₦airaland Forum

KnownUnknown:
The amount of bullshit in this world is breathtaking sometimes.

oneolajire:
You mean you are feigning the spiritual powers used by occult groups?

Yahoo boys rituals must be denied by you as well.


Anyway, why didn't you settle your quarrel with Jesus? Jesus did something special and supernatural for me oooo.

LordReed:
Depends on what you mean. If you mean the conspiracy theories that usually float around concerning some of these fraternities, I would say that those are mostly false information designed to provoke an emotional reaction. If you mean the actual fraternities themselves, I would say that they have no supernatural component to their practices no matter how secretive they are.

oneolajire:
Trying to deny the obvious just because they have no scientific basis.

Looks you have a christian background.

Sixfiguresmart:
https://sunnah.com/ibnmajah:193
Why is allah CARRIED by 8 mountain goats? Doesn’t he have powers to levitate or walk by himself?

Why is allah so light in weight? 8 mountain goats?

Surah 69:17 And the angels will be on its sides, and eight angels will, that Day, bear the Throne of your Lord above them. And the angels will be on the sides thereof, and eight will uphold the Throne of thy Lord that day, above them.

Why can’t allah move without a help?
Why can’t he position without the help of goats or angels? Is he/are they crippled?
Before the goats and angels were created, who carried allah?

So if the angels rebelled, will allah crumble like Naira?

NNTR:
Matthew 13:34-35
'34Jesus used stories (i.e. parables) when he spoke to the people.
In fact, He did not tell them anything without using stories.
35 So God's promise came true, just as the prophet had said,
“I will use stories to speak my message
and to explain things hidden since the creation of the world.”'

Argue with the bible.
Argue with Matthew 13:34

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:
Matthew 13:34-35
'34All these things Jesus said to the crowds in parables,
and He said nothing to them without [using] a parable.
35This was to fulfill what was spoken by the prophet:
“I WILL OPEN MY MOUTH IN PARABLES;
I WILL UTTER THINGS [unknown and unattainable]
THAT HAVE BEEN HIDDEN [from mankind] SINCE THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD.”'

OR

Matthew 13:34-35
'34Jesus used stories (i.e. parables) when he spoke to the people.
In fact, He did not tell them anything without using stories.
35 So God's promise came true, just as the prophet had said,
“I will use stories to speak my message
and to explain things hidden since the creation of the world.”'

I never typed the comment, to be an opinion, I typed 'it is an incontrovertible fact', just as you can see in Matthew 13:34 said

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:
You have a right to your opinion(s), but nobody has a right to be wrong in facts

Opinions are made to change, that's why opinions change in the face of facts. The greatest deception that men suffer, including A&E, even budatuum too, is from their own opinions.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

budaatum:
Why choose to be descended from Adam who was created from mud to ignorantly work naked in a tiny garden if you could choose to be created in the Image of God to "Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth"?

God after all was not created from mud, or was He? So why would you choose to believe you are created from mud to be a slave instead of being created in God's Image to be fruitful and multiply and replenish and subdue and have dominion?

Can those who do not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil be fruitful and multiply and replenish and subdue and have dominion?

Can the ignorant say, "Let there be light" and make the darkness dissapear?

If so, how, and what with?

NNTR:
It is an incontrovertible fact

To each their own

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

budaatum:
Haleluya, my Lord.

Stories are like mud someone spat on and rubbed in one's eyes. One still has to go bath in the Pool of Siloam before one can see, except many don't bother.

NNTR:
The below 'Personal text', is referring to the best Storyteller that ever will be

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

budaatum:
And note, "story", before anyone starts asking me to prove some imaginary made up God created some imaginary made up Adam or imaginary made up Eve or Image! For "story" it may be but evidence shows many are still programmed by it.

hope4nigeria:
I'm just looking back at mylife as I clocked 40year! 40year indeed. In previous years, I always ask myself, will I ever attain such age due to high risk I use to take and many things I use to pass through in quest for surviving and greatness. Just like that I'm 40years old. It's to God's glory. Name 1000ways to die, I've been through 90% of them all! Me alive today is a surprise and a priviledge. God is indeed Great. Happy birthday to a special human like me.

oneolajire:
Maybe they use 'scientific means' to get their activities done. Same way ritualists use 'scientific means' to hypnotize their victims and also manipulate them.

oneolajire:
Can't view any conclusion from your point. But do they exist in any spiritual form?

dattaswami1:
:- Miracles indicate the existence of unimaginable God in a specific medium. But, miraculous powers can also be transferred by unimaginable God into a soul doing rigid penance in which case (of demons) unimaginable God need not exist in the specific medium (of demons).
Miracles exhibited by anybody indicate certainly the existence of unimaginable God as a basic concept. By miracles, you can’t be sure of the existence of unimaginable God in a medium performing the miracles. Miracles need not indicate the existence of unimaginable God in a soul.
Miracles, love with bliss and excellent true spiritual knowledge exist together in the incarnation of God Datta. In every incarnation of God Datta, the spiritual knowledge and love with bliss exist without any exception. Miracles also exist with the incarnation, but, exhibition or non-exhibition of miracles depends on the will (real necessity) of unimaginable God.

oneolajire:
So what is your position on occultism and illuminati?

breathcutter:
Do their soldiers same, in war there are no rules.

With what this man has survived, he can easily make it in hell�

dattaswami1:
PROOF FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD



Shankara gave two phases in His philosophy—

Phase of Reality (Paramarthadasa): In this phase, the absolute reality and the relative reality are mentioned. God is the absolute reality and the cosmic energy is the relative reality, which is produced from God in the beginning of this creation. The cosmic energy includes vacuum also and vacuum is the original form of energy, which is very much invisible. The theory of vacuum generating galaxies supports this point. The special theory of relativity also supports this point, which says that the space or vacuum bends along the boundaries of an object.
Phase of Relativity (Vyavaharadasa): In this phase, the cosmic energy, which is acting as relative reality in the first phase appears as the absolute reality. The relative reality is matter, which is generated from energy and is treated as a form of energy. In this phase, the cosmic energy should be treated as the absolute reality, which never becomes relative reality as long as this phase continues. It becomes relative reality only when this second phase disappears and the first phase appears.

When you put your finger on a solid occupying some space, which consists of millions of atoms packed together, your finger does not penetrate the solid. You feel that your finger is obstructed by the continuous phase of solid matter. This impression is only an illusion and the reality is quite different. Each atom consists of a large quantity of space called Atomic Space. All the sub-atomic particles put together constitute a very negligible portion of the atomic space. Therefore, your finger touches a large quantity of space only and the solid matter viz., the sub-atomic particles is only of very very little quantity only. Even the inter atomic distance is also space only. In such case, your finger should penetrate easily into the solid. But, your finger is restricted by the field of kinetic energy of sub-atomic particles and also the inter-atomic bonds, which are only bond energies. Therefore, your finger is not obstructed by the solid state viz., the subatomic particles and instead your finger is restricted by the repulsion of their energy only. Inspite of the real interaction of energy, you misunderstand the reality of solid state. Therefore, matter becomes an illusive form of energy like a false serpent appearing on the real rope in dim light. If you take the minute sub-atomic particle, electron, it is now considered that the electron consists of sub-particles called as quarks. Tomorrow, the quark may be found out consisting of barks and day after tomorrow, the bark may be found consisting of darks and so on. This ad-infinitum leads to the disappearance of the very nature of particle. Even the electron is considered to have dual nature of matter and energy. Even the theory of particle nature stands finally on the fundamental unit of energy, a quantum. Therefore, the nature of particles slowly ends in the nature of energy only and you have to treat the quanta of energy as particles. Your finger penetrates in liquid and gas states of matter because the inter-atomic distances are long and the binding energies are weak to restrict your finger in penetration.

If you take the energy, its inherent nature is kinetic only because the energy is expressed as the multiples of frequency. Frequency is a kinetic parameter. The kinetic energy is always dynamic in nature. Even potential energy is the energy associated with a static particle and the potential energy does not mean that the energy is static. The essence of all these give the final information that energy means the property of dynamism only. Dynamism cannot be independent. When you see that something is dynamic, you refer to a static substratum, which is dynamic. When you have arrived to a conclusion that the entire creation is only energy, it means that the entire creation is only the property of dynamism. This means that the entire creation cannot be an independent item since the dynamism requires its associated substratum. Therefore, this entire creation, which appears as matter, work, vacuum etc., is a continuous ocean of the single phase – energy. In such case, the cosmic energy or the creation cannot exist independently and requires the existence of its possessor or substratum. When a person is walking, the walk or dynamism cannot exist independently without its associated walker. The walk is generated by the walker.

Similarly, all this creation or cosmic energy is generated by its possessor or substratum. Such substratum should be named by some word and the word chosen is God. You cannot say that God should be the particle because the dynamism is always associated with a particle only. This conclusion leads to a serious problem. In case you treat God as particle, then God should also be energy in essence since the nature of the particle finally ends in energy. In such case, God should be essentially energy and there is no meaning in saying that the God is the generator of energy. The generator of energy itself cannot be energy. The generator of energy should be totally different and should not be energy again. If you conclude that God is not energy, God is also not space because space is essentially energy. This means that God is beyond the concept of energy or space. The conclusion of this logic is that your intelligence cannot imagine God, who is beyond the dimensions of space. Your intelligence can imagine anything, which has the dimensions of space only.

When your hand revolves, each revolution is kinetic energy only. The potential energy associated with the hand may be converted into kinetic energy for sometime. When the potential energy is exhausted, the fat associated with the hand may dissolve supplying the kinetic energy. This is conversion of matter into energy. When the fat disappears, your hand stops because there is no provision of conversion of any small portion of matter of the hand into energy. If some provision is made to convert the hand into energy, the revolutions continue till all the hand is converted into energy. At this stage, since the hand totally disappears, there is no revolution because the energy needs association of some matter as its possessor. You need not argue that the electro-magnetic radiation traveling in space is independent entity without possessor. The electromagnetic radiation appearing as independent entity has its unimaginable possessor called as God.

The electron revolves in its orbit and each revolution is an expenditure of some small kinetic energy. People say that since this kinetic energy is very much lesser than the fundamental unit of energy, electron does not lose energy and is not collapsing in the nucleus in long run. They say that the orbit is static. This argument appears in the following way. [Example:] Suppose somebody is selling 10 fruits for 1 paisa. You take only one fruit and you may say that since you cannot pay 0.1 paisa, the fruit is taken free of cost. In this way, you take each fruit and put in your bag. The seller has to agree with your argument since the paisa cannot be divided into fractions. But, after taking 10 fruits, the seller will demand you to pay 1 paisa! Hence, you must conclude this point in two ways. The first way is that the energy needed for each revolution of electron is supplied from cosmic energy, since neither the potential energy associated with electron nor any portion of the particle nature of electron is converted into kinetic energy. The second way is to treat this point beyond logic of measurement of such infinitesimally small kinetic energy compared to the fundamental unit of kinetic energy that can be measured by the human being. This second point is covered under the topic of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, but even this point needs the requirement of the first point because the accumulation of several revolutions can become equal to the measurable fundamental unit of energy.

The final solution for this is to accept the unimaginable power of the absolute unimaginable God through this event, which can be called as miracle that indicates the existence of unimaginable God. You should not apply the tautology, which is the logic of the relative items to the ultimate absolute unimaginable God.

Hismasterpiece:
Says the guy to waiting to first be spoken to out of thin air.

Hismasterpiece:
So what constitutes evidence? Oh.. I forgot.. You are waiting for Jesus to speak to you audibly when you yourself haven't been speaking to Him and seeking Him for yourself.

LordReed:
May Dr Strange save you from the otherworldly beings of the multiverse of madness.

RoyalDiadems:
May the Lord save your soul.

StilmaVsBorn2w:
This is so embarrassing to say, I would never advise a man to be so sluggish in life. It pains my heart having to experience this several times but since he is an elderly bro that senior me very far I can't put my mouth in his family affair because of this.

I went to visit my brother yesterday, was surprised while we were seated in the parlour... the wife told her husband to go check if the woman selling provision is back.

This wasn't the first time, my brother stood up and went.. I was looking at her the whole time, she was looking at me. The anger was so deep but there is nothing I can do.

They are different instances I can give but no need for that...All I just want to say it's not good to be that calm type of guy.

This is not about being the bread winner of the house, my elder brother is doing very well for himself so is his wife.

As a man, it's just not good to be quite always or be quiet all the time.. gentlemanly. I just don't know how to say it.

Guys what do you think?

KnownUnknown:
The lord saved his soul then sold it to me, the Harvester of Souls. Your soul is next on my list.

KnownUnknown:
And KWAM 1 (no, not that one ) is the only true God. Can the house shout Shokolokobamboshe?!

LordReed:
May Dr Strange save you from the otherworldly beings of the multiverse of madness.

RoyalDiadems:
May the Lord save your soul.

Dtruthspeaker:
Therefore, all 3 exists in exercise of their rights to privacy.

concho:
I might not type well because I lack coordination right now .
My girlfriend of 4 years came back from a one week church program to tell me that the Man of God said I’m not the right person for her .

I am already making marriage plans before she brought this up .

I would actually just walk away on a norm, but she is actually the best thing that has happen to me over the years .

Don’t even know how to start going about this , I am very confused

Someone should help me please

Viktor7:
Both God and Satan doesn't exist.
There's no such thing as Christian Atheism, just Atheism.

oneolajire:
I believe you have your reasons.