₦airaland Forum

Dtruthspeaker:
You are still relying on a document (Book) which as I have said, Lies, or is capable of Lying rather than Truth, found in what we lawyers call Extraneous Evidence!

And I have already presented the evidence to wit- "Egypt, Ethiopia, Rome and 1947 Israeli Resettlement, prove the Truth of it, most especially Egypt!

Dtruthspeaker:
You can say, but can not say it, BECAUSE IT IS NOT TRUE!

Egypt, Ethiopia, Rome and 1947 Israeli Resettlement, prove the Truth of it, most especially Egypt!

And the signs and evidence are there!

Dtruthspeaker:
Truth, is even greater than documentary evidence and Truth has a way of showing up to scatter all Lies!

We did not even need the documentary evidence to show that those evil bastards did invade and occupy Nigeria, there are too much tell tale evidence eg Victoria Island in Lagos, instead of one Yoruba or Nigerian sounding name. Creek Town in Calabar, instead of one Bassey or Anniefok name etc.

MindHacker9009:
Now we are in the super free information age, but so many believers are too scared to look up
any historical information with documentary evidence that proves some of the beliefs they have been taught wrong.I was in this situation for decades as all my parents taught me was Jesus 2nd coming but since I watched a video on youtube with documentary evidence of Roman occupation of Israel during the time of the made up character of Jesus, since then I have been set free from believing in this  FAKE 2nd cumming that has already come and gone in 70 CE.

Believers time to start using the brain GOD has given you and not the one Satan has manipulated.

Competence5050:
What NATO under Obama and Biden does is sleep, drink and eat, they contribute little or nothing, but Trump made it equal contribution. They expect America to do all the work and send it to every NATO member...

Image123:
Do you think it is smarter to say all past written books are invalid then?

Image123:
Do you think it is smarter to say all past written books are valid?

Image123:
As usual, you get it twisted. i showed you that information about the past was accessible and not hidden. i even used a wicked king and scribes as example.
In the same vein, the fact that something is written early doesn't necessarily mean it is valid. i guess you can only think in units.

i answered you immediately already. i said information about the patriarchs was accessible knowledge and that God could have told him. Two clearly given possibilities.

Image123:
Mat 2:4 KJV And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he demanded of them where Christ should be born.

Mat 2:5 KJV And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judaea: for thus it is written by the prophet,

As you can see, the knowledgeable could access previous information including wicked Herod if he so much wanted. It was not hidden for someone not to get it. That something is done or written before Jesus was born or while Jesus was being born doesn't make it valid or the source.

Orkpekyandega:
On my way to my place of work, I met some boys in the neighborhood carrying a beautiful live owl bird.

I asked what they wanted to go do with the live owl bird.

Answer: kill for meat.

The beautiful creature really looked very attractive.
I don't mind owning one as a pet though.

Image123:
i said it wasn't from the BoE, i did not say it was not from a book. It could also be from God, how about that? The words of the patriachs was accessible to those who cared.

Image123:
There are scholarly and divine agreements as to the books you just mentioned, just like any scholarly agreement on other old works. BTW, if you read me carefully, i did not say that there was no book.

Image123:
Okay, enjoy your delusion. That Enoch said something does not mean that he wrote a book. That the book says what Enoch truly said does not mean that he wrote the book. i can write a book quoting you, doesn't mean i am you or that everything else i write is true or you. There are monikers of people on social media, both dead and alive, that say or try to say what the people say/said. It's not a new thing and it doesn't necessarily verify/validate them. But again, enjoy your delusion.

Image123:
Jude wasn't quoting any BoE duh. Jude was quoting prophet Enoch. All sorts of sorry books came out around that time as it was popular to get books and epistles from Apostles telling people God's message. Like there's always fake and copy versions of authentic things. Book of Moses, Elijah, Mary Magdalene, Demas, Judas, Thomas etc. were flying around to deceive people like you.

annyplenty:
It does not change the fact that HE is coming. All the prophecies and signs are aligning.

annyplenty:
He is coming any moment, I still repeat and maintain.

ayoncox:
May be my first interpretation was wrong, premise of first judgement is the availability of scientific facts which most non-believers in God look for so my statement

ayoncox:
In the context of science what are evidences?

Omooba77:
May God forgive you...

daifeanyi68844:
I'm an only son and in relationship with a lady I love so much.

We started dating while we were students. Our relationship is 4 years and 8 months. Everything was going fine until she moved into Lagos and I introduced her to my mom.

Now, any issue I have with my mom, she calls the innocent girl and says it's because of her this thing happened.

My mom and I live in a three bedroom apartment. She and my father are separated.

One minute she's nice to the girl, the next she isn't. We broke up today because of this. I'm really hurt. This girl loves me unconditionally, she supports me, treats me so well. When I started my business she gave me her 200k savings to invest in it. I can't even believe my mom is doing all this. I don't know what to do. I'm really hurt. We planned on getting married this year. I don't know if I would ever find a good person like her.

On the other hand, my mom doesn't even care. I want to cut every ties I have with her.

NNTR:

---

---

---

I am sure I did answer the question and did so with a succint reply

Anyways you can feed off the yellow highlight up there for insights.

Or you want me to clear you with evidence that the Book of Enoch and other variants of it, are best flushed down the toilet, where they belong, as the offer to clear you, still holds

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:
Yes, it is a castigation of the book of Enoch.

Or you want me to clear you with evidence that the Book of Enoch and other variants of it, are best flushed down the toilet, where they belong. If you start, you won't last five minutes into reading the book, before you'll shove it away, from finding the content, being ludicrous and a waste of even idle time.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

NNTR:

---

---

You often like as seen above see me make a point by referencing the Quran, another book when it stands to reason that I consider the Quran valid.

When I quote and reference Quran verses to my dear beloved Muslim brethren and sisters e.g. AntiChristian, it doesnt imply its valid or holds water, but essentially what I am doing with it, is using a nail to drive out a nail.

Apostle Jude and Apostle Peter before him, where not endorsing the BoE, but actually were castigating others reading and believing it

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

helinues:
Man, woman or manwoman, Ukrainians need his help urgently.

Na just a slap on Putin and every suffering go end.

NNTR:
Whats the point you think you are making, with saying, 'yet Jude is canon, funny'.

_{Personal text: Jesus is not a theologian. He is God who told stories.}

Image123:
The reality speaks.

Image123:
Opinions are cheap and free, reality stares you till eternity.

Image123:
Because the prevalent BoE is a fantasy maker of course. The reality and truth stands.

elated177:
Why did you open the thread? I want to have a conversation with you.

elated177:
What do you intend doing with knowledge?

LordReed:
Understand it.

Image123:
It's commonsense. If nollywood produces a film based on the ongoing anything, it doesn't guarantee that it will be the exact truth of the ongoing anything. It also doesn't negate or remove the validity of the anything.

elated177:
Reed, it was just a simple that did call for the shenanigans. Now, answer, what have you understood so far?

LordReed:
Why are you asking me?

elated177:
How is it not any of my business?