in the head, He needs a job and "Intensive" Psychological evaluation. [/color] |
[color=#000050] Usually most artist don't run out of songs instead they run out of inspiration and good producers But.... You are not an artist, there is nothing "artistic" about the crap that you spill Your songs are lyrically poor and filled with ignorant rhetoric #Effortless nonsense [/color] |
[color=#000050]Plausible! [/color] |
[color=#000050] lolll! It's obvious that she wasn't working alone Women are not "wired" to behave like this. [/color] |
[color=#000050]If she "loves you and wants it" satisfying her is a piece of cake An orgasm is a physical phenomena controlled almost entirely by the person's mental state Most women can have orgasms without excessive difficulty if they are comfortable with the situation "if the mind is not in the right state, the body will not follow In most cases, the problem is either some sort of mental block(poor past sexual experiences, location, current issues.......etc) It maybe situational or general You have to first put her in the "Right mental state" and follow that up with a "Response guided path" to the "Right physical state" needed for her to climax. [/color] |
[color=#000050] lolll! [/color] |
HerPov:[color=#000050] Same to you. #Subtle Manipulation [/color] |
Alesandese:[color=#000050] lolll! #playful [/color] |
professorfal:[color=#000050] lolllll! It's easy to be simple-minded and basic Being intelligent is challenging and demanding Most people prefer to clown away their life in search for "irrelevant importance" Quantum Ignorance: it's "deeply rooted" down to cell formation. [/color] |
Alondrah:[color=#000050] It's wrong to maintain any form of communication with an ex Such associations will prevent you from having a healthy relationship The idea is facile and shouldn't be practiced. [/color] |
[color=#000050]These are primary: Mind-set. Social skills. Nous(Practical intelligence) The rest are secondary. [/color] |
Leriebloom:[color=#000050] lollll! Your points are "directly" pointed at a particular gender Don't bother defending your shallow crap, Done here! [/color] |
[color=#000050] I see! ![]() You talk about "ignorance" yet your perspective to things betray you Your points are basic and bare, they can all be summed up as one (lack of respect) I don't understand why women always play the victim card for bad relationships You are equally responsible for the crap as much as he is What you wrote is weak-minded nonsense, You are a hypocrite for "number 3" No man will put down a woman that has "self-worth" [/color] |

[/color]


[/color]