₦airaland Forum

Monkey this, monkey that. Look, I will call a white man a monkey in a jiffy. I've seen some who look more like monkeys than I do. I've even seen some who look like owls, bulldogs, even fish-face. Yes, I've seen many that remind me of pigs. So I don't get bothered by monkeys calling me a monkey.

ehie: money is not everything
he is just an arrogant and overhyped player,28-30 is the shelf life for most athletes,he will stop earning much very soon

Why does the fact that he earns much bother you so much? You better go find ways to earn money too, and stop griping over someone earning a living.

Chanchit: I'm not a Chelsea or Mikel, but John Terry and Cech also make blunders, so why should Mikel be crucified..

I was gonna ask why John Terry was not targeted.

No wonder Lil Wayne's IQ is in the single digits. He's actually a very intelligent guy.

afam4eva: Best performing can also mean "Best converting". It doesn't just stop as getting mumu traffic that doesn't add anything to the website. Now if we're talking about best then many variables will come into player and it will include but not limited to Asthetics, traffic, front-end, back-end, domain name and so many other factors.

Lol. Na your type dey turn basic 2+2=4 to 2*16-3-7-5-8-5=4. What aesthetics does the simple Google search page have? Who cares about domain name if it generates traffic? You said "yeye" traffic. I can imagine what you'd give to get a hundred thousandth of Google's traffic. The whole world knows what it means when they say Google is the "best" website; except for you.

afam4eva: Best is a general term and does not mean same as traffic. A very badly designed and relatively useless site can have more traffic more than an informative site. All you got to do is employ the services of a very good internet marketer.

Eh ehn. Employ marketer now. Sebi you sabi. Generate traffic pass Google. What's stopping you?

Dude, traffic determines the performance of a website. We are not talking of aesthetics when they say "best". Best is simply short for "best performing". Or you expect people to rank sites by how aesthetically pleasing they are?

cheddarking: [b]That kid will have the Defensive Abilities of His father

Hopefully 2008/2009 season; and not going by recent performance.

afam4eva: What i said is that Alexa does not have a rank for the best websites rather they have a rank for the website with the most traffic.

Oh! What criterion can be used to determine the "best" site? What creates traffic?

afam4eva: I can't remember ever making a statement remotely similar to the bolded.

*Ahem* Let me rejig your memory a bit. Do you suffer from MPD by the way?

afam4eva: I don't know when states like Ekiti will start getting their priorities right. Wetin concern Ekiti with technology. they should focus on Agriculture and stop fooling themselves and NIgerians.

Ha ha. The coins will pour out like you just hit the jackpot on a slot machine.

They are deporting their brothers from Niger and Chad?

afam4eva: Biko, when did Alexa start ranking the best websites in the world. Alexa is strictly a web traffic aggregator. These people should stop passing false information. I guess they meant traffic.

Uh oh. What happened to the expected "what does Ekiti know about I.T"? All you came in here to do was talk about Alexa?

nagoma: The publicity stunt would have worked if his " pupils education" has a wider coverage than the creeks.

Why? You mean he should spread the aid up to Zamfara and Borno? Well, he has decided to focus on his area and his people. Deal with it.

2mch: He is the best man for the job that we have at the moment. Am sure if they give it to him he will do well. Someone in his position will not let PHCN fools escape that easily. . His whole academic experience has been abroad and it has been through hardwork, not connection or shady experience and degrees.

He cannot play the politics involved.

chromoTop: dude you got me rolling on these stuffs you write hear, i bet you you should read over and apply logic to your write-ups. if the two largest economies in the world have a strong military might what stops the third from not having one? you think they are a sorry bunch?
Pitiable as Nigeria's military strength is, on the basis of its economic importance, it constantly participates in regional stability by sending military troops to distressed nations- Of course you should know that.
you only need a map of Japan to tell you why they have such a history of military doggedness.
should you tell me owning a nuclear plant has nothing to do with military might and technological edge over other nations tells a lot about how you value your country. 'ridiculously' your nation is about owning one and Iran is in sh't for owning one.

I have to say I didn't quite make head or tail of this.

chromoTop: And on what fact do you write-off a nation (sovereign) as having no military base, force, strength or whatsoever? did the Americans tell you they are recolonizing Japan and wouldn't contain any form of military institution?
you were just told a country is the third largest economy in the world, you think is a fluke? and hey would ride on that without any form of interest protection?
they have nuclear plants buddy, Japanese technology is the most intricate and hideous of all technologies and you write them off?
na wa o

So how does having the 3rd largest economy and having nuclear power plants translate into a military force? Even Nigeria is (ridiculously) contemplating building nuclear plants. Are you one of those who ignorantly think nuclear plants = nuclear weapons?

Tony Spike: Today's war is not a function of the size of a nation's army but by the number of air power and other ancillary military technology. In the 1930's and 1940's, the size of the army helped in accelerating war victories. Today, a single button push activating a nuclear payload via air transport can accelerate victory within minutes. Therefore, today's war is a function of air technology!

The point I was making was, Japan has no standing army! Even the over 240,000 personnel in their SDF (Self Defense Force) are all technically civilians and not military!

All that can happen is the US can side with Japan against China. And they still maintain nearly 50,000 troops at over seventy military bases in Japan.

Please read more here: http://www.cfr.org/japan/japan-its-military/p10439

...and here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_Japan#Post.E2.80.93World_War_II

After a period of U.S. occupation (1945–1952), Japan regained its independence. Japan was also forbidden to have a standing army or wage war by Article nine of its Constitution.

ayobase: And who told you that they are not active militarily.....u had better not to wake the sleeping dog....USA sef dey doff for them!

They are? Can you please inform us what the size of the Japanese army is.

[quote author=islam_is_fraud]"OK, we'll let China bully you and also won't allow you to militarize."

Heck, it might even be strategically advantageous for the US to have Japan ramp things up a bit, if it cannot contain China by itself.[/quote]Forget it. The US will never allow Japan to become a military power again; after what they saw in WW2. Ramp up ke? Once they allow Japan to get active militarily, Japan can easily turn on the US.

[quote author=islam_is_fraud]Germany and Japan are both US allies, though.[/quote]That's what you call people you've subjugated - "allies". Are they really willing allies or they really have no choice? Nigeria was the ally of the so called "Great Britain" remember? We even fought some of their silly wars for them.

I must add that the only thing that justifies their subjugation is the fact that they were the aggressors in the last war.

seleroms: When this is done, the killer is tormented by the spirit of the deceased until he or she confesses.

Are you sure the spirit that tormented him to confess was Wunmi, and not our friendly Police "Force"? Because we know say dem be evil spirit o.

[quote author=islam_is_evil_]There are two groups of people who I think it would be unwise to rile up...Germans and Japanese. Whoever decides to wake up either of those sleeping giants is a fool, in my opinion.[/quote]Guy forget all that. This ain't 1930. No super-power (meaning the US and their allies) will stand idle and allow either of the 2 to reach the levels of threat they presented back then.

Tony Spike: The Chinese might be taking advantage of Japan's military principle of neutrality adopted since the end of the World War II. If it would take China's aggression to wake up and activate 'sleeping' Japan, then I forsee a great Asian-Pacific war in the coming years.

You talk as if they willingly took that position of "neutrality". You forget that they were subjugated and neutralized by the Americans. America will never allow the "awakening" of a "sleeping" Japan. They will continue to administer enough dose of sleeping pills to keep them asleep forever.

Silkmoth33: don't be quick to judge and assume rubbish!. Who have you seen or heard that die of sea water.

Unless you've got anger management issues, your response to my post should be positive.

Look at this mugu. How about you ask sailors why they keep their water on board and don't just scoop from the sea? And to think enough movies try to even educate mugus like you. You best read about it since you are on the Internet. You want to compare sea water to ORT water eh? Ever heard about parts per volume?

And to think this f00l claims to be a medical student. Visit his hospital at your own risk when he graduates.

aryzgreat: Don't think i will ever go to bar beach again, all these creamated bodies will definitely be washed towards the shores and we swim into burnt bodies, kai! , wot about people that take these seas as source of drinking water? nna mehn! did is very unhygenic

You won't have to worry about those that drink sea water; because they are all dead for sure. That's what happens to those that drink sea water. You think you can drink saline (salty) water continuously and stay alive?

TO think that post actually got 4 likes...he he...likes for the stupendous stu.pid.ity of the poster?

Android is a Linux-based operating system for mobile devices

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(operating_system)

iOS is derived from OS X, with which it shares the Darwin foundation, and is therefore a Unix operating system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS

So as you can see they both basically have the same kernel and this should be pretty obvious even to a layman given the similarity of the functions they derive from the (to all intents and purposes) the same kernel..tomato...tomata as someone likes to say. If any comparison can make sense, it can only be in the area of the specs. Saying one O/S is "better" than the other sounds silly.

Katsumoto: https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria?topic=881517.msg10308778#msg10308778

I copied the link above from another thread; the last sentence is just too funny. I had to share to back my comment about Dede1's people settling disputes through wrestling contests. BTW, this is just for laughs.   

What's even funnier is his inability to see the similarity between the US dropping atomic bombs on Japan and the use of biological weapons. I suppose the Americans were cowardly for using such an "unfair" advantage.

joelala: ignorance is indeed a disease.check facts online and educate your shallow brain before coming down here to spew rubbish...google iphone5 and see technology at its best, laser keyboard, holographic display etc. its the flattest phone ever.

If you see "holographic display and laser keyboard" in any video online, it is CGI (computer generated image). No such features.

Patiently waiting for their brothers to launch their attack in Nigeria.

cogbuagu: for your information nothing like iphone 5 iphone 4s is dsame as iphone 5
expert iphone 6

Really? So how come we had version 4 released after 3G S? Wasn't 3G S the same as 4G?

OK. So it was his witch wife and not the fact that he's almost clocking 60 that affected him. I hear.

afam4eva: I believe you.

That you believe or not is of no importance. If you could think a new visa is required every time a person travels, I shudder to imagine the other things you are ignorant of.

Jakumo: I'm not familiar with UK police radio protocal, but in the US, while some police radio communications may be encrypted, most routine dispatcher to squad car transmissions can be LEGALLY eavesdropped by civilians using commercially available police scanners sold by good old Radio Shack, with branches coast to coast.

http://www.radioshack.com/family/index.jsp?categoryId=2032072

Obviously these devices will most likely NOT work in Nigeria, whose police radio frequency spectrum may differ from those in the UK or USA.

Thanks for laying it out and sparing me the keystrokes.