₦airaland Forum

tuzeriouz:
Be like Bini gals and oversea prostitution

Such a fool

This is with blood is shed for to achieve in the shit hole of a zoo

littlewonders:
Good for them. Let me tell chioma to prepare we are climbing a bed of 30,000ft this night. Whether the devil likes it or not, that's where me and chioma will spend this night.

Pls, don't envy us. Life na turn by turn.

Such a fool...

nikkypearl:
and what exactly do you have to offer

.
This is how the problem start

Michelle55:
Huh! for real? you mean you don't like them big and all?

really, I do not. I tried to, but not just my thing

Michelle55:
lolsss.. couldn't agree less even they intentionally do that to hurt me atimes for being on the slender side but I'm already used to their tantrums and I see it as a normal things for guys to love ladies with big bum and boobs

Oga, sorry to say, not all guys like them big I am a guy,and I love slim and girls I do not care about boobs and bums, to be candid, big boobs and bums actually irritate me.

Michelle55:
I agree with you though.. it's normal to like things moderately but the obsession is what I don't get. you need to see the way my cousins would sit down and analyze ladies with big bum and boobs.. I'll end up pissed

there is always this 5% of people out of the normal region of the Gaussian curve on both the positive and negative side. Your cousin, I am sorry is in the negative zone

Michelle55:
guys what's the obsession with lady's big boobs and butts? Ayam not understanding

not everybody should understand

Jogunomi1:
We are planning to get married. I'm thinking of asking her if there is any medical problem we should disclose to each other.

While we were discussing marriage, she opted for registry despite that she is a staunch church girl. What do you think?

please any thing that brothers you before marriage, just clear it now because after marriage 1+1 is never equal to two

Olusegunpeters:
Please note. Some questions from your moodle test or general fundamentals questions will be asked during your Skype interview.

hello, this is kapelvej, you sent me an email request, but I cant access that email for now, can you kindly please reach me at marospylankymoore at yahoo.com

Siga:
.... US and Naija over Iran any day.... we don finally agree ooo.... How I wish we can have constructive discussions like this among our youths in Nigeria...

My brother the truth is that we can, but the youths just like being sarcastic in their reasoning. Even those supporting all manner of politicians know the truth. BUT SOME JUST want TO WIN ALL ARGUMENTS , while some are just being sarcastic. Good evening bro. Together we shall build a new Nigeria

lexy2014:
y would buhari need "hard paper evidence" when he is a beneficiary of tinubus money? Y would he stress himself when u have painted him as a man who is 2 lazy 2 bother about details?

there is this about the way you people argue for buhari. it is an addiction. so i am now the one that makes him lazy

Siga:
... Thanks for the input.... I have always been a student of not telling a sovereign nation how to run its affairs... Yes, Iran has issues when it comes to human rights and all... Nigeria, US and the likes also do have... No perfect nation... Also, a nation can decide to shut its borders to any nation they so wish... it will impact them economically...

My case is based on the fact that Israel needs to learn to live in peace with her neighbors... Nothing will change... Imagine Iran went into Israel to take files... I bet you US will be on the go to invade Iran...

I am not fan of Iran to be clear though... I just believe there should be fairness and US should mediate and not choose sides...

Chairman, small , small you don turn this thing into Isreal Vs Iran. I am looking at countries holistically. stealing of documents from Iran by Israel, and The U,S not doing anything about it is wrong completely wrong, but going by your standard, and i quote you 'of not telling a sovereign nation how to run its affairs...'
I look at countries holistically, like you also said, all countries have their issues. No matter the issues different countries have if I am forced to choose any country to raise a family, trust me I will choose US , NIGERIA, ahead of Iran. This is talking holistically

lexy2014:
are u trying 2 tell me that buhari wasn't aware of d source of tinubus wealth b4 he became president?

Yes, but then, no privy to hard paper evidence. moreover on the lighter side, what is Buhari really aware of... Nothing, He has always said he not aware of this that this that... what a joke of a president

Siga:
.... And you think Israel is more welcoming than Iran when speaking about Africans? ... Oh my... don't get it wrong ... I will choose Iran to be candid...

You are getting it wrong. Israel is not welcoming to illegal immigrants, not just immigrant. you need to just say you will choose Iran, introducing the word candid to support your answer already shows that you know the choice get as e bee. REMEMBER, IN MY QUESTION I SAID 'RAISE A FAMILY', so this is not about you. Do you know how many things your girl child can never do in Iran because she is a girl? I live in Malta, I have lived in Norway, I have seen Iranians that have absconded from their country complaining about their government. Lastly talking about reception do you know that ONCE YOU HAVE AN ISRAELI VISA IN YOUR PASSPORT, YOU CAN NEVER ENTER IRAN AND 5 OTHER COUNTRIES AGAIN WITH THAT PASSPORT. I will not mention the 5 countries, I don't want this to become a religious discussion,I can see you are a graduate from your level of intelligence based on your perfect English composition to my replies, I am sure you know the countries

Siga:
...Bros... at all... I like that your response didn't come with insult... Now, Iran securing Nuclear weapon is something that scares Israel and why they are shouting about it... But what does Israel need it for... and why invade Iran to steal files... Is that right?

I am not saying one country is better than another , we know the antecedent of countries. If you are asked to raise your family in either Iran or Israel, which will you choose

Siga:
... And do you realize any executive decision made can be changed by Trump or next president... so you need the House to vote to make it solid ... Republicans vowed to make Obama fail on all policies sent their way cos they have the power.... Yes Obama failed on some agenda... No one is perfect and I bet you Trump ain't...

Now on the Nuclear issue... what right does any country have to tell another country not to have it when they have stock of it... Israel PM was asked if Israel has Nuclear weapons... he couldn't answer... Now tell me... what right do they have... they have Nuclear Weapon but won't allow others to have....

Israel went into Iran to steal documents... If Iran was the one who went to Israel to do same... the whole world will scream ... What right does Israel have to enter a sovereign nation to take documents and files... Lets be fair for once...

Men, you are already turning this into Isreal thing... Anyway Obama would have used that presidential powers during his time like he did with Iran.

Opinionated:
https://www.opinions.ng/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/trump-obama-1-670x503.jpg

Decision to put the JCPOA at Risk is a Serious Mistake

Barack Obama

There are few issues more important to the security of the United States than the potential spread of nuclear weapons, or the potential for even more destructive war in the Middle East. That’s why the United States negotiated the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in the first place.

The reality is clear. The JCPOA is working – that is a view shared by our European allies, independent experts, and the current U.S. Secretary of Defense. The JCPOA is in America’s interest – it has significantly rolled back Iran’s nuclear program. And the JCPOA is a model for what diplomacy can accomplish – its inspections and verification regime is precisely what the United States should be working to put in place with North Korea. Indeed, at a time when we are all rooting for diplomacy with North Korea to succeed, walking away from the JCPOA risks losing a deal that accomplishes – with Iran – the very outcome that we are pursuing with the North Koreans.

That is why today’s announcement is so misguided. Walking away from the JCPOA turns our back on America’s closest allies, and an agreement that our country’s leading diplomats, scientists, and intelligence professionals negotiated. In a democracy, there will always be changes in policies and priorities from one Administration to the next. But the consistent flouting of agreements that our country is a party to risks eroding America’s credibility, and puts us at odds with the world’s major powers.

Debates in our country should be informed by facts, especially debates that have proven to be divisive. So it’s important to review several facts about the JCPOA.

First, the JCPOA was not just an agreement between my Administration and the Iranian government. After years of building an international coalition that could impose crippling sanctions on Iran, we reached the JCPOA together with the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the European Union, Russia, China, and Iran. It is a multilateral arms control deal, unanimously endorsed by a United Nations Security Council Resolution.

Second, the JCPOA has worked in rolling back Iran’s nuclear program. For decades, Iran had steadily advanced its nuclear program, approaching the point where they could rapidly produce enough fissile material to build a bomb. The JCPOA put a lid on that breakout capacity. Since the JCPOA was implemented, Iran has destroyed the core of a reactor that could have produced weapons-grade plutonium; removed two-thirds of its centrifuges (over 13,000) and placed them under international monitoring; and eliminated 97 percent of its stockpile of enriched uranium – the raw materials necessary for a bomb. So by any measure, the JCPOA has imposed strict limitations on Iran’s nuclear program and achieved real results.

Third, the JCPOA does not rely on trust – it is rooted in the most far-reaching inspections and verification regime ever negotiated in an arms control deal. Iran’s nuclear facilities are strictly monitored. International monitors also have access to Iran’s entire nuclear supply chain, so that we can catch them if they cheat. Without the JCPOA, this monitoring and inspections regime would go away.

Fourth, Iran is complying with the JCPOA. That was not simply the view of my Administration. The United States intelligence community has continued to find that Iran is meeting its responsibilities under the deal, and has reported as much to Congress. So have our closest allies, and the international agency responsible for verifying Iranian compliance – the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Fifth, the JCPOA does not expire. The prohibition on Iran ever obtaining a nuclear weapon is permanent. Some of the most important and intrusive inspections codified by the JCPOA are permanent. Even as some of the provisions in the JCPOA do become less strict with time, this won’t happen until ten, fifteen, twenty, or twenty-five years into the deal, so there is little reason to put those restrictions at risk today.

Finally, the JCPOA was never intended to solve all of our problems with Iran. We were clear-eyed that Iran engages in destabilizing behavior – including support for terrorism, and threats toward Israel and its neighbors. But that’s precisely why it was so important that we prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Every aspect of Iranian behavior that is troubling is far more dangerous if their nuclear program is unconstrained. Our ability to confront Iran’s destabilizing behavior – and to sustain a unity of purpose with our allies – is strengthened with the JCPOA, and weakened without it.

Because of these facts, I believe that the decision to put the JCPOA at risk without any Iranian violation of the deal is a serious mistake. Without the JCPOA, the United States could eventually be left with a losing choice between a nuclear-armed Iran or another war in the Middle East. We all know the dangers of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon. It could embolden an already dangerous regime; threaten our friends with destruction; pose unacceptable dangers to America’s own security; and trigger an arms race in the world’s most dangerous region. If the constraints on Iran’s nuclear program under the JCPOA are lost, we could be hastening the day when we are faced with the choice between living with that threat, or going to war to prevent it.

In a dangerous world, America must be able to rely in part on strong, principled diplomacy to secure our country. We have been safer in the years since we achieved the JCPOA, thanks in part to the work of our diplomats, many members of Congress, and our allies. Going forward, I hope that Americans continue to speak out in support of the kind of strong, principled, fact-based, and unifying leadership that can best secure our country and uphold our responsibilities around the globe.



Barack Obama served as the 44th President of the United States from January 20, 2009 to January 20, 2017.

Source: Read Obama’s Reaction to Donald Trump Pulling Out of the Iranian Nuclear Deal

Obama is out of power, he should stay out of power

Siga:
...Sir, what exactly is Trump fixing....

He is trying to fix the 11 million young adults whose parents brought to America illegally including people from war torn liberia. If Obama was much a good man, why did he not use the presidential power to grant them a pathway to residency instead of using the presidential power to give Iran 5 billion dollars to develop nuclear facility

lexy2014:
what balls is he holding? Did buhari have d files b4 he became president?

Understand the politics. Before the election, Tinubu supported Buhari because he reasoned that the only way APC can defeat PDP is through Buhari. He thought he will be the VP to buhari, and after that, he can dream of becoming the president. But unfortunately nigerians rejected a moslem - moslem ticket. Buhari became president, and got privy information about tinubu, so tinubu must have to stay loyal

Sterix10:
I wonder what Tinubu a progressive minded man found in Buhari( a regressive minded man)
When we will have a politician that will put Nigeria first in all dealings
Nigeria youth needs to wake up, all this old men will die and leave us, we just need a generation that didn't witness the Civil war to be at the helm of affairs.All this current politicians are creating division between us

Because Buhari has all the files about his thieving activities. So buhari is holding Tinubu by his balls.

[quote author=nahzyla post=67280153]Since men are the head of house then the responsibility and duty of preserving the family should be more on the man as the leader. If a marriage fails the man should carry more blame than the woman so direct your thread to men.

Tell them to stop sleeping around and expecting their wives to 'tame' them.

Tell them to put the welfare of their kids first and provide for them instead of giving one mistress outside.

I don't understand how men keep claiming to be superior and better than women but can never accept responsibility for keeping the family together. Always shifting blame like buhari.I wish you well