₦airaland Forum

or better yet him

or you could get him

dobermans are also pretty much a good alternate to alsatians as they possess pretty much the same qualities,

plz may i add that most dogs can be watever you make them to be, if you pamper your german shepherd it could easily become too friendly and lazy and even cowardly. it pretty much depends on how you treat em, even a local mutt can be wild if you mold it that way.

it pretty much depends on what sort of security you want from your dog, are you lokking for a dog that will merely bark fiercly thus keeping the intruder at bay as well as alerting you to the threat or one that will chew an intruder to bits no questions asked? well the perfect jack of all trades would be the german shepherd, great with family members, very intelligent and a nightmare for intruders.

mr dayokanu u cant possibly be serious. everyone can see just how poor the state of german defences are at club level. ur actualy on here praising that horrible badstuber? ur arguments are even self contradictory. in one breath u say that english teams are so good because of the foreign talent which implies increasd competition from supposedly better players and yet you go on to brush off the achievement of a teenager of breakin into that same team. ur comments as a bayern fan are pretty rich considerin

self explanatory, im a little busy now so excuse the hasty and probably ill composed writing.

1. mood swings, very annoying and irritating,
2. menstruation and pregnancy, very nasty stuff!
3. the desire to dominate and have their way always
4. always expecting a man to perform the function of a bank
5. crying!!!!
6. why women feel the need to be naked around their friends
7. being rude to guys who ask em out, we guys have no choice but to try, we're taking a risk here at least be nice when you say no
8. why are men expected to face grave danger ahead of women? are our lives worth less than theirs?
9. female bosses
10. gossiping!!

so i been going thru the other best things and wort things threads and i checked but didnt see a things u love bout being a man thread, well i think one would be appropriate, i love much more things bout being a man than i hate about it,

1. the sense of power, its so intoxicating especially when women and weaker men are looking up to you for help
2. being the boss of the home/relationship etc
3  the ability to appreciate footbal  
4. how everything a woman does is really for men even though they'll claim otherwise
5. being able to hang out till late in odd places doing absolutely nothin
6. black ops
7. the ability to pee anywhere and anytime i want(very important lol)
8. the ability to walk around bare chested without creating a scene(well not too much of a scene anyway)
9. needing barely five minutes to get dressed to go out
10. lets face it men are the epitome of creation, not necessarily the strongest nor the most beautiful creatures but having control over all the others.

this thread looks like the what i hate about being a woman thread, well there are few things i dont quite like about being a man

1. havin to be on guard against gettin turned on in a public place
2. the impossibility of being as randomly friendly to ladies as i am to fellow guys cuz ladies feel every guy speakin to them must be after something
3. being expected to pay for everything
4. having my eyes magnetised to random boobiess

other than that it really is a mans world

rubbish rubbish rubbish, lol this is too silly and funny, so the man that raped her was he blindfolded wen he raped her? obviously they were in the same uni so they must have recognised each other on campus for her to be able to identify him as the cult leader and obviously he picked her out as his target so he must have known her as a person besides was his face blind folded or was her own face covered with mask?? lol funny people

im on does anyone else have these silly arab channels? watched saudi arabia vs guatemala on em earlier on but seems they re not showing the nigeria game ryt now

alright i havent actually got time to post all the relevant scriptures but the fruit adam and eve ate was called the fruiit of knowledge of good and evil, which means they became accountable for their sin, the punishment of which was to b cast out of God's presence

MRbrownJAY:
^^^i weep for people like you who are quick to bring on the democracy card but yet fail to see the reality of life. . . . . . but hey, are people in Libya killed because of their ETHNIC GROUP or because of their POLITICAL AFFILIATION?! use what you have between your ears. . . . . . . . . . .

FIRST
what's happening in Libya is ILLEGAL in the eyes of INTERNATIONAL LAW. you CAN go in and support a country that has been attacked by another country BUT YOU CANNOT go in and support rebel insurrection to support ONE side over the other. ITS ILLEGAL!!!!

if it was that easy then what stops Iran/Syria from arming Boko Haram AND invading Nigeria to fight the Gov. DUH!!!!

who suddenly made NATO/UN/US/EUROPE judge and jury that they can decide that Yemen/Bahrain/Saudia Arabia can kill its people in the name of keeping the peace BUT Libya cant?!

SECOND
if anyone wants to get rid of dictators around the world and restore "so called DEMOCRACY" then why dont they start with SAUDIA ARABIA/NORTH KOREA etc?!

THIRD
- when the Yemeni protesters went to the streets and the Yemen gov. shot at UNARMED civilians and massacred them, the US/France gov helped and supported the YEMENI GOV. where was democracy THEN?
- when Bahrani protesters went to the streets and the Bahrain gov. shot and butchered unarmed civilians, the US gov. directly organized for 2000 saudis to come and help the Bahrain gov. which continued SHOOTING AT UNARMED CIVILIANS. where is your democracy THEN?
- when the Palestinian population went to vote and elected HAMAS as their chosen gov., and Israel and all others decided NOT to accept the DEMOCRATIC WILL OF THE PALESTINIANS, and Israel went into terror attacks killings gazillions of Palestinians, where was democracy THEN?

FOURTH
this attack on Libya is about the control of OIL.
some few Arab countries are now opening their eyes and understanding that instead of filling the pockets of BP/SHELL etc, they'd rather do what Chavez and Morales are doing: USING THE PETROL MONEY FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT!!!! but hey, i am sure you would rather that Libya follow Saudia Arabia and using petrol money to build luxury towers where the common Saudis will never be able to afford to live in.

FIFTH
its all the same propaganda MEDIA LIES that comes out before any of these hypocrite wars:
Vietnam war: they said that 2 Vietnamese boats attacked US boats, but it was later confirmed that it was a MEDIA LIE.
Irak war: they said that they had weapon of mass destruction and that Saddam Hussein was helping Al Qaeda, but it was later confirmed that it was all a MEDIA LIE.
Yougoslavia war: they said there was a genocide in Kosovo but it was later confirmed that it was a MEDIA LIE.
Afghansitan war: they said it was because they were aiding and harboring Al Qaeda but it was later confirmed that it was a MEDIA LIE.
Libyan war: they said that Qaddafi killed 6000 rebels, then they said 2000 then they said 200. and it will be surely confirmed in the future that this was also a MEDIA LIE.

so, if you want to remain a fool then fair enough but dont try to make ME look like you, some people have a BRAIN.

PS: as for the Norwegian dude i repeat: if anyone believes that its ok to break a country's law and kill their innocent people for their causes then what this Norwegian dude did is no different!

quite a silly thing to say. genocide is the act/acts of killing people of a certain race/tribe, the reason why their are being killed really does not have anything to do with the fact that killing a large numbers of people from a certain tribe amounts to genocide.

1. the simple and basic fact is that you made the ridiculous statement that the U.S and this misguided chap are doing the same thing. i went on to show that there are three basic differences between the two, one the U.S aint N.A.T.O, two one has popular support and the other does not 3. its one thing to deliberate target people and quite another for people to accidentally get up in violence. wat does all your rambling have to do with any of these three? im not here to justify anyone but simply pointing out how wrong you were to justify a terrorist act on the basis of the U.S involvement with libya.

2. its really not that simple is it? ever heard of nuclear weapons? besides like i keep telling you this has nothing to do with ryt or wrong but since we're on the subject then i ask, why didnt your terrorist chap go bomb north korea since to you he and the U.S are the same? if you expect the U.S to do such and he is the same as they are tehn i guess he shuld do the same.

3. what exactly does all you said in your points three to four have to do with my three basic points?

MRbrownJAY:
^^ i think the guy wanted to say POLITICIDE.

oh dear, are you saying you really dont know that the members of the opposition who were being killed by gaddafis forces were mostly of a particula tribe? watch the news plz.

you see i was expecting you to do just wat you did, take a few simple points and tun them into completely differnt issues entirely because ur initial points were absolute nonsense.

you said wat this man did is no different from wat america is doing in libya,

i pointed out that it is NATO in libya not the U.S and you began rambling about the origin of N.A.T.O, point still stands that the comparison you made was total rubbish.


2. its called collateral damage. duh, thus rendering ur point all the more obsolete. its one thing to target people and its quite another for people to be caught up quite by accident in the acts of conventional warfare, is it not? compare the civilians casualties from N.A.T.O s entire Libya campaign and the casualties from one single act by this man, geddit?

3. why is it that you people are so incorrigible? darn conspiracy theorists! democracy is all about the will of the people is it not? every day the rebels request for more support so obviously he masses are in support of N.A.T.O action, now tell me, were/are the masses in support of the act of terrorism comitted b this man?
you say its not ok for a disgruntled few to take up arms and kill people, do i need to point out wat an obvious and lousy distortion of the truth that is?? are you ignorant or just bent on telling lies?? this revolt is a popular one with even armed forces officers defecting to the rebel! btw wat exactly would be the legal means to protest when your own government is killing you?

MRbrownJAY:
this man is a lot of things but crazy, he is not!!! he wanted to get the attention of the government about some issues and decided to do something extreme to get it.

yes sadly a lot of innocent people died in the process BUT what he did is no different than the innocent people who die in wars all around the world.

HERE IS AN EXAMPLE: if you compare HIS actions with that of the US gov. then there is absolutely NO DIFFERENCE.
the US gov. doesnt like the policies of Libya so they go to Libya and kills thousands of innocent people, in the name of "needed JUSTICE".
where is the difference?! did their actions solve the problem? NOPE!!!
there are LAWS in place but these people (US gov/Anders Behring) decided to take the law into their own hands.

such disappointing logic and reasoning. you deliberately even twist the truth to suit the nonsense you're spouting.

1. the U.S govt did not go to libya. N.A.T.O went to libya backed by the U.N, the Arab League and [i]Libyans[/i] themselves
2. the intention of the N.A.T.O forces was never to target civilians whereas this man deliberately targeted civilians
3. he decided on his own to carry out his action but N.A.T.O were begged repeatedly to intervene
4. can you really not see a difference between intervening in impending genocide and killing people merely to prove a point??

very basic question, answers seem blurred by perceptions and misconceptions. there are different kinds of relationships of which friendship is one. now if ur talkin bout the difference between romantic relationships and friendship then simply put friendship is one of the components of a romantic relationship. for those who say its the same thing here's a question for you, are you in a relationship(romantic) with your best friend of the same sex?

@baby boy u myt be ryt in saying strikers generate more attention but my point is that that does not really mean they are the most talented or that their position is more difficult, the diamond -water paradox i made reference to is a typical example of this, water is more valuable than diamonds but diamonds are much more expensive,

Ibime:
Depends on your physique. Simple. Someone of my size finds playing CB or Centre forward easiest. In ma younger days - played left wing and centre-mid but I was skinnier then. The hardest position I've played is left-back, cos you need to be sure when to go forward or stay back. In terms of fitness, Centre-mid and winger are the most demanding. I find playing centre-back very easy and less physically demanding. Players like Ledley King do not train at all, but slot easily into centre-back. He could not do that in centre-mid.

im gonna have to agree with this,
and this

[quote author=baby-boy link=topic=715609.msg8759092#msg8759092 date=1311238298]like I said earlier on the easiest position in football is behind your laptop sitting on the couch[/quote]

montelik:
D easiest position would be full back. Its d simplest position to learn and not a particularly critical one compared to goalie, center back, center midfield or striker.

how can you say that?? the full backs are almost the most critical piece of the puzzle, imagine a team without full backs, they would be completely exposed to attacks down the flank which is already the channel thru which attacks are predominantly channeled. and wat of the attacking input as ell? take a look at evra and alves for eg, evra's poor defending in recent times has been a great weapon for oppnents while alves's attacking play is one of the critical elements that makes barca's team click, while fullback is indeed relatively easy to play it is a very critical role

[quote author=baby-boy link=topic=715609.msg8748690#msg8748690 date=1311103811]Look only 3 midfielder are in the top 10 most expensive transfers and 2 of them have retired the only one  and Kaka could be used as a second striker.

1 Cristiano Ronaldo – Manchester United to Real Madrid, 2009, £80million

2 Zlatan Ibrahimovic – Inter Milan to Barcelona, 2009, £56.5million

3 Kaka – AC Milan to Real Madrid, 2009, £56million

4 Fernando Torres – Liverpool to Chelsea, 2011, £50million

5 Zinedine Zidane – Juventus to Real Madrid, 2001, £46.5million

6 Luis Figo – Barcelona to Real Madrid, 2000, £37million

7 Hernan Crespo – Parma to Lazio, 2000, £35.5million

8 Andy Carroll – Newcastle to Liverpool, 2011, £35million

9 David Villa – Valencia to Barcelona, 2010, £34million

10 Gianluigi Buffon – Parma to Juventus, 2001, £32.6million[/quote]thats not the best of statistics to use, if we could compare the prices of a much broader selection of plaerys then i believe the results would tell a different story. in any case the relative price of a commodity is not the accurate measure of its value, question which is more valuable, water or diamonds?

[quote author=baby-boy link=topic=715609.msg8745498#msg8745498 date=1311073605]ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha


Tell me why strikers are more expensive to buy and command the highest pay day since football began?

The mere fact that a striker has the think faster than any other player when he has the ball, has less time to make a decision, has less room to manoeuvre, has to have the perfect touch on the ball,[/quote]dude strikers arent more expensive, midfielders are the most expensive players nowadays, especially if you class wingers as midfielders

medjai:
Playing as a CB, one poor control, one poor pass, one second loss of concentration and you are instantly punished. As a CB, your touch and passing must be faultless.
Besides, playing as CB is the most physically demanding part of the gme.

how is Cb mor demanding physically? midfielders cover the most ground during a match, and these days DMs are as physically imposing as CBs, in fact Ferguson once said he admired the nesta maldini milan defence because they once went an entire game without making a single tackle(cuz by mere positioning they snuffed out all chances), truly great defending is more a mental thing than a physical thing. i have played both CM and CB and honestly wen playin CB i get bored, the action is all in CM

and i dont need to point out the fact that most CBs realy dont have great control, seriously can yu name one defender wit better touch on the ball than any one midfielder of your choice?(both at world class level)

[quote author=baby-boy link=topic=715609.msg8744837#msg8744837 date=1311066079]sitting on the couch!!!!!!!!!![/quote][quote author=baby-boy link=topic=715609.msg8744837#msg8744837 date=1311066079]sitting on the couch!!!!!!!!!![/quote]lol na reclining on the lazy boy myt be a bit easier .

medjai:
Centre-back is the most difficult position to play in. The role of a CB has changed these days. Most teams like to build their attack from the back. Long gone are the days where all you need do as a CB is hoof the ball.
E.g of modern CB's are Gerrard Pique, Thiago Silva, David Luiz. . . They are actively involved in their team's play.

The easiest position to play is forward.

medjai:
Centre-back is the most difficult position to play in. The role of a CB has changed these days. Most teams like to build their attack from the back. Long gone are the days where all you need do as a CB is hoof the ball.
E.g of modern CB's are Gerrard Pique, Thiago Silva, David Luiz. . . They are actively involved in their team's play.

The easiest position to play is forward.

no way can CB be more difficult than CM, tru most teams build from the back but the fact is CB's have so much space that this is not a problem, they mostly end up passing to a full back or to a midfielder to do the work of moving the ball.
as a CB if your suroundin players(i.e midfield and full backs) are good then you hardly get to face attackers one on one so all you do is position yourself for the interception and to mark players out of the game.

[quote author=baby-boy link=topic=715609.msg8745210#msg8745210 date=1311069924]Really!!!!


knowing that the hardest part of football is getting the ball into the net!!!! I recommend you ask those who play as a striker how easy or hard it is?[/quote][quote author=baby-boy link=topic=715609.msg8745210#msg8745210 date=1311069924]Really!!!!


knowing that the hardest part of football is getting the ball into the net!!!! I recommend you ask those who play as a striker how easy or hard it is?[/quote]its relatively easy cuz u dont really need any special talent you just need to be naturally athletic to be good enough as a striker. in fact as a striker its like the whole team is working for you

wat do you guys think the easiest position to play in football is? most would say full back but while the position might be relatively easy to play it is also relatively difficult to play well. personally i think it is central defence that is easiest. you dont need to possess a very wide range of skils to play there, at full back you need both defensive and offensive skills and at midfield you will need a measure of both plus technical ability, playin as a forward is relatively easy as well, so wat do you guys think?

conclusive evidence that of the apostles were nigerians!
1. Judas loved money therefore he must have been Igbo(chukwuemeka judas)
2. Peter loved quarrelling therefore he must have been yoruba(olayinka simon peters)
3. Paul loved to kill christians therefore he must have been Hausa
4. John loved to be given a high position therefore he must have been from the niger-delta
5. the rest are hardly mention and therefore thay are minorities

yo leroy
glad to see u back
took u like two weeks just to write that crap?
nigga yu shuld lay back focus on school
stead of comin on here and actin a fool
cuz its clear u aint got the swag
hidin behind yo fear your a cyber quack
scam emcee your lines r just wack
i wouldnt win if this was a race and thats a fact
cuz this aint a race its a one man track
yea im the alpha ahead of the pack
and your the runt, talk big but i bet your a kvnt
ill crush u like a giant crushes an ant
ur ed and im gulliver
so even tho i admire ur liver
u cant win wen ur playin with fire

so yu call yourself wizzard? damn
that explains why yur face is so withered
u drop corny lines feelin dope
pullin silly faces thats ryt ur a joke
and ur from S.A?
nigga RIP cuz u probably got AIds
question is, have u eva been laid?
probly just a junkie hooked it off the needle
wen im done ul be hooked up
ul need a nurse to feed u
c its nothing to me, son i got no qualms
ending yur life bittch get ur dicck out yo palm
c this nigga's explosiv im like napalm
but ur flow stink so bad u shuld go beg 4 alms
cuz ur never gonna make it not in hip hop at least
but yu did yo best yu tried, now accept this defeat.

yo i been out a minute
but your boy is back
zero to sixty
wen i step on the gas
explosive flow
bout to drop sick bars
i just kill and go
u culd call me mopo
i run my game
like im usain bolt
and im so cold im like the south pole
who's this kid?
i bet yu wanna know
but i stay underground, im something like a mole

this is very interesting, wen the story broke initially, everybody believed the womans side completely including myself but now that contrary evidence is coming out people are creating their own reasons why the new evidence might be false!! wat why the blind sexism?? it is a documented fact that this woman was expelled from japan for assaulting a diplomat!! does that not tell you something bout her nature?? also lookin at the nature of injuries she sustained it is clear to see that even a punch could not have caused those injuries but those were caused by a sharp object i.e the metal railings the main claims she fell agianst, plz people should be objective.

incredible that he waited 45 minutes in the same spot just to return the bag

Joey82:
@poster,
U got got me login in after such a long while, i even struggled to get my password right.
I seriously think all those expression of love shulda gone to your wife.
Imagine how good she'll feel.

y shuld those expressions of love have gone to the wife instead of the child?