Ezeagu's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ezeagu's Profile › Ezeagu's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 (of 349 pages)
Dawgpound:That's because an Igbo person will catch hell if they mention any other group in the recollection of Biafra. They don't even need to start mentioning any other ethnic group before some attention seekers start shouting the over used speeches, "don't call us oh", "you better keep Biafra within the 5 Igbo states only", "Ika are not part of Biafra!", etc, when the main coup leaders were __________, when the second in command of Biafra was _______ and when the person that actually came up with the name Biafra was an _________. I think many people inside of these groups are happy 'no one' (you know who no one is) knows they were part of Biafra or fought for it. . . . . . . .too bad a person from Abonnema, on leaving the east, would be called Igbo! (Well, from what I've 'heard', they'd probably be half right, but I'll leave that story to the hundreds of threads dedicated to it) |
They have metal detectors in their secondary schools. End of thread. |
jason12345:Okay, it's time for Biafra! ![]() |
I propose that Ijebu-Igbo should be changed to Ije-ndi-Igbo. Igbo-Ora should be Igbo-na-ndi-Ora. That way the names will be more traditionally Nigerian. |
Some people need a life. . . . . and a Gordon Bell Prize. ![]() |
Onlytruth: |
chyz1:The king of Agbor has always been the Dein. Note oh! No one should say Ika does not exist! |
You people need a life. |
For all those who like picture illustrations, The Obi of Owa: [center]https://www.woghirencharity.com/images/EdwinsDad.jpg[/center] [size=18pt]Sorry wrong picture, here's the Obi of Owa:[/size] [center]https://www.deltastate.gov.ng/March/PRESS_BRIEFING_WARRI_319.jpg[/center] Yeah. . . . . . . |
chic2pimp:Igala are not descended from the Yoruba. |
alj harem:Are you enjoying the insults, or what? |
alj harem:Not when you have a bunch of hateful creatures on your back (I don't mean Yoruba and Hausa as a whole, by the way). Hew! People please calm down with the fighting! It's not that serious, at least it shouldn't be! |
alj harem:Come, why are you looking for trobuul? |
chyz1:Ehn?! I na su bekee? Ndi nor na eba ana nu bekee! ![]() |
alj harem:Because of several gun manufacturers. I dey joke. . . . .small. |
tensor777:Where do you get this stuff from? Was there some kind of survey? There's a video right up there with over 20 British people, men, women, children in the swampy Niger Delta! Now if that isn't evidence of populating, then I don't know what is. If you want to believe that the British were concerned with colonising and developing a place, and then leaving it all completely to the "natives", then that's okay.tensor777:Okay, so the Lebanese are not the first foreigners to settle Africa. |
tensor777:That was in the 19th centruy not 20th century. That is as backward as saying Arabs cannot settle West Africa because of mosquitoes. The Niger Delta in 1956: [center][flash=480,385] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sK4xoD2Zm60?fs=1&hl=en_GB&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999"[/flash] [/center] tensor777:En masse, what do you mean by enamasee? I guess you mean significantly larger than Europeans, if so can you give a number? |
tensor777: tensor777:What does that sound like? tensor777:Crrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. The missionaries job was to pacify 'natives' for colonialism to seem rational, they did some good things, but Africans didn't need them. You can talk about civil servants and military officers being here to protect interests only, but it does not make sense when you count in that many of these people brought their wives and children with them. Can you tell me a country that was invaded first by a populations women and children instead of the military? |
tensor777:You're talking about "intended" like the British Empire was a charity for the development of countries that are thousands of miles away and they had an intent of letting go all their possessions one day. These officers brought their wives with them to serve Empire by populating the colonies, and there are actually many British people (by many I mean hundreds or thousands) who were born in Nigeria, but left after independence like they did in India. The purpose of colonialism isn't to just cheat the other in trade, if that were the case then people wouldn't carry their whole families with them. Colonialism was to assimilate and eliminate the other, which is why they had to destroy many kingdoms for them to establish 'European quarters' in the first place. |
tensor777:I wouldn't sat they were "only too happy to depart", that would be going a little far, just because of the weather? Lugard and the rest were living in all corners of Nigeria, including places that did not have Jos' climate. Looking back at history, 80 years can seem like 20 years if you don't take notice. The point is that there were Europeans who spent a good portion of their lives in the harshest climates of Nigeria, yet they and their families stayed there. The planning of the new cities that came about because of the British and the replanning of old towns in Nigeria had priorities in separating the Europeans and Africans. The British wouldn't waste money on this if they thought others weren't coming to settle. |
tensor777:Nigeria does not have one climate. Many British people were already living in Nigeria before independence, just like Kenya and Zimbabwe. We can't say that they never had an intention of settling West Africa when there were several thousand of them living in designated European quarters in Nigeria's major urban areas. The British were still learning about the territory they only recently conquered. |
ChinenyeN:You're right, that's the original name along with 'Diobu' (an Ikwerre people who's land Port Harcourt was built on). |
[quote author=tpia@ link=topic=538189.msg7025666#msg7025666 date=1288191547]one vanatuan ticking black other doesnt mean all of them are doing the same. if black primarily means african, then they are a different category. sri lankans and many indians are darker than most continental africans but they're not officially listed as black.[/quote]Black doesn't mean primarily African. Caribbean people are not African if they don't identify as such. The people of Melanesia weren't called Melanesian's for nothing, same as Negritos. These people were called 'black' because they share common features with 'Negroes' which is why they come under the identity black. It would be deceiving yourself if you're going to say that you really believe that that is the only Vanuatuan that would tick black, when the whole story was that the community was split between 'black other' and just 'other'. [quote author=tpia@ link=topic=538189.msg7025666#msg7025666 date=1288191547]the US options for hispanics are black-hispanic and black non-hispanic. white- hispanic white non-hispanic. they're still grouped separately from mainstream blacks. everywhere has a separatist movement. nothing new.[/quote]Why are you talking about the US? This is about the UK. How about you go and read up about some Papuan's and what they identify as before making up stuff? What is a "mainstream black"?Melanesia |
kabukabu50:Chay, see someone calling themselves a Nigger! Gamine:Mmm! Is it only VI, why not Ajegunle! |
[quote author=tpia@ link=topic=538189.msg7025590#msg7025590 date=1288191037]i doubt they'd tick black other. black asians identify officially with the asian culture over ethnicity. same way hispanics include all colours. the term black primarily is associated with africa, and not all blacks are from africa originally.[/quote]Someone just told you that a Vanuatuan ticked 'black other', there's no asian culture about them, they're aboriginal. The Papuans in Indonesia even have a separatist movement for their half of the island. There's no option for 'latino hispanic', they'll just have to tick 'other'. |
[quote author=tpia@ link=topic=538189.msg7025509#msg7025509 date=1288190397]they're black but still asian. Or, in the US, pacific islanders.[/quote]They are Oceanian, more specifically Melanesian which is between the continents of Asia and Australasia (they lean towards Australia because they are actually "Aboriginals" . They identify as black, therefore they have a "black background" which means they would tick 'Black other', just like a South American would tick 'Black other' and not just 'other' for American.[quote author=tpia@ link=topic=538189.msg7025546#msg7025546 date=1288190690]mostly in liverpool. I read it somewhere- maybe wiki. Many of them intermarried however. there were a lot of west african blacks in 16th century england, but it seems most of them were transferred to spain and portugal or some other place. the blacks in 18th or 19th century britain were likewise sent back to sierra leone or elsewhere.[/quote]Are there any still existing? |
[quote author=tpia@ link=topic=538189.msg7024856#msg7024856 date=1288185762]papuans and negritos would be asian. AAs and hispanic could be other black i guess. some blacks in liverpool are the descendants of african seamen from one or two generations ago.[/quote]Actually, many Papuans see themselves as 'black', same as many from places like Vanuatu, plus Papuans are Oceanian's. I don't know of any British black people that are descendants of seamen, do you have any stories? |
debosky:Other Blacks are Papuans, African Americans, Negritos, Black South Americans, people from other areas that identify as black, it could be adopted children, it could be half 'Caribbean/Half African children', etc. Any "black person" from Africa is "Black African". There aren't many Black British people without knowledge of a country of origin outside Britain, even among adopted children who's biological parents, most times, leave knowledge about themselves. |
honeric01:Read realllyyyy slooowwwlllyyy so you can understand. ![]() Why are you asking me for stats when you are the one claiming that people aren't stabbed by 15/16 year olds; shouldn't you be bringing out the "statistics" (as if Nigeria has any) to show crime rates among kids, in fact bring out the "statistics" about crime rate in general. We'll have to wait for a long time. I hope you u.n.d.e.r.s.t.a.n.d now instead of chatting about things Nigeria hasn't got. What don't you get about the difference between a city and a country. Nigeria and Lagos are two different levels, one has 15 million people, the other has 140 million. I hope you learnt something new today. I don't expect you to reply with anything that relates to this post, so like I said before, believe what you want to believe! |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 (of 349 pages)


Ndi nor na eba ana nu bekee!
. They identify as black, therefore they have a "black background" which means they would tick 'Black other', just like a South American would tick 'Black other' and not just 'other' for American.