₦airaland Forum

vooks:
But Truth is constant, else if it changes across culture and time then it is worthless


Very true, but we are not comparing women but DOCTRINE. Do you think DOCTRINE should change with time?


You are an idiot. If whatever Mohammed did 1400 years ago is inapplicable today, is it possible that Islam invented 1400 years ago is outdated?

Aisha still had her dolls when she was married

Question is whether this is worthy emulating. Is it or was Mohammed primitive

What an slowpoke! So would you gladly marry a 6 year old if she 'consented' and there was no law against that?

She was very mature and that's why she had dolls when she was married.

Typical Christian with their arguments, I stopped reading ur stories when I saw the insults. U knw u can make an intelligent reply without insulting right? It showed ur level of reasoning. If u want to argue with me, or av a discussion, wise up

vooks:
But Truth is constant, else if it changes across culture and time then it is worthless


Very true, but we are not comparing women but DOCTRINE. Do you think DOCTRINE should change with time?


You are an idiot. If whatever Mohammed did 1400 years ago is inapplicable today, is it possible that Islam invented 1400 years ago is outdated?

Aisha still had her dolls when she was married

Question is whether this is worthy emulating. Is it or was Mohammed primitive

What an slowpoke! So would you gladly marry a 6 year old if she 'consented' and there was no law against that?

She was very mature and that's why she had dolls when she was married.

Typical Christian with their arguments, I stopped reading ur stories when I saw the insults. U knw u can make an intelligent reply without insulting right?

vooks:
How does one determine which are valid and which are not? Does Allah give guidelines for this or a list of the 'valid' ones?

Thru the chain of narrators (Isnad)

vooks:
How does one determine which are valid and which are not? Does Allah give guidelines for this or a list of the 'valid' ones?

Thru the chain of narrators (Isnad)

vooks:
It is mentioned and so is circumcision and abstinence from pork. It is included in the Torah which had an expiry date; the death of Jesus Christ. Also mentioned is animal sacrifices as well as no planting of two different crops on the same field.

Now, after digression and an asinine attempt to insinuate that Holy Bible is just as bad as Quran, tell us; would you marry a two year old and masturbate on her thighs till she is old enough for penetration?

why do u pple keep shouting over an issue that happened 1400 years ago. Times av change and so av pple. U can't compare women back then to now. U guys shld stop being hypocritical. Go back in history, About 200 yrs ago in US, the normal marriage ago for female was abt 7-12 yrs , let's compare this to 1400 yrs ago.
Back then it was no big deal to see women marrying at age 9- 12 and boys at 14 becos the rate of growth and development might av been higher then. Back then u cld see a 16 yrs old as a commander of an army. But times av changed now a 12 yrs old wld probably still be struggling with JSS1 or 2, and babyish.
The Prophet married Aisha at age 6 and she was brought into his household by age 9. Aisha wasn't forced into the marriage as u all like to paint, neither was she maltreated in marriage. She might or might not av been 9yr old but what stood out about her was her maturity, Intelligence, knowledge and contributions during and after the lifetime of the Prophet and She was reffered to as the 'Mother of the faithfuls'. She was one of the major contributors to the hadith of the Prophet and a teacher to both young and old, male and female.
So tell me if She hadn't been both physically and mentally mature but a wimpy, weepy, helpless, 9yr old like u all like to paint her, do u think she wld av made such impart?

true2god:
The first country any sane person will use to bench-mark islam is saudi arabia. Saudi arabia is the home to the islamic prophet, the home to the two islamic most sacred cities (mecca and medina), the place the islamic prophet was buried, the home to the famous prophet mosque, the home to muslims' most sacred shrine which muslims worldwide idolize (the kabba). Saudi arabia is one of the few countries that accept all the hadiths and the sunnah of the islamic prophet (without question) because they understand the history of islam and part and parcel of the islamic history. So who is more islamic than saudi arabia, is it Nigeria? Tell me the country we should use to bench-mark islam.

If saudi arabia make apostasy punishable by death they are following the hadith and the sunnah of the islamic prophet. Muslims living in saudi arabia, pakistan, iran, sudan, somalia etc, have no problem with killing apostates (in line with islamic laws) but muslims living in 'decent' countries find it embarrassing to their religion hence will cook up many lies in order to deny their apostasy law. Many muslims lives a duplicate life and beliefs and thats bad.

Lets see some hadith that justify the killing of apostates:

Sahih Bukhari, volume 9, #17

"Narrated Abdullah: Allah's Messenger said, "The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Messenger, cannot be shed except in three cases: in Qisas (equality in punishment) for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (Apostate) and leaves the Muslims."

Sahih Bukhari, volume 9, #57 Narrated Ikrima, "Some atheists were brought to Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event, reached Ibn Abbas who said, "If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah's messenger forbade it, saying, "Do not punish anybody with Allah's punishment (fire)." I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah's Messenger, "Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him."

Sahih Bukhari, volume 9, #58 Narrated Abu Burda, "Abu Musa said.....Behold there was a fettered man beside Abu Musa. Muadh asked, "Who is this (man)?" Abu Musa said, "He was a Jew and became a Muslim and then reverted back to Judaism." Then Abu Musa requested Muadh to sit down but Muadh said, "I will not sit down till he has been killed. This is the judgment of Allah and his messenger," and repeated it thrice. Then Abu Musa ordered that the man be killed, and he was killed. Abu Musa added, "Then we discussed the night prayers .....

These are very few hadiths that justified killing of apostates in islam. So if saudi arabia is evil and barbaric, that means islam is evil and equally barbaric because the saudi government rule by 100% sharia law and consevatively follow the trilogy the the quran, the hadith (especillay sahih bukhari and sahih muslim) and the sunnah (especially ones from ibn ishaq and al-tabari).

On a final note, can you provide any country to bench-mark islam since you claim that saudi arabia is not islamic enough to be used for bench-marking islamic beliefs?

I will overlook all d other stories in ur write up since I'av given my reply.
But I need to change a notion wc actually shows how ignorant u are of Islam. Ibn Ishaq and Al- Tabari, are know to be very unreliable, with narration of very weak and fabricated hadiths, and stories abt the Prophet. Muslims take the Sira of Ibn Ishaq wt a pinch of salt, since it is well known for falsehood and gathering narations with unreliable sources or even fabricated ones. The Muslim critics are always quick to pick up his and Tabaris work thinking they av points, but we don't take them serious.

Reyginus:
Why should it be on Frontpage?

Cos it's a different perspective from all the lies, half truths and propagandas we've been perpetually fed wt and used to. It allows one to reflect and see the loop holes and correlations. That is for those who want to and not blinded by stereotypes

I have these views to share.
- The actions of Muslims whether or not they claim to be in the name of Islam or the name of God are not to be equated with normative authentic Islam
- The authentic Islamic teachings are based on
a)Quran : The preserved, intact Word of God.
b) Hadith: The Sunnah of the Prophet. The authenticity and strength of it's chain has to be taken into consideration
As regards apostasy.
Evidence in the Quran
- There is no single verse in the Quran wc prescribes earthly punishment for apostasy. Verses only speak of God's punishment.
Q4:137: 'Behold, as for those who come to blive then deny the truth, and again come to blive and again deny the truth, and thereafter grow stubborn in their denial of truth . God will not forgive him nor will guide them in any way'
* It is notable in the above verse that had the Quran prescribed capital punishment for apostasy, the person wld av been killed at the 1st instance.
-More revealing is the fact that there is overwhelming evidence in the Quran for freedom of conscience, belief and worship.
Q18:29 'And say 'O Muhammad', the truth has now come from ur Sustainer. Let he who wills, blive it and let he who wills reject it'
Q2:256'There shall be no compulsion in matters of faith'
Q88:21-22 'And so, O Prophet, exhort them, ur task is only to exhort. You can't compel them (to blive)'
Q60:8 - decrees that pple of all faith co-existing peacefully with Muslims must be accorded just and kind treatment.
* Hadith-
There are few reports alleging that the prophet ordered killing of apostates who refused to repent however they av been deemed weak and unauthentic by Scholars of Hadith due to the weakness in their chains of narration and therefore not reliable esp in serious matters like capital punishment
and many more
A case of apostasy reported in a book of hadith (Bukhari) considered the most authentic book of hadith.
- Jabir Bn Abdullahi narrated a bedding pledged allegiance to the Prophet by accepting Islam and then he got a fever and went to the Prophet 'cancel my pledge' but the Prophet refused. He went agin asking to cancel his pledge, but the Prophet refused. He then left Medina ---'
*The incident took place in Medical where the Muslims had an independent Islamic state, where the Prophet had full authority to implement Shariah. But he didn't call for the man to be arrested, punished nor killed.
- The treaty of Hudayybiyyah was signed by the Prophet and idolatry. 'In wc if a Muslim in Madinah decides to apostate and go back to idolatry the Prophet wld allow him leave and vice versa'
* some scholars justify apostasy by citing apparent safeguarding the Muslim Community and it's political entityfrom disintegration, yet the Prophet allowed apostasy even while Muslims were vulnerable and insecure.
Apostasy can only warrant death penalty if the apostate committed other crimes like murder or instigating war. Like some apostates who had killed and mutilated a shepard after they had apostated and left

More grease to ur elbows OP, this thread actually opened my eyes to many things. Many questions I av answered and unanswered. I definitely know there is more to these terrorist groups than religion or whatever they are camouflage with. They look for excuses to infiltrate and wreck havoc in different countries, create hatred against a religion. They had been successful in blindfolding many pple from the truth playing the Super hero when in actuality they are the villains. Many pple refuse to think outside the box.
We are watching as the events unfold. The truth shall become manifest one day.
And why is this not on FP?

More grease to ur elbows OP, this thread actually opened my eyes to many things. Many questions I av answered and unanswered. I definitely know there is more to these terrorist groups than religion or whatever they are camouflage with. They look for excuses to infiltrate and wreck havoc in different countries, create hatred against a religion. They had been successful in blindfolding many pple from the truth playing the Super hero when in actuality they are the villains. Many pple refuse to think outside the box.
We are watching as the events unfold. The truth shall become manifest one day.

I don't know what to call it. Stupidity?
I heard of a story tht almost made me puke, similar to this woman's.The man was very abusive but this woman's neighbours informed her mum. Apparently, her parents live far from the couple, but the mother travelled there, she met the man beating up his pregnant wife, when the mother tried to stop him, he beat her up wt the daughter. Both were later rushed to the hospital.
After recovery the silly woman insisted she was going back to her husband. I was like, is this love or madness?
I dnt knw why some women chose to overlook the warning signals or worse still hope he'll change. If as a fiance a man is already slapping u around and u still marry him, u are stupid.
Even if u were arguing and he raises up his hand to slap u, nt once nor twice even if he doesn't, or he has a quick temper and get's angry over unreasonable thns, be preparing to run for ur life.
Those children u claim to be staying for will live their life wt or wtout a mother. U're even doing them injustice cos the children will no doubt be affected psychologically watching their father beat their mother every day. Don't allow a beast deform or murder u. The Society sef will type RIP.

ashjamu:
Acid, city, tidy



Auxeses

Is there any word like auxeses or are we forming words too?

Sex, sexes, see
Burglar

cremedelacreme:
Seriously I actually found the 3 letters within 20secs. The C and 6 were pretty easy to find, it was only the N that took a lil time.

funny enof, I found N the easiest, I was wondering why they said this might be difficult.

Speechless3:
Op speak for yourself then, 99.99% of your brothers are more concerned about attacks on their dead religion than they are sympathetic of "terror victims" And to think you just exhibited same behaviour calls for more serious concerns.

And truth be told how many of the non-muslims manifest sympathy to the terror victims? Without being hypocritical do a survey of the threads involving terrorism and all u see is pple quickly rushing in to bash Islam. There was a thread abt a Muslim that saved lives, but d disappointment in many non-muslims can be felt cos they do not want to hear anything good coming forth from Islam.
No rational human being wld be happy with what these terrorists are doing. Cos it cld be anyone. Muslims aren't happy with what is going on, much less when the terrorists are hiding their evil agendas under religion. Many negative stereotypes av been created regarding Muslims with Muslims being assaulted or killed by other pple simply for being Muslims. They do not represent Islam, but Muslims are forced to be on the defensive, so u can't blame them for wanting to clear their religion from deluded animals claiming to be Muslims. And no Islam is not a dead religion as much as it might please u to wish it so neither is it in support of terrorism.
Peace.

daretodiffer:
Nah, I will never do that however I could try putting bullet to your amoeba head. What say you?

Calm down my sister, I know all these can be very annoying but u've got to calm down.
It's not easy trying to reason with pple blinded by hate, stereotypes and falsehood. They brought questions from their usual hearsays and falsehood wc were duly refuted but they wld never accept rather they'll resort to insults.
Personally I only answer some pple I deem a bit reasonable when I av time, but most times it's always a waste of time, cos in the face of facts they'll still continue their delusions
May Allah bless us. Rather ignore them, it isn't easy bt better so one doesn't sin against God while answering some morons.

Waiting for the day this post will come to FP 'Linda Ikeji pooping in the toilet of her mansion, isn't this beautiful?' these Linda ikeji and her mansion's posts are dry already.

emmalexabl:
When sizeable population of this religious sect are extremists and terrorists..,
wont you agree with me that there is something seriously wrong with islamic doctrine..

what wld u describe as sizeable population? As far as I knw these terrorists are a minority sect but with profound effects becos of the havoc they cause to life.
I'm sure u av met many Muslims how many of them are terrorists and how many of them av u met who support these psychos?
There is nothing wrong with the Islamic doctrine, the only thing wrong is the evil in the mind of these pple, their disregard for life and whatever agendas they av beneath the religious cover they are using.
And av u ever wondered who the sponsors of these pple are, the pple protecting them, the pple supplying them with top class ammunitions and weapons they use. France only deemed it fit to attack the ISIS camp after lots of lives av been lost, if they knew where these pple are hiding, why wait till they strike b4 exterminating them? Will the West with their acclaimed intelligence tell us they don't know what is going on and the pple behind all these attacks? There are a lot of things we don't know.
Fighting these terrorists shld be a collective effort of all right thinking individuals, no matter the religion, cos blive it or not this pple are killing Muslims too. Rather than brewing hatred and stereotypes against Muslims, the whole world shld come together to fight these deluded animals.
Many Muslims lose their lives cos of the propagation of evil stereotypes, some teenagers were killed back then by their peers just cos they are Muslims. Their was a thread I saw on NL abt a pregnant woman tht was beaten up and lost her preg by some guys in Paris just cos she is a Muslim, yet some of us still justified this evil act by saying she deserved it since some 'Muslims' were killing pple abt. There are certainly many animals in human skin, no matter the religion

emmalexabl:
Are they moslems or not ??

The crusaders that claimed to have been fighting for Christendom, were they Christians or not?
Anyone can claim to be a part of a particular religion, that doesn't make what they are doing acceptable in the religion. These terrorists may bear Muslim names, shout Allah Akbar, but they are committing grievous sin and their actions are against Islam

Jazakallahu khairan OP. Jummah Mubarak to all my Muslim brothers and sisters

missKiffy:
My own view is that seeking her husbands permission b4 taking a job or before being allowed to work is absurd because this means whatever the husband says is final, irrespective of whether the job will enable her grow career wise. Seeking the husbands permission is a different thing entirely, as opposed to a situation whereby you and your husband can converse, communicate, you know talk about it and come to a reasonable agreement, but in this case the husbands decision stands, irrespective of whether he sought her opinion or not, and he mite even refuse her working for his own selfish reasons.

Your last words av said it all. U related it to Islam, that was why I answered u. It is more of the culture of those pple than religion.
Becos there is no part of the Quran or hadith where the woman is prohibited from working if she so wills, so why shld the man stand in her way? As long as the job is halal and will not involve immorality and lack of modesty the woman is allowed to work. The woman can decide to work and decide not to. If she decides to and the work doesn't fall out of halal means, no qualms, and if she decides not to the man can't force her.
What I meant with my statement as regards permission, is that the woman has to inform her husband and involve him wt her plans at job quest. I see no big deal abt this.

Craven:
missKiffy HaneefahRN

I agree that it is backwards for a woman to still ask for permission from her husband to work. This is the 21st century; everyone has rights to explore their dreams and be whatever they wish to be. And it isn't right for the possibility of a woman's dreams to come true to be dependent on her husband. Because what then is her life's purpose? Why is she alive of she can't truly 'live'?

Women have moved from a time when their opinions were irrelevant to a time where they can truly change the world. But when their dreams to become great is dependent on their husbands, then there is a real problem.

Marriage shouldn't be a boss-employee relationship. It should be more of two teammates working to improve each other. Notice I didn't say 'one person'? Because marriage is a two-way street. While a wife should encourage her husband to be the best he can be, a husband should also encourage his wife to be the best she can be, not just in her marriage, but in the career she chooses to pursue. He should encourage her to pose as a good example for his children, his sons and his daughters; so that they too can look at their mother and be proud that she is good at something other than homemaking; so that while their peers are bragging about their mother's cooking skills, they can chime in and yell 'My mother isn't just a great cook, she saves lives for a living; she's a surgeon!'

But how can we achieve this if we believe a woman can do nothing without her husbands permission? No woman is any man's slave. It's her husbands role to advice her the way she advices him, and not to 'dictate' to her. It's is a marriage after all, not a tyranny. The purpose of marriage is to help each other grow, not to hold the key to the other person's growth in a locker and have them come to you for permission to access it.

By now you should know where I stand; I am all for gender equality. I do not believe the male gender is superior to the female gender. And I do not believe the female gender is inferior to the male gender. We all have the same access to life in this world, and we all have the opportunity to explore it in our own way. And I do not believe anyone, male or female, requires permission from another person to explore life the way they choose.

I try not to use religion to back up my arguments because religion is different all around the world, and you cannot use one religion to dictate how people around the world (who have different beliefs) should live their lives, but there is a part in the Bible that states, 'there is neither male nor female, for you are all equal in Christ' (Galatians 3:28). The Bible is contradictory, I know, but the verse clearly illustrates my point; we shouldn't encourage women to feel lesser then men (asking for permission to explore your dreams speaks of nothing but inferiority), we should encourage them to be the best that they can be as career women, as mothers, as wives, as political figures. It's okay if a woman choses to be a housewife; the whole point of Feminism is that a woman expresses her right to choose, so I don't judge. But if a woman wishes to go the extra mile, it's her decision and no one should take that away from her. One thing people regret on their deathbed is that they never got to live life the way they wanted. It's unfair to subject women to this fate.

Besides, if a woman is destined to be great, what husband can say no? What 'permission' will stand in her way? Her husband's? Absolutely not.

Nice and intelligent post. I actually replied Misskiffy cos of the term backward she used and her relating it to Islam. In Islam there is no aayah in the Quran and no part of the hadith where a woman working is prohibited. She has her freewill to work if she pleases and not to if she wishes, she can't be forced to work neither can she be forced not to, if she wills. As long as the job is halal, no problem. What I supported is the woman informing her husband and seeking his consent before taking up a job, of course the husband has no right to deny her of this. Women are encouraged to be Drs, nurses, teachers, whatever profession that will not involve lack of modesty and is halal.
Men and women are equal b4 God, and in the Quran it is said 'that ur wives are a garment to u, and u a garment to them', the husband and wife are expected to co-habit as partners in love.

missKiffy:
If you guys notice, majority of the countries are muslim countries, why are this people so backward

Pray tell me what is backward abt a woman seeking her husband's permission b4 taking up a job? Note that it isn't Countries where women aren't allowed to work. If the husband is sufficiently rich enof to take care of all the financial responsibilities and his wife doesn't work, it's no one's biz.
In Islam, a woman has right to financial freedom and security, if she wants to work she is allowed to, and whatever earnings or properties she gains is for her alone, not for her husband nor the family, the husband is seen as the head of the home and also the provider for the home. The financial responsibilities of the home lies on him. These Countries allow women access to education and are allowed to work, as long as the work environment is Halal, I can remember as at 2010-2011 or so, one of the best opthalmlogist in Saudi Arabia is a woman.
Like I said, I dnt see anything backward abt this, but I'm interested in hearing ur view.

The base line is SAY NO TO PRE-MARITAL SEX. Remember condom isn't 100% safe. Both male and female, u've got everything to lose. STIs are real. Keep f ucking around and come down wt HIV or hepatitis or syphilis etc and say u've got nothing to lose.
But truth be told ladies av more to lose as a result of pre-marital sex, what wt d risk of unwanted pregnancies, abortions wc comes wt the risk to life, STDs, and if u're a religious person, sinning against ur God, etc. But some pple will still come around to say virginity is overrated, continue letting every irresponsible guy like the OP who claims to be a bf use u and come back to say virginity is overrated.

Eeyah, I pity ur mom sha cos for ur dad to still be slapping her at this old age of theirs, then she must av been chopping correct beating when they were younger.
U shld't av intervened and stand up to ur Dad in the heat of the moment, 'although I dnt blame u, even as a lady I dnt think I can watch such happen wtout confronting him' u cld av waited call them separately and try to diffuse the situation. My advice is if u av the means and can afford to, pack out of the house bt dnt do anything silly trying to get back at ur dad. U're a grown man u knw

softtouch2:
You don't even know the meaning of "psychopaths"
It is better use for Terrorist.
Just tell me how many Muslims has publicly denounced Boko Haram and ISIL in Nigeria?

When Boko Haram started, most of una dey praised them... including that Terrorist Moderator - Mactunji

Mr Dictionary, what does psychopath mean? And how was my use of that word wrong?
Muslims av always been denouncing BH as not Islamic, but the stereotype still continues. I don't know abt the 'most' Muslims who were happy pple were being killed, probably the ones around u, cos I avn't met or heard of a real Muslim who wld claim to be happy with the actions of BH. U gud just like imagining falsehood. I'm still wondering why I'm answering u though

They are both wonderful courses. My only advice is choose what u're passionate abt. It's obvious u av a gud ground in engineering already, if that is what u want pursue it. Please, I beg u don't go for nursing, if u don't av passion for it, cos when things get rough, ur passion will be the only thn keeping u going, but if it was neva there, there will be problem.

softtouch2:
[size=64pt]Go preach these to ISIL & Boko Haram!
[/size]
[size=16pt]You are talking to wrong audience here[/size]

And pray tell me how I am talking to the wrong audience? My audience are stereopythic pple, and I av made my points, wc are facts obvious to any muslim, while at it, teach me, how to reason and preach to deluded psychopaths.

MinorityTribe:
Don't forget to post your divorce pictures on Nairaland too. BTW is that your mum?

why are u such a sadist. Wld it kill u to wish them well and keep ur evil thoughts to urself.
Op, HML in adance, wish u all the best in marriage

heykims:
Point of correction, a fact erroneously injected ma'am...
The surgeon general of US isn't a nurse, but the surgeon general of d US army. And she's d surgeon general based on d fact that she's d most senior officer among those in d health arm of d force.

thanks for that correction sir. It was an overlook on my part. But it still doesn't change my point

heykims:
Point of correction, a fact erroneously injected ma'am...
The surgeon general of US isn't a nurse, but the surgeon general of d US army. And she's d surgeon general based on d fact that she's d most senior officer among those in d health arm of d force.

thanks for that correction sir. But it still doesn't change my point

angiography:
My dear, I concur with your submission.

Thanks bro

kinguwem:
The problem of the nursing profession is inferiority complex. The nurses are paramedics and have specific roles in the hospital. The doctors are the leaders of the medical teams and the medical consultant takes charge of patient management. However, because of more emphasize on remuneration, the paramedics attempt to equate themselves with doctors. What they should do is to lobby for a change of their scheme of service to enable graduate nurses to rise above GL14. Secondly, even in developed countries, there are different categorization of nurses based on their qualifications and specialty. They are paid based on the services they deliver. Nurses are involved in administration of health establishments but must not necessarily be the Medical Director. They head some health institutions but not tertiary hospitals including the teaching hospitals. Nursing education is still fairly developed in Nigeria and is rather surprising that a fellow of the postgraduate college of nurses will compare himself/herself to a medical consultant. As stated earlier, the problem is desire for better remuneration.

Typical Dr's mentality, anyone who isn't a Dr must av inferiority complex. Being a paramedic isn't demeaning or belittling, it only means one is a non- Dr health professional. U guys really need to change ur egocentric and self centred orientations.
As regards the CMD issue, Drs normally shld''t be CEO's of the hospitals, unless they av administrative or managerial degree with some yrs of experience. In sane Countries where Drs don't claim to be all in all, CEO's are administrators, managers, with some years of experience in management, although a Dr can be if he or she possesses these qualities, the CEO can be from any profession whether health related or in the business route. The best man for the job is chosen, and even presently in Nigeria, we can see the havoc some corrupt CMDs av also done to the health sector, thank God they are being exposed already.
And do u know the present Surgeon General of the USA is a nurse? This can never happen in Nigeria, if the Drs had gotten what they wanted, I'm sure it wld av been monopolized as the post of minister for health and state minister for health has been, wc shld not be.
Yes, Drs are very important figures in health care, they plan the pt care wc is their responsibility while the other team members performs his or her role as licensed and needed, but no, no health worker is beneath or a minion to Drs, we are equal, we are all professionals with diverse roles working towards a specific goal.