ichidodo: [color=#1980BC] Tis better to overkill it than to undercook it....So it is good..[/color]
Boss, i picked interest in coding due to your exchanges, and I downloaded the Mosh course from YouTube. Is it ok for me to start from Python? In all, what's your advise for me as a beginner.
Anyone that is objective should watch this and tell me how Lampard's statements was wrong. Watch from 5:40s and 22:36s. Take note of the questions asked o, before una continue to dey form unnecessary outrage. Chelsea fans just dey para unnecessarily
swiz123: Lampard just threw Roman under the bus. Where are those defending him for not congratulating Chelsea after winning the UCL. This dude is very vindictive.
This is you falling for headlines. Secondly, you don't expect Lampard to say "oh, I love that guy" the press will crucify him.
The full statement, then you can make your mind on what it is.
With Abramovich under the microscope and facing huge criticism over his close relationship with Putin as his time in charge of Chelsea ends on a sour note, Lampard - now Everton boss - was asked for his thoughts on the Russian, but decided to keep his thoughts brief.
He said: 'I can probably count on one hand how many times I've seen him in the last many years.
'I worked for Chelsea, which was an absolute pleasure for 13 years. And that's where I want to leave that one.'
When asked about the situation at Stamford Bridge in general, Lampard admitted he “cares a lot” given his deep-rooted links with his former club.
He added: “It’s a difficult moment for the club. Everton is my priority and we have to test things, but of course on a human level, people who are just doing their jobs and when their jobs are in danger, you care a lot.
“We watch the news every day and understanding what’s happening in the world has a greater perspective than ever before. So maybe an existing contract position or a free transfer is not the main thing. Maybe that’s what’s going on in the world.’
Kloppo: Once their is instability or war in a particular country ,the first country the citizens think of going to as refugees is US and THE WEST....reason I think it is moral for them to interfer just like France do for francophone countries....
There are countries ruled by monarchy (either absolute or constitutional),long serving presidents,dictators and have oil like Saudi but they are not problematic to the world or trying to invade other countries...they are on their own jeje but that is what you call iNTEREST....
Pls what are this INTERESTS,I am curious to know
Like i said, using morality as an excuse is stupid. The lives they are destroying in process deserve it? Another question, the countries that your so called moral pariah has intervened in, how many of them are in peace today? Aren't they all war torned countries? Afghanistan after many years, billions wasted and lives lost, did US achieve anything of moral note there? Or did they successfully get rid of the instability and war? The countries that were having their own systems of leadership without trying to invade other countries were their sovereignty respected? You are asking me Jamb questions about what interests is. Mtchewww. NB. I am not a country pursuing it's interests, but when a person who is not sharing in the interests goes about justifying that country's interest pursuit and calling it a moral enforcer, then there is need to call out blatant ignorance and/or stupidity.
Kloppo: Is it about Americans wanting countries like Iraq and Venezuela's oil or about "regime change" or tyrant in power...
because Mexico,Canada,Nigeria,Algeria and Angola all have oil too but they never invaded us....
This are a list of countries with high oil exports and production but "the America wants oil and will invade them" agenda is not happening cos they have a stable govt
Who is this one? Wetin concern US with another country politics? Abi sovereignty no matter again? Giving moral grounds as excuse for US to destroy a country is stupid. Saudi that is still under Monarchy are in bed with US, so your point is moot. Better wake up, it's about interests, Nigeria is still serving their interests, so no need to sabotage Nigeria. The difference between the first set and second set of countries you mentioned is their willingness to serve a stronger nation's interest.
Tuchel was forced to praise Mason Mount. The press put knife to his throat to praise their fellow English compatriot, that one is not reliable, trust only Tuchel’s praise of Havertz and dismiss his praise of Mount, that's the right thing to do.
I have never given up on any other DC series as quickly as I did Titans
It's hard to watch honestly. Na just sentimental Fandom dey keep the viewership high, cause no improvements. Even Star girl that's CW series have been doing better.
EPL will have to cut 4 teams from the league and drop to a 16 man league to accommodate this nonsense
It's not only issue of schedule, how do they tally a team playing only 10 teams and a single league table. That's the real issue for me, they haven't even said anything about how they intend selecting the 10 teams that each team will play.
Havertz10: This confusion, nothing happened to American capitalism, it's operating as should, these issues are mostly a result of its efficiency, if anything they have misused it they could have been the greatest country on earth on every metric, they had all the advantages but human beings, greed and lack of broad thinking will always destroy things
Life under capitalism is structured like this
There is worker L and owner of money M
How M gets his money can be via inheritance or hard work, or M can be government
M has money and with money you can make more money, so he gives L a share of his profits for L to do certain things to enable M get more money with his money, M has the desire to make as much money as possible, becsuse of that he is encouraged to take advantage of L, meanwhile deluded L wants to make enough to become M someday
That's the root of the whole issue and because of the way the world is aka capitalism, L will have to work in multiples harder than M to even make a living, those that go on to have wealth had to be financially literate enough to chart their path and that's if they are even opportuned to get good paying jobs, the effort needed to go from M1 to M100 is less than the effort needed to go from L1 to L10
it's a brutal battle that we fight among ourselves each day over mostly vainly things, meanwhile those at the bottom suffer, instead of understanding them, you assume that they are lazy because you don't understand the magnitude of work they have to do to climb social mobility ladder
See some brick layers or cleaners, I just wonder how much pain they pass through doing those demeaning jobs for small pay that wouldn't even improve their life beyond basic survival
But the holders of M wouldn't increase their earnings because plenty L's are looking for a means to survive, so they take advantage
Because government is essentially M, holders of large quantities of M will always have their desires prioritized above all else, the desires of L will always be impeded
I wish I was sharing a fictional tale
On point analogy. But like i said previously, everyone is aware of these challenges, the issue has always been proposing a better system. Even if such system existed, first there will be the issue of implementation (on paper analysis is different from real life), then there will be issue of capitalist elites not wanting it to succeed. Life has never been fair to all, and perhaps, it never will.
GloriousGbola: In my opinion once America won the cold War, they no longer had to present capitalism as a viable alternative to communism, and things went downhill from there. American capitalism wasn't always like this.
Any system that has to do with humans get worse over time definitely. Ideologies are easily mapped on paper, but when it come to implementation, it brings a whole new level of difficulty, worst of all, people will always find loopholes to take advantage of, the difference between capitalism in America then and now is time. Talking of loopholes, in a capitalist economy, will the government watch a corporation that employs say 50,000 people fold up, knowing the implications on the location the corporation is cited? Government have been ensuring the survival of and bailing out corporations for the same reason. Although this idea is not true to capitalist ideologies.
Amoto94: Your understanding of capitalism is flawed I will advise you to read Mazucatto's The Value of Everything to understand how capitalism as practised presently doesn't reward workers and the general public in a fair and just manner
That's because Capitalism itself is flawed. Everyone knows this, but suggesting a better system is what is difficult to do.
Kloppo: If "Commiserate to how he works" is Productivity, skillset and value the worker brings to the company then the company has no fault...
Capitalism allows for the most productive workers to reap the rewards for being MORE PRODUCTIVE.....Reason why Origi and Mo Salah cannot collect the same salary..
Capitalism motivates its workers better than any other economic system because it allows for INEQUALITY.
And every man works his socks off to become better than others not become their equals.
Forget equality of outcome, equality of opportunities is the only thing that can be strived for (albeit difficult itself), because once one beats the odds and gets a better outcome compared to others, you can't expect his generation to face the same odds. Which means they don't face the same opportunities as others.
Mtchewww, nonsense and ingredients. He said fairly clean billionaire I hope he stops supporting Chelsea when the new owner is not as clean as he idealistically expects
On this paying for sex. There's something i want to chip in. We have MEAT, money, energy, Attention, Time. The truth is we pay for sex one way or the other. If you think you shouldn't pay money for sex - which saves you time and attention. Then you should also put a cap on how much of you attention, energy and time you pay for sex. As we keep discussing, let's not only limit payment to money.
I understand the cry about racism happening in Ukrainian borders. But I have no issue with Ukrainians being evacuated first, i mean it's how the world works, the moral thing to do is evacuate everyone in no order or class, but it is war and war is the wrong place to find morality. If my house is on fire, i am evacuating my family members first.
donjazet: UNNECESSARILY?? UNNECESSARILY YOU SAY?? Innocent people are literally dying because this criminal has enabled and is in cahoots with a autocratic authoritarian tyrant. I'm "crying" as you've said because I can't believe I let myself be one of those deceived and brainwashed into celebrating and enabling a criminal murderer. Now the chicken has come home to roost. The world is now reaping the seeds sown by the likes of Abrahmovic.
The least which we who have also celebrated a criminal can do is join voices in also condemning him strongly. To do that we must first snap out of our delusions of seeing him like a savior and see him for the criminal he is.
Watch live videos of how government officials are ordering MEN to line up to go and fight the war.
"Say goodbye to your daughters, mothers, and girlfriends; you must turn back and fight the Russian invader!”
The wicked command given to Ukrainian male folks. Remember women were fleeing and wives were freely Crossing the borders into Porland.
Where are the feminists in Ukrain and around the world to seek equality in this most dangerous situation? A situation of life and death yet the male is given away to be slaughtered while the females freely gets safe haven.
MEN no one truly love you in this world!
Are men who are trying to escape cowards? Or not masculine enough?
Calibrator: You are not obligated to defend the sovereignty of your fatherland? So if someone shows up tomorrow at your ancestral home, you will willingly sign over the ownership of the land to him?
Cowards and empty barrels abound! And you lots are always quick to point to the great men of times past as true patriarchs when you can't even meet up to the barest minimum of what patriarchy entails.
Redpill dictates that men embrace masculinity and female act their part by staying feminine. What is masculine about cowardice?
Continue focusing on only sex and don't broaden your understanding of what masculinity is really is.
Even if the opening theme of the thread was about getting sex or whatever, anybody who has ever seen the four walls of a learning institution knows that the introductory lessons of every course are the easiest to grasp so as to lay ground work for the more difficult lessons to come.
Nonsense!
That's your business. You can fight if you want. I will choose my battles wisely.
ubunja: I would be dumb to listen to any government mandate that puts my life at risk. The same reason I will never take that covid jab. Who would want to remain in a war zone? I swear these politicians are full of shiit
I woukd have left before the conflict even escalates Yes, i know they have to fight for their sovereignty, but i am not obligated to join in the fight. I will choose my battles wisely.
Meanwhile, “It is forbidden for men aged 18-60, Ukraine citizens, to leave the borders of Ukraine,” according to the State Border Guard Service. “This regulation will remain in effect for the period of the legal regime of martial law. We ask the citizens to take this information into consider.” - Ukraine president.
The word "Alpha" in general is contextual. Alphaness have different interpretations in different spheres of life and hardly does a man fit into alpha categorization in every area of life. A teacher is most likely Alpha to his students. A boss at work Alpha to his subordinates. A man can be Alpha in areas where his abilities allows hin to dominate and beta in where his abilities fall short. You can be Alpha in a room of intellectuals and be beta 3 minutes later in a gym. You can be Alpha to one woman and beta to another woman, context is everything. When we talk of Alpha, the context must first be defined. A man who is alpha at work but beta at home, do you call him an Alpha or Beta? So it all boils down to your interpretation of what Alpha means, but the redpill doesn't call the richest guy Alpha "Alpha Fvcks, Beta Bvcks", if you don't turn your wife on, but you are there solely for financial umbrella, sorry, you're beta in a redpill sense. That's never to say a man shouldn't strive for success, since you can be both rich and Alpha.
Most of our players are just unnecessary hype, after weeks of silence, a player scores a goal or has the odd good performance and his camp will start making noise only to go silent in a few weeks time. are you guys not tired of this cycle of mediocrity?
Last season: 36app 6goals,5assists This season: 27app 7goals, 6assists
Last season: 23app 2goals, 3assists This season: 14app 4goals, 2assists
Last season: 35app 6goals 8assists This season: 11app 1goal 1assist
Last season: 23app 2goals,3assists This season: 15app 2goals, 1assist
Last season: 27app 4goals 2assists This season: 13app 3goals 0assists
Last season: 27app 4goals, 3assists This season: 17app 2goals, 1assists
17app 5goals 0assists 7 touches in 90mins
Look at the attackers we are parading, and yet it one hype after the other, one agenda after the other.