Goel's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Goel's Profile › Goel's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (of 13 pages)
kikuyu1:Not a coincidence. Modern humans spread in world from Africa. It's a fact. |
rvp2018:I'm rather hitting out on topics after topics that are being presented to me to somehow prove that India's in same league of African Union. I will win every argument in the end by default because that isn't true. For India's greatness, as told before there are 10 tonnes of indicators to shatter your celebration of India's low GDP per capita (as if it moves up Africa's stature against India even an inch). I'm just not willing to make a jumble of childish arguments and have an objective discussion. Google "Ad Hominem". You have Google to Google India's what you called "greatness" instead of taming me. rvp2018:I won't be ever used to. India's GDP per capita growth rate is double Kenya. It's MER GDP per capita will be double & even triple of Kenya too soon. So, I will not get used to even India's income group. I'm even personally earning nearly 4 times what I used to some 5 years ago. I can write tonnes of attributes of India what I actually can say get "used" to it coz any of Nigeria or Kenya will never be able catch up with them. Do I? rvp2018:It's my pleasure that you thinking that I will give any damns to Nigeria or whichever African/other country having higher/lower number of poor people than India. ![]() There is a thing called "poverty ratio". You would see me, for a very good reason not ever mentioning Nigeria having lower/higher poor people. Seriously, Africa has more than 50 states populations from 1/6th to 1/700th of India. If Nigeria has one poor on one non-poor, India has one poor on 40 non-poors. This status-quo never changed. Or Burundi is probably better than PRC because PRC has higher number of poors than Burundi? ![]() rvp2018:Not necessarily, certain countries survived Asian financial crisis after currency devaluation, India is one of them. And I don't think any of my whippings will do any proper shape to your dumb mind and make you understand that nominal GDP is an inductor of financial power while PPP GDP per capita is used for development. No one uses total PPP GDP. And why I said it has holes? Because GDP is about economic activity. GDP is about trade & not wealth. Indians have much higher money in form of accumulated wealth (liquidity, homes, buildings, vehicles & so on) like any other AP country what Afros can only dream of for a decade at least. https://m.economictimes.com/news/economy/indicators/individual-wealth-in-india-grows-9-62-in-fy19-report/articleshow/71652515.cms https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_wealth_per_adult https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_total_wealth Stevoh18:I'm okay with it if it makes you sleep good at night. Google rape rates. Stevoh18:Not even in Asia-Pacific, leave alone entire Asia. Stevoh18:Besides GDP per capita, even North Korea is miles ahead in human development indicators. Boasting of weapons coz economics & industrialization is something I don't even need to boast off! tylann:Much better at population ratios. The one compares a country with continental population & measures poverty in numbers is himself is a poor, uneducated & mentally stunted person. tylann:Compare the rape rates. tylann:These are only aid programs. What India has over is a long list that won't even let this thread last. Do I post a news daily? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan-African_e-Network_project https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_foreign_aid |
Kazikazi:We were never completely colonized before 1920. Our Marathas fought against Brits and even defeated them in many wars. But there weren't only British in India. There were French, Portuguese, Spanish and Moghuls and even Russians were trying to get control over India. Indian revolutionaries even recaptured small part of India and few islands during WW2. I'm not going to be defend it anymore with apologetic approach. Our fault. We were supposed to defend our motherland what we couldn't. kikuyu1:They are getting very good amount of pounding already. Their military casualties since March are in three digits but they can't tell to world as they will have to react against a much bigger military. But Indian OSINTs are rummaging through their social media accounts to collect proofs. Here is a bit from my gang. https://defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/atleast-64-pakistani-soldiers-killed-in-just-5-weeks.81741/ We will wipe them off from map too but at appropriate time. We don't have anyone to back us unlike their American and Chinese allies. So we will have to be equally strong to be like them. edon21:I never denied. I will even explicity accept that India is still poor. But against the standards it compares to. We can't be called poor outside Asia-Pacific or North Atlantic. tylann:India scripts disagree. They mention trade with civilizations of East Africa. Anyways, even same logic may apply to China too. It isn't a developed country either. Africans are older people than us but they didn't build giant kingdoms and universities. Persians, Chinese and Indians were first to do so but they could not industrialize (what made West rich actually). |
Mkenya2019:Seems that its impossible to shove this up in your mind that status of living standards of countries mismatch with their income groups defined by world bank. It's first time I'm facing an idiot who classifies countries on MER per capita just because it milks his dreams. Everyone cites PPP per capita. You don't have to worry still. Even India's GDP (MER) per capita growth is triple of Africa. So we will enter WB upper middle income group before 2030 even at our slowest speeds. Obiano13:I don't have words to describe your state. |
SUFFERInSMILIIN:Things aren't as simple as you think. Do you think that there was no corruption in West or there is some sort of magic wind to turn your country upside down? Corruption, savage and greed is everywhere in world. European people aren't some sort of angels. Their law & their existing luxuries only prevent them. I don't say that third world can't do better. But your problems aren't as simple as you think. GDP is just an indicator of economic activity in your country. Not an actual well being which is your wealth. It is easy to increase GDP with time but not wealth which results in long term stagnation. You can trade within country to generate GDP but for wealth, you have to have resource extraction tech or export finished product (made from indigenous or imported raw material). Becoming a part of global supply chain is most difficult part of nation. It's like competition for getting a job. Countries who become integral part of chain by hook, crook, innovation, stealing, cheating, begging or bullying get benefited. For every growing country, many others suffer. India can't set up a thousand factories to make smartphones as world buys Chinese. One more thing: *Brits were blood suckers. |
Mkenya2019:I didn't deny that nominal GDP is the measure of international financial power. Development has little to do with government's international financial power. It is internal. For HDI, I said all indicators by SUCH organizations. The few indicators which use nominal GDP capita fail greatly in reflecting realities. You can't call PNG or Solomon islands more developed than India. |
kikuyu1:BTW, unannounced India-Pak skirmishes are still going on. Casualties, real death numbers and timeline are kept secret and never revealed. We will come to know some 20 years later. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/india-would-be-a-southwestern-power-says-jaishankar/article29580988.ece A new revised military doctrine is under contemplation regarding India's posturing too. https://m.hindustantimes.com/india-news/new-military-doctrine-to-be-submitted-in-october/story-S0payhw9CgFs5FfeMqAMyI.html A completely new posturing strategy is under draft for 2030 when India's economy will be next to just US and China. India aims to be a pole itself in a multipolar world of future rather than joining US or Chinese gang. Indian government has formed Defence Space Agencies, cyber agencies, launching more & more spy satellites, funding more & more desi R& D projects and has been preparing to put all the forces under one command. India's defence exports have gone up 25 times and will enter top 10 too soon. We are living in very intetesting times. Here in Eurasia, civil wars with modern weapons, terrorist groups, more and more states with nuclear weapons, warfare moved to space, multiple great & middle powers with nuclear weapons in immediate neighborhood (like Europe in WW2). Unlike during cold war & early post cold war, when no one could stand against US or USSR, today's great powers are close to each other. There are a lot countries with similar power levels or those levels close to great powers. I bet you guys won't deny about the problem that any of you don't have two enemies with nuclear weapons in immediate neighborhood unlike India. We have to take care of one-sixth of humanity while taming them too, daily. |
kikuyu1:This is what stopped us. Just 3,000 kilometers away, American and British nuclear flotilas were ready to nuke us like Japan. https://swarajyamag.com/politics/india-could-have-split-west-pakistan-in-1971/ https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/reveal-names-of-cia-moles-of-1971-war-cic-393131 This is why we tested nuclear weapons in 1974. For your information out of entire media bubble & propaganda, we didn't have any countries as "friends" (except for Japan & France). India has faced direct hostilities from West, China (even Soviet Union before agreement of 1969). Pakistan is still official non-NATO ally of USA and proxy of China and the West to keep India contained in its region. It was finally India's economic development after 90s that has somehow diluted this. Technological advancements after good funds in 2000 made those countries nice to us. We later on developed lot of military doctrines and weapons and are still doing. Will do till we have enough. Now, West wants India to rise to contain China but doesn't want India to cross red lines either. India has some other thoughts. |
rvp20182:No, they use PPP & HDI to compare levels of development wherever I checked. GDP (nominal) is translator of national financial power globally while GDP (PPP) per capita is indicator of well being internally. Nominal too won't be a long deal as India's GDP per capita doubles in 6-7 years. And please understand that, I'm not trying to demean Africa in anyway. But calling the places "same" is a bit too much. My state only translate that India is catching up again fast which is factually correct. The old Indian civilization is poor today for same reason Africa is today. Western looting machine in past few centuries. Technically, Africa is older than Asia. |
Mkenya2019:In 2019, Indian GDP is close to $3 trillions and growing even faster ahead of Africa's $2.4-2.5 trillions which is a quite good gap. Nominal GDP doesn't count for development but financial power of government internationally. That's why we use PPP whenever to study living standards of people. Check the Indian & African GDP & per capitas in 1960s, 1990s, 2010s and 10 year later. |
Mkenya2019:You are using India's 2011 numbers & comparing them to Africa 2019? I'm tired explaining too much of it. As if fellow Africans who visited India aren't able to summarize it. |
Obiano13:1. In terms is quality of life, RSA has a high poverty ratio & inequality, inequality adjusted HDI well behind India. 2. No, I wasn't comparing RSA to India. Some other member was doing what I was trying to refute. RSA indeed is far ahead of most African states what doesn't go in mind of fools. |
Stevoh18:Come on, response & attack can stay limited to a particular member. This particular relevance can't be challenged however. |
So basically, I'm not gonna get any response. RSA can kick the --- of any African country & India can do same to entire Africa or West Asia & Indo Pacific and you guys can't respond anything better except spinning it around. ![]() Case closed Obiano13: |
Kazikazi:*2036 billion in 2018, 2019 figures are yet to arrive. Where do they stand vis a vis all other human development indicators? AFAIK, GDP per capita is always studied in PPP for a reason as India's localised industry makes the cost of living in India much cheaper. Once again, Mauritius & Seychelles are Indian countries themselves. Pick up their poverty ratios and inequality adjusted-HDI, even half of these handful of countries will shatter in no time. Picking a handful of countries to boast of won't help you. Coz on average, Africa stands nowhere near India. Behind in terms of development indicators and far behind if we go ahead & cover technological aspects. India's GDP per capita is still growing faster than these countries. Even these countries with higher GDP per capita than India have multiple holes in their indicators along with no industrial base. India will leave behind them too like others. There are tonnes and tonnes of indicators which you can go through and HONESTLY ask yourself, who has done better? And now let's put all this nationalistic chest thumping aside and get on topic. As instead of replying to my question, you tried to brush it away by tempting me with ad hominem and telling me what YOU THINK about India. ![]() I said no other African country comes anywhere close to South Africa. I hate this country for its anti-Indian political posturing multiple times. I usually try to insult them on other forums, here I've came across stupidity against them what they most certainly shouldn't face. So, my point remains. CAN ANY AFRICAN COUNTRY STAND UP TO RSA? Can anyone of you? India is far away in another league all together and if you think there's some sort of "competition" between India & Pak, you don't even have a clue about world around. Don't blabber about India because I won't respond. I don't think I have to preach much about it. |
pacretus:Not surprised, that's all what an I'll educated street genius would know about India. Afros calling India poor. LOL, my @$$. |
AskiaHarem:LOL Will your denial will make any difference to my opinion or facts? My opinion won't indeed matter for 13 years old African nationalists. No African country (except far away Egypt) can dare to challenge RSA for a war. pacretus:In terms of technology. Aircrafts, shipbuilding, missiles, nuclear weapons & a lot. South Africa simply can't be compared to any other African country. It has made strides in nearly every sector. pacretus:Indians don't need comparison by South Africans to feel important either. Our giant is bigger than naija, RSA or even entire Africa combined in everything except natural resources. We know where we stand and our egos are shattered by west and our giant neighbor PRC only. And we don't have to make brainfarts either because of lot of practical demonstrations. |
MiddleDimension:South Africa doesn't have any rival in Africa. Stop hyphenating your countries with them. |
urahara:The shopping list of these countries is much longer & advanced. There is nothing that Africa makes and they can't. |
Nowenuse:The degree matters. This culture is still prevalent in smaller degrees in Asia Pacific and higher degrees in and higher degrees in Africa & middle east. India definitely has higher instances of it than West and East Asia but lower than Africa and middle east. And stop using this "third world" tag as a symbol of poverty. Third World refers to the nations which were allies of neither side during cold war. Case is different that most of us were poor. |
BTW, my comment on thread, they could better use desks attached with partitions or covers like they use in entrance exams. This one looks stupid. |
fergie001:Now fifth. Fourth in 3 years as Germany is declining. Japan too will be hunted down 5-6 years to become third after US & China. namiji2598:Just ask Nigerians who have ever visited to India whether India is like Nigeria in common or not. Even our smaller cities. Agree that it's not a very great place to live in but it isn't a $hitole either unlike shown by western propaganda machine. Our $h!thole is glorified for various reasons that prevent us from falling into league of Nigeria. Those poor rural areas are either very remote or used to be common during early 80s. Collapsing every decade on. sulasa07:Not population and population growth has little to do with it. Countries with world's highest population densities are among most advanced in world while those with low are backward. Successful ones of them have population concentrated in particular region of their country. Because denser population makes infrastructure projects feasible what won't be possible in a vast and barely populated country. (Doesn't mean that you should let go it crazy high either. Nigeria can't keep 1 billion people with less than one third or less than one tenth of areas of India & China). Your country STARTS to improve (and won't suddenly become successful) once you get hold on it (neither high nor low population growth). |
vaxx:My faulty thinking? Whatever I said was always supported by facts, stats & history itself and not brainfarts from WhatsApp universities. You typed things out of thin air without even checking for factual accuracy and then started carrying out personal attacks, changing topics, using strawman arguments and so on. Who wouldn't love to frequently call out such a member? You still are reluctant. As for my "chest thumping", I told before that I'm a defense enthusiast and I hold a certain level of knowledge of technologies of military equipments (if anyone is interested) and geopolitics which is above average of a juvenile. It's my hobby (soon will be profession). I didn't claim anything outta thin air and there is no boasting involved. I also have a community of people like me where there are lot of seniors to me with far better experience. I didn't beat chest. I was debating while you jumped in & started calling it chest thumping (said I'm "overhyping myself" when you yourself were clueless. Basically, I'm not intelligent but you are an idiot.kikuyu1:Noted, I shouldn't bump this thread again. I'm not gonna learn anything from this forum at least. |
vaxx:We blow at caste, you do at ethnicity, simple is that. vaxx:No, I actually collect mentally stunted samples from various forums and eventually go back to call them out. So stop bringing castes in between. Remember the argument? So, you got anything real or same pathetic uneducated & unrelated logic of "age of the country" and conspiracies about historical economic data? Anyways, I have a proposal. By end of this year, country by country: Ghana, Kenya & Nigeria, let's list up notable events/periods for the country this year as well as from independence. I need some familiarity with African news. I will post same about India if anyone wants. Especially for the people who don't have any knowledge and perception is based on juveniles in their locality. obaaderemi:He never knocked me out. He was so incompetent, overproud & ignorant that he not only wrote things made up in his mind without any confirmation but was even trying to defend it actively. I left because I knew he will keep on replying & changing topic to keep himself with last response in the debate. As for Nigerians, this thread is a pathetic circus. Kenya & Ghana are ahead of Nigeria in most indicators and it's a fact. NigeriaIsDoomed:What's rape rate of Nigeria? NigeriaIsDoomed:LOL, anyone can mess up with anyone internet. Out of it, I'm a financially far stronger person than most people here. As for entire Nigeria itself, my country alone is more than entire Africa combined. |
So, hello all a-hole Nigerians. ![]() Where is that dumbo vaxx these days? |
RTSC2:1. We are not richer than Sri Lanka. Per capita GDP of Sri Lanka is double of India and also other things like HDI, literacy and poverty rate much better than India. India and Sri Lanka are like USA & Switzerland. Because Switzerland & Sri Lanka are smaller countries than powerful and large economies of USA & India. 2. No, India isn't falling. It's per capita GDP and all indicators are improving very fast. 3. Nigeria & Ghana are a different case study altogether. Nigeria's GDP united per capita is close to Ghana only because of extra circulation due to oil. Otherwise, it's a different and poorer country. (No offence intended at any Nigerian). |
tintingz:Hello, I'm an Indian and elephants are very dangerous animals. Those who have elephants are a small community very skilled people with licenses. Elephants aren't caught & domesticated that easily and their transition to residential places is very restricted. You won't able to handle an elephant once it gets spooked by any nuisance and how many lives & how much wealth it will threaten if not shooted down on the spot. You Afros got even bigger elephants so you may know better how ugly they can make it. |
Orissodiq:India has told the story by breaking them into pieces, making them run to UNSC for help and release our pilot unconditionally. Go & google Indian military strength, nuclear capability, chemical & biological weapon capability, anti nuclear missile shield, reconnaissance capabilities, communication, seeker and missile capabilities, industrial capacity and economic might of India. Comparing India with Pakistan is like lamp with the sun. Pakistan isn't a competitor but a nuisance for India. India vs Pakistan is like Russia vs Ukraine or USA vs North Korea. |
samorobo:I'm not a Kenyan idiot. Sooner you realize it, better for you. samorobo:Indeed, most stupid nation India is. By default, my country doesn't need any defending against your countries. My country alone can devastate your entire continent without getting much damage on its own end. If my country chooses to turn hostile openly to any of Nigeria, Ghana or Kenya or any other African country, it will get isolated shortly and future will be in danger. My nation's anti colonial moments were inspiration for anti colonialists of rest of world, immediately after freedom my country direct hostilities from USA (on Portugal) and Soviet Union (on Kashmir) and ended up turning them ally. From nuclear to chemical, biological to conventional, fragmented to thermobaric, tactical to strategic, India went on developing every kind of technology and made a robust defense that made India invasion proof against any superpower or colonizer. It then started on pulling millions out of poverty every year while dealing with wars always on multiple fronts outside country and secessionist insurgencies inside country (finishing nearly all) and still facing while growing. From basic automotive to rocket science, India pursued nearly everything what a great power has at low income status early. At a per capita GDP (nominal) of just $2,200 which itself is growing at very fast pace, India has much better HDI, other human development indicators and access to technology. While you guys still keep on running after other countries for aid, my country has transformed into a donor of aid. We don't have to compromise our national interests in return of nothing against foreign pressure. Keep on your drama with your African fellows only. samorobo:Which analysis? What did he analyse at first place? He just googled Indian news and copied some faultline comments over Indian Central Budget FY2019-20 to keep his argument alive. ![]() There was no "analysis" or conclusion involved anywhere. What do you think? Nigerians trolling people here is actually pissing them off? No, they are even taking more pity on your ignorance. Especially for India, your trolling won't change Nigeria's status vis a vis India. |
vaxx:Who ![]() vaxx:I don't either. Indians rarely talk about Africa in general. I'm the one exceptional who keeps on visiting other sides to know about their politics. Here, I got stumbled with a pathetic idiot. vaxx:What are you waiting for? Just list up a couple of those patterns. I'm confident enough that my pattern doesn't coincide with anyone. vaxx:Stop wasting time on me then. I can't do anything about that. Quote that person only in response to me. Because I'm tired, found you extremly stupid and not going to reply to you anymore. By the way, this is me. https://www.facebook.com/aman.goel.376043 vaxx:Just because your comprehension skills are too weak to understand what I wrote, it's not my fault in anyway. Just at start of debate, I asked you to study Economic Complexity Index, Demographic Transition model, Great Divergence, East Asian renaissance and economic history of world. You didn't know anything about it nor you bothered to research. And blabbered here whatever was in your mouth. World doesn't work in simple way what you believe. Make strategic studies your hobby and you will be wondered everyday. vaxx:Me being egoist? The education and knowledge I have collected over the years in my work field and my hobby is something you can only dream of. I'm not here to impress you or anyone else. However, for my "look alike" friends, you must agree that my pattern is different and I'm a different individual. I keep mouth shut on topics what I don't know anything about. I don't give up however when someone is spewing bullsh!t. There is a thing called "Debate Pyramid". Do study about it. Along with my arrogance, all insults, personal attacks and abuses I threw at you, I kept myself restricted in confines of debate pyramid. I only added arguments, didn't change them unlike you. You were continuously jumping from one side of argument to other and even changing them purposely. Just start reading our debate posts since start, you will get how big irritant you were. Go and study that pyramid. |
vaxx:Wow wow wow! Me spreading bullsh!t? It's you who has been crapping from mouth literally, giving made up statements, one after other and either changing entire context or skip them from your post altogether. Let me list up quite a few: 1. Countries with large population do grow (LOL). 2. China was never poorer than Africa (See economic history of 20th century). 3. Chinese GDP is bigger than USA & EU combined (LOL) as per "reliable sources". 4. India had "poltical instability" (LOL) and for this reason couldn't surge as ahead as China surged. 5. China & India have "historical advantages" (which and how they affect?) for which they are destined to be large economies. And so on. Running away here & there, you lost entire essence of argument (which compared India & Africa) and googled education budget & unemployment trending in India. You skipped Nigeria immediately because you know that Nigeria is decades behind and keep on insisting me to ignore where average Africa stands against India. You skipped most of African countries, all of black countries and bringing up far North African middle east's middle income countries for comparison (what if I drop entire India and start bringing richest Indian states). You knew that Nigeria or Africa on average doesn't stand anywhere near India in education. So you brought average year of schooling as education index and compared it only within "South Asia". Even in South Asia, do you think Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Nepalis get better education than Indians. Have you seen face of their landscape and economic activities? India's literacy rate is above 80%, adult literacy rate is 90%+, 95% school enrollment which is second in region and most of top colleges and universities. Seriously, South Asia doesn't mean anything itself, it's just Greater Indian region with an identity crisis. You actually claimed that India is underfunded, I straight refuted it citing annual budget of $750 billions and then you came up with "South Asian" ranking totally changing context. Indians file 45k+ IPRs annually in WIPO and 3.9k alone in USPTO making it second most innovative developing country after China and at par with East Europe on per capita basis. Enough how much education Indian private sector was able to provide at cost of public ones. Seriously, education is necessary for growth. But it's neither primary and has stages. Economic diversification is actual driver of growth. The circular logic goes on that a great military power status can only be achieved by a giant economy. But great powers use their hard power & capabilities to boost economy. Doesn't mean that journey starts from military. India isn't investing any less on education. The budget however is having slow increase and so is declining as percentage of GDP with economic growth. All of India's space budget, defense budget, education, healthcare and so on are declining. Government is spending all of extra revenue on rail & road infrastructure only. India needs to spend $4.5 trillions on infrastructure to maintain growth which is primary focus. You didn't know either that Indian government amended the method of calculation of unemployment. The reason of unemployment, the demand of type of employment, average wages and even the life of an unemployment person in India is totally different from Nigeria or Africa. Similarly for health. Hunger index doesn't translate to starvation or extreme poverty in India but underweight. A third of Indians are vegetarian and take low protein diet by their choice. Indian life expectancy would have been 72-73 with protein & without air pollution. Indian standards too are different. The point I raised which has been skipped purposely in last two post, India is completely different place from Africa is perfectly consistent. India is in a totally totally different league of countries, different from which countries are trolling India here. Especially Nigeria. vaxx:How ignorant!! Seriously, how should I educate you? Was Denmark's example I gave you not enough? Small countries don't need trillions of GDP to qualify as rich. They too will set up smaller industries and bring profit for themselves. This small amount is enough to enrich a proportionally small country. A larger economy isn't necessary a richer one too. Shove this up in your fragile mind. vaxx:Vice versa is also true. Growth doesn't have anything to do with size. vaxx:Not necessarily. If government doesn't get enough revenue to work, everything will stall. India isn't completey libertarian economy unlike USA & Western Europe. Government still runs most of things. vaxx:Indian government has already increased taxes on super and ultra rich of India. Seems that you again read a billionaire sponsored news article while googling faultlines of India. ![]() India's ultra rich don't take risks of investing into new industries. They have a unique habit of savings that most certainly doesn't contribute anything to growth. Indian industries don't conduct R& take scientific knowledge from Indian government for granted. That's why Indian government increased their taxes from 35% to 42%.Earlier Indian government was generating increased taxes from public and MSMEs (Medium and Small Enterprises). This time they kept our taxes unchanged and went after those lazy fats.As India. MSMEs & startups too are keen on investing critical techs what government wanted to make them. Like semiconductors & chip fabrication, advanced electronics, 5G research and aerospace sector. vaxx:I'm not giving excuses, I'm reasoning. India will most certainly have a bit of indicators close to other lower middle income countries. At the same time, Indian will continue to outperform them in many aspects for its exceptional efforts. In the end, trajectory of India's all development indicators is upward only. It has to be evaluated, what to do and when. Rest I've explained above. vaxx:Do you have any idea how much per capita expenditure will be needed for it? Versus the real result it gives? India doesn't need to import teachers either. Nor it needs to go crazy after secondary education till 95% of population has primary education. vaxx:Easily my foot. Making such big financial capitals need tonnes of investments in infrastructure throughout decades. And why? Why the hell people will dump their reliable products to buy new Indian ones? Answer would be quality control and cutting down costs. As quality shouldn't be compromised, shipping costs will have to reduced. That's why India is so concerned about infrastructure and making freight corridors within and outside the country. vaxx:India's direct taxpayers are low in numbers however doubling in every 2-3 years. Almost entire Indian population pays indirect taxes. vaxx:Bullsh!t logic as usual. According to you, Africa won't overtake Asia in population because "What are you saying? Asia had world's largest population historically". And China wasn't ever poorer than Africa because "bullshit as usual, Chinese GDP had once be the highest in the world. just use Google." ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fact: China dropped out of list of world's largest economies in second half of 19th century and didn't even make it into top 10 till 1990s. At various instances, Chinese GDP per capita was even smaller than Indian ones (mostly remained close however). Besides Japan & Philippines, entire Asia was far far behind Africa. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Income-and-Urbanization-Asia-versus-Africa-1950-2010_fig1_267386204 Chinese & Indians have seen massive famines, dire poverty and much more brutal imperial suppression by foreign powers than Africans have ever seen or will ever see. We even got large parts of our populations wiped out. vaxx:Just clearly, DEFINE THIS DAMNED IMAGINARY "HISTORICAL" ADVANTAGE YOU HAVE CONTINOUSLY BEEN BLABBERING ABOUT" And then explain how it plays any role. If you can't then just shut up. If being large once was a factor, China & India wouldn't even have fallen to weakness. vaxx:I'm wondering why I'm wasting time here? No point arguing with an idiot like you. vaxx:Contemporary Africa refers to black countries. REAL AND CORE AFRICA. Unlike them, Seychelles and Mauritius themselves are Indian settlements while middle income countries of North Africa are middle eastern settlements. It came as a response of your reluctance to compare Nigeria/Africa with India because they are far behind. You wish to skip the most of Africa and handpick a very few countries in proximity with meditarian, I just refuted with what those countries actually are. vaxx:Yeah, Asia often refers to Eastern civilization. When you got to account whole one, you have to include entire Abrahamic civilization (Europe with West Asia) that translates to Eurasia. Contemporary Asia refers to 1. East Asia 2. Indian Subcontinent 3.IndoChina and India superior (Dragon's tale, both regions together called Southeast Asia). These come first in mind whenever you talk of Asia. These too are the ones constituting most population, area & GDP of Asia. vaxx:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_and_projected_GDP_(nominal) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_and_projected_GDP_(PPP) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_and_projected_GDP_(nominal)_per_capita https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_and_projected_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita vaxx:1. You can't do that without cherrypicking. Very few nations and very few indicators. 2. Even that instance will have multiple holes. 3. That instance will be short lived too given at rate India improves every year. vaxx:Agreed on GDP per capita & HDI only but by miles? My foot! ![]() They don't have any damn industrial base compared to India and are mostly commodity based countries. Even here, India will surpass them even at its slowest pace at a time frame of 10-20 years. |

That right there is crazy. It just GDP in market prices converted into USD. The USD as global currency is taken as good comparator. Obviously IMF/WB and other institution have tried to come with PPP - by trying to determine prices of common goods and services based on local conditions - but it's not without criticism either - for instance hair cut in New York is not the exactly the same as with India (Quality of Good & Services ).
Really? Which kain caste be that woman and do you fall under the same caste
when you yourself were clueless. Basically, I'm not intelligent but you are an idiot.
