guilt, if he had any.

Assuming God existed and the criteria for him to be God were not met by Him (according to
some group of know alls - atheists etc )
The accusers of God would still be shooting themselves in the foot trying to prove him
ineligibile for HIS TITLE.
In the Bible, the accusers of Jesus, the religious authority (self entitled) were often
left dumb founded whenever they tried to wrestle with him with their wisdom.
With the card carrying flaming anti-God group, the logic isnt even far fetched to
throw them all into a ditch which they're blind to yet walking into.
For example.
I read in the papers the other day, of the rise in the rate of extra judicial killings in kwara state.
Many supposedly kidnappers especially were dealt burnt alive by angry mobs.
some cultists who went to have a night meeting met their demise when they were returning
because the local vigilantes suspected them to be armed robbers.
The misjudgement is lamentable but the motive behind the jungle justice is irreligious.
The mob were probably not members of the same religious group yet they unanimously
agreed , not through a process of cold calculated logicising, that certain things are
evil and they spurred by anger (they didnt put up the anger or fake it) , descended
on the culprits.
They're anger was satiated after justice had been met.
This lets us know a lot about the composition of the human being.
Anger is a burning craving in human society.And if aggravated enough and they have the means
man as a group will exact justice with speediness instead of waiting for some more formal
logical emotionally controlled artificial process aka the "civilized way".
If man,as a group, cannot extract justice cuz he is over powered, out numbered,e.g in the case of
a military regime, he'll put on an outer show of submission but secretly he'll be craving for justice
. like a thirsty man . in iraq, out of fear the populace were totally subdued so they put up
double behaviour to save their lives.
when Abacha was in power it was the same thing, smiling outwardly but weeping inwardly desiring justice.
This also shows that Anger is an accelerator a fuel for spurring the quick dispensation of brutal justice
which is needed to purge an evil out of its place. so anger , is good and essential like hot burning antiseptic is needed to cleanse a wound of bacteria/germs.
So back to the God in the Dock stand situation,
Imagine God is sorrounded by a pack of wolves , like Jesus was sorrounded by a heaving pack of pharisees, all it would take to uphold God's justice for the hot bowl of punishment He's going to
pour out on those who've resisted His will, will be our history.
Have you ever gotten angry before?
Did you ever burn with anger for a perceived wrong?
Did you ever exact speedy justice - by use of force of brawns or force of many (group of people)
Did you ever feel sated and satisfied when perceived evil was punished?
Did you feel you were right and justified for bursting out in anger?
Then if you being human , and having so short a life span and warped perspective relative to
an eternal being who saw it all and still allowed you get away with your actions,
felt just in ur anger and exaction of justice, God would be even more justified
. His anger has been brewing for years!!! - he's been accumulating it ,
and He's been pleading with the world to repent and turn away,
He's warned the world about His wrath,
He's warned them about the outcome and consequence of HIS WRATH,
He's shown and said that He doesnt circumvent HIS OWN decrees unlike men but rather
legally satisfied them, e.g He sent Jesus to die for man
He didnt use his sovereignty as God to over ride things but made Jesus pay the full brutal price
,get beaten beyond recognition till his skin hung like strips of rangs from his Body,
bearing the full wrath of God that should have been visited on man,
proving that even God is bound by HIS spoken word!!.
Then , on the dock before HIS accuser, he'll have all justification to visit with SPEEDY
ANGER HIS WRATH on the stubborn hold outs who defy and continue to defy his HOLY STANDARDS!!

GOD'S accuser will be dumbfounded , check mated , non plussed , mouth agape that a fly can
buzz in an out, just as it was with the pharisees and Jesus' accusers in the Bible.

assuming he were guilty as accused.

Assuming God existed and the criteria for him to be God were not met by Him (according to
some group of know alls - atheists etc )
The accusers of God would still be shooting themselves in the foot trying to prove him
ineligibile for HIS TITLE.
In the Bible, the accusers of Jesus, the religious authority (self entitled) were often
left dumb founded whenever they tried to wrestle with him with their wisdom.
With the card carrying flaming anti-God group, the logic isnt even far fetched to
throw them all into a ditch which they're blind to yet walking into.
For example.
I read in the papers the other day, of the rise in the rate of extra judicial killings in kwara state.
Many supposedly kidnappers especially were dealt burnt alive by angry mobs.
some cultists who went to have a night meeting met their demise when they were returning
because the local vigilantes suspected them to be armed robbers.
The misjudgement is lamentable but the motive behind the jungle justice is irreligious.
The mob were probably not members of the same religious group yet they unanimously
agreed , not through a process of cold calculated logicising, that certain things are
evil and they spurred by anger (they didnt put up the anger or fake it) , descended
on the culprits.
They're anger was satiated after justice had been met.
This lets us know a lot about the composition of the human being.
Anger is a burning craving in human society.And if aggravated enough and they have the means
man as a group will exact justice with speediness instead of waiting for some more formal
logical emotionally controlled artificial process aka the "civilized way".
If man,as a group, cannot extract justice cuz he is over powered, out numbered,e.g in the case of
a military regime, he'll put on an outer show of submission but secretly he'll be craving for justice
. like a thirsty man . in iraq, out of fear the populace were totally subdued so they put up
double behaviour to save their lives.
when Abacha was in power it was the same thing, smiling outwardly but weeping inwardly desiring justice.
This also shows that Anger is an accelerator a fuel for spurring the quick dispensation of brutal justice
which is needed to purge an evil out of its place. so anger , is good and essential like hot burning antiseptic is needed to cleanse a wound of bacteria/germs.
So back to the God in the Dock stand situation,
Imagine God is sorrounded by a pack of wolves , like Jesus was sorrounded by a heaving pack of pharisees, all it would take to uphold God's justice for the hot bowl of punishment He's going to
pour out on those who've resisted His will, will be our history.
Have you ever gotten angry before?
Did you ever burn with anger for a perceived wrong?
Did you ever exact speedy justice - by use of force of brawns or force of many (group of people)
Did you ever feel sated and satisfied when perceived evil was punished?
Did you feel you were right and justified for bursting out in anger?
Then if you being human , and having so short a life span and warped perspective relative to
an eternal being who saw it all and still allowed you get away with your actions,
felt just in ur anger and exaction of justice, God would be even more justified
. His anger has been brewing for years!!! - he's been accumulating it ,
and He's been pleading with the world to repent and turn away,
He's warned the world about His wrath,
He's warned them about the outcome and consequence of HIS WRATH,
He's shown and said that He doesnt circumvent HIS OWN decrees unlike men but rather
legally satisfied them, e.g He sent Jesus to die for man
He didnt use his sovereignty as God to over ride things but made Jesus pay the full brutal price
,get beaten beyond recognition till his skin hung like strips of rangs from his Body,
bearing the full wrath of God that should have been visited on man,
proving that even God is bound by HIS spoken word!!.
Then , on the dock before HIS accuser, he'll have all justification to visit with SPEEDY
ANGER HIS WRATH on the stubborn hold outs who defy and continue to defy his HOLY STANDARDS!!

GOD'S accuser will be dumbfounded , check mated , non plussed , mouth agape that a fly can
buzz in an out, just as it was with the pharisees and Jesus' accusers in the Bible.

Must u fill 3 pages with ur st.upid rantg cuz u repair/sell laptops?
Wat hav u communicated in so many posts u cudnt say in 1?

A few lines into the write up and i
suspected it was a foreign article so
I scrolled down to see if i was right.

So out of context to d targetted readers!
How many newbies here are contemplating objective-c, use apple work stations and targetting apple app store?

A crappy line says u shud learn app dev instead of hiring a developer. Wrong advice.
If ur not a programmer it will too long to acquire d mindset and in d time u'd b losing prospective profit.
No tru enterprenuer will spill u this poo.
Instead of hiring ,u cud outsource at freelance sites and get proven experts implement ur ideas quicker than u cud ever think . U hit the market early , release often, have more product offerings and make mor money.

A few lines into the write up and i
suspected it was a foreign article.
So out of context to d targetted readers!
How many newbies here are contemplating objective-c, use apple work stations and targetting apple app store?

adebiade: I have been bored at home for Month while I have study the back and front of java, I felt my tallent might waste because there was no electricity here, and only in the night we on GEN where can I go in lagos where there will be light 24 hour. I need a job, my area of knowledges, Java, C#, sql, javascrip, php, xml,html,

buy a gen (i pass my neighbour)
or an inverter .
And get to work.
I downloaded an application this morning tht took the author 8 years to create! If ur complaining after 1 month , u may wanna consider if this programming thing is 4 u.

Logicboy03: 1) The activists
-They normally fight for justice based on their christian ethics and the life of christ
-They usually are good with people from different faiths
-They tend to be more liberal
***How to know them;
You will find them complaining on the complaints section about someone else who was cheated or needs to be compensated


2) The sectarians
-They confine their christianity to one church or one interpretation dogmatically
-They dont get along with other christians eg (fighting against catholics/protestants)
-They hardly get along with people of other faiths
-They tend to be very conservative with their christianity
***How to know them;
You will find them opening threads and bashing other churches or doctrines (catholics are mary worshippers etc)


3) The preachers
-They spend more time preaching rather than discussing their christianity
-They consider themselves an authority on biblical interpretations
-They tend to be conservative with their christianity
***How to know them;
You will find them opening numerous threads preaching left and right. They can also throw cumbersome bible verses. They preach more than they comment on other people's threads


4) The holier than thou's
-They spend time claiming to be filled with Holy Ghost or the grace of Christ
-They spend time criticizing other people's morality
-They dont mix well with other people of faith
***How to know them;
You will find them having "Holy-holy" signatures. "I am filled with grace"....."I walk in the light of the lord". Yet, you will find them being bigots and doing all sorts of atrocities. They also judge a lot

the title of this post is a misnomer. You'll find these set of traits among any group of people involved in any social engagement.
Take soccer or politics or programming,mathematics for example.
You'll find vocal enthusiasts (the preachers in ur example)
subdivided into the knowledgeable proselytes and the parrots.
The knowledgeable proselytes are not keeping their conviction to themselves but go out to win others over to their cause. Their passion is infectious (paul graham of lisp fame has persuaded many programmers to look sideways at lisp - the second oldest programming language in use- by his compelling arguments. Isnt this preaching)

the sectarian:
linux torvalds,creator of linus os kernel, an operating system,
exhibits sectarian traits . He doesnt preach that his old programming language is the best but he bashes newer languages like java. He writes his software in c or assembly.
Holier than thou:
what wud u say of apple product fans?
Some are so snooty,they'll never touch a pc -with their hands.


As an atheist,i know u wanna take a swipe at christianity/God but try better than particularise a generalisation.

Humility that is not of the heart isnt humility.
Just like muslims clothe their women strictly- purdah but promiscuity is still rife.
Love 4 each other?
The dogmatism in islam is the world's migraine.
Even irreligious/agnostic/atheistic countries rue islam.
In every place where there is islamic stronghold,there attendant bondage: denial of human rights, rule by threat and fear etc.
Islam is intolerant . Think boko haram . If its not their way they cant accept it.
The virtures,seemingly, of islam is 4 enticement, wen u get deeper into it,it a stinking quargmire.

Ghenghis:
My company has earned as much as $25,000 on software i wrote (with just 1 enterprise customer, minus annual support fee etc.). The same software was sold to 2 customers (that's the entire market). I'm sure the total earnings must be close to $100,000 in 3 years.

It depends on who is selling and who is buying, there's no limit to how much can be earned, its a matter of meeting the right need.

would you rather try to sell

$50,000 to 1,000 customers or $500 to 100,000 customers?
The big coys understand this secret.

I don't drive a Range Sport , not yet anyway. I'm sure its possible(my MD drove one, and he's a/was programmer). Just hang in there, and open your mind ,

this analogy actually leads to industry shaking ripples. It harms core players ,like the programmer in question,who want to make good money and attracts contempt from the buyers: because people naturally disdain the cheap.
And drives out wud b top players. because the industry lacks its appeal to them.
Microsoft sells developer software up to $5000 dollars, so does Ibm and so does Oracle, they dont all try to mass market their products at ridiculous prices.
Think of the number of companies running oracle database and yet the price isnt pittance amount.
It is this low pricing of software tht makes wud b buyers pour contempt on the seller.
But if they were to sit and code the software they treat like trash they'd respect how much wrk and ingenuity is involved.
Some times price is set as an indicator of the proposed value of the product. Come to think of it, car sellers hav no qualms selling a single car for N12m , and get buyers falling over themselves to own one,
stanford mba fees is around $400k and people break their neck to get in, wat is stanford ,havard,princeton teaching tht cant b acquired much cheaply?
So if ppl are going to fall over themselves for nigerian software we've got to set prestigious prices, and damn the consequences.
This is d case in d real estate market- they set d prices and d customer comes up with d money despite the abundance of potential customers decent housing aint cheap. Infact customers hav come to expect high prices of housing, school fees, cars etc.
Y not same for software which is even more fundamental?

some programmers like richard stallman see programming as a calling. A calling that fortunately pays some remuneration.
U may never be rich as a programmer (according to ur/societies definition of rich) but some of d most influential intellectuals had to make a choice on fame vs pursuit of wealth.
Most influential math dons died poor but their impact can't b recreated with a trillion billion dollars think of the impact of Alan Turing, Ron Rivest, Professor Tanenbaum (creator of minix from which linux was borne), donald knuth(author of 'The art of computer programming', Tex(software)), paul erdos (mathematician), grigori perelman (mathematician- rejected million dollar prize money), alonzo church(created lambda calculus on which lisp is based), berhnard riemann, ramanujan (the indian math genius) etc. Arguably these guys are top notch academicians but theyre abviously very accomplished because they are experts at what they know.

Everybody saying stop hav not helped him.
How does he stop?
The best advice shud come from fellas who've been there too for that long or longer but came out.
Even Jesus had to experience life as a human to save humanity and in the process he "learnt obedience by the things he suffered".
Jesus knows what it is like to b severely tempted because He was tempted in all areas but he didnt giv in.

I'd dare say tht a programmer who is versed in sql is an anomally.
Sql is redundant brain numbing work and programmers are (or shud b) an impatient bunch if they hav 2 wrk on uninteresting stuff.
Y not hire (or consider ) splitting ur dev team into specialties: database manipulation= database administrators/experts.
Programmers:
hard core = (as low as wanna get)
these are the monks who dream in code and need the a temple for an office (not a cubicle. With near-complete noise control. Really good for thinking). Institute noise control policies and separate programmers from other beings . These guys are essentially the products.
Light core devs:
the javascript, web designers html five and those who can code but dont want to operate past welter weight category. They'll use api by the hard core guys also some people break down in concentration if the have to think for a long time for an extended period everyday!!
The github/google code idea is a security check but wat off devs who've got wrks sitting on their hard drives? A zipped archive of theyre works should do. An interview drill can detect falsehood and off course real life experience will prove them beyond a doubt.
Then what about a programmers reading list? Will ur company provide a library for its programmers.
U can tell alot about the direction a programmer is heading by perusing his reading (or wish) list.


Finally the location issue! Its really an isssue as d programmer has to relocate to the company town. But i think its wise for a start up to hav its core staff working together in house.


(my opinion of course).

For perspective, U cud add functional programming to ur repertoire. They have more robust concurrency model than imperative languages and adopt more mathematically explicit syntax (mainly set theory and functions) than imperative langs. By adopting math symbols and keywords more bravely the math inclined programmer sees his program as a mathematical essay, the less mathematically inclined programmer will b doing a subset of mathematics in a fun less threatening way.

Most tech startups u mention have two things in common: deep pockets and deep knowledge base.
Deep knowledge base means ground breaking research cud produce the next killer app.
Stellar team of A+ top notch engineers.
Deep pockets mean u finance the research of a promising idea or toy with many ideas one of which may b an industry game changer.
It means u can engage in massive market manuevers and secure the market even with an average product.
Sorry, but to me jumia,vconnect, jobberman, wakanow are worth mentioning,innovation wise.theyve innovated nothing,just implemented an already tried and tested business model.as populous as the country is were embarrassingly scanty in industry players. There should b 20 jobberman types of the same rank and calibre.y not? Only one player per sector is an innovation killer. Think of countries like the u.s ,thryres monster and dice among others. There's indeed dot com, plethora brings out the flavour. There's amazon and barnes and noble , and many more.
They arent tech companies but companies tht operate primarily thru an online/internet interface.
There's a difference and i dont think these companies hav the vision or managerial expertise or incentive to metamorphose into tech notables , more like just the nigerian banal incentive to "make money" and be the only pea in d pod , the only loaf in d bakery.
In practice they may b aspiring to b d only ass on d road and may b blocking other asses from plying the same road too (and overtaking them). That may b stretching it but tech companies here ar non existent.
Wen u talk of tech comps , theyre d likes tht create software for their internal consumption and for over all contribution to the i.t market, think trolltech, makers of qt , oracle makers of java, the oracle db etc the apache software foundation, take2 makers of grand theft auto, Foss, etc.
Anoda reason y tech is dead is cuz in tech most founders are really techies at heart, they provided d spark and boost tht fanned d first company these comps werent formed by a bunch of marketing accounting or mba types. Neither were they foreseen by these types.

I downloaded it but was expecting a java program. Wat language did u code it in?

Most popular c-like languages have a mechanism for restricting the type of objects a container can accept. Generics. With inheritance restriction can b adjusted to classes of types , e.g a container that only accepts integers would reject doubles but if the type is set to any descendant of type number the restriction bcomes expanded.
The issue however is, restriction is tied to specific types or specific type classes. But in modelling real world situation the need for broadening the restriction parameters even further arises.
For example, say u want the container to accept a string an integer or a file. 3 types, any type of these 3 are acceptable else bounce them.
There's no generic shorthand for this. On d other hand issues like wats d maximum range of acceptable types that can b specified bcomes a problem e.g if a container is set to accept 1000 subtypes performance may degrade but in real life programming these kinda scenario occurs and this scenario breaks the oop philosophy of packing objects under a single ancestor so that they can b seamlessly processed by containers and other clients.
Writing boiler plate over loaded methods is tedious and wasteful of development time. Actually the core of the issue is modern languages cannot adhere strictly to one paradigm as counter scenarios will occur to continuously confound the solo philosophy the language is resting on. Functional languages dont suffer from this problem cuz theyre rougish and unstructured.
I.e un modular. Everything is a function or an argument to a function . Oop is more robust and introduce group thinking to software development (modularity thru classes, single inheritance to reduce needless complexity interfaces to augment shortfall of single direct inheritance and abstract classes, packages and namespaces for further grouping) but all the structure while satisfactory at times can seem as inflexible as an oak tree in a storm. A mechanism that gives the flexibility of a sappling without sacrificing the strenght of d oak is wat's needed and that may mean a number of cases deviating from single option solutions like is the case with the current generics philosophy in c like languages.

texanomaly: @ kambo

Apology accepted.

Btw: You don't even know me. I'm not some mindless bimbo. Contrary to my idiotic comments to you.

I graduated in the top 10% of my high school class. I attended Brigham Young University, where I received a masters in English, and minored in political science. I also have a degree from Texas Tech University in Education.

Don't judge a book by it's occasional lack of decorum.

u must b a side nerd then, with all ur degrees.
Hey girl forgv urself dont b so hard on urself for gushing. It happens ( and sometimes it backfires leadg to defensive psychologcal bhvrs to salvage ones pride! ).
Besides bimbos dont visit here thyre a dime a dozen elsewhere like the romance section where no brains ar required. I shouldv been mor graceful in my reply to save all these tori.

Occasional lack of decorum or occassional lack of timidity. *chuckle*

Islam: a religion of "peace" and "self control". Funny,tht theyre always flying of the handle and enfrcg their will thru peaceful roundtable even tone dialog of war and bloodshed.
So self controlled are they tht the woman is draped like a ninja yet sexual insatiability of d typical muslim male had them slot in a provisional clause of polygamy in order to make the religion more sellable to the target market.

These ar limelight sins . Wat of gossip? Pride? Som of ur acquiantances wont deign associate with u for a few dollars more (a new car, a new house, a new certificate, a relocation to obodo onyibo).
Wat of rebellion: Its like witchcraft to Almighty its the spirit of satan himself. Rebellion is mor rampant thn fornication.
Just paste a "post no bill sign" on a vacant space and see wat will happen next. Even preachers will beat the traffic light to go preach a fiery message against adultery and stealing!
Wat of doubt and unbelief!? : its so insidious tht many dont even consider it until they hear a barrage of faith messages. Jesus rebuked peter for doubtg even though peter awesomely did the impossible -initially- walk on water! Tht tinge of doubt tht led to his sinking was all Jesus commented about! Humans wud hav given him a bronze medal for tryg not God. The isrealites perished in d wilderness for their UNBELIEF it so incensed God tht He said "okay, enuff is enuff u've been yapping tht ur going to die in d wilderness even though i said u will inherit the promise land .. So it is going to be Your word against mine" (my paraphrase).

ciphoenix:

Are we to debate the difference between both terms?

Geeks aren't socially backwards though

there arent enough hours in a day for a nerd (being a purist here) to immerse himself in his subject. His obsession is a mystcal aura to outsiders but it can b unbearable for those who hav to live with it everyday. Loneliness and d feeling of being shunned isnt what other-halves signed up for. One of d top golfers (an indian) lost his wife to golf. Lady said he thought golf, talked golf, played golf practced golf ALL THE TIME!!. Sir Atiyah (mathematician, field medalist) said something to same effect. He's retired and in his eighties but he's always thinkg maths . Small talk is an obvious and irritating no no.

:

texanomaly:

Hmmm. Look I'm sorry. Not really sure what possessed me to say that. I actually do know some geek/nerds.

Also I was top of my class in college algebra. Higher math than that was not a must for my chosen major. (English and Political Science)

So have a nice day. Really

easy girl. Dont b so sensitive -
i was sayg indirectly somethg tht cud b said mor plainly (and less forcefully): an appeal to logically dissecting a seemingly illogical motive!
Thts the way of the scientist ...
Anyway ... (eyes glaze over wen too much xplaing is done) .. I wud b a fool to dish out unwarranted insult. Insult was never intented..
. Blv me.
(and it takes a girl with a wrkg brain to
hav an interest in geeky/intellectual stuff.
average ones either glaze over or nod sheepishly while switchg u off in their minds).
Phew!! (fagged out frm too much talkg).
Hope my seemg-Apologies are accepted :/

texanomaly: I love it when you talk dirty techie.

Sorry...couldn't resist. I'm still trying to figure why I follow you. Interesting stuff though. I'm a sucker for a Geek.

Morning/afternoon

Still morning here.

hmm. Funny . Work the Nand gates and XOR switches in ur brain to resolve the question of y u following poster x.
U wudnt wanna hang with a tru nerd/geek if u met 1 blv me on tht. Theyre too boring for d avrage miss.

The popular free compilers out there with gui interfaces are just wrappers around gnu compilers. Eclipse: wraps mingw, codeblocks wraps mingw, devc++ wraps gcc/mingw.
Mingw is gcc for windows.
Gcc/mingw produces large code on other hand javac produces code thats just a few kilobytes larger than the compiled source code.
It's the distorted code size tht is a turn off as u'd could quickly use up so much disk space while learning and writing sample programs.
Bcc- borland doesnt produce bloated code but comes with poor documentation ,so set up can b a pain 4 a newbie, and in some cases mingw and borland cant compile the same code!
If the code size isnt an issue, u can wrap eclipse or netbeans around mingw and use.
Or try ms visual studio, i hav no experience with it.

Mingw produces very bloated output. A simple hello world class could generate close to a megabyte wen compiled,
codeblocks is an ide around mingw .

It has nothing to do with house work or chores. It's a fallout of cultivated bad habits from her early years and as such its hard to break. Talking wont do. Expressing dissapointment wont either.
You must hav seen hints and traits of this in earlier stages of ur interaction.
One side cure cud b to make take up a physcal activity like jogging exercise etc and stick at it regularly. Dynamic active people are rarely slouchy and dozey. Trade the couch pillow lifestyle of mayb moping away at african magic/nolly wood junk for the exercise program.
More harsher measures to done only a few times and with discretion wud include, pinching and a suprising slap - the shock alone will clear her eyes- but u gat a b careful here. If she the resentful begrudging hardly forgiving type u cud b in for a hard time.

whether they believe in God or not or practice the bible ,its undeniable that the bible has provided loads of material for many a comedians product lines. Gordons, ay, and the rest.
Joke about church, pastor, bible stories, God, Jesus etc. No other religion has had such main stream irreligious and economic influence. Not to talk of tolerance to jeers and taunts. Whether intentional or not! The world learnt a bitter lesson at the beginning of this century when a danish artist tried to raise a few laffs with a joke about an islamic icon! There was almost a 3rd world war!
You'v got to giv it to christianity for its tolerance. It's unparalleled!

Pleasant stream: Sorry to say that every Christian waiting to be raptures in heaven would be disappointed.
We are not going to heaven. We are staying here to reign with Christ 1,000 years and after God will finally come down to dwell with man with the descension of the new Jerusalem .
Jesus will handover everything to God and we all will be subject to him for eternity.
Gullible christians read their bible upside down with the traditional mind set which we were doctrinated by our churches.
Heaven is Gods throne and the earth will be where Christ will reign.
Then what ever we shall do after the millennium would be left to God alone . But not in heaven but on earth for it is written that he created the earth to be inhabited forever.
Though man will become spiritual beigns like angels in heaven. All our thought shall be transparent. Nothing shall be hidden and the ultimate purpose of God for man is to become like him.
Please read your bible with the help of the Holyspirit and unbiased mind. Let the bible interpret itself .

great exposition.
But we will still hav bodies. Yes we will. We will have glorious bodies as mortality will b swallowed up by immortality and corruption will b changed to incorruption. The hard thing is making it in!

Pleasant stream: Sorry to say that every Christian waiting to be raptures in heaven would be disappointed.
We are not going to heaven. We are staying here to reign with Christ 1,000 years and after God will finally come down to dwell with man with the descension of the new Jerusalem .
Jesus will handover everything to God and we all will be subject to him for eternity.
Gullible christians read their bible upside down with the traditional mind set which we were doctrinated by our churches.
Heaven is Gods throne and the earth will be where Christ will reign.
Then what ever we shall do after the millennium would be left to God alone . But not in heaven but on earth for it is written that he created the earth to be inhabited forever.
Though man will become spiritual beigns like angels in heaven. All our thought shall be transparent. Nothing shall be hidden and the ultimate purpose of God for man is to become like him.
Please read your bible with the help of the Holyspirit and unbiased mind. Let the bible interpret itself .

great exposition.
But we will still hav bodies. Yes we will. We will have glorious bodies as mortality will b swallowed up by immortality and corruption will b changed to incorruption. The hard thing is making it in!

@javalove

it's easy to share the highlights of ur success story in sketches but if u wanna help a broda up to ur pedestal u've got to colour in d details then u'll b a true mentor.
U cud even because of the rich details graduate to printing a biography.
Like,
what made u a non (medical) doctor(supposed) get interested in writing a medical app! What seeded the interest?
How did u go from toy apps to mega app, this is a transition many cant make hence theyre stuck as puzzle solvers , teachers etc
there's a saying "those who cant do(or program) teach".
Zuckerberg transition to creating facebook and billy gatus transition to writing altair basic is very well documented. I.e the small apps they wrote b4 d big apps. Share urs.
How long did the blockbuster app take, what was ur experience creating awareness about the app and eventually getting accepted enough to address a notable audience. Then share the frustration stories the low moments when it seemed ur confidence was on d gang plank
and how u averted its toppling over.
Cuz all newbies go thru these phases but som fall by the wayside seeing how a fellow brother made it thru can make a difference btw anoda success story on NL or giving up out of (mayb wrong) belief that theyre not cut out for this kinda thing.