DrummaBoy's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DrummaBoy's Profile › DrummaBoy's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 (of 93 pages)
JesusisLord85: Allow me to post my message again in this thread, as you wrote a lot of dumb things, and I believe this will bring light to you and others: Ok lets look at Acts 15 because I keep getting questions on this, and some of your questions are on this:.... And I have written a rejoinder to what you wrote. A rejoinder you have no response for... Just in case you didn't see it, this is it: @JesusisLord85 JesusisLord85:My main reason for challenging this post too. JesusisLord85:Well, apparently, I do not subscribe to the four laws concept you just suggested at all. In fact I believe that the meeeting in Jerusalem should have ended with the no law concept that Paul in his epistles taught (Galatians 5:18b; 23b) but the three laws were a cop out to pacify those who were of the circumcision because, this meeting holding in Jerusalem, they were predominant and the like Demi argues, Apostle James and Peter themselves were not fully removed from the Judaistic thinking and thus the need to leave those four laws. Of the four, we see that Paul debunked the concept of offering to idols in 1 Cor 8 4 As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one. 5 For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,). So an idol is nothing and eating food dedicated to idols matter nothing but that is to one who has knowledge but he now gave the reason not to eat food dedicated to idol - for the sake of a weak brother and not because they are keeping the Torah: 9 But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumbling block to them that are weak. 10 For if any man see thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol's temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols;As for fornication, when you read that they said those people should keep themselves from fornication that must certainly include adultery bc the latter is the offshoot of the former in any culture and that the Law of Liberty teaches already. The issue of animals strangled and blood does not apply at all to gentiles the same way the offering to idols did not. I conclude this section by saying that Peter and James concurred with Paul and Barnabas in Spirit concerning the issue of circumcision and the law itself but to "please" those of the circumcision, they conceded "something" to them and thus we have the four laws allowed here. The question of a gradual impartation of the knowlegde of the Torah on gentiles is your own private interpretation of verse 21 and no other scripture in the bible lends credence to that position. JesusisLord85:One solid proof that James and the council never had a gradual impartation of Torah on gentile idea in mind comes from the Acts 21 scripture you quote often. Note the preceding verses, James is speaking and telling Paul the things he must do to pacify the Jews who had believed (and I had explained to you in another thread that this was Paul coming under the law to save those who were under the law and not a proof that he lived like a Jew following his conversion Galatians 2:14), he concluded his advice with this statement: 25 As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication.. What that can only mean is that what the gentiles are supposed to do we have made clear to them. There is nothing in that scripture that says they will learn more from the Torah or the synagogues. The reason we have the concept of the church in the house is that Christians following their conversion in First century Palestine were not know to continue going to Synagogues; rather they gathered in homes were they broke bread and shared fellowship, and scripture is replete with this: 1 Cor 11:17,18 JesusisLord85: JesusisLord85:Jesus did fulfill the law. And if he has fulfilled it what is left for us to do in it again? Why did Jesus fulfill the law? Because no man could. So He did and bequeathed the righteous requirement of the law to us, which is perfect righteousness, and we receive this by faith: Romans 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: 4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.The second point that must be raised here for you is to understand that every time Paul wrote his epistles, he put the mark of his apostolic authority on it. Why did he do this because God had soveriegnly decreed that with the coming of Jesus some truths were going to be revealed to the world that he would pass through the apostles and prophets: such that were not revealed in the time past; these truth were not in the Torah: Ephesians 3: 1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, 2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: 3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, 4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; 6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: 7 Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power. 8 Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; 9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: 10 To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God,This truth is called dispensational doctrines. Jesus in John 14: 26 had made it clear that the Spirit of truth will reveal more to the church following his advent. These truths were revealed to Paul and that is why he talked about it when he was contending the Judaizers in Galatians 1:11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. 12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ. And Paul placed his apostolic seal on it and said anyone who teaches contrary to this truth is accursed. The truth we talking about is that the cross of Jesus has abolished the dividing wall between Gentiles and Jews: there is neither Jew nor greek... and the cheif means of division, the Torah and it laws were no longer applicable. The laws has fulfilled it mission: to lead us to Christ. What is left is for men to learn to be led by the Spirit. For if you are led by the Spirit you need not be under any law: Torah or Oral tradition or Church rules and regulation. TBC |
Goshen360: I sure will. But seriously, you write more than I do. I troway salute bro. And less I forget, LWKMD real hard @ Torah lo, tooro ni...Ahhh... Goshen 360 na you get writting ni O That expose on Hebrew 7 is still a masterpiece any day. Beeni O... Torah ko... Tooro ni... Lol!!! |
2. That even though we are saved by grace through faith, we are expected to keep the Mosaic laws as listed in the Torah or Old Testament, after our salvation, as this is how the early churches lived following their salvation.Right from the days of Jesus we see our Lord ministering in the temple/synagogues. A careful study of these ministration saw that he ministered to the multitudes there. Jesus also ensured a time of fellowship with the twelve in homes, in the Garden, on the boat, anywhere he could find solitude to teach them. Finally we see Jesus pick a three, Peter, James and John to be with him alone. After Christ's ascension, the apostles maintained this too. We see them ministering in the synagogues to reach the multitude and we see them ministering in homes privately as they broke bread. Paul really did not change this style. But by the time of Paul we saw that the phenomenum of a church in the house was beginning to emerge. By the time Paul was writing his letters, these churches had grown to be churches in cities but which where mostly in people's houses. There are no records of cathedrals in those days. So it is safe to say that in the bid to reach out or evangelize the early churches went to the synagogues to minister. Eg: Acts 13:4 So they, being sent forth by the Holy Ghost, departed unto Seleucia; and from thence they sailed to Cyprus. 5 And when they were at Salamis, they preached the word of God in the synagogues of the Jews: and they had also John to their minister...14 But when they departed from Perga, they came to Antioch in Pisidia, and went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and sat down. 15 And after the reading of the law and the prophets the rulers of the synagogue sent unto them, saying, Ye men and brethren, if ye have any word of exhortation for the people, say on. 16 Then Paul stood up, and beckoning with his hand said, Men of Israel, and ye that fear God, give audience.I cannot find anywhere in acts or anywhere in scriptures, in connection to Acts 15:21, where Christians, converted, went to the synagougues, to learn the Torah. I would be happy if anyone can provide such an occasion and show us specifically that they were there to learn the Torah with the aim of keeping the law of Moses. Thus my safest conclusion is that the synagougue was a place for evangelizing and it is recorded somewhere in Acts that Paul got tired of the persecution of the Jews and stopped going to these synagogues to evangelize but went to the gentiles. The central theme of Galatians, like I have mentioned before, was that the law was obsolete and Christians, need not keep it: 2:19 For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. 20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain. 3:8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. 9 So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham. 10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. 11 But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith. 12 And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. 13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: 14 That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. 4:4 But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, 5 To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. 4:21 Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?...30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. 31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free. 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. 2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3 For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.ati be be lo... These scriptures are self explanatory. And it is the height of deception for anyone to say that the bondage Paul was referring to here was bondage to oral tradition. Paul has shown in the latter chapter four verse above that the law could be likened to Hagar... the bondwoman; how for God sake, would anyone interpret this as oral tradition? Remember Goshen's definition, law in the NT is all encompassing of everything rules and regulations. Galatians is saying we are saved by faith and the subsequent life we live in Christ is gonna be by faith (2:21; 3:1). I do not know why faith is so offensive too some. It seeem too simple but that is it, we need add nothing to our salvation save to walk in faith... a faith that works by love. And Paul in this same epistle had made it clear that this law is fulfilled in the same royal law Jesus spoke about: LOVE 5:13 For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another. 14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.This is the same faith James spoke about when he said our faith should produce works: using scripture to interpret scripture, that works must be faith working by love. The big challenge with men of all times is that people love to hear something new. The doctrine of grace I am speaking about here is an old doctrine - it is orthodox; right from the apostles days, re-enacted by the Reformers, taught by orthodox churches but lost to the Pentecostal confusion going on all around us. J'85 and his clique will have us learn something new; but they need be told the old is better. I would be taking a break now to return in a few hours. It should give these Judaizers ample time to respond to the points already made before I continue with the remaining three and if reading long epistles will make their brain numb, they are permitted to make do with their insults. TBC |
Goshen360: @ D'Boy,Thanks my broda Your absence is being felt in this place and nature abhors vacuum; pls find time off work and help out here O. Before NL religious section becomes Judaism. |
1. The traditional/orthodox view of Galatians as a letter of rebuke from Paul to the Galatians churches who were becoming influenced by the Jewish religion (Judaism, as interpreted by the NIV bible) is wrong. Rather Paul was rebuking these people for subjecting themselves to the oral traditions - the same traditions Jesus rebuked the Pharisees forMost commentaries on the Galatians agree that Paul the apostle was a very unhappy man when he wrote this letter. In fact this is one letter he wrote himself and did not dictate (Gal 6:11 Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with mine own hand), so we may appreciate the urgency. In this letter Paul passion is seen like no other: He lays down the strongest cursse ever in this letter (1:8,9); He rebukes the foremost apostle Peter (2:11); He calls the Galatians foolish (3:1); He commands his detractors to be emasculated (5:12) and many other passionate acts of the apostle contrary to what many would have called walking in love today. But apparently anything that will tamper with sound doctrine and the foundation of men's faith should not be taken lightly. Martin Luther, the great 16th Century reformer, loved this letter so much he called it his Katrine Von Bora, the name of his wife. So while this letter was doctrinal, it was passionately correctional with rebuke at its foundation. Paul had evangelized the region of Galatia and churches had been planted and in keeping with his tradition, he taught them in the way of grace, left a pastorate behind and proceeded to other mission work. Then those of the circumcision invaded these churches and taught the people that there salvation was incomplete except they kept the laws of the Torah: it was a two fold error - 1. To be saved you had to be circumcised. 2. To keep your salvation, you had to keep the laws of the Torah. 1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 2:3 But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised: 4 And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage: 5 To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue with you. 2:11 But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed. 12 For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision. 13 And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation. 3:1 O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you 4:17 They zealously affect you, but not well; yea, they would exclude you, that ye might affect them. 18 But it is good to be zealously affected always in a good thing, and not only when I am present with you.There is nowhere in all of the above quotes or anywhere in the letter were the phrase Oral tradition is mentioned. All we see Paul emphasize is law, law and law and like Goshen 360 has emphasized on this forum when the NT uses the word law it encompasses everything in the Torah that panders to rules and regulations. Including the Civil, Ceremonial, and Moral laws (in the words of Bidam) or God's law (in the words of Alwaystrue) or Oral tradition, Torah and other ordinances (in the words of J'85). Everything was law and every one of these was what Paul was calling the Galatians not to subject themselves too. The proof of these is the fact that Paul had to endure an offence all through his ministry. I think (my private interpretation here) this is the torn in the flesh he had: he had to endure the offence that will surely come to him as he had only himself, the oral words of Jesus and his personal revelation to contend against the almighty Torah that was read in the synagogues every Sabbath. What makes him most remarkable is the fact that he stood his grounds, so that today we can have the scriptures. If Paul had capitulated to these Judaizers, we would not have the scriptures today and in honor to him God ensured that 2/3 of the NT was written by him. A man who had the audacity to reject the central theme of the Torah: the law, particularly circumcision. God will sovereignly prove this Apostle right when in 70AD the Roman army invaded Jerusalem, fulfilling Jesus prophecy in MAtthew 24, and destroyed it. Everything they could glory in as tradition or religion was destroyed. They rejected the messiah, they rejected his doctrine and very well, he rejected them. Not until 1948 will Israel constitute a nation again. But by that time most of all they could glory in had vanished away. The church of Jesus waxed stronger but Judaism weaker. It is therefore heart rending to find black Nigerian gentiles claiming themselves Jews and calling Christians to keep the Torah. Torah ko, toroo ni... TBC |
It is important that before any sound rebuttal is offered to the content of this thread that we make the position of the OP, J'85, clear as we understand it. J'85 will have us believe that: 1. The traditional/orthodox view of Galatians as a letter of rebuke from Paul to the Galatians churches who were becoming influenced by the Jewish religion (Judaism, as interpreted by the NIV bible) is wrong. Rather Paul was rebuking these people for subjecting themselves to the oral traditions - the same traditions Jesus rebuked the Pharisees for. 2. That even though we are saved by grace through faith, we are expected to keep the Mosaic laws as listed in the Torah or Old Testament, after our salvation, as this is how the early churches lived following their salvation. 3. That Paul and the other apostles of Jesus lived like Jews after their conversion and subsequently taught this to the gentile churches, albeit bit by bit, according to Acts 15:21, in the synagogues every Sabbath. 4. That the Torah was the scripture of Paul's day and that Paul and the other apostles had no new revelation that could be called scripture or final authority on doctrine and practice for the churches in first century Palestine. 5. That Paul writings cannot be taken as final authority for today's church rather our final authority must be taken from the Old Testament. And if at all we would consider Paul's letters, they must be seen in the light of Jesus' teachings. These are the premises upon which my rebuttal shall be based. I will be glad, however, if I left out or added anything, the OP help me out with correction. But being someone who is difficult to instruct , I would pume the above as his position and proceed. |
Hello shdemidemi I have looked fwd to this thread for so long. I think I have an idea of what some disparage as a two gospel really is. This is ur opportunity to state ur position and do it strongly and lucidly Let's not what for Bidam. He has given what he has: a man cannot give what he doesnt have. So let's have ur position on it or we may wait forever. |
shdemidemi: @drummaboyThank U Demi By the time we are through with these vain talkers they would learn never to blasphem again. U are the one we must commend for single handedly shutting them up this long |
Ephesians 2:14-16 : For he himself is our peace, who has made the two one and has destroyed the barrier, the diving wall of hostility, by ABOLISHING IN HIS FLESH THE LAW WITH ITS COMMANDMENTS AND REGULATIONS. His purpose was to create in himself, one new man out of the two, thus making peace, and in this one body, to reconcile both of them to God through the cross, by which he put to death their hostility. Why Did Jesus Die: 1. To make gentiles and Jews one before God. To bring an end to hostilities btw them. What is the Cause of these Hostilities: 2. The law, with its commandment and regulations, ie, Torah, oral laws, and ordinances. What happened to these laws: 3. They were abolished in his flesh via the cross. And what Happened Next: 4. The two, gentiles and Jews, are now reconciled to God. That is the reason Jesus died. That is the gospel. IF ANYONE TEACHES ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY MAY HE BE FOREVER CURSED. I will supply d answers to my questions when power is restored here. |
It for the sake of these "others with open mind" that I have to counter the rubbish you are posting here before the simple is deceived. Let me assume that the post above is a cunning way of saying "I have not answers to your questions" |
JesusisLord85: lol. Can you imagine. So the evidence I use, he now says the APOSTLES of God were "copping out".I did mention that and many other point that you are yet respond to. While you are at it, also tell us what laws in the Torah do you keep as a down right black gentile Nigerian. And if it happens you are not keeping all the 613 laws in the Torah will you tell us why in the light of these scriptures: Galatians 3:10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them James 2:8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well: 9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. 10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.If you want us to keep the laws in the Torah, tell us how we shall keep every one of the 613 of them because that is what the apostle of the lamb wrote above. |
JesusisLord85:If U can supply expose on each of those scriptures I enumerated, even quoting the Torah and OT, to defend this Judaism position of yours then U have an argument. If not keep these doctrines to yourself. |
JesusisLord85:But the sabbath was in the Torah and Jesus made it clear that the man was not made for the law but the law for man. He was giving a glimpse into that time in the church age when Christians will no longer be governed by either Torah or the tradition of men. JesusisLord85:No sir. Legalism is the keeping of laws with the aim of one achieving right standing with God. The gospel you are advocating here is a legalistic gospel. The torah was God's word to the Jewish nation; the bible, with the complete and revealed will of God as revealed through the apostles, is the complete word of God to us today. All we need to know about the Torah is seen clearly in the old testament. No Christian is called to follow the Torah today. JesusisLord85:That is private interpretation of Scripture. That chapter never mentioned pharisaic tradition of judaism. Rather it talked about people who were approaching the Gentiles and asking them to add to their faith in Christ circumcision, an ordinance from the Torah, not tradition of men. The Apostles contended with them that faith in Jesus was sufficient and that is the main point of my contention with you; faith in Jesus is sufficient! JesusisLord85:This point is not necessary to your discuss at all. JesusisLord85:Private interpretation again: That passage meant what he said. Peter was saying the keeping of the Torah put a yoke on them that they had not been able to keep. Jesus had told us that his yoke is easy. Paul then made it clear that we should stand in the liberty which Christ has made us free and not be entangled in the yoke of bondage. The torah and the laws in it were bondage; but the Spirit gives life and liberty! Galatians 3:19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator. 20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one. 21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. 22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. 24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. 26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.The Torah is for slaves and Children; but those in Christ are sons that are to be led by the Spirit. JesusisLord85:I await your continuation but it may do you some good to look up my rejoinder here first. Jesus is Lord and all glory be to his name but he has permitted some mystery truths to be revealed to the church mostly and primarily through Paul and that is why those who propagate a gospel of grace quote Paul a great deal. But no matter what Paul wrote, he never contradicted Jesus rather, he complemented him. These commandments that you keep on and on about where simply the same commandments Paul had shown us that we should keep as we follow the Spirit: Galatians 5:13 For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another. 14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.. That is the summation of the Torah my friend. It is nice that you own up to the fact that what you write here on this forum are your own new discoveries but let us keep it as that your own discoveries. The gospel of grace are truths generations past have contended for and paid the ultimate price to upheld; we would appreciate that you go back and do some more learning to appreciate it, rather than come here advocating a gospel that is calling men back to Judaism - another gospel in its true definition. These are Paul's eternal word of vigilance to Christians against every form of Judaism, Oral tradition and laws of men: Colosians 2:16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: 17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. 18 Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, 19 And not holding the Head, from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God. 20 Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances, 21 (Touch not; taste not; handle not; 22 Which all are to perish with the using |
@JesusisLord85 JesusisLord85:My main reason for challenging this post too. JesusisLord85:Well, apparently, I do not subscribe to the four laws concept you just suggested at all. In fact I believe that the meeeting in Jerusalem should have ended with the no law concept that Paul in his epistles taught (Galatians 5:18b; 23b) but the three laws were a cop out to pacify those who were of the circumcision because, this meeting holding in Jerusalem, they were predominant and the like Demi argues, Apostle James and Peter themselves were not fully removed from the Judaistic thinking and thus the need to leave those four laws. Of the four, we see that Paul debunked the concept of offering to idols in 1 Cor 8 4 As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one. 5 For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,). So an idol is nothing and eating food dedicated to idols matter nothing but that is to one who has knowledge but he now gave the reason not to eat food dedicated to idol - for the sake of a weak brother and not because they are keeping the Torah: 9 But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumbling block to them that are weak. 10 For if any man see thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol's temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols;As for fornication, when you read that they said those people should keep themselves from fornication that must certainly include adultery bc the latter is the offshoot of the former in any culture and that the Law of Liberty teaches already. The issue of animals strangled and blood does not apply at all to gentiles the same way the offering to idols did not. I conclude this section by saying that Peter and James concurred with Paul and Barnabas in Spirit concerning the issue of circumcision and the law itself but to "please" those of the circumcision, they conceded "something" to them and thus we have the four laws allowed here. The question of a gradual impartation of the knowlegde of the Torah on gentiles is your own private interpretation of verse 21 and no other scripture in the bible lends credence to that position. JesusisLord85:One solid proof that James and the council never had a gradual impartation of Torah on gentile idea in mind comes from the Acts 21 scripture you quote often. Note the preceding verses, James is speaking and telling Paul the things he must do to pacify the Jews who had believed (and I had explained to you in another thread that this was Paul coming under the law to save those who were under the law and not a proof that he lived like a Jew following his conversion Galatians 2:14), he concluded his advice with this statement: 25 As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication.. What that can only mean is that what the gentiles are supposed to do we have made clear to them. There is nothing in that scripture that says they will learn more from the Torah or the synagogues. The reason we have the concept of the church in the house is that Christians following their conversion in First century Palestine were not know to continue going to Synagogues; rather they gathered in homes were they broke bread and shared fellowship, and scripture is replete with this: 1 Cor 11:17,18 JesusisLord85: JesusisLord85:Jesus did fulfill the law. And if he has fulfilled it what is left for us to do in it again? Why did Jesus fulfill the law? Because no man could. So He did and bequeathed the righteous requirement of the law to us, which is perfect righteousness, and we receive this by faith: Romans 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: 4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.The second point that must be raised here for you is to understand that every time Paul wrote his epistles, he put the mark of his apostolic authority on it. Why did he do this because God had soveriegnly decreed that with the coming of Jesus some truths were going to be revealed to the world that he would pass through the apostles and prophets: such that were not revealed in the time past; these truth were not in the Torah: Ephesians 3: 1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, 2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: 3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, 4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; 6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: 7 Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power. 8 Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; 9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: 10 To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God,This truth is called dispensational doctrines. Jesus in John 14: 26 had made it clear that the Spirit of truth will reveal more to the church following his advent. These truths were revealed to Paul and that is why he talked about it when he was contending the Judaizers in Galatians 1:11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. 12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ. And Paul placed his apostolic seal on it and said anyone who teaches contrary to this truth is accursed. The truth we talking about is that the cross of Jesus has abolished the dividing wall between Gentiles and Jews: there is neither Jew nor greek... and the cheif means of division, the Torah and it laws were no longer applicable. The laws has fulfilled it mission: to lead us to Christ. What is left is for men to learn to be led by the Spirit. For if you are led by the Spirit you need not be under any law: Torah or Oral tradition or Church rules and regulation. TBC |
Mr Jesusislord85 I request that you refer to your thread on Galatians, I have a question there for you. Thanks. |
JesusisLord85: The problem they have is they misinterpret Paul in the first place. Paul was not against the law. Acts 21:20-24 proves that, as many of his writings, it is just they view it through the prism of a gentile. Romans 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law Romans 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. 4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. Romans 10:1 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. 2 For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge. 3 For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. 4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth. Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work. 1 Cor 3:6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. 7 But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away: 8 How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious? 9 For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory. 10 For even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory that excelleth. 11 For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious Galatians1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed Galatians 2:17 But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid. Galatians 2:20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain. Galatians 3:1 O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh? Galatians 3:10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them Galatians 5:1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. 2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. 3 For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. 4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. Galatians 5:18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law...22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, 23 Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. Ephesians 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, lest any man should boast. Ephesians 3:1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, 2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: 3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, 4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; Hebrew 7:11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? 12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law. Hebrew 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people: 11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest. 12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more. 13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.I am calling on Jesusislord85 to make out time and run a commentary on all the scriptures above to lend credence to his supposed position that 1. Paul did not preach that the law of Moses was no longer to be obeyed by the gentiles like you and me. 2. That the only scripture they had in those days was the OT; even though that is true, how then do we reconcile the ephesians3 quote above that says God revealed mysteries to the apostles that is in keeping with a new dispensation. 3. And any other position he has taken to prove that Christians are to follow the jewish Torah after salvation. You have the liberty to copy and paste any discuss you have made already on any of the scriptures above, in case you have done so in some other place on this thread and somewhere else. Thank you. |
Tgirl4real: This thread is so so interesting. I'm following.I retract my former comment here... Pls all you should refer to the next post. |
Tgirl4real: Awww... Sorry dear Sir.No problem. Take your time! |
My sister, Tgirl, I mind O... in fact I mind well, well but I think I get your drift. When U are through with these guys I will come and finish up my discuss. |
[quote author=JesusisLord85]That is rich, coming from the one who probably hurls the biggest insults on here. Did someone not sanction you for this yesterday?[/quote]The award for biggest insult will go to your comrade in Judaism and not me; I do not go beyond scriptures to 'describe' your type. And as for Bidam and Alwaystrue, whom you claim 'sanctioned' me yesterday; it simple: I didn't reply the former bc I have told him in another thread I am done with him on this forum. As for the latter: one could tell that emotions were already rising and to reply her will lead to such exchanges that will not edify. Of all of U, she alone says what is closest to sense but even at that she has a great deal to learn. I cannot be sanctioned my friend here; I am free as a bird. Except I sanction myself: which I will do now. Like Demi before now, this post marks my last post on this thread. Enjoy your judaistic Christianity. |
Tgirl4real: I just went through the last 2 pages...Exactly!!! After viewing comments following my last post, to say anything more will be akin to throwing pearls to dogs. |
Tgirl4real: I just went through the last 2 pages...Exactly!!! After viewing comments following my post, to say any more will be akin to throwing pearls to dogs. |
MostHigh's Resume * Nairaland chief Judaizer *Black Jew *Keeps the Sabbath *Favorite words: lawlessness, Child of the little horn. *Incoherent Jesusislord85's Resume *Jewish proselyte *In his mid twenties: Young and has a lot to learn though unteachable *Self confessed judaizer *Only Judaizers that doesn't pay tithe on nairaland *Brain goes numb reading long post that should do him some good *Central scripture: Acts 15. Though he knows nothing of the conclusion reached there. * Yet to study Romans but is so sure of Paul's position on the law Most pitiable... smh I am done for tonight. We'll try again tomorrow |
JesusisLord85: haha if obeying the commandments makes me a 'Judaizer', then God bless you for recognising this.How do these commandment equate the Mosaic laws Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. 2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. 3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: 4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.These are the things the law of sin and death could not do but which the Law of Spirit of Life alone can do: 1. There is no condemnation for those who follow the law of Spirit of Life 2. The Law of Spirit of Life has made me free from the law of sin and death, the ministration of death 3. This law of sin and death could not fulfill the righteous requirement of God in men; Christ fulfilled this requirements and we receive them by faith. Outside of all these there is no law to keep: anyone who follows such laws are JUDAIZERS The commandments you listed above are of the law of Spirit of Life! |
@Alwaystrue : @Drummaboy, so is all this calling my username is because I refused to visit your thread.No. You said you will not visit and it was OK with me. Why should I quote you because of that... again, this is a public forum and the minute you register a name and comment, you open yourself up to a response... whatever that response might be. That is why in the thread Alex opened I said that this forum requires a level of maturity. Whatever name you chose to call anyone does not add or remove anything from them, not even a hair so if your opinion makes you happy by all means be happy.The word JUDAIZER according to MostHigh is a slur word and I meant it so; because that is the only way of putting it straight to folks like you the kind of doctrine you advocate. I showed on my own thread somewhere Paul called those of the circumcision dogs (Phillipians 3); another place he said they should cut of their d..cks if he they continue to insist on circumcision. Now, if MostHigh own up to being a Judaizer and non of you have for once proven him wrong, what does that make you? Are you not a Judaizer yourself? Whatever you do not understand but claim absolute knowledge on shows more learning is required.How much of this advice have you applied to yourself? I have never claimed absolute knowledge of anything on this forum; I came here myself seeking the light on tithing and non of you could prove to me why I should continue tithing and so I stopped. How does this offend you? The word is a two-esged sword. You do not know it all. Cheers.e word of GodI do not know what you mean by the above but I believe I have made myself clear. |
JesusisLord85: Lol so you now quote indirectly from the law. Shame it does not apply here.So because we teach that Christians should not follow the Mosaic laws, you think we have deleted the whole of the OT from our bibles. Sorry, it is not so... If you check through the OT, except for very few times and in the times of Moses, you would realize that the law was not the central point of the Jewish religion... it was Jehovah God and what he demanded from his people. And there are places even in OT were God denounced the people's superficial use of the law; stating that he does not want burnt offering but obedeience, etc... We see Jesus repeat the same in the gospels. God demands the Spirit of the law from us and this is found in the Law of Spirit and Life. Alwaystrue may pride herself in the fact that this is what she has been arguing for all this time but as long as we have such Christians making issues out of tithing, sabbath, circumcision and their likes, they are still bound to Moses... They are what they hate being called: JUDAIZERS |
^^^ I pasted my quote 2 minutes before Demi did and we both offered the same answer to the questions raised by MostHigh, without seeing each other's post. Is this "by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter is confirmed"; is the spirit one? |
MostHigh: 22 What shall we do? They will certainly hear that you have come, 23 so do what we tell you. There are four men with us who have made a vow. 24 Take these men, join in their purification rites and pay their expenses, so that they can have their heads shaved. Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the lawThis was my response to this over quoted verse of yours in the thread you opened arguing that Paul was a Juadiazer like you. Hopefully you should be able to respond to it better now; as you are beginning to learn to be patient as Tgirl advised you to in the other thread. Now, MostHigh quotes a passage in Acts were it was said that Paul went to offer a vow at the instance of James and the other apostles.Acts 21:17 And when we were come to Jerusalem, the brethren received us gladly. 18 And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present. 19 And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly [b]what things God had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry. 20 And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law: 21 And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs. 22 What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come. 23 Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them; 24 Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. 25 As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication. 26 Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them. |
flourishG: yes,if the Spirit had led da brother.against such there's no law.He is the son of God.but we will not leave dem our judaizer brothers alone until christ be FORMED in them.My position, also. 1,0000,000 likes |
christemmbassey:Thank U Bro Bassey Discussing some truths with these guys seem to me sometimes like one is throwing pearls to dogs. But my sincere hope is that some others can read and learn. In the days to come when the anti Christ shall manifest fully he will be using the prosperity doctrine primarily to entice people to his kingdom. In those days these prosperity children will simply follow him en masse. Because he and his prophets will deceive with money and signs and wonders. The biggest tragedy of the property gospel is that it is preparing the church to receive the antichrist and not Jesus Christ. |
vickyO: this bernimoore dey gimme joy........Same here. The guy dey try with his leash on OLAADEGBU. Unfortunately the most "holy" Ola has not convinced us that the OP is wrong. Is it a sin to own up to mistake and simply say "I copied and pasted a wrong picture"? I am sure that part of restitution is also taught at the Deeper Life Church. One other thing that needs genuine restitution is Pastor W F Kumuyi coming out to the whole world and telling us that he failed in his parental duties. He succeeded in binding other people's children but failed in doing the same to his own. this restitution should be complete with resignation. |
alexleo: [/b]Ok bross. I think I get your drift. With FluorishG and others taking the apology maybe it was Spirit led after all. I apologies for calling this hypocrite. Cheers. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 (of 93 pages)

after the commandments and doctrines of men? 23 Which things have indeed a show of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.
?