Emmynator's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Emmynator's Profile › Emmynator's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (of 42 pages)
In general, people from developed Western countries have more sex partners than people in developing countries; however, those in developing countries have higher STI rates. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/most-promiscuous-countries djon78 here's a research into the topic. |
djon78:Do you really think Africa indulge in sex more than the western world? Do you really really think that? You'd open your mouth and say Nigeria is more sexual than US? ![]() With too much comfort comes the urge to have sex for leisure, with hardship comes the urge to have sex as a release. The only difference is the child birth rate in poor communities will be higher. And why do you interpret "all roads lead to sex" to mean a man walking around all day with an erection thinking about sex, that's not how it works. |
Exonerate1:He has 64 currently. |
Oldoinyolengai:A guy deflower a girl trusts her because he met her a virgin, not knowing him deflowering her has given her license to fvck around while maintaining his trust. Redpill chapter 22 vs 10 There's no milage on that pussy. |
How sustainable is this? Seeing that the disparity in what revenue generated? Cone said the federation’s method of equalizing World Cup bonuses is yet to be determined. The federation has until now based bonuses on payments from Fifa, which earmarked $400m for the 2018 men’s tournament, including $38m to champion France, and $30m for the 2019 women’s tournament, including $4m to the winning US team. The USWNT have won four World Cups since the program’s start in 1985. The men have not reached the semi-final stage since 1930.
|
I just watched pennyworth season 2 again, adn i dont remember anyone talking about how The baby of Thomas and Martha was a girl. |
TheHulk616:Good to see you maturing, you were once a crybaby hulk, now you are doing hulk a lil bit of justice ![]() May our love for batman never die. ![]() |
Hotspotbro:Wait, wtf? Unbelievable. |
ubunja:Lmaoooooo, true. We fought against simping instincts (which is primarily rooted in sex), became redpillers and say what we fought against doesn't exists. ![]() |
Tonnyray:Exactly, what i have been trying to say, it was like we are saying men just wake up and say "i am doing this for sex", although some men do say that, this is not the case, it is a subconscious programming. The guy talking about 1.0 and 2.0, can agree that 1.0 wasn't erased, it was upgraded, however it is still very much in play although on a subconscious level. Point to anything that motivates you, it will directly or indirect lead to sex and all its components, it's basic evolutionary instincts. I wonder what's hard to understand there. |
Kellzzyy:You see that's where you are getting it wrong, you think we are saying a man just sits and say i am going to become successful for pussy (sure a few men do that), and you most likely think women plan their lives in a particular fashion, or that there's a sisterhood somewhere telling women how to get the best out if men. The truth is that women dont sit to plan, neither is there an organized sisterhood. The seemingly existence of the sisterhood, and the female propensity to do certain things is motivated by evolutionary instincts, and it is more important than you think. For millennias, for a man to successfully reproduce, he must first have a territory and the ability to protect it, creating the best possible environment for his offsprings thrive. This means he gets exclusive access to a woman or women and by extension sex, those who are deemed weak do not enjoy this luxury, as women who are attached to weak men, while lose on the long run, since they will not be protected from danger. In event of a territorial war, where the weak men are killed off, and their wives pawned off to strong men. As a consequence of this women developed the instincts to want strong men, and men developed the instincts to be strong as a consequence. Man want to continue his legacy and women want to procreate under the best circumstances, and this formed the basis of our intersexual dynamics till this day, men get sex and offsprings in exchange for protection and territory, when the world evolved and being strong was a prerequisite for provision "Alpha fvcks, Beta bvcks" came into being. Not just evolutionary instincts but also social learning, a child sees the benefit that is accrued to strong men, his evolutionary instincts to be strong is triggered and enhanced too. Now reducing this to "all men don't say i am going to get rich because of sex", is denying the power of evolutionary instincts and even the redpill by extension, i mean how many times have we pointed to evolutionary instincts when describing female nature. Except you think evolutionary instincts have no effects on men, while it has all the effects on women, which would be false. Finally, ask yourself why testosterone is the major success driving tool for men, if any if the above statements is false. Do your research on testosterone as a success motivator. Testosterone the same hormones that drives us sexually, also drives us to success, do the maths bro, It's simple, sex and all it's components (procreation and pleasure) are the major motivation for men. |
Lightway:You quoted the wrong person? ![]() Or highlight where i said anyone has a problem with ubunja ![]() |
You know what is funny in this discussion? Guys that are against it are pointing to exceptions, when we talk about female nature, don't women point to the same? Talmabout Telsa and co. Sex is the major driving factor of civilization, whether you consider yourself to be an outlier or not, that doesn't nullify the validity of that statement. Sexual instinct is one of the most primal instincts in humans, hardwired into us by evolution. It is important for both recreation and pleasure. And one thing about evolutionary instincts is that it isn't always obvious. Do you think women sit down and plan to do the things the red pill warns you about? Sit down and lie to you self that "all road doesn't lead to sex". I leave you with our popular saying "exceptions dont nullify the rule, they prove it" or does this saying apply only to judgments on female nature? ![]() |
Skepticus:Good analysis from you, you are right. However, I didn't actually look at him from dating advise lens ![]() I came across him by total accident though. |
I came across Dr Jordan Peterson recently and i am intrigued by his thinking and articulation of thought. What do you guys think about him? |
Mychive:All this back and forth for a woman. What more sign do you want that she hasn't already shown eh? If you know what's good for you, cut her off, she is playing games with you, and if you eventually get back together, then you are going to be in her frame. |
Ibime:Klopp drop Mane? |
demmymoney:This would have been true, if celebrities do not end up determining what intersexual dynamics transition into. Most intersexual dynamic trends have been started and popularized by celebrities. |
Hmmm, very interesting topic of discussion today. This is my take. I don't think a redpiller should be against being a provider, this is actually our natural masculinity at its finest. I get that alot of women want to drop their parts while wanting men to retain the provider aspect of the age long transaction. The red pill stands against this sort of shortchanging on the sexual market place table. Avoid so called independent women who neither make financial contributions (saying you're the provider) nor fulfill her feminine gender role in return (oh, that shit is outdated). That is a redpiller's battle. However, if you want to share bills with your woman (dumping the provider status quo), then be ready to accommodate a woman who is dumping her own status quo too. And like anyone will say, being in a modern relationship will emasculate you and masculinate her, because you both have to tap into feminine and masculine sides to come to a common ground. Personally, i am not against being a provider, but i will only provide when my conditions are met, chastisty, agreeable, teachable etc If i am marrying a women, she must engage in a job that can give her time for child rearing, if we are both pursuing a career, getting home late, hereby missing a huge chunk of our child/children's upbringing, then it is an unfortunate situation, which everyone should avoid. I am not interested in engaging in power tussles with a female in the name of modern relationships, I come with the old negotiation chips, she better does the same else a deal is off the table. Red pill chapter 22 vs 12. "He who goes to the negotiation table, must ensure he is getting equal or more value for his resources". |
Havertz10:The reaction so far is shocking and surprising, i guess it's just cancel culture. I heard vitality suspended their deal with west ham too, and Zouma was fined 250k. That's too much na. |
Lidocaine:What just happened is pre-selection, the first girl didn't think there was anything special about the guy, until her friend declared interest. Her friend declaring interest, pumped her own interest. On your first paragraph. "women don't know what they want". Men think women don't know what they want because men go about wanting things differently. Women only want it when it has the right emotional weight, while men want it because it's logical. Emotions fluctuate, logic doesn't. However, true or false that statement may be, you should never use it as an excuse for a woman's shortcomings. Hold her accountable. |
sinfultrust:I would have called it a pseudoscientific swindle, like the concept of IQ, but there is nothing scientific about it. Funny thing is that they use date to arrive at signs, lmaoooo, i have a friend whom i share birthday with, we are like fire and ice, our personality is so different, but if we were both believers in zodiac signs, we will still claim to have the same sign, why you may wonder, this happens for the following reasons. (you may think there are contradictory, but we do hold many contradictory beliefs as humans). 1. People are more alike than they think (i.e an attribute of one zodiac sign, maybe common in majority of people). 2. What people believe about themselves, or what they would like to believe, doesn’t vary much from person to person. (some of the attributes of a particular zodiac signs, feel nice to have, so people want to attach to it). 3. Each person is convinced that he or she is unique (i think this is one of the main selling points of zodiacs signs, the feel good idea that the constellations have an effect over you, it makes you feel unique and special). 4. People are very bad judges of personal behavior/characters (one of the main reason people are ignorant of their bad behaviors, and think themselves better than average. There's something called better than average syndrome, people think themselves better lovers or friends, more honest etc than they truly are, that's why it hurts when that bubble is busted). Betting on these three things, the soothsayer makes a gamble that usually pays off. Because one can speak in generalities that apply to just about anyone, and because nobody thinks that there is anything “general” about them, one doesn’t require any magic powers to give a reading that feels detailed, precise, and true to the willing recipient. Forget people saying they believe it, it is shit. Temperaments is a sham, but it qualifies as a pseudoscientific swindle, because it criteria for qualification is not based on something as fickle and random as date of birth. If one can be 25% of each 4 temperaments, then there is no point of it, except to put behaviors into groups, since some behaviors are more likely to appear in a person that already have one of them, that's just it. So someone saying "I am sanguine, that's how we are" is just looking for an excuse to be where he or she is. This is not exactly in line with the purpose of the thread, so i should have kept it short, but it is what it is, maybe we can learn somethings from it. ![]() |
ubunja:You are very right, the latest girl i got via chosen, was stalking me on Facebook long before I even said the first word to her and she knew a lot about me before I even got to know her name. Although it took me long to see her greenlights, cause she was very subtle about it. She seems to be very concerned about not appearing cheap. After picking up her signals, I approached her gave her my number, she called that same evening, we got talking, everything was smooth and she was very responsive to all my advances. When we got talking, she started exposing how long she has been tracking me, it's almost diabolical ![]() |
On the cold vs hot approaching ish. I am for hot approaching, I can never waste my time cold approaching, I have been chosen more than enough times to be chasing random girls for the sole purpose of "testing my might". For those saying it gives confidence, what's more confidence infusing than being chosen? Maybe it's an ego thing, but i will never try to approach 40 women in a week for the purpose of building confidence, there are better ways to build confidence. You approach 40, get phone numbers of 30 (if you're good), do all the donkey work of following up, chatting or calling (whichever you prefer, calling is always better though) and still end up fvcking only 3, too much work that doesn't justify the outcome imo. My core principle remains "No Greenlight, No Approach". Cold approaching worked very well in the past, when there was no social media to give girls an overbloated sense of ego, and she wasn't receiving enough attention (like she does from social media), that the attention you give her by cold appraching her is enough to nudge her towards being receptive to you. Opposite is the case right now. If you collect a girl number and chat her up, in most cases, you will become one if the many betas orbiting her chat space. If she does accept your advances, she feels like she is doing you a favor. Someone was saying letting women choose is fulfilling female imperative, Lmaoooooo, that's very funny. The women you cold approach at any point wont have to chose you after you've done so much work (out of pity maybe ). Hot approaching allows you to bypass the old system of approaching and waiting for your approach to be reciprocated, increasing your chances of success.Let's imagine hot approaching and cold approaching have the same amount of success, you'd rather do it the hard way? |
Imagine say she no respect the husband, what kind of selfish and inconsiderate request is that? ![]() After all the work wey him plan to do to take care of her in her dying times, all she wants is to be piped down viciously by someone who doesn't give two fvcks about her. It should be clear to the man that she have perhaps cheated on him with this guy during the course of their marriage. The woman is a fool, thunder fire her and her dying wish. Granting people's dying wish is overhyped.
|
Sixtyfive65:I love unpredictability, she is pointing it out, saying worse things have happened and it's this small thing that your are reacting to, it beats her, next time before she does anything little or big, she will think twice ![]() |
A friend of mine Flipping the switch ![]() She legit asked for refund on the money she spent on him, calling it paying for sex ![]() They can't take what they dish ![]() Again i say, be chosen and you will break all rules females create. ![]()
|
Am i the only one not liking the girl who acted as Naomi acting so far? ![]() Then which kind of ugly girl is that Lourdes fgs. Couldn't they get somoone more attractive at least? ![]() Naomi ratings. 6.5/10. |
Polynek:Lol, just rest a little bit. You've gotten the advise you need, prolonging it is not necessary. |
AWALT. How many times have you being interrupted by women and simps alike for saying AWALT, they say "how dare you?", "is your mother like that?", "it only applies to some women" etc. What is a redpiller's response to this? Is NAWALT a reality redpillers want to deny so that their woman "hate" can be justified? ![]() Before i go on, i was in this kind of discussion once and my response was "mention the names of women you know are not like that", after names are mentioned, and I'm like "Ok. Next time i will say all women except Anita, Joy, Evelyn etc" Lmaoooooo. I will try to explain why AWALT is a core part of the redpill philosophy. First, an admission, yes, there are exceptions, and like we all know, "exceptions do not negate a rule, they prove it by their sheer minority". Now when we talk AWALT, we are talking in respect to what we call female nature as a whole (solipsism, hypergamy, narcissism etc), the point is there is no woman free from all of these qualities, if she was, then she won't be a woman. Don't get me started about unicorns, i guess we can all agree that they don't exist. What we simply mean is that any woman walking the earth has either one or more of the female nature the redpill tells you to beware of. AWALT becomes a key part of redpill awareness because this mental schema helps you keep your guard up, bluepilled men know "some" women are like that, but they are often guards down, because they are often led to believe that their ONEitis is special and different, they project the exceptions on their love interests, whether or not she has proven to be an exception, hence putting themselves in danger of being shocked out of their shells. AWALT is a language of guilty until proven innocent. Since we all agree that we can't read the minds of women to know their motivations and social conditionings, i think our point of origin when dealing with women should remain AWALT. Last point to note is, because a woman isn't showing show certain tendencies currently, that doesn't mean she can't show them later down the line, as long as the potential for a seemingly good woman to flip the switch remains, AWALT. Redpill chapter 1 vs 17 "ALL WOMEN ARE LIKE THAT". |
Chiagozieking:True, being redpill is a state of mind, it goes beyond the acquisition of knowledge (although the acquisition of knowledge propels us towards doing the needful), being redpill is a frame of mind. Of course internalizing the red pill is never easy, it entails defeating your inner beta (due to societal conditioning we all have this), and making the redpill a core part of your mental point of origin. Can you be redpilled when you are standing in front of a naked girl? Can you be redpilled when you are rich? Can you be redpilled when you can afford not to be? These are questions we must answer before we call ourselves redpillers. Being redpilled therefore is a journey not a destination, we have to keep confirming our status as one, lest we fall off. Redpill chapter 17 vs 12 "Narrow is the way that leads to being redpilled, and few are found therein". |
GravityDefier:I have seen stuff like this play out especially in school environments, when you give her water enough times, she feels confident to start entering your room, then before you know it, she is taking some of your shirts she likes. When I was in school, one of the ladies my roommate was frolicking with always came to take some of his shirts, and they will drag about it, till my roommate end up conceding, there was a day i wasn't around and she saw a shirt that belongs to me and as she picked it, my roommate told her that it belongs to me, he said he was shocked when she immediately dropped the clothes and went back to her room. When I came back, my roommate told me what transpired, i just smiled ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (of 42 pages)





