₦airaland Forum

achorladey:
Point number 6 is my area of interest. Are they still dealing with recruitment or vacancies in year 2023?
When will they tackle vacancies of year 2025?

honesttalk21:
Peace isn’t the ultimate goal; we still need answers about our origin, purpose, and what comes after. Without revelation, truth becomes opinion, and unity has no solid foundation.

BlackfireX:
@eninn let me ask you Islamic question
Does Allah have a colour?
Does Allah have another Allah that He WORSHIPPED
Quran 2:138 (Surah Al-Baqarah)
​Arabic: صِبْغَةَ اللَّهِ ۖ وَمَنْ أَحْسَنُ مِنَ اللَّهِ صِبْغَةً ۖ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ عَابِدُونَ
Allah is a dye colour , and we are His worshipper. Don't panic

honesttalk21:
Yes, it’s possible.

AntiChristian:
Are you saying those who wanted to take Jesus don't recognise him while he has been preaching around them for three years?
Abeg forget am! Judas sinned just once! Peter denied Jesus three times!
Peter is still a bigger sinner! So why isn't Peter removed too?

honesttalk21:
That’s not really what I’m saying and I think that’s a bit of a stretch. Of course humans aren’t wiser than God. The point is simply that seeing benefits doesn’t automatically mean something is from God.Didn't some initially benefit financially from MMM or pyramid systems before they crashed?
People regardless of being religious or not can build systems that work, that help others, that bring order. We see that everywhere. So if benefit shows up across the board, it can’t really be the thing that proves divine truth.

honesttalk21:
So no, it’s not about God being unable to guide people. It’s about not confusing what works with what’s actually true.

FxMasterz:
Maxindhouse, Truthseeker10
Tell me, were your doctrines of forbidden blood transfusion, men not wearing beards, etc based on the Bible? Since you want to teach us the Bible, tell us whether those doctrines changed because the Bible changed. We really want to know.

FxMasterz:
I am sure, the day bandits ransack the 11 man GB in USA to loot their treasuries and harm their loved ones, they'll immediately find a new revelation regarding war and arms. 😂😂 😆

FxMasterz:
I don't need to present what you and everyone already knows. All i.know is that you have never preached love on this forum judging by title character. Your hypocrisy is legendary.

FxMasterz:
He was talking to the spiritual Israel. Those are His disciples, and I'm one of them!

honesttalk21:
Benefits can point towards usefulness, but they don’t prove that a belief is true. Something might seem helpful, moral, or uplifting, yet be built on false claims. Public accountability and visible outcomes matter, they show what actually works but truth is measured by evidence and accuracy, not by how many people benefit or approve. A religion can inspire kindness, cooperation, and order, and still be wrong about God, revelation, or ultimate reality. Matthew 7 reminds us that judging by appearances can easily mislead. Ultimately, benefits everyone notices demonstrate practical value, not divine or factual truth.

FxMasterz:
You're your evidence. Something everyone on this platform knows about? Even your question already gives you out as the biggest hypocrite of 2026!

FxMasterz:
When you were falsely blackmailing me months ago, were you preaching love among us?

FxMasterz:
All His disciples present and future.

AntiChristian:
You are still wrong! Jesus was addressing the 12 saying they are the one who had stuck with him! And he made a covenant with them!

honesttalk21:
If a belief is true, it shouldn’t rely on being kept private. It should hold up under public scrutiny, where ideas are tested against clear evidence, consistent standards, and open accountability.

honesttalk21:
It’s whether a belief can stand up to questioning anywhere.

honesttalk21:
Fundamental truth is that faith cannot be forced; real conviction comes from the heart. But refusing to quote or compare texts shuts down honest inquiry.

honesttalk21:
Good deeds show value, not ultimate truth. Millions can follow what works socially without it being fully true.
Truth isn’t measured by numbers or benefits alone. It requires coherence, consistency, and scrutiny.

honesttalk21:
Sincere faith and questioning matter most. Shutting discussion doesn’t protect truth; it limits it.

FxMasterz:
Lied that what?

FxMasterz:
When you were falsely blackmailing me months ago, were you preaching love among us?

FxMasterz:
But He said in Mark 13:37
"And what I say to you, I say to everyone: Keep watch!”

honesttalk21:
This input truly sounds principled, but it raises concerns when applied consistently. If only believers can quote just their texts, no belief can be examined from the outside which doesn’t protect truth, it shields claims from scrutiny. Quoting a text isn’t tampering; it’s engagement. Islam affirms earlier revelations, so referencing the Injil and Torah as combined in the Bible isn’t hypocrisy. For a Muslim specifically, referencing the Bible isn't hypocrisy; belief in previous scriptures revealed through the prophets is a requirement of the faith (Qur'an 4:136).
"Let the believer interpret" also doesn't resolve the disagreement. It just hands the answer to the person whose interpretation is under examination. That's circular. The question isn't who quotes a text. It's whether the engagement is accurate and honest. Closing that down doesn't preserve truth. It avoids it.

MrEar:
Am simply repeating what you told me. Only jesus can tell your leaders to Change doctrines when they give a false one. 😁
Thank God they are making many changes to their lies.

MrEar:
Don't forget to also tell them that your teachers lie from time to time and that Jesus corrects them when they lie.

MrEar:
You have work to do. You have gone round preaching to people the lies your leaders gave you concerning blood. Now, you have to go round again and confess to those people that what you said is a lie. Tell them the new instruction from Jesus. Make sure you do that this Saturday and Sunday. 😁😂

MrEar:
Hope you have told your Bible students that your leaders interpretation of the Bible on blood was completely false and jesus has corrected them?

MaxInDHouse:
Desperate to engage JWs instead of humbly asking for a Bible study!🤣

MrEar:
Na me suppose teach you Bible. 😁😂

MrEar:
Your leaders shared something meaningful for the whole world wide association of Jehovah's witnesses. You are all now free to store and transfuse your own blood.
Jesus instructed them to do that.
Thank God.

MrEar:
Thank God Jesus has instructed your leaders to allow members store and transfuse their own blood.

MrEar:
Your leaders have now given JW members the permission to store and transfuse blood. They lied that doing such was against Gods laws and people died because of such lies. Jesus has corrected them anyway, thank God.

MrEar:
You should have been bold enough to ask your leaders that question when they made this statement Below.

MrEar:
Well, according to you, Organization changes comes directly from jesus.
Jesus told your leaders to allow JW members transfuse their own blood. That shows that Jesus is not wicked. He doesn't want JW members to kpai like 🐓.
It is your leaders, who lied that transfusing ones own blood is against Gods doctrines that are wicked. And since you and Janosky helped to spread that lie that means you are also like your leaders. 😁
Please do well to inform your Bible students the new instruction about blood given to your leaders directly from Jesus. 🙂

MrEar:
Witnesses like MaxInDHouse and Janosky don't feel anything. They are even angry over the change in blood doctrines. They are not happy that witnesses now have a chance to save their lives when it comes to issues related to blood transfusion.

honesttalk21:
Your argument depends on one move:
you literalise phenomenological language but only when it’s the Qur’an.