₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,608 members, 8,512,720 topics. Date: Tuesday, 03 November 2026 at 08:46 PM

Toggle theme

Emusan's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Emusan's Profile › Emusan's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 (of 400 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: JW 008 The Year 1914 by Emusan(m): 7:41pm On Feb 03, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
You go cry tire!
The agony of a sore loser

Seven times of the gentiles ended from 2520 BCE in the year 1914.
That was Watchtower delusion.

Provide both God's Word and historical documents that support it.

*Jesus was given the order to start ruling in the midst of his enemies! Psalms 110:1-3
*He sacked Satan in heaven! Revelations 12:7-9
*War began on earth! Matthew 24:7
*Followed by famine and diseases!
*False prophets sprang up on the earth!
*People betray people!
*His disciples continued to preach peace till today! Matthew 24:7-14
God PA I site you cheesy grin cheesy grin

Well one of the false prophets is TC Russell

All these began since 1914! smiley
Then provide the verse where God said it.

How it that hard for you to do? cheesy grin cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: JW 008 The Year 1914 by Emusan(m):
Courz:
There is archeological evidence for 587 Bce. Where is the archeological evidence for 607Bce? This is what Mad MaxinDhouse cannot answer. How come Watchtower relies on archeological evidence when proving the existence of Bible characters but refuses to accept archeological evidence for 587BCe?

Mad MaxinDhouse, show us evidence to back up 607bce.
The only realisable source for him is a young man on YouTube cheesy grin cheesy grin cheesy

After he lied that God gave a SPECIFIC DATE that the Jews left Babylon.

O ya provide the verse, he referred me back to the young man on YouTube.

Technically, the young man on YouTube is more reliable than the scripture

Very pathetic!
Christianity Etc › Re: JW 008 The Year 1914 by Emusan(m): 7:27pm On Feb 03, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
2520-607+1=1914 smiley
Where did that 1 come from?

This is what you said @OP "So the 2520 days will be 2520 years counting from 607 B.C.E. it ended in the year 1914."

So where did that 1 you added coming from.

You don't count and later ADDED, that's fraud grin cheesy grin cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: JW 008 The Year 1914 by Emusan(m): 7:23pm On Feb 03, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
Your question has been answered it's not compulsory you believe it! wink
You didn't answer

Here it is again,

2520-607 = ?

Lying that there is a year between BC and AD shameless man

cheesy grin cheesy grin
Christianity Etc › Re: JW 008 The Year 1914 by Emusan(m): 7:18pm On Feb 03, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
So the year in between the last century in BCE and the first century in CE should be 0 years shey?
This shows how ignorance you are about history.

The last year on BCE is 1BC and the first year in CE is 1CE there's no YEAR in between grin cheesy grin cheesy grin

Provide where anyone ever used a year IN BETWEEN BCE & CE grin cheesy grin cheesy

Guy you can't do anything to that it's 1914 so if you're not OK with it there's no problem you're free to leave no one is forcing it on you! smiley
Your calculation is wrong reason why you're committing historical fraud of ADDING ONE YEAR to 1913 to make it 1914.

607 busted as Jerusalem was destroyed in 587BC

Even your dubious 2520-607 = 1913 got busted again cheesy cheesy cheesy grin
Christianity Etc › Re: JW 008 The Year 1914 by Emusan(m): 4:50pm On Feb 03, 2024
Dtruthspeaker:
This is sense none rubbish. You are just passage shopping.
You can even see the lying liar saying "there is a year between last century BCE and 1st century CE"

This brainwashing is too much.

When truth is steering them face to face.
Christianity Etc › Re: JW 008 The Year 1914 by Emusan(m): 4:47pm On Feb 03, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
There is no 0 year so the year between the last century BCE and the first century CE must be added that's what makes it 1914.
There's no any year between BC and AD stop this lie haba

It's like saying there's a year between 1st century and 2nd century cheesy grin cheesy grin

Kai brainwashing is too bad

Now you know 2520-607 = 1913 and not 1914.
Christianity Etc › Re: JW 008 The Year 1914 by Emusan(m): 3:42pm On Feb 03, 2024
MaxInDandHouse:
I'm not here to argue with you about my beliefs so what exactly is your question? smiley
Smile...

My question is 2520-607=

In case you have problem with your calculator you can use the one below cheesy grin cheesy cheesy

Christianity Etc › Re: JW 008 The Year 1914 by Emusan(m): 3:26pm On Feb 03, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
What exactly is your question? smiley
Read my post again if you see any question(s) there you answer it.

My post addressed the followings:

1. 607BC isn't the year Jerusalem was destroyed as it doesn't have any historical and archeological support.

2. Archeological discovery and scholarly works support 587BC as the year Jerusalem was destroyed.

3. Even if given you the year 607BC by subtracting it from your dubious calculation of 2520years it will be 1913 not 1914.

It's simple mathematics 2520-607=1913

4. Lastly, you lied against God that God says 2520days will become 2520years by citing Num 14:34 & Eze 4:6 of which what God said in those verses was directly on the issue God was addressing not any other things.

So bring your evidence against those 4 points as derived from OP.
Christianity Etc › Re: JW 008 The Year 1914 by Emusan(m):
MaxInDHouse:
Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem and it's temple in the year 607 B.C.E.
False

All archeological evidence pointed to the fact that Jerusalem was destroyed in 587BC

So how long is the SEVEN TIMES?
In the Bible book of Revelation it was revealed to John the apostle that three and a half times is equal to 1260 days! Revelations 12:6, 14

Therefore SEVEN TIMES will amount to 2520 days but if we're to calculate from 607 B.C.E. that will end in the year 600 B.C.E. yet Jesus told his contemporaries that the time God gave the nations is still ongoing in his own days {Luke 21:24} therefore we have to go by the standard God pronounced when Israelites annoyed Him a day will be for a year! Numbers 14:34 compare to Ezekiel 4:6

So the 2520 days will be 2520 years counting from 607 B.C.E. it ended in the year 1914.
That was the year Jesus was crowned as King of God's kingdom in heaven and the first thing he did was sending Satan out of heaven that year {Revelations 12:7-12} the earth began seeing woes right from that time until today! Matthew 24:7-14
Even with the manipulative mathematics you did. 2520 - 607 still gives 1913 not 1914

You see that no matter how you spin it, 1914 is still a haox and scam. cheesy grin cheesy



Here is NUM 14:34 but reading only 34 is cherry picking start from verse 33

33 And your children will be like shepherds, wandering in the wilderness for forty years. In this way, they will pay for your faithlessness, until the last of you lies dead in the wilderness. 34 “‘Because your men explored the land for forty days, you must wander in the wilderness for forty years—a year for each day, suffering the consequences of your sins. Then you will discover what it is like to have me for an enemy.’

The same is with Ezekiel 4:6

God instructions in those passages were clear and God is not saying ALL DAYS MUST BE A YEAR.
Christianity Etc › Re: Ministry To Jws, Part 2 - The 1914 Theology by Emusan(m):
MaxInDHouse:
They are not members of Jehovah's Witnesses yet they both have this to say:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIiJP1JkxsQ?si=82uRI74dW2LAqFcp

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wdDvys2z6k?si=nTReVo2Wx__Quest
You haven't provided where God gave a SPECIFIC DATE that the Jews left Babylon from the scripture as you early claimed, so that we can add 70years to it to arrive at 607BC.

You're still roaming about YouTube fighting with your conscience with the truth instead of just providing GOD'S WORD.

Is YouTube greater than God's Word?

I know in your search for validation on YouTube you also came across videos that supported 587BC but rejected it because it's not inline with what you want.

So, you can reject archeological evidence and MOST Scholarly works that support 587BC and embrace just a random people.

Well, the truth is Jerusalem destruction took place in 587BC which shows that 1914 is a scam and just wait few more years where NEW LIGHT will happen from Watchtower then you'll reflect back on how you're defending this scam, you'll realise it's not good to defend lie. Thou I know you don't have shame!
Politics › Re: Tinubu Has Kept Most Of His Campaign Promises & Yet People Are Not Satisfied by Emusan(m): 6:57pm On Feb 02, 2024
pocohantas:
I did expect a lot from him.
I thought that man has sense.
But I know better now. He probably never did anything special in Lagos. He just got luckly or maybe Nigeria is bigger than him.

To think it is less than a year in office.

And we have 7 to go. His diehard fans should add 7 to their current ages. Someone like Kaypèrry would be at least 50.

What is Nigeria's life expentancy again? grin
The truth is he didn't do any reasonable things in Lagos. Had it been it's the era of social media all those lies wouldn't have fly but you don't expect a country where people see black and call it white to support the truth.

Well the reality is on ground now and everyone can see it with their korokoro eyes.
Politics › Re: Tinubu Has Kept Most Of His Campaign Promises & Yet People Are Not Satisfied by Emusan(m): 6:44pm On Feb 02, 2024
Tallesty1:
Point me to where he said this
At Ogun campaign ground he said in Yoruba in his stammering voice "Wón ṣọ́rọ́ epo, epo awón, a di 500, a lọ 200. Ẹ lọ fọ́kán bálẹ́. À ma gbé wàlẹ"

Interpretation: "They are talking about the issue of fuel, fuel will cost, it'll be 500, it'll be 200... Go and relax, we will bring it down"

I have the video or you can browse it.
Christianity Etc › Re: The Request For A Christian Specific Only by Emusan(m): 5:26pm On Feb 02, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
That's why Seun can't grant your request as it's not all those claiming Christians agreed on your terms! smiley
And Seun has responded that he will do that this year.

See the way you always proud in your ignorance as if you're Alpha and Omega.

Oma se oooo

Let's see if Seun eventually created Christian section if you'll still claim to be a Christian by accepting term or not after the below statement from you: cheesy grin cheesy grin

Christianity Etc › Re: The Request For A Christian Specific Only by Emusan(m): 5:22pm On Feb 02, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
Most translators of your copies are trinitarians so when translating the Christian Greek scriptures they got confused.

Please check the OT and try to correlate with NT to know who is talking @ Revelations 1:8
See how he quickly changed mouth. cheesy grin cheesy grin

He was caught with his own lie of LORD and Lord grin grin cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: The Real Difference Between An Agnostic And An Atheist by Emusan(m): 2:33pm On Feb 02, 2024
Dtruthspeaker:
They also reverse back to agnosticism when they see that we have answered all the atheists nonsense they believe in. grin

Funny people. They want to eat their cake and have it and still put it in the fridge (according to.Jimmy Disu) grin
They be like we said "We don't know"

That's Agnostic meh cheesy grin cheesy grin
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 1:41pm On Feb 02, 2024
Aemmyjah:
He thinks humans can fight spirits?
You people are just so funny.

I said your organisation says Armageddon is a PHYSICAL BATTLE your deluded brother said No! And that the pictures of your publication showing different weapons is old light and there is a new light where no physical weapons are shown yet the article you posted here still shows FIRE FROM HEAVEN.

But from your own thread isn't Armageddon a physical WAR?

Even where our publications shows those army shooting their women at Michael, it is just to show how foolish and useless they can seem to be shooting towards invisible spirits but why would they do that? They have seen things that made them realize that Jesus is intervening on behalf of his people and to attack their earthly enemies. They won't just sit there and expect destruction, they may want to defend themselves with that they have, it's just a foolish thing to do.
Army shooting WOMEN TO MICHAEL KE.... grin cheesy grin


Now see how you confirm my point that Armageddon is a PHYSICAL WAR.

Whether what they do is foolishness or not, weapons of destruction will be exchanged cheesy grin cheesy grin cheesy grin

If you can support your brother who said "Anyone who thing he belongs to Christ under the OLD CURSED AND BASTARDIZED name(Christian) should think twice" is it on matter like this you'll disagree with him?

Even Paul said that the battles true Christians face are not carnal (earthly or physical) since they are against wicked spirits. Is it the one of Gog of Magog that will?
But the people who will fight at Armageddon aren't TRUE CHRISTIANS.

So why should you apply the verse that meant for TRUE CHRISTIAN to the battle of WICKED LEADER?

Just ignore him
Ignore faultfinders
It's just envy that's worrying them
Usual excuse grin cheesy grin cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 1:30pm On Feb 02, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
Physical means what humans can put to use but spiritual means what can work yet humans can't figure out how it's working.
But at Armageddon people will figure out how it's working.

Or you think earthquake, fire from heaven, flood will happen and people won't figure it out? cheesy grin cheesy grin cheesy

He knows he had nothing tangible to say only poised to trade words and i won't give him that chance if he likes let him continue arguing blindly! smiley
But you're the very liar here

You lied it's not physical but your organisation says otherwise

You lied your organisation had a NEW LIGHT you haven't provided where the new light is grin cheesy grin cheesy grin

Well, you can't deny that thousands of nuclear weapons are already in the hands of many countries.

You can't deny that millions of warhead are in store in many countries.
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 12:38pm On Feb 02, 2024
Just one post of mine you have to quote it four times which shows the post hit the right place.

Aemmyjah:
Where I did not use took, he complained I was using football
One thing is to be ignorant another thing is to be ignorant and pride in it.

You use "TOOK" which is a past tense meanwhile the sentence I'm tutoring you on is A PRESENT TENSE.

So how can you use a past TENSE example to justify a present TENSE statement?

Only someone who failed English will do that.

You are just a faultfinder. It seems that is what brings you joy.
Still Priding in his ignorance.

So telling you that you can't use Past Tense example for Simple Present Tense is fault-finding to you cheesy grin

In a forum where you are free to educate us what your church teach about the topic on ground, it is English you find fault with cos you don't understand what was clearly written and understood by millions.
The reason you can't see anything with that sentence is because you're deprived of formal education, that means the millions who understand it also affected.

I showed you how PRESENT TENSE is used and the rules that guides it yet you still dull to comprehend it.

Mr Emusan, professor of Linguistics 🤷‍♂️.
He started to use off-point examples of sun rises in the east grin grin grin
Enjoy your weekend 🍷
My example shows how PRESENT TENSE is used which is what Watchtower used in that sentence.

I'm expecting you to point to the rule that guides Watchtower sentence, you can't provide it which is how to proof or correct information.

I even went further to give example of how the sentence could've been placed yet your tiny brain couldn't comprehend it just because you must defend your organisation.
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:42am On Feb 02, 2024
Aemmyjah:
Listen to who? grin
I heard about it before from a DL and i checked the internet and
I just drew your attention
I guess you were not taught yet. When last did you go to church?
Still the same thing cheesy grin cheesy grin
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:40am On Feb 02, 2024
Aemmyjah:
Another example
A victory ceremony took place in the Olympics which began in September 20

Which one took place in September 20
The Olympics or the Victory ceremony?
😂

More examples coming
"TOOK" is past tense

Omar se oooo cheesy grin cheesy grin

You see why I said you failed English cheesy grin cheesy grin

Don't forget this is Watchtower statement "Nevertheless, the Bible does show that Armageddon takes place during Jesus’ invisible presence, which began in 1914.—Matthew 24:37-39."
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:38am On Feb 02, 2024
Aemmyjah:
Interestingly, ask him to visit the internet amd search what Kumuyi taught about the war of Armageddon whether it is physical or not
Let him go and argue those ones first before he just start saying baseless stuff

Like someone burning potato fields in a community in rage but not realizing that his own field is growing same potato
So you listen to kumuyi, that's wonderful grin cheesy grin
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:34am On Feb 02, 2024
Aemmyjah:
English has failed you
While you failed English.

It's not wrong to have written in Yoruba or another language you understand well
Take this advice to the heart.

If I say crowning of a new champion takes place in the league which kickoff in August.
Wonder why you people quick to use football as example, this shows that you people watch football a lot.

What does that mean.
That the league began in August or that it is August they will crown a new champion?
English no too hard.
I guess you went to school
If not because you failed English, you would have known that the emphasis is on "NEW CHAMPION" which is the reason it's followed by present tense "TAKES" PLACE.

But asking question about LEAGUE shows you really failed English.

You are only teaching yourself the basics of English
It's good for you and your, this is so obvious.
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:27am On Feb 02, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
You still don't get it.

All the highlighted that God used aren't what humans can practice themselves to use during wars so they're not PHYSICALLY WEAPONS but SPIRITUAL WEAPONS! smiley
You're still lying cheesy grin cheesy grin cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 10:35am On Feb 02, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
So you think when the Bible said God is mighty in battle it means humans have PHYSICAL weapons to participate shey? Psalms 24:8

You're just anxious to argue for nothing! smiley
Olodo...the lying liar

The article says "What will conditions be like during the battle of Armageddon?

While we do not know how God will use his power, he will have at his disposal weapons such as those he has used in the past​—hail, earthquake, flooding downpour, fire and sulfur, lightning, and disease."


Even the picture on the article was a ball of fire from heaven, yet you lied that Watchtower doesn't used such pictures again because there's a NEW LIGHT cheesy grin cheesy grin

OR YOU FORGOT

SEE receipt below cheesy grin cheesy grin grin grin

I know you're lying because you don't know how to defend this especially how God will destroyed this earth with all the nuclear weapons already in store not to talk of millions of warhead and the earth will remain the same.

Well God knows this and that's the reason He already has a plan for A NEW HEAVEN AND A NEW EARTH.

God can't be mocked!

Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 10:25am On Feb 02, 2024
Aemmyjah:
Which one took place in 1914?
Armageddon or Jesus invisible presence?
😎
English is not too difficult
Nothing took place in 1914 about God's Word.

But from this write up, it stated Armageddon TAKES PLACE from Jesus invisible presence began in 1914.

Go back to your elementary English text book.

There's a difference between Armageddon WILL TAKE PLACE during Jesus invisible presence which began in 1914 (which means the period of Jesus invisible presence is a long one and the time for Armageddon is unknown but yet will happen before that period ended) and Armageddon TAKES PLACE during Jesus invisible presence which began in 1914.

This is a simple present tense for something such as:

1. something that is true in the present:
I'm nineteen years old.
I'm a student.
He lives in London.

2. something that happens regularly in the present:
°I play football every weekend.
°Victor loves going to the Gym every Tuesday

3. something that is always true:
°The human body contains 206 bones.
°Light travels at almost 300,000 kilometres per second.
°Sun rises from the East and sets in the West

Well, I don't expect you to know this since you and the person who wrote the article were deprived from formal education.
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 10:04am On Feb 02, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
Guy Armageddon is never and will not be a physical war! smiley
You're still lying after what was boldly written on this thread. cheesy grin cheesy grin grin
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 9:10am On Feb 02, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
Solid food is for mature Christians not babies!

As you mentioned Armageddon with 1914 he taught you're implying that it has taken place already. That's why most of them can't gain insight. Jesus foretold that when he begin his kingdom rule in heaven (1914) the following events will lead to the end of all badness which is Armageddon! Matthew 24:7-14

But an antagonist who already concluded in his mind that you're wrong won't listen to gain insight! smiley
Coming from a liar JWs like his father the Devil who once claimed that Armageddon is not a physical war cheesy grin cheesy grin cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 9:06am On Feb 02, 2024
Aemmyjah:
MaxInDHouse, come and see o
English is not for everyone
Who taught you English again grin
You should rather ask yourself that question.

I'm not the one who says below it's from what you posted, so copy it and paste it for chatGPT to interpret and see how it will come out. Olodo!

Nevertheless, the Bible does show that Armageddon takes place during Jesus’ invisible presence, which began in 1914.—Matthew 24:37-39.
Christianity Etc › Re: When the Qur'an is misinterpretated : Did Jesus Die On The Cross? by Emusan(m): 11:29pm On Feb 01, 2024
AntiChristian:
[s]Holy spirit don leave you and you've embraced laziness! You can't even replicate what you said was answered![/s]
Thrash!

I wont encourage you to be stupid as to retype what i had type earlier!
I didn't retype, I simply asked you question.

What is the purpose of judgement when Jesus was already in heaven?

Show me where i said any book supercedes the Qur'an?
Where did you read it that I said you said any book supersede Quran?

Quran should be the actual book where Jesus life, death and coming back should be.

So answer my question.

You guys are all bunches of holy spirit lacking low IQ illiterates that couldn't comprehend simple sentences written logically!
Throwing insult is your defence right?

1. What evidence do you have?
That?

2. Did God write any part of the Bible? Is the Bible God's word?

3. Did Jesus write any sentence or even dictate as a much as a word to any of the disciples to write?

4. Who can authenticate the Bible when all 11 appointed "good" disciples of Jesus altogether to wrote less than Paul an enemy of Jesus when he was alive and a self appointed disciple who claim he say a light that's Jesus!

5. Even Luke and Mark had to write their own accounts in your gospel!

6. How are we sure Matthew wrote the gospel acclaimed to be written by him when he actually kept mentioning his own name particularly in Mathew 9:9
I don't see what leads to these questions because it never addressed my point.

You said "All these are mixed in your Bible"

And I said not at all, Bible is very clear on Jesus life.

Jesus already said by his own self he can do nothing!
That's not the point, the point is Jesus coming back to this earth is to pronounce judgement on the evildoers.

Age is only relevant in this world!
How old was Enoch when he left?

How old is he now?
Waooooo but you said he is in heaven with his HUMAN BODY.

If age only relevant here, it means it's not the same human body or maybe a glorified body which doesn't operate like ours anymore.

Do you agree?

And Allah knows best about Jesus's state in heaven!
Yet Allah couldn't detail this BEST in Quran.

No one knows when he will come and his coming as I said earlier is part of the signs of end time!
If no one knows then how will people know he has come?

He will come as a youth he was, rule with Islam and kill the dajjal aka antichrist.
Then he can't be with the same human body as you claimed earlier.

because a human living for over thousand years should be strickenly old even though no record of any human ever live up to even just 1000 years not to talk of over 2000 and still counting.

The he'll later die and be buried as a Muslim!
Funny enough you used the word ANTICHRIST

Do you know the meaning? cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:09pm On Feb 01, 2024
Aemmyjah:
Nevertheless, the Bible does show that Armageddon takes place during Jesus’ invisible presence, which began in 1914.​—Matthew 24:37-​39.
So the Armageddon has even taken place since 1914.

This is not funny anymore. shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked
Christianity Etc › Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:03pm On Feb 01, 2024
MaxInDHouse:
There are lots and lots of sacred secrets!
But you once argue here that the war of Armageddon is spiritual and not PHYSICAL.

You see the reason why it's not good to be lying and not even follow your own organisation teaching... cheesy grin cheesy grin

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 (of 400 pages)