₦airaland Forum

Ossy12:
Do people still build PC's or buy custom built PC's

Why not, not everyone games on them.

pcguru1:
seriously PC gaming is a different beast however my interest in getting such rig is for Emulation so i can play all my PS2 games, PS2 emulation needs much more for a low spec system so the GTX 970 maybe be handy and i won't even recommend an AMD GPU unless they support the Vulkan API

Dude lol...i strongly disagree..besyds most amd gpus support vulkan anyways...

Any ways my gtx 970 gigabyte mini oc finally croaked...third nvidia gpu to die on me. Havent had a single amd gpu die on me yet. I dnt think i will go to nvidia for my gpu needs for a loooong tym

jesusjnr2:
Lol!

No insults, just laughs for that was just you trying your hands in comedy to good effect.

p.s. I'm not an ATM full of insults waiting to just dish them out whenever requested.

I gave you the example you wanted though. Or u require another specific type? Perhaps one where de person sacrificed didnt enjoy it?

Fadedvoices2:
China might overtake the USA economically within the next twenty years (possible) but China can’t overtake USA militarily (it’s just impossible) .. China has only one aircraft carrier ..boss Russia has two ,USA has 18 aircraft carriers .


China can’t even overtake Russia militarily

So Fadedvoices2 you recon it's going to remain at the same number for ever? China's military might [b]Might [/b]grow to outpace the other two, this is not something we can argue about. It might happen in our life time or not, or might not happen at all. We can only wait and see. But please refrain from making absolute statements.

martineverest:
lol lol

have u asked yourself why china is spying on Korea and Japanese tech companies... especially Samsung?

even ,Taiwan Korea and Japan are far ahead of China..china knows that...have u asked urself why Chinese tech are inferior to those of her eastern neighbors?. ...... research and development is the main reason

Spying? You have prove for this bro? And even if that were true, did Japan not do same and arrive at their current tech level. Learning from your neighbours is not a bad thing...they are learning. And if anything has taught us anything, its that asians can learn and improve on certain things immensely....right now i agree, they are not there yet, but to think they wont get there...i hope you can handle the shock when that hapoens

Fadedvoices2:
Us remains super power - economically and militarily until China’s economy overtakes US economy and also overtake USA militarily (impossible )

Why is it impossible? Do you know how many times the super power label has changed hands? Relax, we know you love the US but nothing is impossible anymore in this world. So stop making absolute statements

jesusjnr2:
Not just daft but dafter than daft!

For I told you how to prove that you're not so, by simply providing just an instance, not two, of God asking for human sacrifice from His follower, for someone who desires human sacrifice should at least on one occasion ask for it from His followers na.

Na wa oh!

Is that not logical?

You are still here talking about an instance of a blunder by a man who made a vow to God that God never asked of him or any other person for that matter, in the arrogance that it would be someone else maybe his servant, not knowing that he had a daughter.

And where's your proof that God accepted such a blunderous sacrifice?

So if you foolishly sacrifice your daughter to God who never asked you or any other person for such in the first place, so it would now mean that God desires human sacrifice?

Provide an instance where God asked His followers for human sacrifice, and kill this argument once and for all, otherwise forever hold your peace as the dafter than draft person that you truly are.

#satanzombie

p.s. Maybe you and your partner in satan zombism could put your poo infested heads together to produce just one instance of that.

Abraham's was asked to sacrifice Isaac. Per your request this satisfies it. Awaiting my insults.

PrecisionFx:
U mean ur cousin should goan kill people for ritual and bring their heads to u for approval, U will approve it and then do ur cousin a Favor he asked for and then u have nothing to do with it

yes ooo....i cant even begin to understand de logic.

jesusjnr2:
Your class of satan zombie's are really the daftest of them all.

If not how can someone who has never asked any of His followers for human sacrifice be possibly assumed to be a blood thirsty God?

Only the satan zombies who are not just swimming but completely submerged in the ocean of daftness could possibly arrive at such a catastrophic judgment.

I mean you have all the pages of the Bible available to you and there are many occasions there where God asked His followers for sacrifices, so if you have any iota of truth in your allegations why not just get one instance where He asked of required human sacrifice from any of His followers and kill this matter once and for all?

So either you do that supposed simple thing to prove that your brains are not poo infested to have come to such a conclusion or you prove that in truth your satan zombie heads are fully saturated with satan poo.

#satanzombie

So he was able to stop Abraham's own but not jephtaph's. Because it wasnt he who asked for it? And so if he didnt ask for it yet accepted it, is he not endorsing it? And i am the daft one? My lord

I hope Jesusjnr spend as much time making threads for Political leaders and crooked *men of God* aka 99.9% of them...

That would be nice to see

PrecisionFx:
And they sacrificed them to the bible God, He accepted the blood human sacrifice n ended the famine he brought upon Israel.

Blood thirsty god

Apparently if you didnt ask for it and simply accept it you are not guilty of the ritual.

Praaaise be to stupidity. Logic be damn.

jesusjnr2:
Name just one instance of such!

Jephtath's daughter...you dnt even know

jesusjnr2:
Keep them coming, so silly, disgrace and what have yous!

But it would be anyone who justifies gays aka gay sex with the baseless excuse of consent, and that instance of a fifteen year old boy has just destroy that baseless basis!

#satanzombie

You are dere worrying about satan? Satan? Have you seen satan before? The one taking advantage of you and telling you you are wise you have not confronted...the devil you have not set your eyes on before, dats the one you create threads for?

You know what? Aluta continua

jesusjnr2:
Yeah!

And news that a fifteen year old gay boy committed suicide made nairaland front page recently.

So he was not yet mature enough to give your flimsy gay excuse consent?

To justify the demonic agenda of gay sex is to chase shadows.

Gay rights = Paedophile rights

What does what you said have to do with the OP? Please it's okay, disgrace yourself nolonger. And he even got 1 like.

jesusjnr:
Study to show yourself approved unto the god of homosexuality, Satan.

You've proven yourself to be a first class graduate of his demonic homosexual university, Lol!

Displaying fully blown ignorance of the truth!

I see the foolish stupidity in your statement pOPe!

Gay rights = Paedophile rights = Bestiality rights

very sad very very sad. Oh Religion! see how you have made a child with a great future so silly. Now he will never see sense again.

rekinomtla:
It's natural, some are just born gay. While others are just born pedophiles.

Yet there is one thing differentiating them. One very important thing. Consent.
The crazy person who stated that a child can give consent about needs to be caned so much till he bleeds out all his stupidity. By law a child can never consent to sex (in Ghana at least that is 16 years old) any child younger than 16 cannot consent to sexual encounters. Same goes with animals...by law no animal can consent to sex with a person, so that too isn't possible. Now i hope you see the stupidity in your statement OP. Study to show thyself approve unto God.

ArchAngelos999:
A lot of things attributed to God in the O. T were not actually of God. The prophets had a limited understanding of God. Jesus Christ is the express image of the invisible God, if it's not Christ character it's not God's character If God is accepting human sacrifice then lets leave the pagans alone.

i only gave him the info he asked for...that's all sir. I dnt want to argue pls. I have learnt not...it yields nothing here. Just a waste of one's time.

sowilli:
check the verb- asked. Indirectly we can say he asked but all of that stopped in the Old Testament.

Please be clear on this. I know u said that it all stopped aftter new testament was introduced but a question was asked (rhetoric or otherwise) and I added to it information that was not included in the post.

sowilli:
[B]the only time God asked for a human sacrifice was with Abraham and Jesus. Where else in the Bible did he? [/B]And every form of blood sacrifice( animal inclusive) stopped after Jesus came. Did you see any blood sacrifice in the New Testament. So if any one says God asked him to kill his child now, you know he is hearing from the devil not God. If someone tells you God asked him to sacrifice his house and he becomes homeless for a while, would you call that evil? The things of the spirit are deep.

Jepthath sacrificed his daughter. A promise made to God if he let's him win over his enemies. First to come out of his house. She did.

Empiree:
What you said here should tell you it is fake. Ask op which terrorist openly renounced terror and not punished just for being member of the group?. Stop believing in trash like this. Op is known for posting cooked up stories. During alkaida era, they did same thing. We heard so much about "former alkaidas now a born again Christians" and never persecuted in their imaginary world. Real terrorists are arrested and locked up. This kind of fake news are brought to you by evangelical christians. It is propaganda, buddy.

You remember Shoebat, the so called "former terrorist", freely walks and does his journalism in US. He was exposed by CNN that he was never member of terrorist group. He only said that to propagate christianity and get monetary assistance from US govt and christian groups to enrich his pocket. If he was truly a former terrorist, you think law enforcement would tell him walk freely?. So they lie all the time. A true terrorist would be locked up. Do your independent investigation on this and you will find that he is undercover christian. They usually come up with this type of thing to overshadow current incident and event like New Zealand christian terrorist attacks on two muslim mosques. They simply want to divert attention. As you can see there is no thread about that terrible incident in New Zealand. So it is up to you to believe this nonsense

thanks bro...well said i shud have known better.

nelsonoba:
Is there any religion that claims to have a saviour of mankind? If your answer is yes, then we can have an argument over which of the "saviours" is real or fake. If your answer is no, then what really are you saying?

Jesus is the only one who ever came to pay for man's sin. Muhammed did not, buddha did not. Every man has sinned, and if obeying some form of rules and regulations in a religious book is what would have saved man, then you already know that no human being including Muhammed himself is saved because everyone of them committed at least one sin in their lives. So if these religious prophets or founders couldn't save themselves from their own sins, then how could they save other people? This is why GENUINE christianity is beyond obeying some sort of rules and regulations, but about the sacrifice of a sinless man on the cross to pay for the sins of a sinful world

And we are back to the question again...where was this claim made? The bible. Its a circular argument. Its only in the boble and no where else.

InaNla:
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” John 14:6

And who said Jesus said that? If its the bible then how sure are you that the bible is real? If its the holy spirit how does the holy spirit sound like? You see what we have here? A secular argument. If all it takes to mke something true is a book then why condemn other religions? They too have books telling them otherwise. What make you so sure your book is the one true one? If you quote the bible in response to the question you have failed.

OLAADEGBU:
Former 'Prince Of 'ISIS' Turns To Christ After A God Dream: 'I Saw A Love That Didn't Exist In Islam'
03-16-2019
Ericah Jones

A "Prince of ISIS" has done what many would consider unthinkable, making a commitment to turn away from his horrifying past to unite with a new way of life through Jesus Christ.

The former ISIS leader, whose identity has been disguised for his safety, is being called Mohammad. The miraculous circumstances that led to his transformation were reported by Dr. Michael Youssef's Leading The Way ministry.

Since the launch of its Christian satellite TV station, THE KINGDOM SAT, Leading The Way is working to touch "some of the most unreachable lives in the Arabic world," including people like this notorious 'Prince of ISIS'.

'Many Are Having Dreams and Visions of Jesus': ISIS Sickened Muslims in Iraq, Now They're Turning to Christ

A video testimony from the ministry reported that one of their follow-up coordinators named Peter received a call several years ago from a man who pleaded to meet with him.

The man on the other end of the phone with Peter turned out to be a spiritual leader in the terrorist group. Even though Peter knew it was possible that Mohammad may try to kill him, he believed God was leading him to go ahead with the meeting.

In a reenacted testimony, Mohammad opened up about his dramatic shift from Islam to Christianity. "One day, somebody asked me why I am a Muslim," he said. Scrambling for answers, Mohammad began to search in the Quran, Hadith, and Sunnah.

"I wanted to find proof and evidence that Allah exists and Islam is right... I found nothing," he said.

But that wasn't the initial reason why Mohammad met with Peter. He says he had just wanted to kill Peter, but during their first encounter, Peter boldly spoke the Word of Jesus over the ISIS leader.

The meeting did not end on a positive note. Mohammad became frustrated and struggled to grasp what Peter had told him about who God really is.

Then the two met for a second time.

Charisma News reports that Leading The Way's senior director of ministry outreach Maged Atalla explained what happened in the next meeting. "The second time they met, Mohammad told Peter he had a dream and saw an envelope dripping blood with great fragrance," he said.

Peter explained that the dream was God telling him that blood had to be shed for the forgiveness of sins.

"Peter told him, 'Jesus is sending you a message and you need to give your life to Him.' At that moment he surrendered his life to Jesus. Mohammed then told Peter that the first time they met he had a knife in his pocket and wanted to kill him on the spot, but something prevented him from doing this," said Atalla.

Now Mohammad's burning life questions have been answered and his life dramatically turned around.

After repenting, Mohammad experienced a peace he had never felt before.

"I saw a love that didn't exist in Islam," he said.

Because of his regular meetings with Peter, this so-called 'Prince of ISIS' accepted Jesus Christ into his life and began his journey as a Christian.

"The true book, in my opinion, is the Bible," declared Mohammad. "I found the truth in Jesus Christ. And because I have surrendered my life to the Lord, I am certain He will never forsake me."

http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/cwn/2019/march/former-prince-of-isis-turns-to-christ-after-a-god-dream-i-saw-a-love-that-didnt-exist-in-islam?

I really hope this man gets prosecuted for his crimes and not let go because he is "born again". Being born again shud not exonerate you of you heinous crimes. An example needs to be set otherwise it will become a loophole for other extremists as well. If he is truly repentant, he should avail himself to be punished.

Akaujaa:
A wise man doesn't quickly dabble into every issue that comes his way. A wise man listens but is slow to talk.

that is not a wiseman that is a gullible man. if you are wise, ask questions.

So my fellow intellectuals, are we truly saying to ourselves that we believe the book of life records every single sin we commit and weigh it against the good we do? is heaven that petty? they have nothing better to do but to count people's sins. this sounds like the conjuring from the minds of primitive men who didnt know better. when will judgement day befall us then? because from all accounts (third party after life and the bible) there are people already in hell...have their judgement already come? what happened to the dead rising and being judged on that day? seriously, can we not ask ourselves dese questions? and we have, wat satisfying answers did we receive, kindly share.

victorian:
Well I'm not MOGs , I don't know how they do it . God is a spirit , He is not a human being , He's not a man . So to become a spirit u need to be dead first and let the spirit be free to ask God, whatever he or she needs to ask.

For me, I'm not impatient like you.

I'm living my life . So be patient or u can ask MOGs , how they access answers from God , as u are well aware they do receive answers from God .

Contact any of them and ask them on questions meant for God .

Why do we refer to God as a he tho? A question that has always bothered my mind.

I believe in God (not Jesus mind you) because I was indoctrinated to do so. If im to really have a reason to believe in him, it would be that I need something to believe in, in times of need. call it cognitive homeostasis. This is the real truth, rich people, or people who can change the course of their destinies do not rely on God. Mostly its the miserables that do that. Count the number of times one has gone to church being very poor vrs the times he goes when he earns a hefty living. I guess im saying that I believe in God still because Im miserable and need something to believe in.

Emmanystone:
I choose to debate? Well, this makes sense. You want to win so you refuse to see sense in anything i say. Sorry, i don't do that. If that's why you are doing this, then i give up, you win.

When you stand before the Lord at death, arm your with enough points to win Him.

I'm ourahia.

What the hell,what did you think you were doing? preaching? Get serious deflector. u obviously are out of your depth. I will continue to put guys like you right anywhere i see the lot of you. later deflector.

Emmanystone:
I happen to have a life.
And, go back and read what you responded to. I don't have time for rhetorics.

you said you were busy for over a week. Dont pull de i have a life crap, you chose to debate.
And again your response to the initial post still doesnt make any sense. Jesus gave no law regarding whatever happened at the time. the men only followed the law of the land that had ruled them for ages. the same law he Jesus siad he had come to fufil not to change.

Emmanystone:
To men, not to God.

Emmanystone:
This is your postulation or it's according to Scriptures? So Jesus approved concubines for men and that is not a sin? I need a scripture here pls.

When one does not speak openly against a subject he is said to have no qualms with said subject. if he had any problem with it he would be vocal about it. that is common sense.. i do not require the holy spirit for this to make sense. And if you do, then you need the holy spirit for more than that.

Emmanystone:
It should ve been mentioned how many times before it becomes a sin?

Take your time and read. By that comment i meant the only time the sin was outlined was twice. when a man divorces and takes another without meeting the requirement and lusting after another's woman. that was all i was saying...simply stating the only tyms the sin of adultery could be commit.

Emmanystone:
What the hell are you on abt here? A woman belongs to her husband and a man belongs to his wife.

You must be on fantasy land sir, A woman belongs to a man, no man belongs to any woman. This is in the Jewish state. Usually found in patriarchial societies.

Emmanystone:
Divorce and fornication in one sentence? She can't be divorce except she marries first. And it's fornication if she's single. Get your mind here.

Good! this one shows the level of your thinking. I'm going to use your explanation of fornication once more for your sake. If a man marries his wife and realises that his wife is not a virgin then surely he must think, my wife has surely had sex before she married me. if that's the case he can divorce her. That's the requirement. Can you wrap her head around that? Now you get your mind here.

Emmanystone:
No, it wasn't, by God's standpoint which never changes. That humans decided to falsify Gods ideals didn't mean the Divine Design was altered.

And who are you to prophess for God? how is your point of view or those who share your ideals that which carries more weight? you can't even understand simply explanation snd you want me to listen to you? well.

Emmanystone:
No human was created to rule or subjugate another. If you understand LOVE, you'd understand it. The reason the Master came is to correct all that, and it began with the Stoning of the Adulterous woman.
Man being the Head of the woman is not for subjugation, but for hyrachy's sake.

No human was created to subjugate another? surely you have not read the bible. i think you are reading another bible. You call it stewardship, but the bible supports slavery, by not condemning it. God tells his people to conquer and take other people's lands. a woman is a support not an equal...A support is an assistant, they are not on the same level. Don't paint a diff picture. Hierarchy is another name for class, caste etc...this mean that on the pyramid the man is on top and the woman is beneath him. You are saying the same thing just using a different word.

Emmanystone:
If you argue, then you'd have to explain why the subjugation is only between a man and his wife, but not Christ to the man.

I don't need to because that's not the title of the thread. please read again the thread title and come back to argue.

Emmanystone:
Christ is the head of the man, yet He does not control and subjugate the man, why then does the man subjugate the one put under him?

See a pattern? The devil in the details.

Im not going to go through this with you cause it a difference of belief system. But i will put in this word

*You best believe me and accept me as your lord and saviour lest you burn in molten hot lava for eternity*

sure, no subjugation.

Emmanystone:
Marriage can only be terminated on the condition that there was proven adultry by one partner.

Wrong, it's fornication. There is a difference.

Emmanystone:
what i say to One, I say to all Says Jesus. No exception.

Again, out of context. Also what did he say pertaining the issue at hand?

Emmanystone:
Maybe the Bible which Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, Esther, Bathsheba, Ruth, Deborah, and Mary Magdalene are in is a different one from yours.

What did these women do? Besides out of all the great men mentioned you mention 8 or so? this is your case lol dont make me laugh. What exactly did these women do? abegiii find something else to say. These women do not negate the point that Israel was a man's world. probably still is.

Emmanystone:
All the great men of old were ruled a d influenced by women, yet women were inferior and considered less than human. By you i guess.

Ruled by women? maybe, in their chambers not in public. Hell will freeze over before a woman talks back at a man in public. Again women were 3rd class citizens in Israel. They were not considered as witnesses in a court because they were thought to be less intelligent. any influence any woman had on her husband was behind public eyes. simple as that.

Emmanystone:
Do you know that women claim their Father's properties in Isreal?

Yeah. If their father had no sons. (Number 27: again, beneath the man. 3rd class citizens..Man you seem to share a lot of misinformation. All these lies.

Emmanystone:
Who made the society patriarchal? God or Man? And, shouldn't it be 'Before you think of the physical, think of the spiritual? Which came first? Or, which emanated from which? You belong to this kworld, so will look only on the physical, i am spiritual, i look at the spiritual to understand the physical. (I didn't even go into what Adultery and fornication means spiritually).

God did when he created man and realised he was lonely before creating woman. with that in mind you know a man is in the image of God. No woman was allowed to hold the terbenacle, no woman was allowed to take up any leadership role in the house of God. so Yeah.

Emmanystone:
The Last i checked, He created them male and female and said TO 'THEM', NOT TO HIM, 'Dominate and subdue the earth.

Again that only proves that woman is above the animals but not equal to man .

Emmanystone:
The Fall put the man over the woman but that was handled and restored by Jesus. He gave his life both for males and females. He gave His Holy Spirit, both to males and females and said to all of them, 'Go into the world and make dsiciples of men'.
'Occupy till i come'. When He will sit to judge us, He will nor demand the sins of women from men. Stupid.

Why am i not surprise...sad state of event when you call me stupid to hide your stupidity. The woman was created as a support not an equal. hence the later creation. whatever gibberish u spewed up here is not worth talking about so i wont address it.

Emmanystone:
Only Men out of their selfishness remain unrepentant to what Christ has restructured.

Wow look at you...even in the new testament there were rules that still relagated women to 3rd class citizens eg, no woman taking leadership in a gathering.
You seem real confused.

Emmanystone:
Thanks for your kind words. But, you are an unbeliever, yet believe you can tell us how to live our lives. Who is more silly here? You have tried to twist the Word to make you feel justified in your sexual proclivity. It won't change the Word in the least.

No you tell me how to live my life and im only sharing my perception. that's all. believe what you would but if you attempt to wrongly educate i will put you right.

Emmanystone:
And, if you are sincere with yourself, this your remark (which i find very laughable), does not include me. Becos, i didn't take sides with a particular section of the Word. I embrace all of it, because my Lord says i shd. So, you may want to redirect yojr remark to someone else.

I do not pick and choose, if i did, point me out and stop trying to muffle your voice at me.

Is that why in one thread you have quoted out of context, exhibited your ignorance, ironically shown your stupidity, and picked and choose between your testaments calling the ones you dont agree with as the old ways? funny...you are a prime example.

Emmanystone:
Very confused group of people
You really wish you have made sense here right? You can't even tell the difference between adultery and fornication, yet we are the confused ones? Hahahahahahaha.
For ya mind.[/quoted]

Oh lord this is ironic, i see a pster trying to educate you but you have been acting like a redneck...you wouldnt listen. i understand, cognitive dissonance and sll.
[quote author=Emmanystone post=75794080]Try to read first, before you can understand whar is 'inbetween the lines'.

I think you quoted the wrong person, you meant to quote Emmanystone. lol funny guy.

Emmanystone:
So, the issue is with the Jews, not Jesus who gave the law.

Took you long enough. Also, This makes no sense whatsoever. What's your point?

Emmanystone:
Adultery is a sexual immorality based on lusting or sleeping with another married woman. Now that we have that out of the way,
Or married man. It goes both ways. If a woman is married and sleeps with a man who is not her husband, she has committed adultery and vise versa.

This is true. But the focus was on the man hence my initial definition. The woman is always at fault irrespective.

Emmanystone:
if the man is married, but the woman is not, he is committing adultery while she is committing fornication.

Wrong. He is only taking up a concubine which is allowed. She on the other hand is commiting fornication...Because the laws of Israel were not fair to women and children. they were as low as slaves if not lower. There was only twice that Adultery was mentioned for men. Lusting after a married woman(because she is another's property, how sexist) and DIVORCING your wife when she hasn't commit fornication for another. this time the adultery charge affects the woman and her new man as well because again, she is still another's property. Pls know about the times you speak of...its not today's world, it was a heavily influenced MAN'S WORLD.

Emmanystone:
that's why it says a divorced woman (for no reason) cannot remarry because according to the law she is still married.
Let's state what the Divine Design says.

Both male and females belongs to God equally.

Both souls answers to God individually (Not the man for the woman or the woman for the man)

Everyone receives the same level of Grace and atonement for sins.

Jesus died for both male and female.

His laws are binding on both males and females.

This said. The Lord Jesus says the only reason they must be a divorce, or what can free both parties from the string or bond that ties them, is if one of them commits adultery.

So, if it's the man who commit adultery, the woman is free to divorce him and remarry if she wills. So also the man. The law is not binding only on her.

Where is this in the bible? the bible was clear on this, A MAN is only cleared to divorce his wife if she commits fornication. A woman had no authority to even talk back at her husband let alone to question him on his infidelity, and even if he does, so what? he is allowed to. She had no authority to take Divorce him. No court would allow that. Hell, women were not allowed to testify in court cos they were seen as less intelligent creatures, how was she going to get a court of men to side with her when they didn't respect her? This is Israel...a patriarchal society. Before you think of the spiritual please acknowledge the physical. A woman in those times had no such power. and i heard no rebuttal from Jesus. in the harlot's case he simply implied forgiveness. he didn't condemn the status quo.

Emmanystone:
You seem not have the definitions down how can you argue out your case?


Lol. Pls read the Word of God in between lines.

closing remark: Its amazing how silly christians can be. they find convenient twists to everything which only they can see. they acknowledge the bible yet only pick and choose the new testament when it fits them.They call it the new days or watever. Very confused group of people. Now we should be reading in between the lines. next time we will read on top of it. confused as hell.

Mariangeles:
You'd surprised to know that the western world believe more in the supernatural...and what I meant by evil eye is people coming here to type negative things about the baby.

they do believe i know, but it doesnt go as far as we make it.

Also i get you, but its not his fault that idiots abound. is it because of tools in this world that i will not share my memories with de world? its unfortunate that nairaland is worse than the youtube comment section but trully speaking, when i think nairaland, i think safe haven. that is quickly changing. bunch of animals here now.

Mariangeles:
It's beautiful but don't you think you're sharing too much ??
Please protect your baby from evil eye

Africans and spirits and evil. white people do this all de tym no one fights dem...blackman.