DeepSight's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DeepSight's Profile › DeepSight's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 (of 808 pages)
@IbeOkehie - I said in my last post that I will import some old posts which you have to review and understand if we are to have any discussion on this matter. I import from this thread - (On Racial Superiority and Inferiority) - https://www.nairaland.com/7887428/racial-superiority-inferiority ---------------------- If you look deep into history you will find that empires have risen and empires have fallen. Once upon a time the greatest power in the world was Egypt, once upon a time it was Persia, once upon another time it was Greece, another time, Rome, another time, the Mongols, another time the Ottomans, another time the Germans, another time the British, now the Americans, and its looking like the near future is Chinese. And yet in this same world there was a time, when Egypt and Rome were at the height of civilization and technology, places like the Germany and Britain of today were populated by bushmen and rural villagers who were very very backward - quite as backward as any African tribe was at another time. The Romans who conquered Britannia met there a very rustic backward people who had no cities and dwelt in gatherings of huts. A person who doesn't think deeply would simply say, oh the Romans were superior people, but were they really or the tide of history, environment, location, trade and other factors had simply swept them to were they were? If you reflect, you will find a certain trend among the most developed countries of the world - they all uniformly fall within the temperate zones of the world along certain latitudes. This tells you that climate and environment have a huge role to play in civilization. There is an old thread were this was discussed at length and I will try to dig it up and leave the link here. There are many advanced studies that have proven conclusively the relationship between climate and civilization. If the set of people who migrated to Europe remained in Africa, their descendants would suffer exactly what we are suffering - and its attendant effects on civilization. There is a science to this. --------------------- See next post. cc: tctrills |
IbeOkehie:I am, sorry all of this is a non starter. Perhaps a proper approach to this discussion is nuanced and complex for y/ou? In the mater of so called IQ tests, or even academic results in particular, it has not even occurred to you for one second that there is a socio-economic and sometimes cultural component at play which is extremely critical. To simplify this: a child brought up in a stable and well to do home, well fed, well catered for and with access to a full compliment of educational materials and advanced equipment (such as computers) is certainly most likely to perform better than a child from a poverty stricken home uncertain of his next meal and with zero educational materials. This alone is sufficient to show the socio-economic component which you have not even averted your mind to, not to speak of the cultural components (e.g: a child from a background which emphasizes discipline, study and competitiveness is more likely to excel at academics than a child from a more laissez-faire background). And yet these two factors I have pointed out (socio-economic and cultural) have nothing to do with actual raw intelligence. This one little thing I have just pointed out is one of the reasons I say I seriously doubt that yo/u can handle this discussion because if you could, you would at once recognize that the statistics that are put up for performance in both IQ tests and academics do not take cognizance of many factors which when played out on a large demographic level with different social realities of the different races are bound to lead to different outcomes. As to point number three, did you really fail to understand that one society can be more productive than another for any number of reasons? Do you deny that something as simple as fertile land can deliver such? Do you deny that weather alone can decide that? Do you deny that flora and fauna alone can decide that? None of these can be denied so it makes absolutely no sense to insist that it is always true that the most intelligent societies are always the most prosperous. It is simply not true. Very often in history the most brutal societies have been the most prosperous by dint of sheer force. PS: And no, you cannot arbitrarily decide that "productivity is the final arbiter" - Throughout history, necessity has been the mother of invention. Many societies were not productive per se because they simply had no need to be, others were forced by circumstance to be, etc. This again does not speak to which people are more intelligent. Its as simple as saying that a man who lives in a desert will have to learn some sort of irrigation while a man who lives in an oasis will have no such need and not do it. Necessity is at play here - not necessarily intelligence. And this is just one example. Many other factors abound. At all events, if I am going to attempt to change your views, we must start this discussion properly. From the historical perspective and by assessing the key factors which lead to civilization. For that, I will import posts I made in another thread some years ago. cc: tctrills |
Ghostagain:Serial killers nko? These chaps are not serious. |
IbeOkehie:You did not complete you argument. You went off-centre. You proceeded from talking about intelligence and then hopping to HDI. Lock up your argument properly. If you mean to say that Caucasians are more intelligent than other races, say so simpliciter. There is much that is lacking but I will not spend much energy with you to the extent that I can help it. I will start by warning you that productivity is not the "final arbiter" of any superiority of any race. Do not conflate the superiority of an economy with the superiority of a race. You should not do that because in so doing you assume material prosperity to be the final arbiter of the human condition. It is not. There are, and there have been, societies that prioritize spirituality for example, and this does not make any such society inferior. Nevertheless even if we were to accept your paradigm of material prosperity. The truth is that this is not always produced by greater intelligence. Many factors can play in: for example a people with a more fertile land can be more prosperous. Also a physically stronger people can be more prosperous by conquest of others - same can a numerically superior people. So its not always a question of intelligence. There are a hundred more factors one can cite but I will stop here. Just start from being concise about your premise: Caucasians are inherently and intrinsically the most intelligent race - right - that is your premise, ko? |
WriterrNg:How much do you get paid for this work please. I am looking for a similar gig if it can be a side hustle. Assist a bros pls. |
IbeOkehie:Saying that one society is more advanced than another society in terms of X, Y Z is different from a consistent approach which views one race as intrinsically and inherently inferior to another. If you dont know the difference, ask, I will expatiate. |
IjeBos:Honestly how do these people derive any sense of joy from repeatedly bleating "I am inferior, I am inferior, I am inferior." Just how? ? ? ? |
CoronaVirusPro:Don't you think you should say "its excellency" rather than "his excellency?" |
AllBlack:That's a problem. |
basilico:Since when did lies start to bother you? |
raumdeuter:I dont go about responding to every incoherent thing I hear. Good day. |
IbeOkehie:Its not such a big mystery as you think. You just dont wish to apply your brains beyond the simplistic notion "white man smart, black man daft" - that is where you are stuck. The reality is far more nuanced than that. Have you ever been to South Africa before? Nigerians are light years ahead of the generality of black South Africans. Light years. And till today, the economy of SA is firmly in Caucasian hands. So is 70 per cent of the land. |
IbeOkehie:No one has ever claimed that every single white person is to blame somehow. Even back in the day, there were white abolitionists. The Quakers in particular. Who can dismiss the role of William Wilberforce? Even in South Africa there were white people who gave their lives in the fight against apartheid. All of these people are FAR more noble than those blacks whose only business in the world is to denigrate their own race and worship another. |
raumdeuter:I refuse to engage in what will amount to a conversation between a writer and a stone. |
LordReed:It is dripping with delight in almost every line. |
CoronaVirusPro:It amazes me how you can stand for justice in Palestine and worship the epitome of mass enslavement at home (BAT) |
IjeBos:All of them (the black Trump worshipping community), are a profound pity. |
Kukutente23:I swear. |
LordReed:Animal Farm, my favorite book of all time. I know it line by line by heart. |
Kukutente23:IF BAT seeks a third term, this particular NASS will endorse it. His only challenge may come from getting the 2/3rds of the State Houses of Assembly. |
Celestialsword:The Rivers Govt should target that. Its a huge disgrace to Nigeria that we literally have just two stadia. Abuja and Uyo. Is it not unspeakable that Lagos has none till date. Whats up with the renovation they were doing at Surulere? |
IjeBos:The more pitiful aspect is that no one lic/ks his own feet in particular. People like him lic/k white feet for the sole pleasure of being able to say that they are inferior to whites. |
basilico:How is it special to say that the wealthiest set of black people in the world live in the wealthiest nation in the world? That statement by the way can be qualified and debated, but even taking it as a given, how is it saying something special? Oh, I get it - because in your view, they have been thereby specially blessed by the white man and should thus be grateful right? Ride on. |
IbeOkehie:Why would I? Of course they did. That's not the issue here. If you think thats the issue and that's your special highlight, you havent even started. I would have engaged you further but I am gradually learning not to waste my energy. Something you said showed it would be a waste and thats all. When you say you dont know who made more money off it, then I have to walk away from wasting my energy because clearly you have no desire to attempt a serious discussion. |
IbeOkehie:Good luck to you too. What a shame. What a deep deep, deep, sad pitiful shame. |
IbeOkehie:This statement alone is sufficient for any sane person not to bother discussing with you. |
tctrills:Be honest. You fled when you were shown up for the absurdity of equating mere genetic ancestry analysis to racism. You are free not to read. Those words are not mine. They are the words of Martin Luther King. |
Basilico, I give you the words of MLK. If you cant see the co-relation with Apartheid SA, well, I cant help you then. "Now there's another myth that I want to mention, because if we are going to have action programs that will prod the forces in power so that they will make the necessary concessions, we are going to have to understand why the forces in power need to be prodded. Now this leads me to say that we've got to get rid of the myth of over-exaggerating the bootstrap philosophy. By that I simply mean this: Over and over again we hear that the Negro should lift himself by his own bootstraps. Then there are those who say over and over again, "Other ethnic groups did it; why don't you?" Now it doesn't help the Negro for unfeeling and insensitive people to say to him that he's been in this country more than 348 years and was brought here in chains, involuntarily, and yet people who have been here, other ethnic groups who have been here for a hundred or a hundred and fifty years have gotten ahead of him. That doesn't help him at all. That only deepens his problem, his frustration, and almost his self- hatred. For the people who are that insensitive never stop to recognize the fact that no other ethnic group has been a slave on American soil. They never stop to recognize the fact that the nation made the Negro's color a stigma. It became something evil. You know even linguistics or semantics conspired against us on this. If you open Roget's Thesaurus, you'll find 120 synonyms for black. They are all degrading; smutty, dirty, lowly, every one of them. Now when you look for the 130 synonyms in that thesaurus for white, all of them [are] chaste, pure, everything elevated, and high and noble. So the society through its language structure came to the point of saying that a white lie is better than a black lie. If someone goes wrong in the family, you don't call them a white sheep, it's the black sheep of the family. If you know something about somebody, and you use that as a basis to bribe them and say that if you don't give them this amount of money that you are going to expose them you don't call that whitemail you call it blackmail. Go right down the language structure, and you see that everything conspired to make the Negro think that there was something wrong with him because of his color. The other thing is that no ethnic group has lifted itself by its own bootstraps. The Negro was freed from the bondage of physical slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, but he wasn't given any land to make that freedom meaningful. It was something like keeping a man in jail for many, many years, and then suddenly discovering that he is not guilty of the crime for which he was convicted. Then you go to the man and say, "Now you're free," but you don't give him any bus fare to get to town. You don't give him any money to get clothes to put on his back or to get on his feet in life again. Every system of justice or code of jurisprudence would rise up against this, and yet this is exactly what America did to the black man. It freed him from slavery and then left him there penniless, illiterate. He didn't have a thing, and there was no land provided. The important thing that America must realize is this: That at the same time that she refused to give the black man anything, she was giving away millions of acres of land in the West and the Midwest through an act of Congress. Not only did she give the land, she built land grant colleges to teach them to farm. She provided county agents to help them and to get them expert, to give them expertise in farming. But not only that, the nation provided low interest rates in later years so that they could mechanize their farms. Not only that, many of these persons are being paid today not to farm, and these are many of the persons who are telling the Negro that he should lift himself by his own bootstraps. A wonderful thing. I guess that it is all right to tell a man to lift himself by his own bootstraps, but it is a cruel jest to say to a bootless man that he ought to lift himself by his own bootstraps. Through centuries of denial, centuries of neglect, and centuries of injustice many, many Negroes have been left bootless. This does not mean that we do nothing for ourselves. It does not mean that we should not amass our economic and political resources to reach our legitimate goals. It simply means recognizing, the nation recognizing, that it owes a great debt on the basis of the injustices of the past.". cc: tctrills. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 (of 808 pages)
It's mind over matter, brain over brawn.