₦airaland Forum

thebosstrevor1:
I do not agree, most black people can not control themselves when they have weapon with them.

Give a blackman a gun and he will use it to rob, plunder and rape.

vickydevoka:
That's why Women think outside the box unlike men.
My neighbor cousin black pass Wanda coal she bleach to get guys attention now she got married to a dark guy, de funny thing is dat all her children are fair in completion. Brother fear who no fear Woman. Women know what's up pass men inarguably. U won't be surprise dat short guy no go born even one short pikin. That's y disabled and ugly men no de Carry out DNA bcus one or two of ur pikin no be ur own

definitelyCYRIL:
Note: please it's gbajabi(alima) and not gbajabi(amila)... please take note..


A trader by name, Mr femi gbajabialima, has poured out his frustration on the buhari regime In the early hours of Sunday morning, calling the president a disgrace to the country and adding that he is one of the worst presidents to ever rule this country.

sunshineV:
i still won't do it. i get coconut head

OmovuduTheBeast:
I don't have time to watch TV
Watching TV too much can lead to poverty
You spend your time watching famous people who have made it at the expense of valuable time that can be channeled to create money.
I have 2 desktop computers and a laptop, they are strictly for hustle. I don't have TV

mamaafrik:
Army Rejoiced,Navy Rejoiced but Airforce personnels cried when the Retirement news broke out,but Sadiq had to go with the other two principalities,oowa gbohun soke. Oopariwo bi eni ti akeeke ta lowo,oope ," oluwa olorun agbayeooo,Bi sadiq ti woko pelu awon wonyi ,jooo,maje kin boloriburuku woko po.", Ooya gba aduraaaaaaaaa

Ezeama400:
.

http://saharareporters.com/2021/01/25/your-home-%E2%80%93-ekiti-governor-fayemi-assures-herdsmen-ondo

tyup:
Beautiful...... but still not meeting up to the 21st century structure

lalasticlala:
https://twitter.com/Oyoaffairs/status/1349790813409185795?s=19




https://oyoaffairs.net/amotekun-corps-member-summarily-dismissed-team-leader-faces-investigation-over-mokola-incident/

Itzurboi:
If you don't have 100 naira, then you have like 93naira cos of bank deduction...
same applies to 1000naira...
Hope you grab my dear bro...

Praxis758:
They have come o....... So this OP and his ill-informed supporters are directly saying CNN removed the Covid update because of Trump.

Please let's place sincerity, reality and pragmatism above sentiments.

WoundedLamb:
You are still trying to lump them up when I have over and over again made it clear the approach is the bone of contention. Politicians will be politicians and it is fine if you can stay within "legal correctness". You overstep when you ignore the due process or try to use violence to achieve your aim. This is America and that can never be tolerated because adherent to the rule of law is a major indicator of a first world country. So nobody is asking for the exact same scenario, the approach only needs to be arguably legal and non violent. Whatever it is you claim the Democrats were trying to do in the last election, they managed to keep it within the tolerance of the American law. They encouraged the people the move on while they challenged the outcome themselves. They didn't resort to inciting violence. And eventually, they lost and went home. Can we say this about Trump?

You're asking what the Democrats would have done if they had perceived any phoney activites against them; was that not what played out the last time when they detected Russian interference in the election? What did they do? They accepted the results in public to calm the people down while they kept digging for evidence long after the election. Like you said, they almost succeeded but eventually lost cause what they had wasn't concrete enough. They were not happy but they let go cause the law had spoken. What makes Trump think he's above that?

The software tweak story you mentioned was alleged. People came to that conclusion not via any technical means but based on what they saw as inconsistencies in the numbers. That's not a problem. The problem is, what made Trump think the Democrats were stupid to have followed the due process when they had their own doubts? What made him think encouraging his supporters to fight was going to yield any positive result?Today 5 people are dead already and you people are complaining his accounts were banned; were you seriously expecting the country to sit back and watch him destabilize them? If Donald Trump had any evidence to prove the software was tweaked to disfavor him, he would have done what the Democrats did when they believed Russian interference worked against them. Ignoring the rule of law doesn't just undermine the democratic system, it undermines the judiciary system and that's the height. He made his choice against the advice of both the Republicans and the Democrats.

WoundedLamb:
The Russian accusation which was made before the 2016 election could not have been geared towards challenging Trump's victory when there was no winner when the accusation was made. It came after Hillary's private email server accusation was brought up. The protest of 2016 had nothing to do with it. And like I said, even if it did, the Democrats took every step to calm the people down. Can you say this about Trump?

The Democrats undermined the democratic system system by challenging the result? Lol... so what then is democracy? Dude, you're really trying to make this about challenging the results because that would help you make a convenient comparison but it is never about that cause challenging the election result does not in anyway undermine the democratic system. In fact, it is an integral part of the democratic system and the right of the loser. The only requirement is that you keep it legal. Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans were the first to challenge the results, it has happened more than 5 times in the American history. I don't know your age but that of the 2000 election was even far dramatic than the Russian accusation. So get your facts right. Challenging the result is not the problem. Again accusations are normal in politics and Hillary didn't start it. Trump's team brought up Hillary's private email server accusation long before the Russian accusation was made.

If you read my posts, I never said Trump shouldn't challenge the result cause it's his right. Like I said earlier, what matters is how the losing party goes about it and Trump's narcissistic and egoistic approach landed him here. America is not lawless. Hillary followed the legal process and went home to lick her wounds when she couldn't prove anything. She didn't incite people into taking to the streets violently and she called them to order when they did. Again, can you say this about Trump?

WoundedLamb:
Please sir, let's not twist history. Except you are talking about a different protest, the anti Trump protest was on November 9, 2016, just a day after the election. And no, it was not in any way incited by the Democrats as suggested by your post. Hillary never rejected the election result. She called Donald Trump the night of the election day to congratulate him and she made a concession speech the very next day; a public display of willingness to go with the result. The protest started later in the evening on the 9th and continued till the next day, and Hillary called for calm. All these are steps that vindicate a candidate. She kept the people out of their saga, something Trump wasn't willing to do.

Though the Russian accusation was first mentioned in September 2016 (before the election even when it was "apparent" Hillary would win), it didn't really gain traction till January 2017 when it was detailed by the office of the DNI. It was never the reason for the anti-Trump protest. Never. But assuming it was; like I said, the person a group of people is clamoring for is implicitly the leader of the protest and has the power to stop a protest. Hillary called for calm when her supporters held a peaceful protest and you cannot in any way hold her responsible for it. Can we say the same about Trump? He didn't make the customary call, he didn't give a concession speech, he outrightly rejected the result and even called on supporters to "fight like hell", a statement that could be interpreted in many ways. And when the protest took place, he called them "great patriots". Bro, check that out.

Moreover, the anti-Trump protest of November 2016 was not in any was as destructive. People don't just get arrested for protesting in the US. If these Trump supporters guys are being arrested and social media are banning Trump's accounts, it's because the protesters were extremely aggressive (5 people dead so far!) and Trump (the implicit leader) who was meant to call for calm was doing the opposite. His cabinet members are resigning, he doesn't talk with his vice anymore, etc., everyone can't be wrong and only him right. Dude is living in his head alone and it's shocking he's got people supporting him in Africa.

No, I don't need the media to explain to me what l lived through. Let's not always attack the media, it undermines our own intelligence. There's absolutely no comparison between the way the Democrats handled their loss and the way Trump is handling his. Only sentiment would make anyone even consider that.

mach7:
Hillary "accepted" the result attended the inauguration, and thereafter stated that she lost because the Russians helped Trump win. Even wrote a book about it too.
Obama accepted the result, despite all the efforts that he and the intelligence apparatus under him did to spy on and subvert Trump's win.
The Democrats "accepted" the result by using 3 years to conduct an investigation into the Russian collusion and delegitimizing Trump as a "Russian puppet"
The Media "accepted" the result by constantly demonizing Trump and his followers and not presenting anything he did in a good light.

The World is unfair, I will leave things here. Judge for yourself.

WoundedLamb:
Hillary accepted the result and Obama ensured a smooth transition. Those two are the card bearing party members representing the Democrats in the whole drama. The so-called thugs are citizens; supporters like you and I. They aren't party members, they only seek good governance and would always go with one preferred candidate or the other. I don't think the issue here is the reaction of the people when their preferred candidate loses an election. The issue is the reaction of the candidate who is the representative of thier party. Trump's action or inaction fueled this unfortunate outcome. We both know this, let's not galvanize it. People will always react but the decision of the person they're clamoring for determines to what extent the people would go. Trump could have stopped this a long time ago but he encouraged it cause he had hoped it would yield a positive result for him. He's only giving up now cause he has no choice.

Good afternoon.

Activist001:
Today it is Trump, tommorow it may be you. Big tech have now become the regulators of the free world and freedom of speech.

They can now essentially tell you what you can and cannot think - anything away from the mainstream liberal belief system and feminist ideology is now termed "hate speech" and "dangerous to our democracy" just like Buhari does here in Nigeria.

If you support Twitter on this, you're a fool. Their stocks are plummeting after the ban anyways so we'll see how it goes for them.

Trump made Twitter what it is today and this is payback? Who knew Twitter before Trump ran for office in 2016 and used it as his official communication channel since he didn't trust the news?

Another platform will surely rise up and Twitter will regret this decision! You cannot suppress the views of more than half of the USA and the world at large and win. It's not possible.

Gbogbowa:
what has Trump done wrong,you have an incident and no investigation and you are blaming Trump but that is not democracy

Balogunodua:
And where is the fence the op is talking about