₦airaland Forum

chic2pimp:
Not even that. Always seen him as more of a CM. Barcelona of recent times have never needed an AM. The philosphy has been pretty simple. The three Midfielders are there to retain,recycle and dominate possession with the goalscoring left to the dudes upfront. Deco the closest thing Barca had to an AM never scored 10 goals in the league.

Story for the Gods.

Anyway, send him to CM where the likes of Xavi, Toni Kroos and Xabi Alonso shyte on him in terms of CM.

When you are tired of that, send him to LW where Ronaldo, Neymar, Ronaldinho and even Hazard will shyte on him.

Iniesta is an embarassment of an AM looking for another position to hide in.

Is he not the one some deluded Barca fans call the greatest AM of all time? Now he is running from AM position.

chic2pimp:
Also Not that I agree with Ibime on Iniesta btw. Never seen Him as an AM tbh

We are starting to hear the truth now.

When you are an embarassment at something, they will deny you like Simon Peter.

Iniesta is an embarassment to the position of AM.

homesteady:
Ogbeni! Reply to this!

In 2009, when I made that statement, Barcelona had just started dominating club football and Iniesta had no record to examine at the very top at that time. As usual, all the hype was around the tikitaka merchants so it is easy to get carried away when you see Barca in the final playing fantastic stuff.

After few years of studying that team, and having some years of Iniestas record to go by, it didn't take long to figure that Xavi actually runs the tikitaka game, while Iniesta is not doing his job properly, which is to make the difference in the opponents goal. Xavi was actually even outproducing him at certain stages from a deeper position. I quickly compartmentalized Barca into it's constituent parts - Xavi and Messi. The midfield dominance comes from Xavi (best midfield dominator I've ever seen) while the winning of games comes from Messi. Iniesta has nothing to do with it but get carried along.

Infact within a year or two of making that statement, I recanted and named Xavi my favourite midfielder of all time.

homesteady:
I just saw that Iniesta made Linda ikeji blog football team of the year

Thats where he belongs, on pages of gossip magazines with pictures of him dribbling as evidence. When the real footballers are putting in the work and winning games with their end product, it is vaccuous reports of intangible contributions that will be put forward for Iniesta.

homesteady:
As usual, your lies! How many teams have defeated Spain 5-1 in any competition? The only time they got whopped by that scoreline, Xavi was on the pitch, and he was fully fit! Everyone except you knows that Spain slump was due to their coach and they can't always continue to perform at the highest level!
During this year Euro, he was their most important player!

You keep on asking me for his contribution, I posted a picture of a page from the technical report of Euro 2012, they stated his contribution and the same can be said for other competitions he entered!
If you don't agree with it, maybe you should take a trip down memory lane, think of what made you declare him best midfield in the world! Please don't clown me and say it was because he was dribbling! Have you ever crowned Quaresma best winger in the world? Ben Arfa, Zaha and many more! Have you ever declared them as best in their positions? Because this guy's are monster dribblers!

My friend Xavi was finished in 2014 with ankle arthritis, that's why he was being benched for Barcelona. It was up to Iniesta to carry the team since Xavi can't carry him anymore and he failed woefully.

Iniestas international career since 2012 is exactly what would happen if Iniesta kept dribbling himself all game like Pius Ikedia without Xavi to win the matches.

The facts remain that Xavi scored or assisted 50% of all Spains goals in knockout stages of those tournaments, including all the tight 1-0 victories such as twice against Germany, once against Portugal while apart from the World Cup final fluke, Iniesta only assisted in the 3-0 whitewash of Russia which was an easy game anyway.

You can read all those nonsense reports all you want. Report that told us that they are awarding Iniesta for his creativity. . . with only one assist in Group Stage. Such nonsense report is headed straight for my dustbin.

Even Cesc Fabregas quietly assisted 1 World Cup final goal, 1 Euro final goal, 2 Euros semifinal goals and didn't make this much noise.

Iniesta assisted in whitewash of Russia and was lucky to be in the right place at the right time in World Cup final, and we no fit hear word again.

homesteady:
Sharrrrrrrappppp to! The only person drunk here is you! You are Damn fucking high! High Asf!
How would only one person be against established journalists, technical teams and millions of football viewers?
You should check into a medical facility! You shouldn't carry this madness to 2017 oh

Show me Iniestas contribution and Xavis contribution in those tournaments, lets see who is carrying the team.

I told you that if I show you Xavis contribution in those tournaments, you will disown Iniesta. Of the 14 goals scored by Spain in knockout football in those tournaments, Xavi scored or assisted 50% of them.

That's why since Xavi started having ankle problems and later retired from International football, we see Iniesta being bitchslapped 5-1 every tournament.

Xavi provided the only assist in Euro 2008 final, 2 assists for Euro 2012 final, assist for 1-0 win over Germany in 2010 WC semi, assist for 1-0 win over Portugal in WC 2010 last 16, Goal against Russia in Euro 2008 semifinal.

Iniestas only goal or assist contribution in knockout stages of any tournament apart from the fluke WC final goal that made his name is an assist in a 3-0 win over Russia.

So when I tell you that the corporate sponsors who choose MOTM in champagne box have drunk too much of the champagne, you better believe me. This is why you need to borrow more data so you can do more indepth research to see the truth from the hype. Xavi is Iniestas Lord, Saviour and Carrier.

homesteady:
Ben Hayward

This is the person Ibime calls passenger!
Wawuuuuu!

My friend sharrap and show me his contribution not nonsense MOTM awards by drunk corporate sponsors in champagne box buying into hype. If I show you Xavis contribution in those tournaments, you will disown Iniesta. MOTM ko, MOTM ni. MOTM for dribbling himself like Pius Ikedia while Xavi is providing all the assists.

FBS:
This Idrissa Gueye guy dey impress moi wella.

When Villa were getting relegated last season and Idrissa was being mocked by Villa fans, I wrote the below. FBS, tell your guys at Lokomotiv or CSKA to give me scouting job o.

homesteady:
You can as well add Pedro and Pinto since every Tom, Dick and Harry is now bigger than Iniesta

My friend sharrap! Did you type this post with borrowed data?

When Iniesta played with Ronaldinho, Deco, Eto, Giuly, was he more influential than them?

Now he is playing with Messi, Suarez, Neymar, is he more influential?

Such is the career of a carryalong nigga.

raumdeuter:
Iniesta wasnt in the team that lost to Celtic, Maybe if he was they wouldnt have lost. While Fat Frank was in the team that lost to Vikings and Hapoel

And what about Xavi? What is your big story on Xavi? That he is also unproductive? Make your argument and no dey skirt around

Is Xavi not Iniestas master? Before the coming of Ronaldinho why was he leading Barca to 6th in the league and getting bitchslapped out of UCL group stage?

You have no argument unless you apply the same to Xavi.

2006 to 2008 when Ronaldinho stopped carrying Iniesta, we saw him being bitchslapped all over La Liga by Emerson and Diarra. What did the eunoch do to lift his team?

raumdeuter:
This is the obesity thingy again. How many minutes did Iniesta play vs Celtic in 2003 and lets see how many minutes Lampard played vs Hapoel and Viking

You mean he wasn't even good enough to get in a team that lost to Bobo Balde and co and was glued to the bench?

Alright, what of Xavi?

raumdeuter:
Fat Frank before Roman couldnt qualify vs Vikings of Norway, couldnt qualify vs Hapoel Tel aviv, as even struggling below Newcastle in the league

Same way Xavi and Iniesta couldn't qualify vs Bobo Balde of Celtic in UEFA CUP 2004 before the superstar team was established. Barcelona could not even qualify for UCL those days, instead we'll be seeing names like Deportivo and Valencia. Tell us something new.

raumdeuter:
Those are 7 players I listed by the time you add Stanic to it thats 8. vs an Israeli team. ANd Fat Frank was giving the excuse of not having first team members Basically without ROman billions Fat Frank is useless

Fat Frank in the 5 years before Romans billions has more goals than Pius Iniestas 12 year career played in teams with a multitude of Balon Dor contestants. What a disgrace!

Pius Iniesta was never bigger than Ronaldinho, Eto, Deco, Giuly when he played with them.

Never bigger than Xavi, Messi, Suarez or Neymar when he played with them.

His whole career, he has been a carryalong nigga.

2006-2008 when the big boys dropped their level slightly and Pius Eunoch Iniesta was asked to carry his team, Guti, Emerson and co started bitchslapping him all over La Liga.

Lampard on the other hand always carried his team of inferior players, for example, he has twice as many top scorer awards for Chelsea as Didier Drogba, the other big influential player in his team.

Khakhi no be leather.

raumdeuter:
Etoo was not a top 5 striker in the world, Ronaldinhos career was just stagnant before going to Barca where he exploded. What did Ibra achieve at Barca

Eto was top striker in Europe and Balon Dor 3rd place in his 1st season in Barca.

Iniesta has never played a season without several Balon Dor contestants in his team. Lampard was the only Balon Dor contestant in his team.

The worst team Iniesta played in is better than the best team Lampard ever played in. FACT.

raumdeuter:
players refused to travel fat Ibime said yet the Chelsea lineup that faced Hapoel in Israel had Babayaro Hasselbaink, Zola, Lampard, Terry Zenden Melchiot

Name the rest of the players. For example, the starting centreback was even one Ugandan boy that was playing nonleague football one year later. Can't remember his name. Kitamire or something like that.

Zenden was a fat unfit substitute, Stanic was just returning from ACL, and Terry was still a youth team player - that was his first full season and he only became part of the team later that year.

Debroslink:
Did Iniesta win the league without Messi or Ronaldinho or Eto'o or Xavi?

The money spent on your education was a waste.

Tell me the season Iniesta mutually and exclusively won the league without these players mentioned? If it wasn't Ronaldinho, it was Messi.

From 2006 to 2008 when Ronaldinho dropped his level to Drogba level, tell me what Iniesta contributed to his team. Without Ronaldinho and pre-Messi becoming the best player, what did Iniesta contribute? Was his 3 goals and 3 assists per season then enough to stop him being bitchslapped by Mamadou Diarra, Emerson and co?

Do not ever compare a difference maker to a carryalong eunoch.

Iniesta has never for one season played without several top 5 Balon Dor players in his team. Lampard was the only top 5 Balon Dor player in his team. Do not compare khaki with leather.


The worst team Iniesta ever played in is better than the best team Lampard ever played in so I don't know what crap you keep talking about Romans billions.

When Ronaldinho dropped his level from 2006 to 2008, Guti was bitchslapping Iniesta into 3rd place in la liga. What was his contribution then?

raumdeuter:
Shut up you obese Arrow

Those 30+ men made the CL quarters and lost in extra time to Barca Lampard got to Chelsea and suddenly Chelsea is losing to Vikings and Hapoel Telaviv

Mugu, the previous season before Lampard arrived, the team went out to St Gallen in UEFA Cup.

1999/2000 when they got to UCL quarters was the last of the 1997 team. Lampard arrived 2 seasons later.

Hapoel Tel Aviv loss when Lampard arrived was because senior players refused to travel to Israel after Israeli minister was assassinated. It was mostly youth team players that played that match.

Debroslink:
1st, I don't discuss Boateng

2nd, Iniesta at 22 had more impact than Ronaldinho in our UCL win against Arsenal.

3rd, Iniesta won the league title without Messi or Xavi beside him in 2 different full seasons.

4th, Lampard would have been a nobody without Abramovich's billions. Show me the titles he won without Abramovich's money.

You are very foolish. Iniesta had more impact than Ronaldinho? Why not Henrik Larsson or Belletti. Please remind me where Iniesta charted in WPOTY that year? Fool.

Iniesta won the league with Ronaldinho the best player in the world, Eto the best striker, Deco the best midfielder, Suarez the best striker, Neymar the best winger not named Messi or Ronaldo. You must be very stewpid claiming Iniesta did something without Xavi or Messi when all the players I just mentioned are better than anything Lampard ever played with even in Romans team. What you need to do is show us what Iniesta won with Albacete, mugu.

Lampard was the highest decorated player in the team he played for - he was 2nd in the world and no one else at Chelsea finished top 10.

Iniesta played with several WPOTY winners and top charters like Ronaldinho, Suarez, Neymar, Messi, Henry et al.

Lampard was the only top charter in his team. You cannot compare the quality they played with, yet the Eunuch was outproduced 6 to 1.

raumdeuter:
Before Lampard started making Chelsea team, they won thee Winners cup, won the Super cup beating Real Madrid, they got to the CL quarter finals where they lost to Barcelona in extra time

So Chelsea was achieving things before lampard joined them, Lampard joined and in Europe they cant beat Vikings of Norway cant beat Hapoel Telaviv UNTIL the messiah Roman arrived to save Lampard from going the direction of Jody Morris

Fat Frank if-not-for-Roman Lampard

My friend will you shut the Bleep up? Which year did Chelsea win Cup winners Cup et al and which year did Lampard join Chelsea?

This is not like Pep who turned Bayern from UCL winners to 7-0 disgrace in one summer. We are talking of a team of 30+ pensioners in 1998 that were largely all retired or past it by the time Lampard landed in Chelsea 3 years later.

Debroslink:
Iniesta won the league before Messi started playing for Barcelona.

Iniesta won the league and Copa after Xavi left.

No Sugar daddy there.

Show me what Lampard won before Abramovich's billions saved him.

My friend will you shut the fcuck up. Iniesta won with Ronaldinho, Suarez, Messi etc.

Iniesta has never played with subpar players in his life. He was born with silver spoon.

What did Luka Modric win without Madrids billions?

Show me what Boateng won before Bayerns billions.

Lampard at 36 went to Man City and was their top performing midfielder despite his old age, you are here typing crap about Romans billions. Why not Sheikh Mansoors billions?

Lampard has more goals in just 5 years pre-Roman than Pius Iniesta has in his whole career. That should be enough to bury the eunuchs head in shame.

PietroRico:
You cannot criticize Hazard for one thing and ignore that same thing when it comes to iniesta...

This is the crux of the matter. . .

airmark:
The day i realised a la liga goal keeper had more goals than Pius iniesta in that season he played 33 matches without a goal.

See who that fool Debroslink is comparing to Lebron James in regular season. I'm sure he meant to say Kwame Brown. Pius Kwame Iniesta.

Nihilist:
Na so you hate the word 'Oscar' reach Ibime?

All na the same thing abeg.

raumdeuter:
You have no drop of shame in that fat body of yours

For Terry it was the awards that count, For Iniesta suddenly the awards that count 2 weeks ago no longer count

At least I was consistent, you keep wriggling in whatever direction those fatty tissues take you

Tell me which grammy award Living in Bondage (Boateng) has been nominated for that we should bring his name up with Terry.

When we talk about Lampard, we are talking about a 2nd best WPOTY. When comparing Shawshank Redemption and Forrest Gump, we can have nuanced comparison outside of box office takings and Grammy awards, not phucking Living in Bondage!

raumdeuter:
Before Lampard Chelsea was winning in EUrope and even made it to the CL quarters with players like Babayaro, Morris and Flo

Suddenly Lampard got there was playing with Chelsea a big name and was getting kicked all over by Israeli and Scandinavian clubs

Without ROmans billions Lampard was no better than Jody Morris and Sam Dallabona

Before Lampard, Chelsea had top Internationals like Zola, Vialli, Di Matteo close to their prime.

Lampard era was the era of the Enrique Lucas and Jasper Gronkjaers.

raumdeuter:
Shut the fucck up. The below is your post only the names changed and the awards modified

For Terry we should go check the UEFA and FIFA awards, For Iniesta the awards dont count, You cant even show consistency over a few weeks, twisting around like a pregnant cow.

I have always remained consistent in my evaluation Its always performance in big games.

Unlike you for one its awards that count, for the other the same awards that counted for Terry's case suddenly dont count anymore

BTW you have not told us how Burruchaga scored the only goal in 1986 world cup final fatty bombom

You shut the fuckkk up.

Should we ignore the fact that Boateng has never been nominated for any award when comparing him with Terry?

We can compare film that has won 5 grammy award with film that has won 3 grammy award and say that the one with 3 grammy award is better and the one with 5 grammy award should only have won 3. What we can't phucking do is compare Shawshank Redemption (Terry) with Living in Bondage (Boateng) that has never even been nominated for any phucking grammy.

agrovick:
Show me the league title Iniesta won with Albacete

You dey mind that eediot? Since when was Pius Eunuch Iniesta responsible for winning any league title with 3 goals and 9 assists per season?

raumdeuter:
Meaning pre Roman Chelsea is a 4th placed team and behind Newcastle and 15 points behind winners

Tell us where Chelsea was in Europe that same season or the season before

To know the level of Lampard before Roman billions

Where was Groningen when Suarez was there?

Where was Hamburg when Boateng was there?

So you mean Lampard was supposed to take Mario Stanic, Jesper Gronkjaer, Jody Morris, Mario Melchiot, Tore Andre Flo, Enrique Lucas, Slavisa Jokanovic, Sam Dalla Bona, Babayaro and co to European glory?

The UCL qualification he took them to is not enough abi?

Lampard pre Abramovic scored more goals than impotent Eunuch Iniesta has done in his entire career playing with Messi, Xavi, Eto, Henry, Villa, Suarez, Neymar, Sanchez et al. . . . plus enough change to cover all of Busquets goals as well.

Who is the real fraud here but the impotent albino eunuch?

Debroslink:
You mean the uncle who was covered by the billions of Abramovich?

I have given them the example of Stephen Curry and LeBron James.
One can pad up 402 3 points stats in normal season like Lampard, the other is widely regarded as one of the greatest NBA players of all time due to his influence in biggest games.

Except that in regular season, Iniesta is more like Kwame Brown than Lebron James

If you were not serious, this would be funny. Is this not Lebron James in top 10 ppg ahead of Steph Curry?

Eunoch Iniesta on the other hand will not be found in the top 50 AMs if we list their contribution during regular season. Andres Kwame Iniesta.

.

raumdeuter:
I have proven Lampard is a football nobody without Romans billions

Lampard before Romans billions scored more goals than Pius Eunoch Iniesta has scored in his whole phucking career.

Send Iniesta to West Ham, he will relegate them with his ZERO goals and ZERO assists.

We would be waiting to see how Iniesta will be waiting for West Ham to reach a final in order to turn in a decent performance.