₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,330,142 members, 8,444,047 topics. Date: Monday, 13 July 2026 at 12:38 AM

Toggle theme

Jayriginal's Posts

Nairaland ForumJayriginal's ProfileJayriginal's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 (of 97 pages)

Christianity EtcRe: People Argue that Moses Saw God. How True Is This? by jayriginal: 3:13pm On Oct 25, 2013
Joshthefirst: na bad belle dey worry am. grin
Why I go get bad belle?
Christianity EtcRe: People Argue that Moses Saw God. How True Is This? by jayriginal: 3:13pm On Oct 25, 2013
okeyxyz: What exactly is your problem broshuh
Nothing really oh. I just find some of the stuff you write incredible.
GamingRe: Nairaland Official Chess Thread! by jayriginal: 1:43pm On Oct 25, 2013
sarutobie: Maybe he should just adopt the exchange variation and steer the game through calmer paths as white..
I mentioned that.
Christianity EtcRe: People Argue that Moses Saw God. How True Is This? by jayriginal: 1:22pm On Oct 25, 2013
okeyxyz: I said before: Moses saw and spoke with what he understood to be God in that dispensation of the Law. But in reality it was not God but entities/angels carrying out the mandate of God(again in the dispensation of the law). But the law is gone now(to them that believe) and angels no longer have the mandate to speak in the place God.
Hogwash!
Christianity EtcRe: Atheists, Agnostics And Open Minded Persons. by jayriginal: 10:19am On Oct 25, 2013
Ihedinobi: Religious philosophy is a well-defined field in itself. There are skill sets necessary to operating effectively in it and you do not acquire them by merely reading the Bible. That much is an established fact. Established by the existence of academies and fellowships that regulate the field.
Come off it.

Why does it have to be so complicated that you need apologists for something so simple.

Assuming without conceding, Jesus broke everything down. He said, love God with all your heart (etc) and love your neighbour as yourself. Do you really need academies for that? How hard can that be? But no, you need apologists like that silly (I forget his name at the moment but reading some of his nonsense can make you vomit in disgust) guy who sounds like P Alvinga or maybe Alvin Platinga. Ill look it up.

The only extras you need outside the bible in my opinion are historical perspectives. Maybe some archeology too. Little stuff like that. Not academies specializing in sophistry. Isnt the holy spirit supposed to guide you anyway? Arent you supposed to have the spirit of discernment?

Reminds me of the time when only the clergy had access to the bible and tried to prevent people from getting their hands on it. Further more, how many have this theological expertise you speak of? Do you have it? And if you dont, does it mean anyone can flourish their theological credentials in your face and ask you to screw a donkey because God wants you to?

I call bull on this!
Christianity EtcRe: Atheists, Agnostics And Open Minded Persons. by jayriginal: 9:45am On Oct 25, 2013
Logicboy03: How silly.....

Anyone who has read the bible can debate with a theologian from morning to night on similar grounds
Reading a biology textbook (or books) only will never put you on the same grounds with a biologist..


You christians are experts at conflating and misconstruing things to fit lies that protect your religion
Word!

Idiots Guide To Winning A Religious Argument Against Anyone


When confronted by reason, claim its a spiritual thing and your opponent cannot understand.
1-0.
Christianity EtcRe: Atheists, Agnostics And Open Minded Persons. by jayriginal: 9:39am On Oct 25, 2013
Uyi Iredia: I'm quite willing to bet you are as ignorant as he is wrt theology. That said I'm currently a number 7. For starters, God isn't empirically verifiable and runs against the thread of common experience.
Uyi I'd like to take you up on this sometime. I feel time is against me though because Im not sure for how long you will remain at 7. Maybe a little interview or something.

Im really curious on your thought processes at this point.
Christianity EtcRe: Atheists, Agnostics And Open Minded Persons. by jayriginal: 9:34am On Oct 25, 2013
minute: Dawkins should stick to what he knows. Dawkins talking about theology is like

Britney Spears giving her beliefs on quantum-physics. It makes no sense and people

should ignore it.
What qualifies anyone to speak on theology? This is one of the most senseless things people say on here. Ill take it that you heard or read it somewhere then came here to regurgitate without thinking twice.

Now ask yourself (again), what qualifies anyone to speak on theology.

Im sure even you cannot deny that the notion of religion and religious experiences are subjective. If you agree then I need not continue as Im sure you get the point. If you disagree, well that will be another story . .
Christianity EtcRe: "Daddy GO" of Atheism: My First Impressions by jayriginal: 9:30am On Oct 25, 2013
ajayikayod: Link not necessary, i answered u earlier.
Burn!
Christianity EtcRe: "Daddy GO" of Atheism: My First Impressions by jayriginal: 9:22am On Oct 25, 2013
honeychild: So I finally bit the bullet and bought what seems to be the "Holy Book" of nairaland atheists: Richard Dawkins' "The God delusion".
.
Wondering what made you buy the book. That aside, I see no reason why you should get the impression that that book is the "Holy Book" of nairaland atheists. People dont quote it, people hardly quote Dawkins and Dawkins has written several similar books before and after it.

You are generalizing and projecting.

I have only read up to the 4th chapter so far, but I must say reading it is a pleasant surprise. Judging by the obnoxious and gratuitous insults spewed on this board by his more prominent disciples- I was expecting to be assaulted on each page with insults to God and of course me for being so unintelligent as to have faith.
Ok (Uyi Iredia style)

On the contrary, what I find is that the eminent scientist is wise enough to know that he doesn't know everything. Logicboy and Ooman please take note: the default atheist position is not "There is no God". But "God, though not technically disprovable, is very very improbable indeed. "
LogicBoy has never said "there is no God" at least to the best of my knowledge. Stop generalizing. Ooman, I cant really say though I think he declares positively that God doesnt exist.

I am also highly impressed with his willingness to concede when he has made a mistake. For instance, I had earlier watched a debate he had with John Lennox in which he was taken to tax for stating in an earlier edition that there is controversy amongst historians about whether or not Jesus really lived. He was quick to acknowledge that he was wrong, and I noticed that in this edition he makes the statement "although Jesus probably existed....."
Ok. (Uyi come collect your royalties)

So, my question to nairaland atheists is: Why do you think it is a necessary part of being atheist to insult every one who is not and to be gratuitously crude, vulgar and obnoxious?
You are generalizing again.
Christianity EtcRe: People Argue that Moses Saw God. How True Is This? by jayriginal: 3:34pm On Oct 24, 2013
okeyxyz: Moses saw what he understood to be God in that dispensation of the law. But the true God of christ, nobody ever saw before the death and resurrection of christ. The true God of Christ was always hidden. What the people of old saw was a shadow(imitation) of him, being that the Law of moses was the standing system of righteousness and under that system, God cannot be seen nor understood.
If I talk to you now the first thing you will say is "You are not a Christian". You should really learn to look before you cross the road.

lanrexlan: You forgot to read this.
Exodus 33:11 (NIV) -The LORD would speak to Moses face to face,as a man speaks with his friend.Then Moses would return to the camp,but his young aide Joshua son of Nun did not leave the tent.How does a man speaks with his friend? Will you back your friend? Moses saw god in the bible,face to face.Ojukoroju hmmm
Thank you jare.
HealthRe: Thread For Weed Smokers. by jayriginal: 11:41am On Oct 21, 2013
aManFromMars: Lol. How? Fast food does more harm. Please bring something concrete.
See that there?

That same doctor I referred to as a petrol head was with me one day, drinking and smoking (not weed) and so we got to talking about how unhealthy stuff was. He said "abeg drink jor" and there was a doctor on "housemanship" and he interrogated that doctor right there. What he was trying to establish is that in his line of work, he sees more people die from obesity than from any other thing.
HealthRe: Thread For Weed Smokers. by jayriginal: 11:34am On Oct 21, 2013
aManFromMars: Weed, for me, relaxes me. So I kinda agree with those who say it's medicinal, though I haven't really done any research on those claims. grin
Then you should research. It is medicinal. It helps with cancer and glaucoma. That much I "know" without checking. I probably should check before posting but . . . screw it!
HealthRe: Thread For Weed Smokers. by jayriginal: 11:25am On Oct 21, 2013
joudini: I would say l had early contact with weed. Started at 14 in boarding house. One of the things l copped from weed was the relaxed, laid-back, multi-dimensional view it seemed to give me about an event. I no longer looked at an event just like an event but as a sequence of reaction from an earlier event. It seemed l could see the board instead of individual pieces just like an eagle flying overhead. It gave me a super-imposed sense of awareness. I was at peace with myself and nature. But only as long as l was under the psychedelic effects. Over the years though, l have understood that l shouldnt let a substance, natural or synthetic, determine my state of mind for me at any moment. I had to give it up.
Sounds like what a friend described to me.

Dude is a doctor but a petrol head.

So he was telling me that he smoked a joint with another doctor (who I know personally and who later independently narrated the story to me) and they were driving and all of a sudden, my friend told the other one how he could feel the inner workings of the car, from the transmission to the shaft, to the oils and all. The other friend replied that he could feel it too. Bear in mind that this dude had no knowledge of cars.

Weed has been used to argue the case for spirituality for similar reasons but its not a good enough reason.

Anyhoo, I think its well established that weed (while more or less socially unacceptable) is far less dangerous than alcohol (which is quite acceptable except you are in the North)
HealthRe: Thread For Weed Smokers. by jayriginal: 11:14am On Oct 21, 2013
bonetalk: I can't forget this thing called marijuana, it almost killed me/make me insane in my secondary school days and it lasted for 3 days before i could get myself back to normal. The last time i smoked it was when i was re-writing my ssce examination, i couldn't write anything down on that day, i couldn't walk, nor see clearly, everything i saw then were moving including buildings . It was funny but i cant forget those ugly moments of my life. Thank God for my life now, i've accepted Jesus into my life, and there is nothing like that in Life!
aManFromMars: Erm, keep your Jesus out of this thread,abeg.

That man that forgot to bless a marriage because he was thirsty for alcohol...

The man that dried a fig tree so he could smoke the leaves.. angry


No come spoil my thread. tongue
I think its a greater high for him. Opium things wink
GamingRe: Nairaland Official Chess Thread! by jayriginal: 10:10am On Oct 14, 2013
^^^

Since I am not yet sure what side you find it difficult to play against, I will offer some general solutions.

The Spanish begins after the moves 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5

Once you have gotten to that point, the best thing is to steer the game into a specific variation. While the most common move is 3. ..a6 for black, you could steer it to your direction by playing 3. ...d6 . Even if you play 3. ...a6 during the course of the next few moves, you will have chances to steer the game into a direction you can dictate.

As white, you can play the exchange variation by playing 4 Bxc6.

The point of all this is to get you to choose a variation and study it. The reason is that the Spanish is one of the most complex of the Chess Openings and has a very huge number of variations. You should try and dictate the pace of the game rather than let someone else dictate it to you.
Do some research with a database, choose the variation you like and then start looking at games that were played with those variations. You will start to get a feel for themes and plans.

I dont know if you have access to training software like chessbase and others.

One other thing you could do is pick out a repertoire book . One that comes highly recommended is "A Spanish Repertoire for Black" by Mihail Marin.
GamingRe: Nairaland Official Chess Thread! by jayriginal:
prof800: The white.
Ah, maybe I didnt phrase my question properly. I meant which side are you having trouble playing against.

You could take a look at these links. They should help somewhat

http://exeterchessclub.org.uk/content/spanish-torture-ruy-lopez

http://www.becomeawordgameexpert.com/ruylopez.htm
Christianity EtcRe: Atheist Hangout- UPDATE (Atheist Sermon- THE STORY OF GALLORAN) by jayriginal: 9:11am On Oct 14, 2013
Logicboy03: No amount of debate will stop Joagbaje from believing in in tithes or texting demons
grin
GamingRe: Nairaland Official Chess Thread! by jayriginal: 1:48pm On Oct 13, 2013
prof800: Does someone here know quick way to break the wall of Roy Lopez?
I need to use it. This guy has been winning me siiiince.
What side of the Spanish are you having problems with? The black or white?
Christianity EtcRe: Path Of The Seeker by jayriginal:
okeyxyz: Using humor to cover your failed argument??

I ask you again: Can you offer a valid critique or opposition to any true christian doctrines or claims?? I'm guessing no, so you sneak away with a humor jab cheesy
Ah, no. Not at all. You dont even seem to have read what I wrote neither did you get the implication of my last post.

For you to say that christianity does not say non believers goes to hell without qualification tells me that arguing with you will be pointless.

Your last sentence validates me further. For one, I spoke of merely asking for proof. It was that part that you took issues with and you said this

okeyxyz: What sort of proof might you be asking for. I speak as a christian and it seems to me that everyone who criticizes the christian doctrine, these criticisms are for things that are not christian. They seem to require a proof of claims that were never made(nor attributed to) by this christian God or his doctrine. Bottom line, no body understands this God, else they'd be asking relevant questions of him/his doctrines.
And I stated a claim which you denied. Im very content to leave it at that. To do otherwise will involve loads of typing which I am not ready for especially given your response. My response is appropriate considering the unseriousness of yours. I dont even need to reference the bible for this one. However let me indulge you a little.

I hope I will not be required to explain the following to you:

Righteousness is said to be like filthy rags (doing good for goods sake) to God
Jesus declared himself the way the truth and light and the only path to God
Jesus said that all who believe in him and are baptised will be saved and those who didnt will be condemned


Now again, flowing from your earlier (disappointing) response, nowhere is it written in the bible to eat starch and banga soup. Think about it.


No be everything them dey tell person.


PS:
If you want to make your point, you have to be prepared to define christianity, tell us who is a christian and of course inform of us the qualifications for hell.
Christianity EtcRe: Path Of The Seeker by jayriginal: 8:02pm On Oct 12, 2013
beejaay: am not saying what u said was wrong (who am i to even say something like that), i was only bringing in another perspective (frankly speaking i dont subscribe to the right/wrong idea..to me nothing is wrong and nothing right, everything is just as it is).. i was only saying that a seeking mind should not stop his wandering mind because it is in wandering that we become whole..
Ok boss.
Christianity EtcRe: Path Of The Seeker by jayriginal: 6:56pm On Oct 12, 2013
okeyxyz: You are not a christian. There is no where in the doctrines where non-christians are threatened with hell.
Ok.

There is no where in the doctrines that amala and ewedu should be consumed wink
Christianity EtcRe: Path Of The Seeker by jayriginal: 9:54am On Oct 12, 2013
beejaay: in the path of seeking there is no confusion, everything that a seeker follow is as it should be.a seeker should not be afraid to satisfy his curiosity, infact he has to be open-minded to all cos in the end nothing matter at all..
seeking means trying it all (in whatever way ur mind pointed u too..one thing i have come to know is that a true seeker can never get lost) and we all take different path, different path that might have been condition by how we were born, the situations our mothers were during pregnancies (some were happy throughout the 9 months, some were happy for some months and some were sad all through)... a seeker need to get to a point where he realizes there is really no point to be made and he can only know this after trying to make all the points
The best kind of search comes from within. I didnt have to dabble in this and that to arrive where I am. Practically all the reading I have done was done after I had finished my introspection. I read to learn alternatives to the doctrines I was brought up with and because of the mindset I had and still have, I read and question. Its the reason I usually decline to advance any position even if scientific. I digress. . .

I stand by what I wrote to Uyi. Its not necessary to try out everything on the menu and even if you should do so, at least complete your journey first.
Christianity EtcRe: Path Of The Seeker by jayriginal: 9:47am On Oct 12, 2013
okeyxyz: What sort of proof might you be asking for. I speak as a christian and it seems to me that everyone who criticizes the christian doctrine, these criticisms are for things that are not christian. They seem to require a proof of claims that were never made(nor attributed to) by this christian God or his doctrine. Bottom line, no body understands this God, else they'd be asking relevant questions of him/his doctrines.
Oh claims are made.

Is it not a claim of christianity that I will go to hell if I do not accept Jesus as my lord and saviour?

Lets start with that.
EducationRe: FG Stops Salaries Of Striking Lecturers (ASUU) by jayriginal: 3:54pm On Oct 11, 2013
castrokins: You should ask ASUU how they expend TETFUND. What cause are they fighting for? After years of funding through the Tertiary Education Trust Fund, can you say for a certainty that objectives of the fund were/are met?
I dont think you know what the strike is about. I dont think also that you have the benefit of hindsight. Some of us have seen these scripts play over and over again.
EducationRe: FG Stops Salaries Of Striking Lecturers (ASUU) by jayriginal: 3:50pm On Oct 11, 2013
omogidi234: @ topic, ASUU should invent another style of getting their demands met other than strike. Government is not feeling the immediate impact rather it is the students.
Kindly suggest a few.
EducationRe: FG Stops Salaries Of Striking Lecturers (ASUU) by jayriginal: 3:49pm On Oct 11, 2013
goziepenzy: . Good move by FG! ASSU my nyash
Of course. Seeing as you seem to think with it.
EducationRe: FG Stops Salaries Of Striking Lecturers (ASUU) by jayriginal: 3:46pm On Oct 11, 2013
Sweetlemon: Bravo!

But it is really sad! Nigerians have gotten so used to being used by the FG that they don't want to be rescued. It's like a wife, an abused wife who is so used to being treated like dirt by husband that she now enjoys the pain.
There's deep pain in my heart because I know that no matter how hard I pray for Nigeria, Nigeria will not get better because the people themselves do not want change!
We are a pathetic people. Its harsh but its reality. Until we learn to discern and until we can stand up and demand our dues, we will continue to get played.
EducationRe: FG Stops Salaries Of Striking Lecturers (ASUU) by jayriginal: 11:59am On Oct 11, 2013
Most of the people condemning ASUU have no clue whatsoever. Get yourselves enlightened!

Now listen. ASUU is fighting for a cause and ASUU is being steadfast in their cause. This is not an ambush, this is over an agreement that was reached years ago.

ASUU is not like other unions eg your NLC.

Does anyone remember how NLC ruined the occupy Nigeria protest to the dismay of many Nigerian youths? Have you forgotten the betrayal of the masses when the NLC in mysterious circumstances called of the strike?
Did anybody do anything about it?
What of the youth that died during the protest? He was shot by police. What happened to that?

You know why NLC could betray you like that? You know why the Government can walk all over you with shoes studded with 6 inch nails? You know why the general condition of the masses does not improve?

It is because we are a nation of lily livered suffering and smiling people who will rather continue in hardship than risk the slightest inconvenience to stand up for their rights.

ASUU is fighting for a cause!
Christianity EtcRe: Path Of The Seeker by jayriginal: 10:29am On Oct 11, 2013
InesQor: Thanks for the contribution, jayriginal!

But would you say 'belief' / 'disbelief' in God is that discrete, that you can deem an atheist as one who does not believe in God's existence? I think atheists have varying extents of disbelief, do you think this matters in the definition?

My point is, even Theists sometimes have experiences that make them disbelieve God's existence, howbeit for a short period of time. It is said that doubt is an integral aspect of faith. I like to say is like friction in a system, apparently undesirable but in the right quantity it is required for any motion in the first case.
Thought provoking. You bring up a good point.

I think the appropriate word to use in case of theists who have certain experiences is doubt (rather than disbelief). Certainly, the effect is the same no matter which word is used but I think the "word" doubt offers more clarity in the circumstance. The reason is that I can say I doubt the existence of God personally but I think its easy to be misled by that. I think the word "doubt" implies a transitional point. It either resolves back to re-belief or hardens into disbelief (oh boy english nor easy oh).

I see your point. Someone who "doubts" can not be said to believe in the real sense of the word. I hope my paragraph above covers it. If so, I will like to amend by saying that a "doubter" cannot be strictly called an atheist. Lets say such a person is re-evaluating and must resolve. That much is clear. There must be a resolution. It wouldnt do good to say, "You know what, I cant decide either way so I will remain neutral until I can decide". At such a point such a person will probably say he or she is an Agnostic but such a person is really an atheist.

So yes there are different levels of disbelief but I think they are mostly irrelevant to the definition of atheism. It wouldnt matter if I state positively that there is no God or if I simply say I dont believe, I am an atheist.
The only exceptions I think are the "doubters" who are in transition and must either go forward or go back. Theres no sitting on the fence cos that takes them in one direction only.
Christianity EtcRe: Can Demons Send SMS? ( For Those Who Have Experience In Casting Out Devils) by jayriginal: 10:06am On Oct 11, 2013
Joagbaje: Shamback or smith shared in his book how he came to Africa and ministered to a witch doctor and in the night , satan visited him , heavy wind which flung his bed from on end to the room to the other, when he woke up he commanded the devil to come back and re arange the room . The wind came back in and re aranged the scattered room.
Joe Agbaje, the Demon Whisperer.
Christianity EtcRe: Path Of The Seeker by jayriginal: 12:51pm On Oct 10, 2013
InesQor,

I have always held that an atheist is one who doesnt believe. Once that qualification is met, such a person is an atheist (and agnostics so called, qualify as atheists). It is not essential that the person must have a positive belief in the none existence of God.

I see no compelling reason for God but I leave room that there maybe one since I cannot state otherwise with certainty.

There are some Gods I reject outrightly. All Gods who have even a single attribute ascribed to them (except for the attribute of existence) must necessarily be false/non existent in my thinking.

My reason for this is that no one knows but we can deduce. You will note that all attributes of God are human descriptions; loving, powerful, good, bad, kind, vengeful, jealous, intelligent and even, existence itself. We give whatever God we choose human attributes as makes sense within our own particular experience. These are things that we take for granted and usually without consideration as a result of indoctrination.

Is the world evidence of God or evidence of itself? To most, it is evidence of God. To a few, it is evidence of itself primarily.

So yes, maybe an all knowing ball of energy or even a grey haired floating man in the sky did create all that is, but we cannot know and I cannot believe that. People just intuit, and convince themselves, then convince others then deduce what this God likes and doesnt like and how to please it and next, you have a standard religion.

The only God I can "allow" to exist is one whos sole attribute is existence (at least at a point). I wouldnt even give it the attribute of power unless that power can be used deliberately. Pretty much like I wouldnt call a completely paralyzed person powerful even though he may inadvertently produce physical effects occasionally.

The whole point is that we do not know. We can only speculate using our everyday experiences as tools to intuit. There is nothing to show that nature must follow our fantasies. It can be nice when we argue the merits and demerits of a particular worldview but not so nice when we force same worldviews on others or preach them dogmatically.

We dont know for sure and we may never know for sure.

As such, I advance no position, I merely ask for proof.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 (of 97 pages)