₦airaland Forum

Tango123:
Did u read what the op wrote

It was a souvenir at a birthday

When hus daughter birthday comes around, other parents in the class will expect him to also spend huge on souvenirs. That is why he returned it

I think he did right.

Another thing he could have done is keep it, but refuse to give expensive souvenirs when it gets to the birthday of his daughter

As a man, op has made his decision.

Oh my bad. It still doesn't matter. Nothing is wrong with a souvenir. If people expect you to spend beyond your means, will you spend? As long as no one can force you to pay, people's expectation shouldn't be a problem.

KingAzari:
Hustle ooo so that you won't be angry that your child received an innocent harmless gift from a rich classmate.

Poverty mentality. Always angry at the rich for no fault of theirs. Hustle, man, hustle.

Werey.

This is not right. There are more productive ways to teach them about greed. If their uncle or aunt gave them a PS4 as souvenir for their cousin's birthday, would you ask them to take it back just to teach them your own lesson on greed? You just unnecessarily stifled their happiness for the time being. Poverty chop elbow.

The right thing to do, if you care, is to locate who bought them the gift. Confirm that the person's parent(s) is(are) okay with it lest we have a case of someone using his/her tuition fee or stealing his/her parents money just to impress our of peer pressure.

Why are the men crying for goodness sake?

"...to love and to obey."

OP, are you a female troll hiding behind a male moniker? If your story is true, I would say you are a pathetic, desperate, and narcissistic simp. You have a big but fragile ego, and no self-respect. If I were your father, I would sell you for a gallon of fuel. Mtewwww. Just kidding.

binghamm:
The truth is any woman in the west will do this, naija woman from village or naija woman based abroad or western woman. Any woman would do it. The only women I can think of who wouldn't do this are Indian or pakistani women brought from india and pakistan. Those ones are more subdued because of their religion.
What I don't understand about this video is the way the woman is just vindictive. Regardless what the man may have done, haba why is she throwing water on him? What kind of nonsense is that? It's clear she's taking full advantage of the fact that the guy cannot raise his hands and hit her under any circumstance. He's probably under the watch of the law and that would put him in serious trouble. So the woman is going the extra length and trying to provoke him all she can. That's just stupid.

Don't kid yourself. Female nature is universal. Give them power over you and they will use it.

Hintona:

Meghan Markle must not hear of this. Hush!

ubunja:
very true about Sweden, Australia and California as the strongholds of feminism. But in terms of raw practical misandry day to day, Canada takes the trophy. That's why Jordan Patterson trends heavily because of the systemic war against men over there .

Meghan Markle had to subtly drag Prince Harry back to California. Though the misdanry, systemic war against masculinity, gynocentrism, and feminism are wide spread. I agree that Canada is the champion in that aspect.

ubunja:
there's a reason why the Red Pill movement is unofficially headquartered in Canada. Its the strongest there because misandry is the strongest there.

Australia, Sweden, and California are the fortresses of feminism and gynocentrism. Sweden and Netherlands are Europe's worse examples of left wing liberalism. Do you know that there is now a wide spread idea, even in the UN, that Covid-19 lockdown has yielded an alarming increase in domestic violence against women and girls?

Hathor5:
I know it's your favorite topic so you have the energy to go back and forth for days but I am just here because you people seem to know a different west from the one I have lived in so let me pick out one line to show you that what you type is not to be taken seriously.

The bold is a general statement referring to the laws of which country exactly? Never mind. The fact that you type like the divorce laws in all Western countries are the same shows that you need to educate yourself more. More facts, better differentiation, less generalizations and less bias would go a long way for you.

Laws governing relationships are not EXACTLY the same everywhere. In fact, in some countries and states, common law marriages (Defacto union as it is sometimes called) do not legally hold. In fact most states in the United States do not recognize common law marriages. In some states in the United States, you pay child support till your child turns 18, others make you pay till the child is 21. Generally, the laws are basically the same in how they fleece married men.

As to your question, that law applies generally. If you need an example, I will give you California. Just go to the L.A. County Superior Court and ask, that's if you stay there. Even Dr Dre's wife is requesting $2M per month PLUS $5M in legal fees for lawyers and other professionals working on her case. It is very common. Stop being disingenuous.

Anyway, we can agree to disagree. I rest my case.

ubunja:
Prenuptial agreements are watertight on paper.but in the real world they can be contested. Just like Wills.

Who is Wills?

Hathor5:
Legal documents, not only pre-ups, can be nullified for different reasons

Of course. Did I imply otherwise? If a document was discovered to fraudulent or didn't meet certain legal requirements, it can be nullified.

but you and your friend say that pre-nups can be nullified just because a woman says so which is a fat lie.

I never said if the woman says so. What does this even mean? All a woman needs to do is claim she was made to sign the prenup under duress. She can also claim she wasn't in the right state of mind or she was drugged. Her claims are believed without requirement of evidence. Worse is when the judge is a feminist who will think the wife is always truthful and give her a very favourable settlement than neccesary. The judge can also decide the prenup is "lopsided" for no reason, especially when children are involved.

Many women can't even afford a good lawyer and many couples, men and women, have lost a lot of money because they were unable to settle their differences outside the court.

Lol. You are trying to play some game here. If you really know how the system works, I am sure you do but won't tell the truth, you would have admitted that the woman's legal fees are to be covered by the man under the law. The man is not only paying his legal fees, but he is covering his wife's legal fees as well.

I wonder why you peeps never post the stories of women who pay off legal fees years after the divorce took place or why we never hear stories from you about the women who pay spousal support. MrBrownJay is the only man here who actually mentioned such.

I have said before that women do pay alimony and child support. In fact the richer partner suffers these laws. I don't talk more about women because most of them are aware of these laws, they even discuss it with their fellow women and fortify themselves on how to fleece men in every possible way; divorces are usually planned by women from the first date. Secondly, most women marry men that earn higher or just as them. Men are usually the breadwinners and such is usually demanded of them. Rich ones like Oprah Winfrey don't get married except to a man that earns more or just as her.

Also, there are many privileges in the divorce courts that women enjoy that men don't. Men who earn less can't be believed without requirement of evidence when they file a domestic violence charge against their wives just to take the kids. In divorce courts, and other courts, men are presumed to the perpetrators of sexual and physical violence, women are presumed victims thanks to the Duluth Model under which courts operates. Many at times, except in exceedingly rare cases, if a woman, usually the average Jane, refuses to pay the child support ordered by court, nothing happens. A man will always go to jail if he refuses pay no matter how little.

And why you think that you are smarter than these white men who still choose to get married despite all these so 'unfair laws', some even several times, is quite funny and yes majority of men choose to get married. Please don't tell me they are simps because I think that it's actually you calling yourselves alpha who have a problem with your masculinity, a serious one for that matter.

This is funny. They are simps who don't know any better. They are so hooked on the happily ever after dream and think women who are different and won't use the court houses against exists abundantly. They believe in the illusion called genuine romantic love, and they think they just need to find these special women. Am I lying?

Ubunja

Hathor5:
I live in the West so I don't need the internet to know how things work here but you are free to search the internet for more stories to confirm your bias.

You should have just outrightly lied that prenups are always valid. If you want to insist that I, the lawyers in the documentary, the links, and others who have had their prenups cancelled are utterly wrong since you live in the West and hence your take is the yardstick of truth, be my guest. You are also welcome to outrightly say I am picking things that confirm my bias.

Good day.

Hathor5:
Do you live in the west or is it internet knowledge again?

Prenups are not water tight. They get tossed out most of the time that mgtow/red pill men jokingly call them glorified toilet papers for divorce judges. Actually, for no reason, the judge could say "I find this to be lopsided" and he tosses it out or he could just agree with the woman that it was signed under duress without requirement of evidence.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/jefflanders/2013/04/02/five-reasons-your-prenup-might-be-invalid/amp/

https://www.boydlawlosangeles.com/can-a-prenuptial-agreement-be-voided/

https://www.18884mydivorce.com/defending-attacking-prenup-agreement/

Below is an excerpt from a documentary involving divorce attorneys on the validity of prenups. Note what was said at the beginning, also note what was said at 1:18: "divorce proceedings the United States is so complicated that even the best contracts [prenups] can't stand up against the court system


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brznz2tif58

The money paid is usually taxed; this is how divorce lawyers and judges make their money. So there is always the incentive to nullify prenuptial agreements.

I came too late to the party. MrBrownJay1 made many good points but there are some things I would have loved to correct. I will address that in a thread if I remain on nairaland after this week. Overall, the laws favour women more than men.

Ubunja

GreatResearcher:
My boss, long time. Work has taken me away from Nl. I am trying to recover all that the rodent stole from me last year. Always busy.

Good. I wish you success and growth.

La click La get married to a Karen in the United States.

MJBOLT:

i wonder what you want us to do

I was about to ask the same thing. She could have just ignored the guy, removed her number on nairaland, and simply moved on. I don't know why she had to bring this issue and the pictures here. Vagina citizens sef.

Regex:
Pañsophist, Skepticùs, Martiñez39s Ubuñja... They got a new trolling keyword

Zzor is just another Karen.

MrNipplesLover:
definitely u didn't read my comment.
I said she was exactly like the celebrant of this thread. she no get big breast and we didn't have any form of sexual intercourse.

just her null reactions when I sucked and pressed her breasts, na my point be that. she didn't allow make I fvck am, oga.

If you say she has little or no breast then fine. However, it doesn't invalidate much of what I have said. Good day.

MrNipplesLover:
Happy birthday to her.


btw,
she reminds me of one footballer girl I met many years ago. this babe had a body like this celebrant but anytime I pressed her breasts like this, she go just dey use me press phone.
so many times I bring her breasts come out and start sucking them, this babe go just dey look me, no reactions at all.
when I asked am say she no dey in mood ni? she said she's not feeling anything at all as I dey press her breasts. that I just dey press breast she no feeling any arousal at all, even if I suck her breasts till next year, she no dey feel arouse. that's why all her exes no gree stay with her. nawa ooh. but the babe no gree make I fvck am.

abeg, hope no be so all female athletes be sha?

She was being honest. Most of the moans, and screams of "harder!", "Faster!", "oh my god etc., are just acting. Only relatively few men are fit and genetically endowed to turn a woman on, satisfy her in bed, and make her orgasm. Fortunately, a woman can get pregnant for an ugly unattractive man. The big the breast, the harder it is to sexually stimulate due to lesser nerve endings. Your girl is the type that cannot come and kill herself.

Zimri:
16.

---

---

Karla Homolka was an active participant in several rapes and murders with her husband Paul Bernardo. They murdered a couple of teenage girls and even Karla’s younger sister. They even recorded some of their heinous acts.

This notorious Canadian serial killer along-with her husband raped and murdered 3 young girls. She got a worldwide media attention when she was convicted of manslaughter following a plea bargain in the 1991 and 1992 rape-murders of two Ontario teenage girls, Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French, as well as the rape and death of her sister Tammy

Feminists will rashly say that she was under the influence of her husband.

Shakzee:
but CR7 did not pick these teams to play against, its not his fault that they are not top ranking FIFA teams

Did I say it is his fault?

FuckThaMod:
No european teams he faced were weak, afterall they qualified to be part of tournaments. If they were weak why didn't the previous legends in football score goals against them and be at the top? You know what you are doing, so stop acting innocent and kill your silly agenda.

I said I am not arguing again. I rest my case. Chill!

FuckThaMod:
Yes! He played against those teams in tournaments, mostly group stages.. Ronaldo doesn't really play friendlies and qualifiers too. Like i told you earlier, 17% of his goals are friendlies compared to 49% of Messi friendlies goals. Digest that before comparing international stats.

There is no need to argue, I rest my case. If my analysis which shows the tons of goals he has against weak teams isn't enough for you, or you want to justify them saying they are tournament goals, nothing I can do. I rest my case.

FuckThaMod:
You think you are smart.. Why don't you say those goals by messi against the top teams were in friendlies and not in major tournaments? Also, prior to yesterday's match, 17% of CR7 international goals were in friendlies, while a staggering 49% of Messi international goals were in friendlies. Stop twisting facts to suit your camp nou dweller.

Why are you counting only tournaments? Did they count only tournaments when summing Ronaldo's record? You mean he got all his goals against Luxembourg, Estonia, Panama, Andorra, Faroe Islands, Armenia, Cyprus in a tournament?

Anyway, I didn't come to this thread to argue that Messi is better than Ronaldo. So far I am just showing emotional Ronaldo fans like you that my initial post, which came as a joke, has some merit. Nevertheless, Ronaldo is one of the best players in history. Good day.

Reference:
Please, please, please do not drag me into your Messi, Ronaldo skirmishes. I don't do infantile, pointless stuff. They are both legends in their right. However I have a general preference for National team football as being the pinnacle of sporting excellence and that is what I emphasise here as being worthy of commendation because games come few and far between, records are thus highly valuable.

I didn't come to this thread to argue that Messi is better than Ronaldo. So far I am just showing emotional Ronaldo fans that my initial post, which came as a joke, has some merit. Nevertheless, Ronaldo is one of the best players in history.

Beverlyjean:
Hope u analysed it this way when messi was busy scoring Haiti, Qatar, Nicaragua, eibar, steau Bucharest, valladolid, on his way to 91 goals in 2012

Lol. Give me your analysis and let's know you are not making stuffs up. In 2012, Messi scored 91 goals in 69 official games. He scored 79 goals in 60 appearances for FC Barcelona, and 12 goals in 9 appearances for Argentina. That's impressive.

Mind you, I didn't come to this thread to argue that Messi is better than Ronaldo. So far I am just showing emotional Ronaldo fans that my initial post, which came as a joke, has some merit. Nevertheless, Ronaldo is one of the best players in history.

Reference:
Every Continental Federation has the strong, the weak and the hapless teams. Europoe has France and San Marino. Asia has South Korea and Ali's Iran but also has Hong Kong and Brunei. Oceania has Australia and Tonga. South America has Brazil and Argentina but also has Peru and Paraguay. The North has the United States and Mexico but also St Kitts and Barbados, Africa has Senegal, Egypt and Camneroun, it also has Seychelles, Liberia and South Sudan....

I wouldn't even consider Portugal at Tier One European soccer powerhouse not with the likes of Spain, France, Italy, Germany and Holland dominating since soccer became an international sport in the 30's, yet this man is able to achieve this in the most competitive Federation in the world.

It is more than an outstanding achievement. It is the stuff of legends. A testimony of his sheer passion for the game and a record that will endure for decades to come.

Is Messi now the one with an advantage? Despite everything, he has way way more goals that Ronaldo against fifa top 50. Read this post of mine on this thread.

https://www.nairaland.com/6107409/ronaldo-want-break-ali-daeis/3#93743677

EVILFOREST:
After those people who else.. ?

Don't mind him.

Openbusiness:
Why don't you try to break a REAL record like Messi"s Highest GOAL IN A YEAR RECORD in the entire history of football. No human being can beat that record

Messi did this while playing in the best leagues and tournaments with quality teams: La Liga, UEFA Champions League, Copa Del Rey, etc.

Parisian:
You're deceiving yourself, Europe has the toughest football teams in the world. Why hasn't Messi achieved this feature with Al the weak teams in South America?

FuckThaMod:
Dry, those teams didn't come to play either and i don't see anyone talking about Messi against Haiti, Nigeria, Nicaragua, Qatar...

As at November 2019, 26.09% of Messi's international goals came against teams in the fifa top 10, Ronaldo had 8.08%. Breaking it further down, 56 of Messi’s 70 international’s goals have been against teams in the top 50, while just 28 of Ronaldo’s 99 goals have come against teams in the top 50. Lithuania is the country Ronaldo has scored the most goals against (7), while Messi has scored more (5) against Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay than any other team.

The highest-ranked team Ronaldo has goals against is Sweden (5) followed by Netherlands (4). Brazil are the highest-ranked team Messi has scored against most (5), followed by Uruguay and Paraguay (5).

It should be noted that Ronaldo has scored at least two or more times against these teams, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Russia and Switzerland. Messi meanwhile, has found the back of the net at least two or more times against Spain, Switzerland, Nigeria and Mexico.

Read more: https://www.google.com/amp/s/soccernet.ng/2019/11/ronaldos-99-international-goals-or-messis-70-which-is-more-impressive.html/amp

If Ronaldo faced the strongest European oppositions and scored many goals against them, how come 75 of his 99 international goals, 75.76%, came against the following teams: Lithuania (7), Andorra (5), Armenia (5), Latvia (5), Luxembourg (5), Sweden (5), Estonia (4), Faroe Islands (4), Hungary (4), Denmark (3), Russia (3), Northern Ireland (3), Azerbaijan (2), Bosnia (2), Cyprus (2), Kazakhstan (2), Saudi Arabia (2), Czech Republic (2), and a single goal against North Korea, Panama, Ecuador, Greece, Iceland, Finland, Serbia, Ghana, Ukraine, and Slovakia.

I didn't even include the one he scored against Cameroon. Ronaldo is a great player, I even call him my ewure, but let's not pretend that initial post doesn't have any merit.

frankmoney:
....

You well so?