₦airaland Forum

yuzedo: ME? HELLLLLLL NOO! I live in a Banana[b] Iland[/b] house wit swiming pull and table-tennis lawn. But i heard fase my people normally used padlock to lock their pot of soup! huh wtf? we give uppppppp!

this fella is the biggest joker ive ever seen... with your diction the only way yu live in Banana island is if ur a house boy or gate-man and as such yu really shuldnt be looking down at others. your need for attention is another cause for concern...grow up!

btw there is nothing like a "table tennis lawn"... may God deliver you from lying. you probably meant tennis court...i cant believe no one else has picked up on your nonsense

.

dude how can u come here to ask wat yu can do? even a 15 year old simply cant descend to the level of asking such an aimless question. unless yu want us to tel yu to use her legs to cook yam porridge?

tym up!

this thread is faggish.... but ill upload a definite winner in a few mins

well if its an ex i dumped i wuld say "i'm sorry"
if she left in acrimonious circumstances i probably wuldnt reply... or id say sumn like "i pray yu find the ryt guy"
no need to return meaningless aggression of a person who is clearly hurting because of you

yu want him to stop? lose your toothbrush

i asked myself the same question this morning.....from an evolutionary perspective women have developed these assets(excuse the pun) in order to attract men to mate with them, thus ensuring the survival of he species. from a common sense perspective it is clear that God made it that way as part of His plan for attraction between a man and a woman. its like asking why do men like a pretty face? it seems rhetorical until you probe deeper. all faces are made of the same thing i.e tissue and bone therefore there is no good reason to prefer one persons face over another but we have been made to appreciate differences and to classify them on a scale of beauty which differs for each person. this is all part of God's plan for attraction between a man and a woman. these things wer put there because God wants us to have a lot of things to enjoy (in the ryt context of course)

shakara4u: _{walks n,reads all and walks away}

whistling,women have needs,men have responsibilities

na Adam cause am

lol wat a way to put it.... food for thot indeed

kimberluge: I wonder why men still stare n get a bonner at a muslim woman who is fully wrapped in sari! Dis goes a long way 2 show dat most male humans r evolved from animals compared to d female folks!!Cause I know God made a difference btw Humanbeings n animals n dat is SELF CONTROL!

i am willing to bet that yu have never ever seen a man do this and yu made it up on the spot just to prove a nonsense point! no guy ever does this no matter how depraved, perverted and desperate one is. please grow up


[quote author=huni_naija]I guess we ladies are just good at playing the devil's advocate... She can go from acting to the holiest woman on a sunday to the baddest flirt you've ever come across on a saturday!

Where as the men can't seem to get away with such... They are labelled bad from the onset! Double standards much?

I'm now starting to see how dangerous we women truly are.. Lmaooo

The fear of women is the beginning of? [/quote]homosexuality ....

emalekuo: Do u consider this a dumb question?

yep.... at that age there is nothing legal you can do to stop her. she's an adult so you are limited to prayer and advice which by that stage is probably too late

due yu gotta chill and either lower your standards or upgrade your self cos dr is always someone for everyone

due yu gotta chill and either lower your standards or upgrade your self

i wuld come to nairaland and ask a dumb question

a good woman is the perfect companion....love is a necessity of life whether yu like it or not.

firstly its hell hath no fury like woman scorned o.... unless there is nigerian version i dont know about
secondly if the men wanna complain let them complain. they are still the ones bearing the responsibility(Lord knows i love this word) so let he who wears the shoe tell wer it is pinching him

andyanders: hope u like her, marrriedoooooooooo. no put eye

andy ur wife is beautiful. all the best to yall!

the logic behind this thread is baffling in all honesty. the post makes what seems like a valid point by applying the " put yourself in their shoes method" but made a critical error by not taking into consideration the fact that for you to get a clear picture of exactly what their shoes feel like, you must not only wear the shoe, but you must have the same size of feet! what am i saying? basically you cant rationalize female behavior using male mentality. this is erroneous because the mindset of guys and girls are totally different. the fact that girls are approached so often means that to be offered sex or whatever is not such a big deal to them. to a guy it would seem like a big deal because we rarely get offered(relatively)and end up doing the offering. you cannot use the mentality of the hunter to understand the behavior of the prey. for those who still dont get it, if you were a girl you would not think being offered sex by so many people was such a big deal. therefore you would only go for the best offer and chose to ignore lesser ones. therefore those girls who go after numerous offers are indeed exhibiting abnormal behavior relative to their gender. thats the whole point. now why would anyone be encouraging lose behavior from either gender anyway? Jesus is coming soon and if yu aint convinced bout that then consider the fact that yu may die very soon as well.

Marlbron: Guys its only a game. I doff my hat to Sir Alex for the strategy he brought to the game which stifled the freeflowing game of Madrid. There is no doubt the sending off changed the game as it enabled Mourinho to bring Madrid who changed the game with his masterful play. Lets analyse the goals.

The first goal -an own goal should not have stood. Van Persie was offside when the ball got to him, the kinsman missed that, and that gave Man U an advantage.

The challenge by Nani was a dangerous one, not helped by his simulation, which made the ref decision a very correct one. Had he accepted responsibility, he might have been lucky with a yellow. No matter, Nani saw Arbeola late and should have directed his leg away from Arbeola rather than aiming for his chest. The rule is clear- dangerous play, red card.

Now with the sending off, it was still 1-0 to the Red Devils. Why did Sir Alex not hold on to the lead?He missed a trick there. When Modricd was brought on, he failed to respond to that and still carried on as if the midfield was still on the same dynamics. That was a rare lapse of concentration by a great tacticIan, a great coach. ManU should have organized better and perhaps should not have conceeded. Being 10 man down does not mean you loose a game.

After the second goal, ManU brought in changes and were very determined and may have scored a goal or two. The day was saved by good goal keeping. The Red card, made it easier for Madrid, but Sir Alex playing to the crowd rather than focussing on strategy as Madrid brought Modric, may have cost ManU the match. And by the way, ManU fans, there is next year champions league which you are sure to play. Remember, the first goal should have been an offside call, so stay humble.

sorry bro but the bolded is just rubbish. wat exactly do you propose shuld have been done differently? from the off the team was set up to defend so the only possible change would have been an attacking one. bringin on an extra defender at 60 mins against real is the definition of suicide cuz then the pressure would be unbearable and with world class players they would be bound to score.you must realize that it took every single one of our 11 men to effectively defend as we did in the first half. wen real had the ball we exerted pressure from the front and squeezed them resulting a good number of misplaced passes and makin it easier for our defenders to repell real's players. losing one man simply granted them all the space they needed at the back....the two goals are evidence of that....the space that was available for that cross on the first goal simply was not there wen nani was on and modric certainly wouldnt have had that space to shoot prior to the sending off. there was nothin Fergie could do to respond to the modric substitution cuz like i said the only possible change would have been to throw on an attacker which is at happened wen real began to defend their lead. besides it was Modric for Khedira my friend...straight swap! there was no tactical change there! they threw on Pepe and we threw on Rooney. im strugglin to understand this rubbish yu wrote about sir alex playing to the crowd rather than reacting to the modric sub. in fact i am struggling to keep calm here. wat do u even mean?? are yu saying this because he encouraged the crowd to yell more? that is simple morale boosting 101....the great man knew we were in trouble and turned to the crowd- the famed 12th man advantage of every home team(in this case 11th man) for support. please go and write long stories about something else cuz yu sir do not know what yu are talking about here.

Vanneni: 190 don't be ,entioning my name in matters like this. You don't know me.

ItsModella: You must be very stupïd. In your pathetic mind, you're a psychologist, right? Did you say my type? I suggest you shut that shithole you call a mouth if you don't have anything meaningful to say. You can't just open your useless mouth and spew nonsense about me simply because you've been allowed access to the internet.

See this poor äss efulefu o, coming on here to form levels.

If a guy decides to spend on his girl, how is it your business? If he decides to eat onions while she eats the suya, how is it your business? If the guy decides to drink water while the girlfriend eats nkwobi, how e take concern you? na you dey pay? the guy tell you say him dey hungry? Dey dere dey take panadol for another man headache. My point is, people all have their reasons for doing what they do, reasons you have no idea about. You can't just judge them based on what you think (which is very skewed btw). The way you'd act is not the same way they'd act and you can't open that smelly cesspit you call a mouth and judge them based on your own standards.

lol r y guys seriously gettin pissd ova nairaland? come on no one really exists on here..its just a bunch of weird user names... just go with the flow or ignore annoying stuff...

[quote author=Okija_juju][b]Answers:

1. Everybody would have known he was in town because I am almost dead certain he rode into town with an escort and sirens blaring.

2. By virtue of his status as a Police commissioner automatically makes him a politician. He prolly was also into village politics as well. A lot of folks would want him dead.

3. In Nigeria, you can buy an AK-47 from the streets for as little as 50 - 100 thousand Naira.

4. He was prolly being followed and monitored. A reflection of poor training. Nigerias answer to insecurity is brute force in numbers which really isn't all that wise. If he had an unmarked vehicle in his convoy that was trailing him, they would have spotted those guys faster. Every time I see a convoy go past me, I laugh because it's so easy to attack them and get the upper hand especially with those AK 47s which are not very effective in close quarter combat. If his orderly had a pistol, he would have been able to manuever inside that vehicle and return fire easier than he would with a big rifle inside that confined space.

5. Everybody in his community would know where he lives. That's a no brainier.


In summary, the Nigerian Police needs to be retrained. Those AK-47s should only be carried by a special unit (e.g our SWAT unit). Inside a car, an AK-47 is not easy to manuever. A pistol in the hands of a well trained officer is deadlier than an AK47 in the hands of a thug. Moving in a convoy with flashing lights dosent necessarily mean that ou are safe. A special team of officers in an unmarked vehicle following a distance behind would be more effective as they would spot a trailing vehicle faster and move to intercept. Our entire security structure needs to be revisited. It rather sad. He was killed in front of his gate. He had a unit of heavily armed officers inside his house who didn't respond, despite hearing what I am sure would have sporadic gun shots just outside the gate. By the time they responded, the assailants had enough time to kill the commissioner, shoot up his orderly, ransack the vehicle and take the orderlies weapon and then get into their vehicle and drive away. That shows gross incompetence. It's a sad case, but I am not surprised. I have always said that a well coordinated unit of armed robbers would be able to enter the central bank and get away easily.

This is indeed a sad sad case. We really are at the mercies of men of the underworld in this nation.
[/b][/quote]if this guy really had that many enemies i doubt he would have been bold enough to move about so freely... this had to have been done by someone with a specific maybe not so obvious grudge against the guy.

plus altho firearms are relatively easily accessible, i doubt any tom dick and harry would be able to assemble a team of assailants capable and daring enough to assault the late CP. this had to have been done by someone with significant links to the underworld,

the story says the vehicle was trailed which would imply that the assailants probably were camped off somewhere close to the location where he dropped off his guest rather than close to his premises. if they were camped out around his premises than it is unlikely they wuld have to trail him all they would have done would be to lay ambush for him a he was leaving rather than when he was returning. strategically this wuld have been the best move unless the visitor was involved in the killing.

also camping out close to the mans home would greatly increase their chances of being spotted before having time to pull off the assault. im 90% certain that he was trailed from a location back to the house rather than from the house and around the town.

this then leads back to the visitor. it is either the visitor was indeed involved or the attacker was someone who knew the visitor had ties to the late C.P.

reports are that the visitor was a barrister...who would possibly have a case to answer against the late C.P? what projects could he have been about to embark on? further questions for the police

i honestly wonder if women think correctly sometimes... honestly no offence intended at all but it seems like yalls brains are prone to emotion induced malfunction. you pissed him off, then got pissed off yourself and actually expect him to come pamper yu? wat r yu, some baby in diapers?? why is it that women just want to take, take, take and take? is love your birth right?

Kamanda: Hi! My name is Lola.
I used my friend to set up my boyfriend to see if he'll cheat on me.

Now they've sent me a wedding IV.
What am I?

you are an idle story teller

read her post...after describing the situation did she ask a question such as "what shuld i do?" or "where shuld i go?" na...she asked wat is wrong with men which means she doesnt have much to worry about

yea i read the story but she doesnt seem to be in trouble yet...nothing significant has happened and she accepts she has to move out so she should just be a big girl and move out. where is the trouble?

if im in a good mood i will...no big deal, it wont be the first tym i would have lied to her abi? and this tym id be straight with God since it was the pastor that "forced" me to lie lol...jokes tho

lol sorry to hear your story o but yu really dont sound like yur in any form of trouble...life goes on!

been dr done that...the truth is that this behavior stems from desperation and low self esteem. when you feel that the girl you want is too good for you one tends to go all out to impress... the truth is if yu feel a girl is too good for you then yu best not even attempt it cuz whether or not she is actually too good for you, your behavior will send the signal that you are not good enough for her which will lead to her messing yu up and your own feeling of inferiority will be reinforced. rather than getting sucked into this trap, every man needs to find something very useful to do, something you love, something you are an expert at. this gives one a natural confidence and swagger and im not just talking about having money here. its about purpose guys!

mehn let it go....if it hurt yu that she forgot your birthday what you should have done was to make your feelings known to her at the time.... paying her back like this is not cool for your relationship. it really depends on whether yu guys truly love each other or if its just about intimacy

poster what do you intend to gain by sucking up to women in this manner? you are setting yourself up for nothing more than heartache and ridicule because the same women who applaud you on this thread wont take a second look at your type in real life. please do us all and most especially yourself a gigantic favor by manning up.

now of course we must treat the ladies right...for no other reason than the fact that we must be nice to everyone irrespective of gender, race or other differentiating characteristics.

thank you for your kind attention.