Emusan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Emusan's Profile › Emusan's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 (of 397 pages)
MaxInDHouse:Olodo...the lying liar The article says "What will conditions be like during the battle of Armageddon? While we do not know how God will use his power, he will have at his disposal weapons such as those he has used in the past—hail, earthquake, flooding downpour, fire and sulfur, lightning, and disease." Even the picture on the article was a ball of fire from heaven, yet you lied that Watchtower doesn't used such pictures again because there's a NEW LIGHT ![]() OR YOU FORGOT SEE receipt below ![]() I know you're lying because you don't know how to defend this especially how God will destroyed this earth with all the nuclear weapons already in store not to talk of millions of warhead and the earth will remain the same. Well God knows this and that's the reason He already has a plan for A NEW HEAVEN AND A NEW EARTH. God can't be mocked!
|
Aemmyjah:Nothing took place in 1914 about God's Word. But from this write up, it stated Armageddon TAKES PLACE from Jesus invisible presence began in 1914. Go back to your elementary English text book. There's a difference between Armageddon WILL TAKE PLACE during Jesus invisible presence which began in 1914 (which means the period of Jesus invisible presence is a long one and the time for Armageddon is unknown but yet will happen before that period ended) and Armageddon TAKES PLACE during Jesus invisible presence which began in 1914. This is a simple present tense for something such as: 1. something that is true in the present: I'm nineteen years old. I'm a student. He lives in London. 2. something that happens regularly in the present: °I play football every weekend. °Victor loves going to the Gym every Tuesday 3. something that is always true: °The human body contains 206 bones. °Light travels at almost 300,000 kilometres per second. °Sun rises from the East and sets in the West Well, I don't expect you to know this since you and the person who wrote the article were deprived from formal education. |
MaxInDHouse:You're still lying after what was boldly written on this thread. ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Coming from a liar JWs like his father the Devil who once claimed that Armageddon is not a physical war ![]() |
Aemmyjah:You should rather ask yourself that question. I'm not the one who says below it's from what you posted, so copy it and paste it for chatGPT to interpret and see how it will come out. Olodo! Nevertheless, the Bible does show that Armageddon takes place during Jesus’ invisible presence, which began in 1914.—Matthew 24:37-39. |
AntiChristian:Thrash! I wont encourage you to be stupid as to retype what i had type earlier!I didn't retype, I simply asked you question. What is the purpose of judgement when Jesus was already in heaven? Show me where i said any book supercedes the Qur'an?Where did you read it that I said you said any book supersede Quran? Quran should be the actual book where Jesus life, death and coming back should be. So answer my question. You guys are all bunches of holy spirit lacking low IQ illiterates that couldn't comprehend simple sentences written logically!Throwing insult is your defence right? 1. What evidence do you have?That? 2. Did God write any part of the Bible? Is the Bible God's word?I don't see what leads to these questions because it never addressed my point. You said "All these are mixed in your Bible" And I said not at all, Bible is very clear on Jesus life. Jesus already said by his own self he can do nothing!That's not the point, the point is Jesus coming back to this earth is to pronounce judgement on the evildoers. Age is only relevant in this world!Waooooo but you said he is in heaven with his HUMAN BODY. If age only relevant here, it means it's not the same human body or maybe a glorified body which doesn't operate like ours anymore. Do you agree? And Allah knows best about Jesus's state in heaven!Yet Allah couldn't detail this BEST in Quran. No one knows when he will come and his coming as I said earlier is part of the signs of end time!If no one knows then how will people know he has come? He will come as a youth he was, rule with Islam and kill the dajjal aka antichrist.Then he can't be with the same human body as you claimed earlier. because a human living for over thousand years should be strickenly old even though no record of any human ever live up to even just 1000 years not to talk of over 2000 and still counting. The he'll later die and be buried as a Muslim!Funny enough you used the word ANTICHRIST Do you know the meaning? ![]() |
Aemmyjah:So the Armageddon has even taken place since 1914. This is not funny anymore. |
MaxInDHouse:But you once argue here that the war of Armageddon is spiritual and not PHYSICAL. You see the reason why it's not good to be lying and not even follow your own organisation teaching... ![]()
|
madridguy:And in 2027 you'll still vote the same People you called rogues again. Stop the pretence. |
AntiChristian:You search for it instead. Every created soul would die including Jesus!So which judgement will Jesus face after he is already WITH ALLAH? The Qur'an is not the only islamic text! The adhan is not in the Qur'an but established in the traditions of the Prophet! The Qur'an, the word of Allah is separate from the traditions of the Prophet!So there's another text that supersede Quran. Why will Allah forget such a detail event? All these are mixed in your Bible!Not at all, Bible is very clear on Jesus life. Jesus only coming to pronounce judgement on the evildoers. Yes, body and soul!Which means Jesus is the oldest man ALIVE. You mean Jesus will be pooing and urinating in heaven ![]() Lastly, if Jesus is still human in heaven which makes Him the oldest and will still come back. Will he appear as still the same OLDEST MAN or be born again? Quick Note: Many Biblical events about end time are already in place. So when will your Isa come and when he come how does Quran say people will know he has come? |
MaxInDHouse:"Then you will know the truth and the truth will set you free" And you too! ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Nobody asked your story Mr storyteller. I said the young man QUOTED God's wordStop lying. This is what you just said "God's word gave us the specific date when the Jews left Babylon ..." Let's even say the yound man QUOTED God's Word, do you mean you don't know WHERE IT WAS WRITTEN IN GOD'S WORD? to back his argument so listen and see if he has something worthwhile or not!He doesn't have anything worthwhile to say. Archeological evidence surpassed any random person. For summary! You can't provide where God's Word stated the SPECIFIC DATE the Jews left Babylon. You go with a random young man because his video suits your narrative and discard the vast evidence provided by the archeologist. God is wonderful ![]() |
OLAADEGBU:I thought there's a court ruling on this case or am I missing something? |
MaxInDHouse:Can you imagine. You claimed God's Word gave SPECIFIC DATE the Jews left Babylon and I asked you to provide it. You direct me back to YOUR YOUNG MAN on YouTube. So your YOUNG man is more accurate than God's Word, right? ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:So we should discard the same method of dating. That's nice. So which years the Jews left Babylon according to Bible? |
MaxInDHouse:Provide evidence for the above. Stop lying. If God gave specific date Scholars won't find it hard to agree with. But scholars agreed with 587BC because it's fact. You choose 607BC because it supported your 1914 nonsense with a dubious calculation. How does 2520days suddenly changed to 2520years? |
MaxInDHouse:That's the problem with you people, do you think the archeologist wants to proof Bible right or wrong? No! They just carried out their works. Meanwhile, you called them atheists but you discarded God's word on creation which placed creation about 7000years and support the same Atheists when they say universe is billion years old. So you know what that means? |
MaxInDHouse:I should listen to him and leave archeologist evidence behind. Is that how it works? he asked a thought provoking question:DID GOD MENTION when the 70years will start? No! So, archeological evidence shows its 587BC based on the samples collected from the site inspected. Who should we go with, a random person on YouTube of archeologist? |
MaxInDHouse:Very pathetic. So how did you get the accurate date of 607BC because Bible never mentioned any accurate date. So if archeologists got a date close to 607 BCE then there's no need arguing over that.There is a need because you did a calculation above which you ADDED to 607BC to get 1914, you know going with archeological date of 587BC will never arrive in 1914. What matters is that Babylon was conquered around 6th century BCE.No! What matters is that archeological evidence says Jerusalem was destroyed in 587BC add your 2520days turn years to it and let's see if you'll arrive in 1914 as you calculated above. The source i got said it's 607 BCE and another source said it's 587 BCE the difference is just a decade meaning it actually happened around that time. That's what really matters if there's nothing attached to this!The source of 607BC is wrong because it's not supported by any archeologist 587BC is the accurate ONE because it's ARCHEOLOGICALLY SUPPORTTED. It actually happened isn't a deniable fact but which specific year with archeological evidence is the key here. |
MaxInDHouse:Waooooo can you imagine? Yet you asked me to Google: WHO CONQUERED JERUSALEM in 607BC. Provide your source where it was stated that Jerusalem was conquered in 607BC Or 607BC doesn't have any historical support and just pick by you? ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Are you typing? ![]() Jerusalem was not destroyed in 607BC It was destroyed in 587BC
|
MaxInDHouse:I don't need to google, provide your source here! All archeological evidence pointed to the fact that Jerusalem was destroyed in 587BC
|
Barristter07:You even tried to admit this unlike your fellow JWs who have been putting the blame on those who decided to wear beards. Anyway, can you also openly admit as no where the doctrine like 1914 was spoken about in the Bible or you'll still be defending it? because I know brighter light will soon shine on this 1914 saga |
AntiChristian:I believe this have been addressed many times here. Jesus will later die and be raised up for judgement just like all of us!He already raised up, so of what purpose for him to die and be raised up again? Where can one find this in Quran? That death is different from being raised up body and soul! He hasn't died yet according to our texts!So you mean Jesus is still in heaven with his HUMAN BODY? |
Which charger did he use: Samsung or Oraimo? Anyways, he is in France using the original charger sha. |
Well detailed article. The most astonish part is that not only do scholars agree that Jerusalem was destroyed in 586/587BC there's archeological evidence of the destruction dated to the same period. So for Watchtower to continue to use 607BC as the year Jerusalem was destroyed shows how dishonest they are. |
BluntCrazeMan:And they will face the consequences of it, as there's no ignorance of the laws. So,, I don't think you're writing this to prick anybody's moral Judgement..Sure! Just stating the obvious fact. They will see that it is not good, and still go ahead and do it.That's why they need to be reminded that there's consequence to their actions. |
You don't cope with temptation to cheat rather you made that permanent decision not to cheat on the wedding day. If you cheat in marriage then you don't know the meaning of marriage. |
Courz:Yes! It's called SDA reformation of 1914 @color - That's why new light is delaying to shine on that one but whether they like it or not light must shine to the glory of God the Father ![]() |
Ken4Christ:I don't see where she was attacked, I only see people saying she already lost in court. Or is there no court ruling on the case? I know so many Pastor who wanted to have affair with my wife through their post on Facebook. Not one, two or three. At least over ten of them. But I never exposed them.SO MANY PASTOR..... There must be something wrong somewhere. Is your wife MISS UNIVERSE? |
Ken4Christ:I've read your previous post on this thread but I'm wondering why this question. Now you came up with "SUPPOSING" YES! If what she said is true, you don't need it to be covered. But I didn't see where you ask a similar question like. SUPPOSING what she said is false, does she not need to be punished by the LAW? You people will be doing hide and seek, meanwhile you already taking side in a situation like this.. Is that what Jesus taught you? |
achorladey:I do say that Watchtower never brings anything new just corrupting the existing doctrines already known for ages. Even their famous 1914 is still a copy of SDA and the funny thing is SDA has discarded that because it's never supported either by the Scripture nor Archeological discovery. I'm very sure that a new light will soon shine on 1914 saga but they are just ashamed of its repercussion. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 (of 397 pages)

