₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,328,212 members, 8,434,638 topics. Date: Saturday, 27 June 2026 at 12:47 AM

Toggle theme

DrummaBoy's Posts

Nairaland ForumDrummaBoy's ProfileDrummaBoy's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 (of 93 pages)

Christianity EtcRe: Pastor Sam Adeyemi Comes Out Powerfully On Tithing by DrummaBoy(m): 4:49pm On Aug 10, 2013
Back to the matter of thieves and robbers in God's house. Who did Jesus actually refer to as a thief and a robber?

Enter Jesus into the temple. Lo and behold the place is filled with men selling sheep and doves. Jesus makes a wip and drives them out saying: ' Do not turn my father's house into a den of thieves'.

So there we have it: modern day thieves and robbers are not those who refuse to tithe under an obsolete levithical system seeing there are no Levites and Priest to pay tithes too; rather modern day thieves and robbers, who have turned God's temple into their den, are those who feast on gullible worshippers' tithes and offering in the name of being ordained pastors.

Thus the veritable theses from Femi Aribisala is very apt: Any Pastor that Collect Tithes and Offering Today is a Thief and a Robber.
Christianity EtcRe: Pastor Sam Adeyemi Comes Out Powerfully On Tithing by DrummaBoy(m): 4:34pm On Aug 10, 2013
@Bidam

Do you believe Paul was an inspired author of scriptures?

Do U agree he wrote revelations and mysteries not revealed to other ages?

Have U heard of the concept of dispensations?
Christianity EtcRe: Pastor Sam Adeyemi Comes Out Powerfully On Tithing by DrummaBoy(m):
Alwaystrue:

You really are one funny guy.

The only person getting worked up over tithe and going on the offensive
is you. You said I was getting worked up on the other thread? No one
mentioned tithe on the other thread, yet you were asking me why I was
offended on why you do not tithe. You are trying too hard. Seems you
were thinking aloud and like looking for offense where there is none.
Lol.

I can see you like argument and can't seem to help seeing my posts. It
is fine. Whatever you say does not move me and I have made that clear
long before now.
If you do not see me fit to discuss bible matters with, then leave my
post when you see it. Try not to discuss with me by force. This your
grouse is so petty and it shows in your posts. If the best way to deal
with people is to insult them and have no apologies then you have God to
answer to. I am not bothered about insults, I just gave advice to you
as it is not becoming of those who profess to love.

I said whatever you fit is ok for you, go ahead, why should I prove you
wrong. You say one thing and do another. Now that you have said your
bit, please try to be happy. I have peace of mind with what I post.
Thanks for the advice.
You are welcome... any day.
Christianity EtcRe: Pastor Sam Adeyemi Comes Out Powerfully On Tithing by DrummaBoy(m):
As for U Bidam, who is forever ready to defend Mama, Ignorance is not an excuse - it would only rob of so much. May U also find capacity to learn.

I taught it b4, I will teach again: Jesus purpose for coming to earth was not to teach Bible Doctrine. He came to die for our sins, Matthew 1:21. He fulfilled this and today we can enjoy this blessing through faith in his name. He made it clear that the Spirit of truth will reveal these things to the church when we are able to learn them.

Paul received these doctrines and taught them in his epistles and thus we have doctrines on Justification, Redemption, Predestination, Church administration, Marriage, Conversion, Giving, etc. While Paul taught extensively on giving to the church he never mentioned tithing. Where did we find ours?

Jesus Christ was born under the law and was subject to the law so as to fulfill the law: thus we have MATTHEW 23:23.

What is so difficult to understand about this?
Christianity EtcRe: Pastor Sam Adeyemi Comes Out Powerfully On Tithing by DrummaBoy(m):
@ Alwaystrue

My first grouse with U on this forum was bc I claimed that women do not have the capacity to engage theological discourses. So far you have not proven me wrong.

The last time I raised an issue with U on another thread U became so
worked up I considered it best not to respond so it doesn't degenerate to something else.

Theological discourses require stability, strength and intelligence; not emotions.

On D issue U've been raising about letting God lead me on this tithe
matter and not NL: By the grace of God, He has led me thus far. Check
that thread I opened, I talked about the things I had against tithing; the little snag was with Abraham and NL helped me with that. God can use anyone U know.

So cool down madam... and do not come here defining to us what rudeness is or what it is not. If U do not want anyone to be rude to U, You have no business being on this forum.

My advice: find capacity for theological discourse!
Christianity EtcRe: Pastor Sam Adeyemi Comes Out Powerfully On Tithing by DrummaBoy(m): 12:07pm On Aug 10, 2013
@Alwaystrue

The 'principle' we find here is not 'tithing' or the the need to tithe. The principle the word of God teaches from Abraham giving of the tenth and the taxation for levites and the support for minister spoken of in 1 Cor 9 is the principle of GIVING or the need to support God's work through giving.

It showed forth as tithing under Moses and shows forth as grace giving (Giving as U are blessed; giving without compulsion; giving only after U have provided for your family; giving bc U love God; giving with common sense and not out of a religious compulsion so as not to incur God's wrath, while some fraudulent pastors smile to the bank, etc) in the new testament.

At this risk of starting a back and forth, will Adeyemi or any Pastor on this forum supply answers to the ten questions I provided above or forever keep silent?

I believe that God himself is behind this tithe controversy and it is his means of liberating people.
Christianity EtcRe: Anony & Deep Sight: Verse By Verse Academy On The Trinity & The Deity Of Christ by DrummaBoy(m): 10:28am On Aug 10, 2013
^ I have sent a private message to Seun and I believe he will attend to the matter.

Seun is a reasonable person: He reviewed the other unpopular law that favored Muslims bc of the popular outcry against it.

That thread he closed showed people love mmw. If more people clamore for his re installment he can be reinstated and we can then have Deep back and this thread will continue.

Simple.
Christianity EtcRe: Anony & Deep Sight: Verse By Verse Academy On The Trinity & The Deity Of Christ by DrummaBoy(m): 8:51am On Aug 10, 2013
@Pastor Kun And Others

After reading Deep comment to quit I visited the thread were the matter of mmw sack was being discussed to get the full gist.

Deep layed down a strong word of protest on mmw sack: main point being NL religion section is offering to much slack for Muslims. Muslims alone have a subsection. I, a Christian, have always advocated a sub sect for Atheist and satanist but Seun just waves him aside and said something to the effect that he would not be missed.

Is Seun afraid of Muslims on NL? With Jesoul ill, Maclatunji has been Mod a Christian section, no wonder our threads don't make it to front page.

Worst still, this morning that thread on mmw sack has been closed.

I am not a trouble maker but this is injustice at its worst and if I will be banned for this so be it but I call on all active Christian contributors to this forum to 'step aside' from the forum for a time until mmw is re installed.

I agree with Deep position to call it quit in protest; maybe we all should!
Nairaland GeneralRe: Has Manmustwac Been Sacked? by DrummaBoy(m): 12:02am On Aug 10, 2013
Pls, someone, has the thread for voting mmw back as Mod been opened?

Atleast he has my vote to be returned...
Christianity EtcRe: Anony & Deep Sight: Verse By Verse Academy On The Trinity & The Deity Of Christ by DrummaBoy(m): 11:25pm On Aug 09, 2013
Deep
Sight:

My deepest apologies, Anony and all.

I cannot continue this thread because I will be permanently withdrawing
from Nairaland going forward on account of the unacceptable disposition
of the owner of the site.

Best wishes.
I am adding my voice to the call on Deep to re consider your position and return to the thread/forum.

I believe the Seun matter will be resolved.

Plssssssss...

Thanks in advance
Christianity EtcRe: Faith In Him: Subjective Or Objective? by DrummaBoy(m): 11:08pm On Aug 09, 2013
Great piece. I agree with most of what is written therein
Christianity EtcRe: Bible Study - Galatians... Has The Modern Church Misunderstood? by DrummaBoy(m): 10:20pm On Aug 09, 2013
Error 5

5. That Paul writings cannot be taken as final authority for today's church rather our final authority must be taken from the Old Testament. And if at all we would consider Paul's letters, they must be seen in the light of Jesus' teachings.
While discussing error 4, I had inadventantly spoken on error 5.

May I just add a little bit. Paul never contradicted Jesus in his epistles. In Colosians 3 he called Christians to let Christ words dwell richly in our hearts. He quoted Jesus often too. Paul complemented Jesus and never contradicted him.

Jesus has given the church gifts of minister: Apostle, Prophets, Evangelist, Pastors and Teachers. I consider this a four fold ministry bc a Pastor must also be able to teach. Of all all of them the work of a Teaching Pastor is probably the most important. If the church will grow, we must have Pastors who can rightly divide the word of truth and make the bible speak, while reconciling the seeming differences in them.

In my sojourn through Christian life, I have seen very few sound bible teachers. Many in the pentecostal churches have allowed an over pre-occupation with Charisma to eat into a solid time of bible study that must lead to sound teachings. So I, personally have resorted to orthodox protestant teachers to help me comprehend bible doctrine and not pentecostal pastors. This is how I have found truth for myself and such truth I can defend with the last blood in my veins. We may wish ask our modern day Nigerian Judaist who there teachers are and if they did discover these things themselves - are they not guilty of adding to the bible?

Thank you for enduring the long read.
Christianity EtcRe: Bible Study - Galatians... Has The Modern Church Misunderstood? by DrummaBoy(m): 10:08pm On Aug 09, 2013
Error 4

4. That the Torah was the scripture of Paul's day and that Paul and the other apostles had no new revelation that could be called scripture or final authority on doctrine and practice for the churches in first century Palestine.
That the Torah was the only scripture of Paul's day is very true and it has become the only foundation that J'85 stands on to propagate his strange doctrine. What he insinutes, although he denies, is that Paul so called revelation was not inspired at best and false at worst. This sort of talk is not new. This generation is shurring up a new kind of Christian group that deny Paul and claim his letters were not scripture but mere letter to Jews and gentiles scattered all over the Roman world. But may we permit Paul to speak for himself:

Galatians 1:11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. 12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ
Ephesians 3:1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, 2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: 3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, 4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; 6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: 7 Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power. 8 Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; 9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: 10 To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God, 11 According to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord:
He had spoken of this mystery earlier on:

Ephesians 2: 11 Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; 12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: 13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; 15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; 16 And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby: 17 And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh. 18 For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father. 19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God; 20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
From the above stated scripture I enumerate the following truths

1. That Paul received revelations outside the things written in the Torah that is today called scriptures.

2. That these revelations were not revealed in time past, they were not found explicitly in the Torah.

3. That these revelations had to do with God bringing the gentiles to his kingdom through faith in Christ Jesus.

4. That the means of doing this was the cross of Jesus.

5. That the implication of this was that God tore down the wall of partition btw gentiles and Jews and this wall itself was the law, with its commandments and ordinances, the Torah.\

6. That the result of this is that there is no more Jew nor gentile but all are one in Christ Jesus today.

7. That these truths are mysteries and can only be understood under the concept of Dispensation: which shows that an unchanging God permit various changes through time, so as to bring about his eternal purpose for saving man from Satan's kingdom.

By extension, we see the teaching of Paul as the doctrine of the dispensation of the church age. I say this with reverence that the purpose of Jesus' coming was not to teach doctrine. His purpose was to die for sinful man and bring about a righteousness with which such a man can reach God, through faith. (However, Jesus teaching must still be taught in Church today because he layed the foundation on which the gospel of grace must stand. However, bc he was born under the law and subject to the law, we need sound teachers who must rightly divide the words he spoke so that we can know which ones belong to the dispenation of the age of Isreal and the one that belongs to the dispensation of the age of the church). Jesus told the disciples that the Spirit of Truth will lead them to all truth. This he did, albeit in Paul through the dispensational mysteries. While the church is founded by Christ and his blood redeems every saints, the doctrines that must define church life and the Christian way of living following salvation can only be obtained via the revealed truth of God through Paul primarily and the other Apostles secondarily in their epistles to the early churches.

Now, in Revelation, John shows it clear that these revelational mysteries are closed and their no other truths being revealed today beyond what we already have in the holy writ. To add or subtract from this is to bring judgement on oneself. Peter also lend credence to Paul's epistles by calling them scripture in 2 Peter 3:16.
Christianity EtcRe: Bible Study - Galatians... Has The Modern Church Misunderstood? by DrummaBoy(m): 9:33pm On Aug 09, 2013
Error 3 contn'd

Now let us refer to Acts 15:21

21 For Moses of old time hath in every city them that preach him, being read in the synagogues every sabbath day.
J'85 will have us believe that James was saying that the gentiles will hear the Torah in the synagogues and do the remaining demands of the law. But what I see here is a fine summary of the events of Acts 15. The council had agreed that the law has been a burden that no one has been able to keep even among the Jews perfectly and there was no need to burden the gentiles any further with them. However, they enumerated four points that they needed to heed as a matter of urgency. From Jesus words in Revelation, as ably quoted by J'85, we see that the issue of food sacrificed to idols was an issue in their time. Idol worship was rampant and to eat such food, though Paul said in 1 Cor 8 it was nothing, would actually equate one with other idol worshipers and make one so. Thus, in keeping with the law of the Spirit of Life, which urges holiness and sanctification in the redeemed, this acts would be regarded as unseemly among saints.

It must be noted here that contrary to those who call advocate of a gospel of grace lawless, that we encourage Christian sanctification, especially as stated by Paul in the latter halves of his letters. Yes, no one can say effectively that he has saving faith, if he cannot show it by his works. James was saying that the it is expected of saved gentiles to keep these four laws. He is not saying that the four were to be the beginning for them to keep other laws of the Torah. To insinuate that is to rubbish everything Paul labored over in his epistles, especially that of the Galatians. Today, the matter of idols is not a big deal anymomre. But we have other forms of idolatary like greed and these are things that Christians are still enjoined to avoid.

There is nowhere, like I have mentioned before, in the NT were it was said that gentile believers went to the synagogue to learn the Torah with the aim of keeping its laws. There is no such place in the whole of the bible. If they went there at all, it was with the aim of carrying out missions to the Jews and proselytes.
Christianity EtcRe: Bible Study - Galatians... Has The Modern Church Misunderstood? by DrummaBoy(m): 9:11pm On Aug 09, 2013
Error 3

3. That Paul and the other apostles of Jesus lived like Jews after their conversion and subsequently taught this to the gentile churches, albeit bit by bit, according to Acts 15:21, in the synagogues every Sabbath.
I have written on the fact that Paul and Peter lived like Gentiles following their comprehension of the gospel of grace and I will just place here below, before proceeding with the discuss:

In extension to this I wish to add that Paul did not live as a Jew anymore after his conversion or better still, after his calling to preach the gospel of grace. Why do I put forward this position? Paul would never had had the moral ground to rebuke Peter for acting hypocritical if he himself was equally guilty. What was Peter guilty of? From the laws in the Torah, and as exemplified by the books of Ezra and Nehemiah, the Jews were not to have any dealing with Gentiles. God showed Peter in a vision in Acts 10 that this had changed. The implication was that Peter could go into a gentile’s house and minister to him. In reality one may conclude that Peter understood God’s message to him then in letter alone; having practiced Judaism for so long, it was difficult to put that vision into practice continually. So he arrives in Antioch and noticing that the believing Jews were not there (as in Jerusalem) he felt free to eat with the gentile Christians. The minute these Jews appeared he stopped eating with them; so much so that Barnabas too followed suit. Paul rebuked him. What this implies is that Paul was still eating with the gentiles. Hear Paul in Galatians 2:

11 But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed. 12 For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision. 13 And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation. 14 But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews? 15 We who are Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles, 16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. 17 But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid. 18 For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. 19 For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. 20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.


While every verse quoted above is worth expatiating on, notice what Paul says of Peter in verse 14: “I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?”. Paul is saying here that even Peter, at least while he was at Antioch, was living as a gentile. And it is also possible to posit from this scripture that Peter had always lives like a gentiles, at least after his grasp of the doctrine of grace. From Paul’s denunciation here we can posit rightly that PAUL HIMSELF LIVED LIKE A GENTILE.

In chapter two he talks about some of this circumcision folks coming in to spy out their liberty in Christ: what was this liberty; the fact that they no longer lived as Jews but as gentiles. The truth of the matter we can deduce from this passage is that Paul lived the message he preached. He was sent to the gentiles and part of the message to the gentiles was that they needed not keep the Mosaic laws anymore to be saved; he preached that message and lived that message. Hear Paul again in the epistles to the Philippians:

4 Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: 5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; 6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless. 7 But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ. 8 Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ, 9 And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:


Here Paul reels out his Judaistic credentials but how does he sum it all up: dung – shi.t (excuse my language), that is the perfect expression for it. In Galatians he had called the law weak and beggarly but here he calls it shi.t! Why is this so? Because there are two righteousness he is discussing here: a righteousness by the law and a righteousness by faith in Christ. Comparing the two, one is but dung to the other. You cannot serve two masters: you cannot be pursuing a righteousness of the law and also that of faith; one has to go for the other. It is safe to say that Paul no longer lived as a Jew after his grasp of the doctrine of grace. The righteousness of the law, the life of Judaism, Pauls says here he has counted but loss for Christ sake.

Now, MostHigh quotes a passage in Acts were it was said that Paul went to offer a vow at the instance of James and the other apostles.

Acts 21:17 And when we were come to Jerusalem, the brethren received us gladly. 18 And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present. 19 And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry. 20 And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law: 21 And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs. 22 What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come. 23 Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them; 24 Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. 25 As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication. 26 Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.


He claims from this passage that Paul lived like a Jew. That passage is easy to explain with two verses found in 1 Corinthians 9:

19 For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more. 20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;


From this passage we can learn that Paul was free from pleasing men; he exercisedhis full liberty in Christ to live and preach the gospel of grace. But so as to win the Jews he lived like a Jew and subjected himself to the law. Jerusalem, at the time Paul visited, was in uproar. The allegation made against Paul that he taught men not to live under the law WAS TRUE. James and others’ suggestion was the sort of “wisdom” Paul had discussed about in the above passage. His main aim of going to Jerusalem, was to testify about Christ to the Jews, as he would later do to Ceasar, so that the Jews could have their very last warning from God to accept Christ or be overthrown (as it happened in AD 70). So Paul took up the vow and went into the temple to make the sacrifices, to be under the law, all in a bid to be acceptable to his people so that he could have the chance to tell them about Christ.

Apparently, it did not work. But they got the testimony they needed to hear. And Jesus confirming this testimony stood by Paul subsequently and told him the same way he testified of him before the Jews, he was to do the same before Caesar (Acts 23:11). Any sound bible scholar will realize that the message of that section of Scripture was not that Paul lived like a Jew but simply that Paul did everything, including coming under the law, to witness to his people.

Another example to buttress this point is Paul taking Timothy and circumcising him. He did this so that Timothy’s message before the Jews will not be rebuffed. But notice that he did not circumcise Titus (Galatains 2:3). So if Paul kept the law strictly, he would have circumcised Timothy and Titus but he did for one and not for the other. It is called walking in wisdom.
Christianity EtcRe: Must Christians Observe The Law Of Moses? by DrummaBoy(m): 8:56pm On Aug 09, 2013
JesusisLord85: hahahaha
We Nigerians (and various other groups of africans) circumcise and name our children on the 8th day beause this is one of the traditions our ancestors clinged to, after being "scattered" to the corners of the earth. We are Hebrews smiley
Delusion

Phillipians 3:1 Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe. 2 Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision. 3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh. 4 Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: 5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; 6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless. 7 But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ. 8 Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,
We are the circumcision. We are the true spiritual Isrealites.

Romans 9:7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
FYI
Christianity EtcRe: Bible Study - Galatians... Has The Modern Church Misunderstood? by DrummaBoy(m): 2:55pm On Aug 09, 2013
My apologies to those still expecting my conclusion of the expose on the five primary errors of J'85. I will return to it in a short while with discuss on no.3.

We have serious power supply problem in Nigeria.
Christianity EtcRe: Must Christians Observe The Law Of Moses? by DrummaBoy(m):
Bidam: Yeah..The brother is removing all those junks taught him by the sunday school teachers that Jesus came to abolish the law. Just like mosthigh pointed out a poignant point. How do i teach my children the bible? Should i tell them ok receive the Holy Spirit IJN? or should i with wisdom follow this wise sayings of Solomon.

Proverbs 22:6

New King James Version (NKJV)

6 Train up a child in the way he should go,
And when he is old he will not depart from it.
So its a new doctrine after all!

There is this lady on this forum that quoted Gbile Akaani once and said something to this effect: "If it is true, it is not new; if it is new beware, it is not true"

There is nothing new about the doctrine of grace; What is new is this keeping of the Torah after salvation.

I have asked others and they had no answers to it, so I ask you too. You want us to keep the Torah. Fine. Which one of the Torah laws should we keep? And if we are not to keep every one of them, will we not be doing injustice to the scriptures below:

Galatians 5:3 For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
James 2:10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
Christianity EtcRe: Must Christians Observe The Law Of Moses? by DrummaBoy(m): 11:12am On Aug 09, 2013
JesusisLord85: This is why I say that, unless you embrace shdemidemi's two gospel myth (which I have dispelled severally), there is no way you can even begin to suggest that 'christians' don't have to keep God's commandments.
Despite this, they walk hand in hand...to the same destruction, lest they repent smiley
John 13:34 A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. 35 By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.
Galatians 5:14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 15 But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another. 16 This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. 17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would. 18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
James 2:8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
That is his commandment, my friend, not the Torah!
Christianity EtcRe: Must Christians Observe The Law Of Moses? by DrummaBoy(m): 10:51am On Aug 09, 2013
JesusisLord85:


You see why your reasoning is screqwed up? Your justification is that some sinless people today do not keep the law, therfore it must be ok?
Rabbinic jews rejected the Messaiah. And we know, they will accept a false messiah in the endtimes.

John 5: 43 "I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive."
I do not understand that aspect of your saying the Jews are sinless. Are you the one saying it or they claim it. I know the Jews rejected the Messiah and they were judged for it with the overthrow of Jerusalem. My point is that that judgement was not just for rejecting Jesus, it was for rejecting his message: the message of the cross that teaches that God has abolished the dividing wall btw Jews and Gentiles. And that dividing wall is the Torah itself!

The problem with your quote in Ephesians 2, is that it directly conflicts Matthew 5:17 and Romans 3:31

Matthew 5:17 "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil".

Romans 3:31 "Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law."
I have long suspected it but now you have confirmed it: like MostHigh you do not believe Paul's letters are inspired. That is why you pick and choose what quote of his that soothes your argument at the moment. How do you accept what is written in Galatians and reject what is written in Ephesians?

The word abolished is here KATARGEHO, Strong's Gk. #2673). and interestingly, the same greek word is used here, as is used in Ephesians 2:15.
So what is the obvious conclusion, taking into account other scripture, and Strong's? That the translation is poor.
Here is an appropriate response from JMAN05 to this same issue you raised earlier with him. I am not an authority in Strong yet so I will allow those who know how to use it to tell you:

JMAN05:

You are quoting the words of Jesus to support that Jesus was not against the law and my "note" above addresses that point that Jesus was not against the law. the law ended AFTER his death. didnt I say so?

my brother, "telos" primary mean "end". the other one is "goal to end" not JUST goal. (exrgetic dictionary of the NT). from the context of that romans, end is the logical word to pick. can you say "I am... the beginning and the 'goal to end (or goal) (telos)'"? rev. 21:6. the context shows that end is the logical word. Strongs 5056: "(to set out for a definite point or goal); properly, the point aimed at as a limit ie (by implication) the conclusion of an act or state...".

basically when something reaches its goal it ends. that is the sense telos convey. so the law points to Christ and ends after his death cos it has fulfilled its purpose. like i said above.
To get the full undrstanding, I sugegst you read this article:

http://www.hebroots.org/hebrootsarchive/ 9706/970611_b.html

Shalom
I see. Bidam had pasted a quote from that sight too earlier on. I had also suspected those were your teachers, along with the Torah, but now you have proven me right. If you have anything on that site, you may paste it here to support your argument but the last thing I want to use my holydays for now is reading some mumbo jumbo about how the Torah is relevant to us in 21st century jet age!
Christianity EtcRe: Must Christians Observe The Law Of Moses? by DrummaBoy(m): 10:35am On Aug 09, 2013
MostHigh: Pual is you God
And you insist that Paul's letters are not scripture.
Christianity EtcRe: Must Christians Observe The Law Of Moses? by DrummaBoy(m): 10:29am On Aug 09, 2013
JMAN05: Are u ready to have this discussion following the format i said above?
I must warn you they only play the game by their rules and not by anyone's: it called pride and it is the product of reading too much Torah.

1 corinthians 8:1 Now as touching things offered unto idols, we know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth
If you have anything to contribute to the discuss do so independently of these two because they will waist your time. So far, I see that you are trying to reason with them but they don't reason: why? Torah, again.

But I won't want to discourage you too much bc you may just as well find a way to them that many of us have not been able to. So far, I must commend you for your resilience.
Christianity EtcRe: Must Christians Observe The Law Of Moses? by DrummaBoy(m): 10:22am On Aug 09, 2013
JesusisLord85: Why do they like to argue about 'keeping the whole law'
Did not David commit adultery. Did not Abraham give his wife away to save his own skin.
Nobody was justified by keeping the law, no man can boast before God. Before Christ, they were saved by faith. After Christ, we are saved by faith. Only difference for the lawless is that they say they are now saved without any works.

1 John 2:4 "He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him"
John 13:34 A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. 35 By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.
Galatians 5:14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 15 But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another. 16 This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh. 17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would. 18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
James 2:8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
That is his commandment, my friend, not the Torah!
Christianity EtcRe: Must Christians Observe The Law Of Moses? by DrummaBoy(m): 10:14am On Aug 09, 2013
Tgirl4real: Waiting for the concluding part...

BTW, can drummaboy n Jesusislord tell us what the torah is? I believe that this info will help us to be on the same page.
I accept the definition J'85 provided from wikipedia

Torah (/ˈtɔːrə/; Hebrew: תּוֹרָה, "Instruction", "Teaching"wink is a central concept in the Jewish tradition. It has a range of meanings: it can most specifically mean the first five books of the Tanakh, it can mean this plus the rabbinic commentaries on it, it can mean the continued narrative from Genesis to the end of the Tanakh, it can even mean the totality of Jewish teaching and practice.[1] Common to all these meanings, Torah consists of the foundational narrative of the Jewish people: their call into being by God, their trials and tribulations, and their covenant with their God, which involves following a way of life embodied in a set of religious obligations and civil laws (halakha).
The confusion is when he decides to read his own meaning into it like he does the rest of scriptures.

The quote above clearly shows that the Torah was the religious books to the Jews. Yes, they contain God's word to His people the Jews but the very essence of the book of Galatians was to show that the purpose for giving the Torah has been fulfilled with Christ's death on the cross:

Galatians 3:19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator. 20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one. 21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. 22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. 24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. 26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise
Ephesians 2:14 For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; 15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace; 16 And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby: 17 And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh. 18 For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father. 19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God; 20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
That is the purpose of the Torah: it was a guide, a schoolmaster, a means to show the utter sinfulness of man and his need for a Savior. How, in God's name, will anyone in 21st century be advocating a return to the Torah when even the Jews that it was first given to do not adhere striclty to it today?
Christianity EtcRe: Must Christians Observe The Law Of Moses? by DrummaBoy(m): 9:53am On Aug 09, 2013
JesusisLord85: ...for the simple minded smiley
2 Peter 3:15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
Christianity EtcRe: Must Christians Observe The Law Of Moses? by DrummaBoy(m): 9:44am On Aug 09, 2013
Goshen360: Good! If Christ is the END GOAL and\or THE END OBJECTIVES of the law, what does that mean? This is the best shot of scriptures you will ever have here. Doesn't it mean the law has an END OBJECTIVES and that end objective is CHRIST. Doesn't it mean, the law's end objectives is to end up in CHRIST - pointing to Christ? Doesn't it mean when one comes to CHRIST, the end objectives of the law is completed and is no longer needed? Doesn't it mean the law was to be a guardian UNTIL Christ should come? Doesn't it mean that as many as are in Christ, the law have been completed\ended its objectives? Doesn't it mean that when that END GOAL or OBJECTIVES are reached or fulfilled, such law is terminated, null and void? Now that the END OBJECTIVES or END GOAL of the law has been reached in CHRIST, what do you still need that law for? To retain you in Christ?

You're going from Lagos to Ibadan and your end objective is to get to Ibadan. You called a taxi and he drove you to Ibadan. Now your END OBJECTIVES is reached (to get to Ibadan); please tell us, do you still need the service of a taxi-man? You left Nigeria for the UK and now you living in UK, what law and\or constitution do you obey? UK or Nigeria? Christians lived UNDER a better covenant, NOT under the law because they now have the indwelling of the Spirit, replacement of the guardians of the law, Galatians 5:18; you're just simply not getting this simple truth. A GREAT CHANGE HAD HAPPENED SINCE THE TIME OF THE OUTPOURING OF THE SPIRIT - THE HOLY SPIRIT HAD REPLACED THE ROLE OF THE LAW GUIDING FOLKS UNDER THE LAW AND WHEN A BELIEVER IS LED BY THE SPIRIT OF GOD, SUCH ARE SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF GOD AND ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE LAW OF MOSES NOR ARE THEY UNDER THE LAW.

Amplified Bible (AMP)
18 But if you are guided (led) by the [Holy] Spirit, you are not subject to the Law.

New Living Translation
But when you are directed by the Spirit, you are not under obligation to the law of Moses.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
But if you are led by The Spirit, you are not under The Written Law.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
If your spiritual nature is your guide, you are not subject to Moses' laws.

Galatians 5:18


YOU CAN'T BE LED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT AND AT THE SAME TIME BE LED BY THE LAW. That's what Galatians 5:18 is saying. Read it again and understand. Led by the Holy Spirit = NOT under the law, not subject to the law. Flip the coin and see the other side: Being under the law or subject to the law = NOT led by the Spirit.

In other words, the law was our ·guardian [child-minder; tutor; an attendant slave who watched over a child in a wealthy Greco-Roman household] ·leading us to [or until] Christ so that we could be ·made right with God [declared righteous; justified] through faith. 25 Now ·the way of faith [L faith] has come, and we no longer live under a ·guardian [child-minder; tutor; v. 24]. Expanded Bible (EXB); Galatians 3:24-25

Amplified Bible (AMP)
24 So that the Law served [to us Jews] as our trainer [our guardian, our guide to Christ, to lead us] until Christ [came], that we might be justified (declared righteous, put in right standing with God) by and through faith. 25 But now that the faith has come, we are no longer under a trainer (the guardian of our childhood).



New Living Translation
For Christ has already accomplished the purpose for which the law was given. As a result, all who believe in him are made right with God.

Amplified Bible (AMP)
4 For Christ is the end of the Law [the limit at which it ceases to be, for the Law leads up to Him Who is the fulfillment of its types, and in Him the purpose which it was designed to accomplish is fulfilled. That is, the purpose of the Law is fulfilled in Him] as the means of righteousness (right relationship to God) for everyone who trusts in and adheres to and relies on Him.

Romans 10:4
End of discussion!

That is to say, the objective of this discussion has been fulfilled by the masters themselves by the statement above!!

E ku ise Oluwa O; may your tribe not end on nairaland.com!!!
Christianity EtcRe: Bible Study - Galatians... Has The Modern Church Misunderstood? by DrummaBoy(m): 12:58am On Aug 09, 2013
^Those are the jargons J'85 reads and come to spew at us here.

NOW LISTEN GOOD: Galatians not only teaches Justification by faith alone; it teaches that the subsequent Christians life is also by faith: Read Galatians 2:20-21

Paul quotes from the OT bc the Spirit that authored the OT, the Spirit of truth, has always advocated a life of faith for saints from the foundation of the earth: THE JUST SHALL LIVE BY FAITH Hab 2:4

So don't take scriptures out of context to justify a lame position. The life we are called to live is faith in the risen Christ... a faith that works by love.

So don't come here and terrorise us with Torah this.. Torah that... if the Torah could save anyone, why did Jesus have to come and die?

Abegi... make U allow us hear word. Bc U got something from the internet we should be shivering... God knows how much rubbish the net spew out daily... better read you bible or better still read scripture and yes, learn from tested and trusted reputable fathers like Calvin and Luther
Christianity EtcRe: Pastor Sam Adeyemi Comes Out Powerfully On Tithing by DrummaBoy(m):
At the least I agree with Femi Aribisala on one thing: Every pastor that collects tithe today is a thief and a robber!

On a second thought...

I will pay my tithe to Sam Adeyemi or any other Pastor if he or they are able to supply answers to these questions

1. How much is his salary?

2. When last did he publish an account of his church finances for members of his church to peruse?

3. What are the welfare packages his church has for the needy, the poor, the widows, the jobless, missionaries, Christians in northern Nigeria, Christians living with HIV/AIDS, etc?

4. How many private jets does he own?

5. What does he need them for?

6. Why is the welfare package of the Pastors a hundred times better than those poor and needy mentioned in 3?

7. Can his church survive without tithes and offering?

8. Why does he carry out a practise that is not found in the NT? And if tithing is pre-law, is circumcision not pre-law too? Did he circumcise his son on the eight day of birth?

9. When was he ordained a priest according to Melchizedeck or according to Aaron to collect tithe?

10. Why is tithing obligatory in his church when giving is not in 1 Cor 9:7?
Christianity EtcRe: Exposition Of Kingdom Principles by DrummaBoy(m): 11:39pm On Aug 08, 2013
OK Bidam, Pls continue the discuss. I honestly thought U were through with that first post.

And as for the being through with U on this forum, I reconsider: Forgive me for being a pain... OK... I believe I am forgiven?

And as for U Boomark wey want pursue Bidam; if I catch U... person dey lay doctrinal foundation U say make im add KONKIRI...

E no good O... LOL!!!
Christianity EtcRe: Bible Study - Galatians... Has The Modern Church Misunderstood? by DrummaBoy(m): 10:57pm On Aug 08, 2013
shdemidemi: grin cheesy grin

burst loose exit mode activated by our ambiguous/equivocal friend....
Exactly!!!

Let him go; we will be waiting for him when he returns... I hope he will be able to stay sef grin grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: Bible Study - Galatians... Has The Modern Church Misunderstood? by DrummaBoy(m): 10:05pm On Aug 08, 2013
Goshen360: ^ Bros, abeg PM me immediately with your mobile contact again. Its urgent!
I've sent it. Check now and confirm. I am still on this page
Christianity EtcRe: Bible Study - Galatians... Has The Modern Church Misunderstood? by DrummaBoy(m): 10:02pm On Aug 08, 2013
... and concluded:

JesusisLord85:

We also know that Jesus considered the "traditions of the elders" not equal to written Torah. Often times the oral tradition violated the written Torah (Mark 7:9).
Matthew 15:2-3
2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread. 3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?

This verse gives real insight into the people that the apostles are confronting. Would they even be having this debate if the concern was the written Torah, the word of God? Of course not.
But the sabbath was in the Torah and Jesus made it clear that the man was not made for the law but the law for man. He was giving a glimpse into that time in the church age when Christians will no longer be governed by either Torah or the tradition of men.

JesusisLord85:

Like Christ, the apostles upheld written Torah but rebuked those advocates of legalism, i.e. oral law. Basically, members of Pharisaic Judaism.
No sir. Legalism is the keeping of laws with the aim of one achieving right standing with God. The gospel you are advocating here is a legalistic gospel. The torah was God's word to the Jewish nation; the bible, with the complete and revealed will of God as revealed through the apostles, is the complete word of God to us today. All we need to know about the Torah is seen clearly in the old testament. No Christian is called to follow the Torah today.

JesusisLord85:

So, to answer the first question, it is the Pharisees who are making the demands mentioned in Acts 15:5. The passage is dealing with whether the Gentiles needed to convert according to Pharisaic traditions, i.e. become proselytes to Pharisaic Judaism. How can they be talking about messianic Judaism, Jesus just spent his time teaching the Jews the scriptures, and now you’re saying they do away with all that? That is absurd.
We already know by checking other scriptures that Gentiles could be saved without going through the rituals of becoming a proselyte - the belief of Cornelius and his family confirms this (Acts 10).
To us, some 2000 years later circumcision is just one law out of the 613 laws in Torah. However, from the 1st century Pharisaic perspective, circumcision was the means by which one became a proselyte. (Notice I am not even talking about conversion to Christianity here. Jesus didn't even know what a Christian was. Chei.) That is why this ritual is being singled out as a demand apart from its inclusion in the Torah. Generally obeying the law is not the issue, this passage is bothered with how the Gentiles convert, and the requirements thereof.
Notice they didn’t complain that the Gentiles don’t keep kosher and the law, or the Sabbath and the law. The law already includes these things. It is singled out because it is what they consider to be the rites of passage to becoming a proselyte to Pharisaic Judaism.

It might sound absurd that circumcision had become a conversion ritual by the Pharisees, but today, baptism is sometimes misused as a means of joining a particular church. For example me refusing to be baptised in the Mormon church is my rejection of Mormonism, and NOT baptism per se!

The apostles rejected the Pharisaic demand that the Gentiles should undergo the Pharisaic circumcision ritual, AND NOT circumcision itself, that was not the debate. Why do you people imagine a vain thing?

At that time, the gospel was being received by Gentiles without them having to go through the conversion ritual of the Pharisees. God accepted the Gentiles as they were, hence he "made no distinction between us and them" (Acts 15:9).

"Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe. And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us; And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?"
That is private interpretation of Scripture. That chapter never mentioned pharisaic tradition of judaism. Rather it talked about people who were approaching the Gentiles and asking them to add to their faith in Christ circumcision, an ordinance from the Torah, not tradition of men. The Apostles contended with them that faith in Jesus was sufficient and that is the main point of my contention with you; faith in Jesus is sufficient!



JesusisLord85:

Side note: can Mr two-gospel shdemidemi explain how this Jew was preaching a gospel to the Gentiles that God had lead him to do? According to you, only Paul knew the full truth and that truth was given to the gentiles. lol
This point is not necessary to your discuss at all.

JesusisLord85:

Peter argued against the Pharisees, warning not to put a yoke on the new believers, a yoke neither they nor their fathers could bear; this yoke is the Pharisaic oral tradition. How can Peter be teaching that the commandments of God is bondage? That would be blasphemy!. Jesus said:

"The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers."

Now doesn’t that sound more like the yoke Peter is alluding to? The yoke many of you have blasphemously claimed is the very word of God?

See what Jesus also says to the Pharisees:
Mattew 23:15
"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves."

So we can see that the oral tradition of the Pharisees is a burden, NOT the commandments of the Most High God. God’s way is freedom, contrary to what many of you teach here:

"The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach freedom to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, To preach the acceptable year of the Lord." Luke 4:18,19
This echos Isaiah 61:1 (please check, I'm trying to keep this tight, it is late)

Liberty is defined in Psalms 119:44-45
"So shall I keep thy law continually for ever and ever. And I will walk at liberty: for I seek thy precepts."

Leviticus 26:13
"I am the LORD your God, which brought you forth out of the land of Egypt, that ye should not be their bondmen; and I have broken the bands of your yoke, and made you go upright."

How can you say God brought them out of bondage, and gave them the instructions (his word, his Torah), which you also define as bondage? The traditions of man is the bondage.
Private interpretation again: That passage meant what he said. Peter was saying the keeping of the Torah put a yoke on them that they had not been able to keep. Jesus had told us that his yoke is easy. Paul then made it clear that we should stand in the liberty which Christ has made us free and not be entangled in the yoke of bondage. The torah and the laws in it were bondage; but the Spirit gives life and liberty!

Galatians 3:19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator. 20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one. 21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. 22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. 24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. 26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
The Torah is for slaves and Children; but those in Christ are sons that are to be led by the Spirit.

JesusisLord85:

Ok so let’s look at the demand by the Pharisees that the Gentiles keep the Law of Moses. To the Pharisees, the Law of Moses means both the written word (Torah) and the oral Torah (their traditions) – remember their dialogue with Jesus in Matthew 15:2-3. These people considered them equal. So when they say the Gentiles should keep the Law of Moses, they are not making any distinction between their traditions and the written Torah. Simple enough.

Let’s not forget that the Gentile’s were given four ‘starter laws’, and were to learn the rest of the law each week in the synagogues. And we know that these laws come from the Torah. Obviously, the apostles were not making up a new set of laws.
"But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood."

I will go into detail why these are specifically mentioned as things the gentiles must adhere to immediately. That will come tomorrow. Early start tomorrow.

Shalom
I await your continuation but it may do you some good to look up my rejoinder here first.

Jesus is Lord and all glory be to his name but he has permitted some mystery truths to be revealed to the church mostly and primarily through Paul and that is why those who propagate a gospel of grace quote Paul a great deal. But no matter what Paul wrote, he never contradicted Jesus rather, he complemented him. These commandments that you keep on and on about where simply the same commandments Paul had shown us that we should keep as we follow the Spirit:
Galatians 5:13 For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another. 14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.
. That is the summation of the Torah my friend.

It is nice that you own up to the fact that what you write here on this forum are your own new discoveries but let us keep it as that your own discoveries. The gospel of grace are truths generations past have contended for and paid the ultimate price to upheld; we would appreciate that you go back and do some more learning to appreciate it, rather than come here advocating a gospel that is calling men back to Judaism - another gospel in its true definition. These are Paul's eternal word of vigilance to Christians against every form of Judaism, Oral tradition and laws of men:

Colosians 2:16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: 17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. 18 Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, 19 And not holding the Head, from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God. 20 Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances, 21 (Touch not; taste not; handle not; 22 Which all are to perish with the usingwink after the commandments and doctrines of men? 23 Which things have indeed a show of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.
All I am asking is a line by line rejoinder, like I did yours and if not then maybe you wait on your doctrine another ten years like most reasonable people do before running out of your study with Eureka!!! sort of doctrine that will put you in a mess. I have always wondered why Peter wrote what he wrote, but after reading J'85, I wonder no more:

2 Peter 3:15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
I am not the type that says things like this but in the light of this scripture, J'85, be very careful.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 (of 93 pages)