₦airaland Forum

naijaboiy:
[color=#1980BC]Probably he's a fan of hers.[/color]

chuna1985:
Looooooooooool, I'm really sorry for Nigerians. Now what makes u think that APC senators want to remove their own immunity.

APC na majority, but they don't have 2/3 majority.

chuna1985:
Only the Nigeria senate has the power to remove immunity, And I assure u that they won't.

PassingShot:
That was what gave birth to "I don't give a damn" response!

PassingShot:
GEJ didn't declare his assets as president. He was forced to do it as VP and by the time he was elected in 2011 he had already stolen too much to make him declare his assets. So, GEJ NEVER DECLARED HIS ASSETS AS PRESIDENT.

sultan457:
With response to allegation that the President did not declare his asset publicly he doesnt have to since he has submitted to the code of conduct bureau it is their duty to announce to the general public about the asset not the president himself.

bdchange:
I am in amazement and flabbergasted to know what you stand to gain in buhari's failure. Some folks have stood their ground and fervently want PMB to fail even before assuming office just to prove a point on their stance.

A country,where you live, earn your daily bread deserves your unlimited prayers to succeed in all her endeavours.

So, think twice if you want PMB to fail or succeed within the next four years.

As for me, I pray he succeeds.
Thanks. What about you?

modath:
Its Jonathan/Yar'adua's responsibility to probe the administration before them but it was not deemed important despite Jonathan himself proclaiming that they kept quiet about a $10 billion "stealing" they discovered.

Jonathan said he wasn't "interested" in politics but would bend over backwards to cling on to it at all cost including allowing the treasury to be plundered in an unrestrained manner.

The duty of this administration is to probe the one that preceeds it, nothing more nothing less.

egift:
I agree. But the part of don't probe is the problem. While ensuring looting public funds is not carried out blatantly, the past excesses that come to light, should not be swept under the carpet. If the table was turned, the story will not be the same. But my joy is that the boldness to loot, has been crippled.

egift:
I think the System should be open to carry out its mandate without limitations. Like strenghtening the Anti-Corruption Agencies, setting up a special Court for Prosecuting only corruption cases and reviewing our laws like the Penal Code and Police Act to reflect the realities of how public office holders steal in the 21st Century, etc.

What I find absurd is saying that unless other administrations are not probed till Independence that no one should ask question on how Jonathan and his cronies looted the Nation. It is wrong. The other day on "Political Voices" on Radio, someone even said it should include till the time of Lord Lugard or else it will amount to witch-hunting any effort to investigate what happened under Jonathan as President. Imagine!

baibijay:
Lmao. Sick fellow

naijaboiy:
[color=#1980BC]Hehehehe....you sef na player [/color]

Ymodulus:
why are they smiling?
Lol area boys now serving as security protocols.





Bayelsans.
why are they making her happy?
Nigeria - (North) - (SouthWest) = Region B. [Where B = defunct Biafra ]

Region B is always know for celebrating Mediocrity. This is the problem i have with that region. Some pertinent questions comes to mind when viewing this picture, they are:

1. Why is he been celebrated now?
2. What did he achieve during his 7years of rule?
Its so sad to note that these people will never learn.
If anything made my day today. Its Buhari's move to end Region B Amnesty Program.

-Ymodulus
"I am for everybody; And I am for nobody. - @MBuhari. #EagleSquare #DemocracyDay #NewNigeria"

Dorobuccii:
I usually don't comment on posts like this but this tribal generalisation has to stop. I wonder where you got the idea that all yoruba girls are dirty and 'orobotic'? Or all hausa girls are female suicide bombers?

carinmom:
In as much as i m in support of the establishment of these universities, but the truth Of the Matter Is there is no law in support of their Establishment, as such ASUU may be right on this.

Ibangap:
Some of us abusing ASUU should also look from this perspective; what if they were really scared of speaking out for fear of their own interest, many would attest to the fact that the imediate past govt. would not condone any act of 'rebelious' policy that would geopardise the interest of it's friends or sympatizers, and we know that most of universities that was setup by the imediate past administration were either owned by one of it's own or by one of it's sympathizers. Under this situation, which of you would speak out and risk losing his source of survival? Mind you I'm not trying to defend them but you should consider yourself in their shoes under such administration where doing things the shady way is the norm.

eseh1:
...hehehheehe