₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
Ọmọ i already have what you told my brother i just want everyone to see how empty you are all these while yet arguing aimlessly.

Yet you still want attention so bad

Since you said:
"Jesus is Yahweh" and
"Jesus was praying to Yahweh"

There is no hiding again it's clear that your Jesus was praying to himself jọọ no story!

I know none of you can ever answer that question even your gods in Warwick.

What is that NAME Jesus talked about?

MaxInDHouse:
So Jesus is Yahweh. YES or NO!

Answer my question oga

Stop jumping

achorladey:
You see him jump on Bible commentaries to bail him out, the same Bible commentaries of false Christians and Babylon the great.

The most astonish part is how he fused King of kings into Daniel just to make scripture says what it didn't say.

MaxInDHouse:
And you initially said Jesus is Yahweh o!

Yes! YAHWEH is a NAME!

Or you want to say two persons can't have ONE NAME.

Now, the question I asked Mich that leads to that post is this remember he couldn't answer as he uses his normal style to run away from it.

In Matthew 28:19 we read "Go, therefore, and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit,"

The NAME in this verse is SINGULAR and what is that NAME?

Let me see if you will answer or chicken out

So is Jesus not praying to himself?

Yes Jesus isn't praying to HIMSELF.

MaxInDHouse:
And who is His father o?

Yahweh!

Now, you know that Jesus can't be praying to Jesus.

I'm glad that is cleared

MaxInDHouse:
Not only that Jesus was praying to Jesus!

No! Jesus was praying to His Father.

How is that hard for you to understand?

Janosky:
Nah Emusan way to dey deceive himself.

He's coming to deflect & digress to irrelevant matter.
.

Any of my post now can never negate any of my previous posts since I joined Nairaland in year 2012.

I don't digress unlike you people who always boycott, turn blind eyes or deviate from POV.

Just tell your second to answer my question and see how you people will receive another Bible study.

Janosky:
Psalms 136:1-3 ,Jehovah is the LORD of Lords.
Daniel 44:6 Jehovah is the king of kings.

Your own Daniel have chapter 44

Where did you see King of kings in Psalms 136:1-3 is my question?

It was never there but you inserted it fraud.ster

Jehovah is the Prince of Princes.
Your Trinitarian mentors agreed with the Jews.
Screenshot evidence.

Go and rest or continue WAILING and throw tantrums to mock the holy scriptures.

Jesus is The King of kings! Hallelujah

Truthseeker10:
MaxInDHouse, Janosky, Aemmyjah, Gabrielshow24, QuinQ.
This is the evidence that Emusan claimed that Jesus is Yahweh/Jehovah according to Psalms 110:1.
But it seems the Trinity doctrine is against him now.

Legacy Standard Bible
Of David. A Psalm. Yahweh says to my Lord: “Sit at My right hand Until I put Your enemies as a footstool for Your feet.”

American Standard Version
A Psalm of David. Jehovah saith unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, Until I make thine enemies thy footstool.

Until you tell me the Trinity doctrine you've been running away from since then your question/point will be addressed.

Short note: you forgot what leads to that post which is the same thing you're doing till date.

Aemmyjah:
Jesus was telling Jesus to sit beside him


That is what makes sense to people like Emusan

No it doesn't make any sense not only to me but also to any reasonable person.

The Father told his Son.

Besides, if you're asked to provide the scripture that says "Sit BESIDE me" you'll begin to say another thing.

Truthseeker10:
You mean your tears after being dealt with by Google?😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Emusan wan forget him teaching oo....
Emusan who is the Jehovah in Psalms 110:1. What is the singular name of the Father, son and holy spirit in Matthew 28:19 according to your teaching?

Back and forth tears

I love that

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂

Now see who is crying

I love the tears

Truthseeker10:
Grammarian Emusan has been cornered😂😂. No cry oo.

Keep it coming

I love this

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂😂Baba don shock as dictionary disappoint am.....a whole Grammarian Emusan has been defeated by Google at last.😂😂😂

Keep it coming.

I love it.

Truthseeker10:
According to the screenshot below on point 3.

Grammarian Emusan. 😂😂😂Emusan Emusan......"might" means "you don't know" or it means "probably you think" that "The God" was absent due to grammatical accuracy?

I love this!

Janosky:
Very stupid question not supported by the holy Bible.
Psalms 136:1-3 Jehovah God is the king of kings.
Everywhere that expression is used in the old testament.

"Give thanks to Jehovah, O YOU people, for he is good: For his loving-kindness is to time indefinite; Give thanks to the God of the gods: For his loving-kindness is to time indefinite; Give thanks to the Lord of the lords: For his loving-kindness is to time indefinite;

This is how they keep adding to God's word.

Where does the phrase King of Kings appear in Psalms 136:1-3 even in your own NWT?

Later that title was given to Jesus Christ, John 17:7 & in revelation.

Were you the one who gave Christ the Title?

Was the Title ever used for Moses the one you claimed Jesus was like?

Did your TenQ Bible indicate which of the title is higher?
No?

Who is The Prince of Princes?

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Emusan wan forget him teaching oo....
Emusan who is the Jehovah in Psalms 110:1. What is the singular name of the Father, son and holy spirit in Matthew 28:19 according to your teaching?

If it's my teaching just provide the evidence.

Besides, if you don't tell me Trinity doctrine you know and provide evidence for your false accusation. You won't get answer to your question.

Grammarian Emusan. 😂😂😂Emusan Emusan......"might" means "you don't know" or it means "probably you think" that "The God" was absent due to grammatical accuracy?

I love this

Janosky:
Your comprehension skills nah ZERO.
Please help yourself.

It turns to provide scripture to support your claim my comprehension skill is now zero

I'm enjoying this

Janosky:

Emusan,Use your brain and data .
Stop depending on freebies.
;

Still afraid of screenshot

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Emusan wan forget him teaching oo....
Emusan who is the Jehovah in Psalms 110:1. What is the singular name of the Father, son and holy spirit in Matthew 28:19 according to your teaching?

If it's my teaching just provide the evidence.

Besides, if you don't tell me Trinity doctrine you know and provide evidence for your false accusation. You won't get answer to your question.

Grammarian Emusan. 😂😂😂Emusan Emusan......"might" means "you don't know" or it means "probably you think" that "The God" was absent due to grammatical accuracy?

I love this

Janosky:
The expression "The King of kings" is very common in the old testament for instance Psalms 136:1-3, it referenced ONLY Jehovah God & does NOT apply to Jesus Christ.

"The King of kings" is Jehovah's title in the old testament & later extended the title to Jesus Christ His son.
John 17:7, Jesus Christ agreed that he received it.

WAILING WAILERS deceiving themselves.

Provide the scripture for your claim.

At least scripture is so straight that Jesus is King of kings.

So who is the Prince of Princes?

Janosky:
Oga,Use your data and your brain to discover the answer.

When he is afraid of screenshot just know that water has passed Garri

Truthseeker10:
Emusan who is the Jehovah in Psalms 110:1. What is the singular name of the Father, son and holy spirit in Matthew 28:19 according to your teaching?

Now, shifting left and right.

Just tell me about Trinity doctrine first and provide the evidence of your claim.

Janosky:
The person wey dey quote Isaiah 44:24 upandan for Nairaland no get memory to recall his post he installed Jesus as God Almighty of the old testament.

The wonders of LIARS shall not end on this forum anytime soon.

Smile....So is that lie you want to cover for your fellow liar

Janosky:
Why is archoladey deceiving himself?

What is the Emphatic Diaglott rendition of John 1:1?

Carry your folly out of this thread.
JWs dwelling rent free in your head.

Who wrote the Emphatic Diaglott?

Truthseeker10:
So Emusan you never claimed that Jesus is Jehovah?

Another one!

Keep the useless question coming

You never pass oo.
Grammarian Emusan. 😂😂😂Emusan Emusan......"might" means "you don't know" or it means "probably you think" that "The God" was absent due to grammatical accuracy?

Passed!

Truthseeker10:
Answer na to prove that you never held such teaching here. Is Jesus not Jehovah according to you?

If you made any claim, it's your responsibility to back it up with evidence.

You called people and then said "Emusan has taught on this platform that Jesus is Jehovah."

So, provide your evidence and stop asking me nonsense question...

Grammarian Emusan. 😂😂😂Emusan Emusan......"might" means "you don't know" or it means "probably you think" that "The God" was absent due to grammatical accuracy?

Passed!

Truthseeker10:
Emusan is Jesus no longer Jehovah😂😂?

So you don't have evidence for your false accusation.

Grammarian Emusan. 😂😂😂Emusan Emusan......"might" means "you don't know" or it means "probably you think" that "The God" was absent due to grammatical accuracy?

At least your question has been answered.

You're just chasing shadows.

Glad of that.

Truthseeker10:
Emusan, is your teaching of Jesus being Jehovah against the Trinity doctrine?

Tell me the doctrine of Trinity first.

MaxInDHouse, Janosky, Aemmyjah, Gabrielshow24. Emusan has taught on this platform that Jesus is Jehovah.

Provide your evidence.

It seems the Trinity doctrine does not agree with him oo. Only him can help us out here oo.

What is the Trinity doctrine?

😂😂😂Emusan Emusan......"might" means "you don't know" or it means "probably you think" that "The God" was absent due to grammatical accuracy?

My explanation is very clear.

You intentionally removed "MIGHT BE" from my statement as dubious as you are.

If you don't know the meaning of "MIGHT" that's your own cup of tea.

It's evident your question has been answered.

Truthseeker10:
Are you trying to deny Emusan, that you taught that Jesus is Jehovah?

Just tell me what you know about Trinity, how is this hard for you?

Are you saying that "might" means that you are not fully aware of the grammatical accuracy of John 1:1 as it appears in the kjv if "The God" is added?

No! MIGHT as I used it means I don't know THE REASON KJV omitted The definite article "THE"

This shows have answered your question.

Truthseeker10:
Tell me how you came up with the teaching that Jesus is Jehovah.

How I came up....wa oooo

So, you don't know about Trinity doctrine you're talking about. That's nice.

😂😂😂😂you are not part of the translators.....but as the grammatical genius that you are. You claimed that they omitted "The God" due to grammatical accuracy.

When lying is your hobby.

He intentionally removed "MIGHT" from my statement because there's no honesty in you.

My statement was "It MIGHT be due to GRAMMATICAL accuracy"

Please explain the possible error if we add "The God" in the kjv translation as it appears today.

Again, already answered!