₦airaland Forum

airmark:
This was Fraudiola calling Conte, a master before Chelsea's board sold Matic without his consent and refused to buy him Lukaku and VVD to upgrade his team. Unless you also want to call Fraudiola by his fraudulent name like Dayo and A40 did.

Don't force it, you are looking bad.

You don't want to go by expert opinions and testimonials again?

OK, let's do this.
Picture 1: your record is outdated, Pep holds the longest consecutive wins at 18.
Picture 2: Conte surrendering to Pep before a ball is kicked, domination.

Junnior:
Money is not the only reason why I might want to take a job. So, I might accept it if I'm gonna learn a lot on the job, thereby building up my CV and experience.

Now, what actually is your answer to the question I asked?

Fair play.
Like you said attractiveness may not be the only reason you might want her.
Personally, I'll reject if I am not into her at all.

Airmark, I brought my own "expert opinion" plus testimonials from Chelsea fans on Conte. The highlight of the day is probably Conte's abysmal champions league record. Enjoy

diggz:
I am beginning to distaste this 352 especially when we surrender the ball and not press the opposition to make mistakes when we are not with the ball. The fact that we can still be playing deep against a team like Norwich is annoying to watch. Conte should stop playing this steeewpid 352 against smaller teams

Greatihex:
Chelsea played like a team from league 2.
Conte!!!!! Thunder fire you there!!!!
This bastard waited till 80!!!!!!!!!!!! Minutes before making just one sub. Why should thunder not fire this man.

At some point, man City players just stood, passing the ball, while Chelsea players looked on.

Unlimited22:
Conte's stubbornness now borders on obdurate stupidity.

airmark:
I should not follow opinions of experts but yours, Emmynator. Something dey worry you.

Which expert is that?
Shane no go even allow you bring Conte own.
Pep has 2 UCL, Conte has none. That's reality.
Pep hasn't won in 10 years, that's true, Conte hasn't won since he started coaching.
I wonder who compares Conte with Pep.

Junnior:
Guys, what will you do if an unattractive girl asks you out?
Skepticus, luminouz, caveadullam, Martinez39z, dierich7, jessepaid, mjbolt, aomine in da house, etc.

What will you do when a company that pay 10k per month asks you to come work for them?

airmark:

Who are you to just tell us something and we accept as the gospel truth?

When both got to Epl, we know who flogged each other to win the league in 1st attempt. Without Messi, Fraudiola wouldn't have won the UCL. He had to spend Messi's Barca's buy-out clause to get City into the final.


These are Bayern fans below sincerely exposing Fraudiola when nobody was on their necks.

All these are just whataboutism, their achievements speak for each other.
Achievements is what matter, how you got it is your cup of tea.
How many trophies does Pep have? Compare with Conte. There you have your answer.

Bringing budget listing, opinions of other people and whatever other wack defense you have won change reality.

hensben:
Do you agree Conte is a fraud?

No.

Everything is so instant nowadays, most of the times for good reasons, after all why should we waste so much time doing things that can be done in very little time.
However, the effect of the instantaneous nature of modern life has some negative effects on our life, especially on our outlook of life. Patience is no longer a virtue because it doesn't meet our instantaneous expectations.
I start gyming, after two weeks, no visible improvements, i give up, it didn't come as quickly as expected.
I want to make money instantly, after 2 months, it's not bringing the desired income, I'll quickly switch to another one, and perhaps resolve to crime for instantaneous money.
Self development becomes a problem, we need to get there quickly, we need to discover ourselves now, we need to become the best version of ourselves right now. 3 years? That's too long.

If you reading this, I am here to tell you that real things take time to build.
You have been taking the red pill for days or months, and you are in a hurry to become "alpha", calm down, real things take time, you can't force it. It's a process, just like the process a butterfly passes through before it manifests into a beauty.
From what I have read so far, many of us are stuck on our redpill journey, because we thought we've arrived at our destination so quickly, then we decided to stop moving.

Remember, a real man takes time to build, thank you.

All these unnecessary arguments should end, Pep Guardiola is a better coach than Conte, Full stop.
All the conditions involved doesn't matter, it is what it is.

nani667:
✔️

Shedibalabala
Scantimonous

dhiqson:
Kilon tun sup baiii

Honestly, I think aspiring patriarchs don't have a full grasp of the current realities we face.

But in the end, one must decide how he wants to apply TRP knowledge.

Just when I thought Will Smith can't go any lower

If you are an aspiring patriarch, abort mission, you are engaging in what's called mission impossible.

For patriarchy to take place, enabling environment must be present, the woman must be willing to submit and the man must have unshakable frame.

Today, the first requirement is absent, making it difficult to get the second, and thereby increasing the unlikelihood of the third. You may think you can win against the world alone, but you can't.

Vetting before marriage won't help you much, a woman can change 3 days into her marriage, it's so easy. There's no way to guarantee that she won't change. The society will make sure she does. There's this constant call for female freedom, she may decide to pick that call any time.

You have to recognize how fvcked the times are, marriage is a scare and a big risk, establishing a patriarchal family system is almost impossible.

Andremalan731:
One bitch that has been posting loved up pictures with her boyfriend for over 6 months
The last time wey we talk na June
She texted me today asking me to help with capital for her new business

Imagine the Audacity

Very shameless folks.
Haven't spoken to someone in 4 months and then you need money for capital, suddenly you remember that someone exists, lmaoooo

Like you said, it's the audacity, if it was a simp, he would have rationalized and thought sending her the money will be a step in getting closer to her and boom, she is credited. She has such audacity cause it works. You didn't send to her, good, many others will.

Chiagozieking:
It clearly isn't mine as she doesn't forward the matter again after she took a while to say a word again I just blocked her

Lmaoooooo, why is she using her mother to scare you?
Telling you her family is involved to create a sense of obligation in you is classic manipulation.
Since you insist it isn't yours, carry on.

pu7pl3:
Stargirl S2 is two tiers above Titans s3...the only thing Titans had going for it were the fight choreography and costumes

Exactly, Titans has so much potential, who is the 11 year old producing these shitty story archs?

Titans season 3, has the same problem I had with season 2, the story is just going back and forth.
This season was just average, nothing spectacular.

Stargirl season 2 >>

erusen:
Let us play 4 at the back this chirade has gone one for too long

4 ATB with our current crop of players? No na.
This current formation masks the flaws of our players abeg.

Mendy is a world class goal keeper ability wise.

Chai, reading this thread was a bad idea, una don spoil Injustice for me
Make i run go watch am.

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Havertz dey quarell with Lukaku?

[/color]

Definitely not quarell, no chemistry yet.

Singapore1:
i find it hard to believe that havertz didnt give lukaku a single successful pass

Same way I found it hard to believe he didn't create more than 1 big chance last season in PL.

drisham:
Wow tuchel actually said he connects well with kova and mase

Tuchel na correct coach na, he knows those things.

Lukaku's chemistry with other Chelsea players so far in the PL.

Kelvinhunt:
My thought exactly......but I haven't really done the friends with benefits stuff with any girl before..how do I intiate it... should I tell her about it directly or what?

Like i said, if you want dating stuff, look elsewhere, she's not ready to give you that.

There is no textbook approach to beginning FWB relationships, but the basic idea is to bypass the whole relationship thing and go for sex directly.
Is there any sexual tension between both of you or is she coming to you on a purely platonic level?
If she just wants to trap you in friend zone then you should ignore her, making it clear that you are not interested in a platonic relationship.

SOZINN:
My brother, that's all anyone can say.
I don't care how long you have been in this game. Cheating can happen to anybody, redpiller or not. The only thing the red pill can do for you, when those scales falls off from your eyes and you discover the the true colors of your woman is to help you deal with it.

If he was a redpiller, he won't waste his career like that. He might not even move a muscle in light of what happened. That's where red pill comes in. The red pill cannot prevent cheating, that can happen to anyone.

Exactly, the red pill is not a cure to cheating women, a woman that wants to cheat will cheat.
The red pill rids you of a certain hopes and expectations, and truly it's the hope and expectation that kills.

SOZINN:
I laugh at those posting comments about how they cannot trust their wives. Dude, let me just spell it out.
If you are married or so much as live in the same apartment. You live because she allows you to.

Don't tell me you don't trust her when she makes your food and you do other things together. If she wanted you dead.
You'd be DEAD.

If you don't trust your wife or fiance, then there's no point.

Definitely, there will be some level of trust.
Trust as being used popularly relates to intersexual dynamics, do you trust that she won't engage in infidelity?
Killing you is a big deal, and if you've done something that offends greatly, you shouldn't trust your wife to do nothing, except she has shown signs of not having affinity for the borderline crazy.

When it comes to sex and some other "little" things, it's better not to have too much trust, it's trust that made some men not to notice their wives cheating under their noses. A trust that makes him excuse every sign and warning, such level of trust is dangerous for the man.

Kelvinhunt:
There's this girl we work close to each other we got really a bit close..I told her what I want from her....and she says said LJBF..I ignored her move on and stop giving her any form of attention..
Few months ago she came bk always getting close to me and stuff...she claims she don't want any form of relationship cos her previous relationships are nothing to write home about....
So I am kinda confused how to handle the suitation....what do all think.

The bolded is still a LJBF strategy, since she knows you won't accept friend one directly, she is coming indirectly, counting on you to be a gentleman that wouldn't want to break her heart.

Depends on what you want from her, if you are OK with becoming friends with benefits, emphasis on benefits, then you can push to get it, even though you guys won't be official. But if you want a relationship, then reject her new strategy ASAP.

A001:
Who's rewriting history? Maybe you think all the info in that book is new. They're not.

A number of African historians have written on the subject many years ago, but the current effort just got more support and backing from African leaders, especially the AU.

That's the major difference.

Who's more qualified to write the history of African people?

Africans or Europeans or Arabs? You're saying the authors and contributors that wrote that book are rewriting history?

If you don't narrate and document your own history, foreigners will do so as they wish and use it to manipulate you.

No one is rewriting history, unless of course you think the whites and the Arabs have exclusive rights to write the history of Africa.

No historical record is 100% accurate, even this one compiled by Africans.

It's a lot grander. You sound like the average Nigerian that knows the (controversial) history of fictitious Jesus offhand but doesn't know the simplest of facts about the history of their native land.

No wonder most Nigerians see "black" as something dark, shameful or evil and "white" as the opposite. That's the dominant view in the country.

You sound so naive. Even the highlighted doesn't matter to you, it's important for archeological, pedagogical, and research purpose.

Every aspect of history is important.

You might as well tell schools to scrap the aspects of archeology and paleontology in those departments that deal with the origin of civilizations on earth.

You are playing the "if you don't agree with this history written by Africans, then you must be under mental slavery of the whites" card.

In any war, most times the party with the most sophisticated technologies and skilled men wins. That doesn't mean the invaders were more civilized than some parts of Africa hundreds of years ago.

Military technologies aren't the alpha and omega of technological advancements or civilization. The main reason why the whites had superior technologies was they're war-mongers and expansionists.

Many great countries in today's Europe used to consider plundering the resources of richer and friendlier countries and conquering and colonizing them a key part of their strategy for growth and development.

Many Africans in the past didn't have interest in such endeavors. But that doesn't mean some of those African countries were less civilized.

Due to this reluctance to invade and colonize foreign lands, that's why you'd hardly find adherents of African traditional religions beyond Africa, except due to the trans-Atlantic slavery trades, unlike Christianity and Islam.

Or do you define civilization or greatness based on a country's successful plundering efforts, engaging in slavery, invading and colonizing other people?

Very good, the Europeans did what they had to do to better their lot, there is no good or bad in history, just the Victor and the vanquished. You see, the main points and facts of history will remain the same.

This your question is a funny one.

Most Africans see whites and Arabs as their masters and as superior races because they (Africans), due to their lack of historical knowledge, don't know the damage these people they revere did to the continent over the past years through colonialism and slavery.

They only know the bad aspects of the history of black people as taught to them by the white and Arab supremacists, but not the glorious past. Both aspects are crucial.

While one shouldn't deal with the whites and Arabs with scorn or indignation, it's not proper to treat them obsequiously as well.

Most Africans see themselves as descendants of the ancestors of Israel people (that applies to the Christians) or descendants of the ancestors of Arabs (that applies to the Muslims).

This makes the Africans feel inferior to the whites and Arabs. But this popularly held notion about the origin of mankind is utterly false without any iota of evidence, except the Bible and Qur'an respectively.

But the claim in any book — however popular it's, whether religious or otherwise — still remains a claim unless enough evidence is given to support its veracity.

According to most experts in paleontology and archeology, Africa is the cradle of humankind.

This fact was arrived at working with the data collated over several years — a growing body of evidence in form of tons of fossils and remains of early humans discovered in East Africa over the last 60 years or thereabouts.

It's important to research about this fact concerning the origin of mankind and learn the African origin of civilization. If you don't know your history (both the good and bad aspects), you'll remain in slavery forever and easily lose your identity.

You reason like the average Nigerian that thinks it's a waste of time to learn history.

I don't think it's a waste of time to learn history, i think you overestimate the effect of learning said history.
You think historical glory will overwrite the effect of inferiority complex generated by current status?
Now it will have "some" effect, but like I said you overestimate it's effect.

A001:
You're not making any sense at all. If this assertion of yours is true, then that means no civilization has ever existed on this planet in history because looking at human history, the majority of the peoples in all parts of the world have always worshipped one god/goddess or the other, whether civilized or not.

Today, religious people are in the majority in all First World countries. Just like those religions of the so-called civilized people have their good and bad aspects, the native ones in Africa also do.

But the problem is you're focusing on the bad parts of these indigenous religions as you were taught by the white supremacists.

Thus, if you're saying that for the simple fact that being religious means a country isn't civilized, then you clearly don't know what you're talking about.

You're taking "civilization" to be the same as "enlightenment". But both are starkly different.

In all eras of human history, freethinkers have always been in the minority, and I don't see that changing in the next few hundred years.

(Though Otem says in some centuries from now, the scale will tip in favor of freethinkers. This, he claims, was revealed to him by some ancestors of Africa, the gods and goddesses worshipped in religions, who monitor (future) happenings on Earth via satellites from other planets with times much faster than ours and in some parts of the inner universe where there's no time.

It's an interesting statement, but still a claim nevertheless.)

You're a clearly a very ignorant fellow to posit it was the whites that brought enlightenment to Africa.

Were most of the white people or Arabs themselves even enlightened a few hundred years ago?

You're funny.

In any nation or during any human era, the enlightened ones are always few.

I agree with your points here, Havertz10 is interpreting the present into the past.

Religion played its part in human development, you cannot deny that fact.
The US and Europe were religious for most parts even up till the late 1900s, that didn't stop them from developing.

And then there is the trend of blaming religion for everything, it's just funny.