₦airaland Forum

pacespot:
You didn't prove anything bro, Yoruba wannabe . The money sent by hushpuppi to the account of your supper cop is meant to do what? To silent the whistle blower who by the account of the story was going to bust the crime by tipping off the Qatari man who was going to send the money to fraudsters through the USA bank accounts. Help yourself by reading up the meaning of an accomplice in crime under the law. The fact that the Kyari guy is not the person who actually laundered the money does not mean he is not part of the crime scene, he was complicit of the ongoing crime either intentionally or by accident, so it is now left for the law to prove if he is innocent or guilty. Let him go to the USA to clear his name. His name was already mentioned.

I hope I've educated your silly mind about the law with this little post

1. You have "educated" me with your weed induced imagination
2. Your conjectures and concoctions are yet to answer my question. So you mean Nigeria will extradite Kyari to the US just because of an allegation that he collected bribe from Hushpuppy? The moment you are able to show with reference which Nigerian law allows Kyari to be extradited under this circumstances, send me your account details......
3. If you are a law student, put yourself through a self-induced carry-over, relegate yourself to year 1.....

pacespot:
Against who? fool

You could well send a missile to United States from here in Nigeria and United States would do nothing since the missile did not originate from their country

The way you aboki people reason makes me want to puke each time I remember Lord Lugard

1. You really need to Puke...and get rid of the toxins clouding your system from reasoning at the level of a n elementary school kid

2. So let's check the story again. As alleged, Hushpuppy transfered x-Naira to an account for Kyari to help deal with his errant boy. Bahm! Nigeria will extradite him to the US because? US said so? errm! Bros, take your meds....

3. Let's return to “the way we aboki people (unfortunately for you I'm Yoruba) reason...” Why is it that whenever you struggle albeit fruitfulnessly to articulate and intelligently communicate your point you resort to tribal slant? It obviously take an untrained kid, of unsound mind and someone bereft to intelligence to think and communicate in this pattern

shadeyinka2:
Human beings (Nigerians) makeup CBN not buildings!

Lil Sis,

Sit this out....you're totally underwhelming here

shadeyinka2:
Using your own quote:

And their CBN regulated banks allowed the infraction!?

I haven't said that they didn't break any rules, that can be sorted out in the courts.
My issue is , if you check deeply, its because they refuse to settle some CBN staff...

So You mean CBN took them to court because "they refused to settle some CCBN staff....."? Haba!....

Ok12345:
Why are they frustrating the youth?

We are trying to beat against inflation by investing in dollars

1. When are the youths going to learn about the laws of the environment where they do business?
2. You can invest in dollar, but you cannot carry-out functions of banks making international transaction beyond a limit if you don't have license

shadeyinka2:
Why?
They are startup companies and not BANKS!
Investigation can be done without freezing their account.

If you check carefully, all the hullaballoos is simply because the young guys refuse to service them at CBN!

Some of you are just as naive as you come.

In the motion ex parte marked FCH/ABJ/CS/822/2021 and filed on August 4, CBN through its counsel Michael Kaase Aondoakaa, submitted that “the investigation being carried out concerns what has been discovered to be serious infractions by the defendants/respondents in connection with some foreign exchange transactions, and non-documentation by the defendants/respondents in violation of the extant laws and regulations, particularly the Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act and the Central Bank of Nigeria foreign exchange manual.”

“That more specifically, there is a grave allegation that the defendants/respondents are engaged in illegal foreign exchange transactions, accessing/procuring of foreign exchange via their banks from the Nigerian foreign exchange market via several bureaux de change, international money transfer operators and have transferred cash deposit of more than S10,000.00 (Ten thousand dollars) to various accounts overseas contrary to provisions of extant laws and regulations and also traded in foreign securities and cryptocurrencies in contravention to CBN Circular referenced TED/FEM/FPC/GEN/01/012 and BSD/DIR/PUB/LAB/014/001 dated February 5, 2021, and July 01, 2015

Who does business in any place without learning about the regulations and regulatory requirements?

san316:
I don't want to believe that most of the people that commented before me are so daft.

1. The video shows a man wearing Lai's signature cap boarding a plane against the report which says he's wearing a face cap.

2. How does the video prove that he's going to the US?
3. Does Kai need to disguise to travel to US to see Jack
4. If the FG was desperate to bring Twitter back, they could have just easily unbanned it. Do they need to beg Twitter to let them unban Twitter?

Make we dey use our brain small abeg

Bros,

If you compare the 86% failure rate of JAMB 2021, you won't need to wonder far. Kids dominate this place...worse still they are not smart

pacespot:

pacespot: :
I won't be surprised to find out these people are also using this Twitter negotiation to bail out Abba Kyari from facing USA court trial. We haven't heard anything about that one lately

Do you think his extradition will not be effected

So you came to conclusion that Kyari will be extradited to the US.... for an alleged offence he committed on Nigerian soil?

AgroDoctor:
See how the country's resources is being wasted. So Twitter representatives cannot honour a country where they make billions from in revenue by coming down to have a meeting with the minister?

See how we have made this country so cheap and irrelevant because visionless people are leading.

...and you came to this conclusion through that video?

pacespot:
I won't be surprised to find out these people are also using this Twitter negotiation to bail out Abba Kyari from facing USA court trial. We haven't heard anything about that one lately

...and what court case does Kyari have in the US?

BeeBeeOoh:
And you want me to believe Lai Mohammed who said that Jack Dorsey is begging Nigeria to uplift the ban?


Use Your Head

Use yourhead you say? You see a picture of someone boarding a plane and that automatically translates that he's going to Twitter ?

You need to take your advice

4601CE:
I’ve watched the video, and I’m still looking for where he’s trying to disguise with a baseball cap according to sowore.

Sowore too mumu abeg

Sowore is a pained idiot who has lost relevance, and digging looking for dirt to slander the govt. But Sowore is not as mumu as the plenty mumu way full here believing this story

BeeBeeOoh:



I thought Jack Dorsey ought to be the one to come to Nigeria since Liar-Lai Mohammed made us to understand that Twitter and his village people are on their knees begging Buhari and Nigeria have mercy on them??


Ndi Ala

So, someone took a phone and made a video of Lai Mohammed in a plane.....and BAM! he concludes he's going to US to meet Twitter....and you believe ? shor of asking if it makes sense to you ...I ask if you need to assess you capacity to be fooled

Data Analytics is the future that is already here

Data Analytics will be an interesting journey but you need to start pretty early....

Hope your math and stats are good and they will come as added advantage.

Get yourself on some introductory courses on coursera, udemy etc. For post grad, check Data or Business Analytics courses at Havard, Chicago Booth, Texas Universities

gebest:
your mother is useless

Some drugs you're taking or should be taking?

Kobojunkie:
1. There you go again throwing out the word "heresy" without carefully reading through what was written.
2. What has that to do with what I wrote?
3. Again, what has that to do with my response?

Everything

Kobojunkie:
Jesus Christ is God's New Covenant Law in the Kingdom of God and according to Him, and since we become members of His Kingdom even here on earth, it is included in His Law that marriage remains as defined by God in the beginning, this before God cursed man and woman for their sins against Him - Genesis 2 vs 24

2. The promise of the Kingdom of God belongs, not to those of the Old Covenant, but to those of the New Covenant and so when Jesus Christ was asked the question, He phrased His response in the context of the Kingdom of God, the Kingdom He came to bring to those who will believe in Him.

So Jesus Christ used the opportunity to make it clear that the marriages we have begin and end in this world and are not a part of His Kingdom.

1. Marriage has absolutely nothing to do with curse on the woman, this is pure heresy
2. Marriage is God ordained and was not repudiated by Jesus
3. Salvation, rapture and resurrection is individual... It is separated from marriage. Even the scripture talks about 2 being together and one shall be taken

Kobojunkie:
Interesting!

So when I said that Jesus Christ declared that your marriages are of this world and not of His Kingdom, why did you scream heresy?

How has this scripture explained the concept of marriage as God ordained it? This scripture was an answer Jesus to the trap question from the Saducees

Kobojunkie:
Interesting!

So invariably, you are saying that your marriages begin and end here in this world, is that not so?

Except you have something else in your book of heresy

Kobojunkie:

Jesus Christ described two different groups of people in that response

1. Who are the children of this world who marry and are given on marriage?

2. Who are the they who shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world- His Kingdom?

Are these one and the same people or different people who live here on this earth?

How do you expect me to provide an answer to your misunderstanding of the scripture?

There is no marriage in heaven because at resurrection ...e.g. when a partner of a couple dies ahead of the other, it does not mean their marriage continues in heaven.

Kobojunkie:
1. try Luke 20



2. Again, the Words of Jesus Christ is God's Truth of me - all others are the opinions of men or even Satan Himself.

Did you post this again, knowing that;
1. Luke 20:34-36 is the same as Matt 22: 30?
2. in simple Berean translation "In the resurrection, people will neither marry nor be given in marriage. Instead, they will be like the angels in heaven"
3. Is this the scripture that you misrepresent as contrasting the union of Christ and the Church? OMG! Bros, sit this one out. You do not have any sound understanding of the scripture. You are just misrepresenting it

Kobojunkie:
You are saying that when Jesus Christ declared that your marriages are of this world and not of His Kingdom, He, Jesus Christ was wrong because you believe instead that marriage is about the Church that belongs to Jesus Christ?

I am a follower of Jesus Christ and not a follower of Paul so I ofocurse separate the Words of the one who is God over me from the opinions of men, even Paul

1. I am not familiar with the words in bold, you made the twisted assertion and not me. I do not know a scripture of such. But if what you're refering to is Matt 22: 30, then I can only conclude that not only are you a "confused-confusionist" but also lacking in understanding. For Christ sake that scripture is Christ explaining the context of resurrections where there will be no need for marriage.

2. It is the height of self-deception to say "I am not a follower of Paul...". This is the deception of you end-time heretics.

Kobojunkie:
So, in essence, your submission is that what God declared of marriage in Genesis 2 vs 24 and what Jesus Christ reiterated - Matthew 19 vs 4 - in the New Covenant means nothing you choose to cling instead to what was supposedly written by Paul in his letter?

You are saying that when Jesus Christ declared that when your marriages are of this world and not of His Kingdom, He, Jesus Christ was wrong because you believe instead that marriage is about the Church that belongs to Jesus Christ?

What is the meaning of the self-contradictory statement you put up there? I am not part of the heretics like you that tries to separate Paul's admonition as separate from God. Even Paul situated this same Genesis 2 vs 24 as the foundation of his admonition. What have I mentioned that contradicts the two scriptures you put up here?

People like you are have been schooled by quack heretics who lack a basic understanding of the scripture and twist the scripture to suit their whims.

Kobojunkie:
Jesus Christ, the one whose Church you pretend to speak of, told you in plain words that marriage is as defined by God in Genesis 2 vs 24.

Do you believe Jesus Christ or do you instead cling to that formulated in the minds of men?

This your submission here is more like a self-delusion. You want to equate marriage as some phantom "equality" yet you don't want the expatiation of the scripture that actually situates marriage.

1. I believe you're are confused and lacking in capability to understand the scripture you claim. The preceding verses stated the process of God removing a rib from the man to create the woman...and only stresses the reason why a man would cleave to his wife as God intended, because she was formed out of him.

2. Marriage is a covenant, a sacrament that binds the man and the woman together in union just as Christ and his bride - the church. The same scripture you keep quoting was deeper explain by Apostle Paul

“Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church. -Ephesians 5:31-32

. It therefore mean that marriage is modelled after Christ-Church relationship.

3. Talking about relationship between the two, it is settled in the scripture

23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.

There was nowhere is the scripture was it explain that the headship of the husband is a curse on the wife....except you are also saying the Headship of Christ over the church is a curse....

Kobojunkie:
Be more specific.

Marriage of a Man and Woman is likened to the Union between Christ and the Church, where Christ is the Head and the churchis the body...just as Husband is the head...

Kobojunkie:
Where are these instructions given by God?

Jesus Christ said you must submit and obey Him and Him alone. Are you saying God commands women to not obey Jesus Christ?

The problem with your ignorant argument is that you are yet to situate the concept of Marriage for what it is - an epitome of the Union between Christ and the Church, where Christ is the Head, and the church submits to Him....

All this your unbiblical explanation is the most ridiculous I've ever come across on discussion of what marriage represents

Kobojunkie:
Even though Jesus Christ made it clear that marriages are not of His Kingdom, but of this world, they continue to install themselves as marriage counselors in the name of God.

Marriage was in place before the curse showed up so equality in marriage is not against God but as God created it to be.

After the curse came in however, woman was cursed, condemned by God to be ruled over by man and perish in the end - cease to exist / return to dust when she dies!

However, through Jesus Christ all who believe in Him, including women, are saved from this condemning curse(all those who live under the curse perish much like Adam), and are made equal members of the Kingdom of God.

Sadly, your Mogs have no knowledge of this and so continue to preach lies as sermons in the name of God.

This is heresy of the highest order

CodeTemplar:
Submission by wives unto husbands is an unmistakable new testament instruction. Going back to eden in other to rationalize it against some class of pastors is pure persecution.

It is pure balderdash

jesusjnr2020:
One thing I have observed from most men who claim to be of God, is that they are sexist but they obviously have no grouse with that because they think is their right to be so, but the woman has no such right.

It's really shameful when I see how they fail to emulate the ways of Jesus who on several occasions defended the rights of the woman from her oppressors as the Pharisees.

Today they are they remind me of the Pharisees much more than Jesus.

They want to keep her in perpetual bondage to man, not know that the saying in the Bible that man shall rule over her was a punishment for her role in man's fall, hence it's no longer valid, because Jesus her redeemer upon His death has broken the yoke and bondage of sin over her life.

That's how they'd make sexist rules such as "a woman shall keep silence in the church and not speak" among such they do to stifle her, but thank God, God is not man, so He doesn't follow the rules of men, but His, hence He would make some women not just to speak in the church but to lead some of the most powerful churches in recent history as a certain Kathryn Kulman.

I chose to align with God's plan and intentions for the woman just as my Master Jesus did so that I would not find myself going against God.

God bless.

What you've stated here is not Biblical , but a twist.

LilMissFavvy:
The last time I was curious enough to read about the causes of marriages collapsing, infidelity was the number reason, not submission, so this people can continue to spew whatever they wish, the only thing that bothers me is that they never preach LOVE/SUBMISSION hand in hand, as Bible recorded it. Yes, I believe in man loving his wife and wife submitting as Bible mentioned, but what these preachers preach is not complete, I see them as preachers who just want to garner the attention of men with reasons best known to them, my opinion anyway.

My dear,

The Bible did not precondition submission on love, neither was love a precondition submission. Each has his or her express instruction from God. Expecting both to be preached together is like setting your own precondition

Where is Proadroit?

Come and eat your vomit

Proadroit: ...The fact remains no bank account has been hacked remotely...

Proadroit: ......so whose bank account has been hacked by an external party of recent via electronic means. I am not talking of atm card theft, i am talking of remote Access to people's bank account...