MetaPhysical's Posts
Nairaland Forum › MetaPhysical's Profile › MetaPhysical's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 (of 343 pages)
On April 20, 2020, the Yoruba ethnic nationality of Nigeria was admitted into the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organisation (UNPO). The euphoria that greeted the epochal event, which ranked the Yoruba 45th amongst UNPO members, followed closely by the Igbo who were registered as the UNPO’s 46th member, is yet to die down. The Yoruba nation’s agitation for sovereignty is led from unusual quarters – Prof. Banji Akintoye, an octogenarian emeritus professor of History and African Studies, is an avowed Awoist and top echelon leader of the pan-Yoruba leadership group known famously as Afenifere, which had been in existence pre-Independence Nigeria. Afenifere’s no less famous pioneer leader was the sage and Yoruba inimitable and indisputable leader of all times, Chief Obafemi Awolowo. Until 2019 when a conglomeration of Yoruba self-determination groups elected Akintoye leader of the Yoruba, a move seen by many as dissatisfaction with the mode as well as pace of action by some other Yoruba leaders, few Yoruba citizens knew of happenings within the fold of their leaders, least of all participate in such activities. Akintoye’s style of leadership has been remarkably different. While he is eager to avoid confrontation with the other Yoruba leaders – and even is wary to admit there is a crack anywhere – he has demonstrated the desire to open up the Yoruba World Congress (YWC) that he leads to participation by a wide spectrum of Yoruba intelligentsia and activists of all hues. That must have accounted for the waves the young YWC is making at home and abroad, rekindling the hope of better days ahead for a flustered, marginalized and crest-fallen nationality that once was primus inter pares amongst Nigerian nationalities and whose achievements even set it at pedestals higher than those of many of today’s industrialised nations. As if bent on maintaining the tempo, the YWC followed up with what it called Town Hall Meeting last Friday, which Akintoye hosted on the Zoom platform. According to Prof. Anthony Kila, YWC’s Secretary General, there were over 1,800 registered participants from 27 countries. I was busy elsewhere and could not attend. There can be no denying the fact that Yoruba citizens across the globe are not happy with the place and fortunes of their Yoruba nationality in the scheme of things in Nigeria. That they hold Nigeria’s skewed federalism responsible for this unsavoury state of affairs is also beyond dispute. Therefore, the battle cry of the Yoruba has been a return to the glory years of republicanism, whose other more famous name now is restructuring. The target is that the stranglehold of one section/ people over the others can be loosened and that the various regions/peoples can control/develop their own resources for their own use and make assured progress at their own pace. Unbundling the bountiful energies of the various Nigerian nationalities (including the North’s), the clamoured for restructuring promises to be the catalyst and elixir for national development through the route of diversity as opposed to the stultifying unitarist and top-bottom approach that has impoverished everyone rather than engender development. I have chosen to comment on this issue today for two reasons. One is that membership of the UNPO must not be seen as an end in itself, but as a means to an end. While it may be appropriate to see and celebrate it as a right step in the right direction, every Yoruba self-determination group must be reminded that, with UNPO, it is not yet Uhuru or freedom. Mercifully, Akintoye is a temperate person not given to any undue or infantile radicalism of hoisting empty self-determination flags or of encouraging petulant grandstanding that will cause more grief than gain. While it is true that UNPO has been the route to sovereignty for many oppressed people and disenfranchised nationalities, the fact is that there are still many of such UNPO members who are yet to achieve their goal. The Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), otherwise known as the Polisario Front, has fought unsuccessfully for independence from Morocco since 1973, despite many United Nations resolutions backing it up. One achievement that the late Ken Saro-Wiwa, writer, environmentalist and rights crusader, won for his Ogoni people was getting them admitted into the UNPO as far back as on 19 January, 1993. The Ogoni Bill of Rights, which detailed the demands of the Ogoni people, was made popular all over the world by Saro-Wiwa. The contrived state murder of Saro-Wiwa on 10 November, 1995 by the brutal and murderous Sani Abacha military dictatorship, however, snuffed life out of the Ogoni struggle. Nevertheless, Saro-Wiwa remains a nightmare that will ever haunt the Gambaris of this world. So, Akintoye, YWC and other Yoruba self-determination groups and personalities must watch it! My second reason for writing this is to warn that it must not be assumed that the Yoruba self-determination war is the only battle that must be fought. There is another battle that is not only as important but which will also aid the former’s successful execution: It is the battle to hold the feet of the Yoruba political leadership to the fire of good governance as opposed to the practice at the moment where South-West governors as they come and go behave as Lord of the Manor. They have generally failed to make the best use of the opportunities available even in our skewed federalism to develop the region. In other words, they have, on the whole, been rapacious, indolent, lazy and unimaginative; lacking in vision and character, they have neglected to seize on available opportunities and have abysmally failed to convert the potentials of their people and the resources of their region into the potent force that can activate the development of the region. That skewed federalism has been our bane is true; but that bad leadership has also not helped matters is beyond dispute. Addressing one while neglecting the other will not take us far! Akintoye is right to pursue the Yoruba nationality goal at the global level. Kudos! He cannot, however, neglect the other side of the coin, which is holding the feet of South-West governors to the fire of good governance. We cannot pillory the Federal Government or the Fulani while excusing or hobnobbing with our own political leaders who steal us blind; waste our resources on frivolous and white elephant projects; and, like Nero, fiddle while our land is overrun from the North by truculent marauders and from the East by shylock merchants mopping up everything in sight. Leaders who betray and sell their own people to live the life of opulence while the self-same people they profess to lead wallow in abject poverty must henceforth be called to account. Akintoye will have to take up that assignment. It is an assignment more important, more serious, more worthwhile, more useful, and more beneficial to our people than the membership of any UNPO. Like the lead character in Henry Rider Haggard’s 1886 novel “A history of Adventure”, our leaders behave like Hilda Rumpole: “She… who must be obeyed”. That has got to stop if the rot in the South-West must be halted; the Augean stable cleared; and the people and region hauled upon their feet to be on the match again (apologies, MKO Abiola) to turn again their captivity and unlock their decade-old arrested development. The Yoruba nation deserves to have a National Development Plan. Letting governors act as they pleased has not been helpful. It is time the Yoruba have a regionwide – five years, 10 years, etc. – development plan that will serve as road map and guide for anyone who becomes governor of any of the South-West states. Key areas of interest should be agriculture, industrialization, commerce and trade, education and, of course, security. Is it not a shame that we no longer feed ourselves? We now depend on others. And must we wait until all our land and properties are bought over by others and we become tenants and strangers on our own land before we begin to cry on that front again? The rate things are going, soon, we shall be left with nothing! We are assailed from the North and buffeted from the East but our leaders pretend all is well. Hear me again: Soon, we shall be left with nothing! That time, Hubert Ogunde’s “Yoruba Ronu” would have turned full cycle! https://www.newtelegraphng.com/wanted-yoruba-national-development-plan/
|
Yenefer, This article is priceless. ![]() Proof that Ibo economy is dependent, and can be wiped out by Yoruba. |
This proves that Ibo is economically dependent on Yoruba. If Yoruba closes its border to Ibo....aah... |
BabaRamota1980: ![]() This is Enugu Declaration. Giving malam till Oct 1st to vacate SE with all almajiri. |
kayfra: ![]() We thank Ikpazu for eba and egusi palliatives.
|
jeffizy:Lol. ![]() |
It is also important to warn that landlocked Igboland should not be deceived by the success of the few rich landlocked countries like Switzerland that specializes in finance, which does not travel by boat, and its high-end manufacturing is integrated with Europe's single market. Chinua Achebe, in Things Fall Apart, tells a story of Okonkwo, the main character, who was banished from his village of Umuofia for accidentally shooting a young man. When it was time for Okonkwo to return, after seven years in exile, he instructs his wives and children to prepare a huge feast for his mother's kinsmen in a gesture to show his gratitude for their support. When asked why he was “overloading the table with food,” he said, “I cannot live on the bank of the river and wash my hands with spittle" Suffices to say that like Okonkwo in Things Fall Apart, Igbos who are known to be outgoing are not washing their hands with spittle, because across the Nigerian landscape, they are living right at the banks of the Benue River, Kano River, Kaduna River, Ogun River, Sokoto River, Cross Rivers, etc. They also thrive at the banks of these rivers and “overload” their abode with human and infrastructural development. Unfortunately, every now and then, one of the most absurd analyses by the proponents of an independent state of Biafra which is that the five Igbo states in imaginary Biafra is not landlocked makes it to the mainstream media. Last week, in a piece “It is a lie: Igboland is not Landlocked” published in Sahara Reporters, Aloy Ejimakor presented what looks like overwhelming evidence on how easy it is to transfer Apapa Port to the banks of the “Atlantic” Oguta Lake in Igboland for the business of shipping. As expected, those without a good understanding of the Nigerian physical and human geography; no good grasp of the maritime industry, and no clue on the economies of shipping and logistics are attempting to push water uphill. The campaign to entice Igbos to withdraw from the waters off the coast of Lagos, Port Harcourt, Warri, etc. is an attempt to force the waters to flow uphill. Forget about the “dredging” of the Oseakwa River in Ihiala, the Azumiri River, or the “Atlantic Ocean” at the mouth of OgutaLake, the truth is that Igboland is landlocked and will suffer, economically. Do not let anyone deceive you about that. All you need to confirm that is to consult a good physical geography teacher. If you do not have one, simply go to Google Maps on your phone and look for blue markings indicating water bodies and decide for yourself how close the Atlantic Ocean is to Igboland. It should be that simple, if only you approach this quick visual research with an open mind. Here are some facts per World Bank economists working on trade logistics issues, being landlocked is a major reason why 16 of the world’s 31 landlocked developing countries are among the poorest in the world. According to the Economist, of the 15 lowest-ranking countries in the Human Development Index, eight have no coastline. All of these are in Africa. Without seaports, these landlocked countries pay more and wait longer for imported food, and other goods. Also, they have an equally hard time exporting, with the result that they trade less and grow more slowly than their coastal neighbors. A quick look at the map of Africa and the location of Central African Republic, Burundi, Niger, Chad, South Sudan, Mali, and Burkina Faso, will give you an idea of what it means to be landlocked. So, it is clear, the most obvious handicap of Igbo people who are known for international trade will be moving goods to and from ports. It has been augured that the actualization of the state of Biafra does not mean that Igbos will be forced to come back to the land-locked states. We are told that we will still have access to the ports in the neighboring countries around landlocked Igboland and as such can easily import and export goods and services. A counterargument is that if Igbos are forced to pass through dozens of police checkpoints between Lagos and the Niger Bridge, Onitsha, under one country Nigeria, how many roadblocks will be put in place if Biafra is an independent country? Just imagine that for a moment. Now, imagine also what will happen if the same blockade is put in place from the northern, southern, and eastern boundaries all around Igbo land. How on earth will such an independent state be independent economically? If the movement of imported heavy goods must be re-transported inland to landlocked Igboland, how on earth will the economy be viable? I am a teacher who makes use of graphics to help my students understand some concepts that would otherwise be difficult to grasp. So, for clarity and easier comprehension, I ask that you pause here and take another look at the Nigerian map. Pay particular attention to the location of Apapa, Port Harcourt, and the new Lekki Deep Sea Port under construction. Then, slowly move your eyeballs inland towards Igbo states for a good understanding of why seaports are sited on the coast of major water bodies. So, forget about emotions and sentiments, a sea is a sea and a river is a river. So, do not let anyone deceive you, international treaties can promise access to the oceans, but the responsibility for implementing them lies with the governments of the "transit states". Now, imagine how happy and eager the minorities in the Niger Delta region will be to help build infrastructure that would mainly help their landlocked Igbo neighbors. They have little incentive to. Also, just like Nigeria has closed its borders for months now, transit states to landlocked Igboland can interrupt commerce making the economic viability of landlocked Igboland difficult. For Nigeria with known civil strife between ethnic nationalities, landlocked Igboland will have to reroute trade at exorbitant cost, reducing their competitiveness. You cannot argue with facts. It is also important to warn that landlocked Igboland should not be deceived by the success of the few rich landlocked countries like Switzerland that specializes in finance, which does not travel by boat, and its high-end manufacturing is integrated with Europe's single market. Also, Botswana, a middle-income landlocked country, exports diamonds, which are shipped by air. Pointing at such countries offers little hope to a landlocked Igboland without similar natural resources and with people that are heavily involved in the importation of heavy goods in containers. From the analysis, above, you will see that it is not necessary to tell a wise person to get out of the sun. We are Igbos and we are wise. There should, thus, be no need for anyone to tell us that land-locked Igboland is an economic disaster waiting to happen. On a final note, when you show the moon to a child, it sees only your finger. Sadly, no matter the size or how full and bright the moon is, people who want to see the Atlantic Ocean at the banks of Oguta Lake or Otamiri in Imo state will see one. But, do not be deceived, landlocked Igboland will be an economic disaster. As my father used to say, I am a teacher and my responsibility is to keep teaching irrespective of whether the students are listening or not. The worlds of the elders do not lock all the doors; they leave the right door open. Igbos should not lock themselves up. Rather, we should leave the right doors open as we work for an equitable and better Nigeria, for all. Together, we can. Churchill Okonkwo, Ph.D. On Twitter @Churchillnnobi http://saharareporters.com/2020/05/19/do-not-be-deceived-igboland-landlocked-and-will-face-economic-hardship-churchill-okonkwo
|
nku5:Keep promoting your defeat as a victory. World class is relative. ![]() |
meeky007:Biafra is history bro. Its no longer on map. |
Adaibeku:Who do you want me to fund? Chi5 or Rekhina? Rosalind got her hand in my pocket at moment. ![]() My sister how u dey? Miss you. Adadioramma I of Ibeku land!! ![]() |
nku5:Those who were eye witnesses already told you what they saw and knew. Their information and record is solid. Im not like you, telling us you know Palma that had not existed in 100yrs. Maybe you were one of the slaves Kosoko traded from Palma. ![]() |
nku5:It could be from the journal of medicine if you like.....it existed as a record of Parliamemt....long before there was anything called Commonwealth. I told you already....you are a quack! ![]() |
nku5:Youve been all over the place with your conjectures. Nothing else you say has credibility on this topic. You said you are familiar with Palma and know the area. You also said Nigerians were sold to slavery across Atlantic. After making such wild and spurious claims your credibility is destroyed on this topic. You have no clue about Palma but you want to prove yourself an authority by telling us your familiarity is unquestionable. Many things are questionable about your underatanding of the Parliamentary Papers and the isssue under discussion. Was there a port in Palma? Yes there was. Who said so? An eye witness British Consular officer reporting to Parliament. What did he say? Palma port belonged to the exiled King. Did he saybit belong to FG of Nigeria? No. Did he say it belonged to Britain or anyone else? No. Who says it belonged to someone else? Nku5. How did nku5 know it belonged to someone else? Nku5 lived in the area, he is very familiar with Palma. ![]() |
AhoadaRivers:I misled who? Rekhina ![]() Im going to do more than mislead her. Just let me catch her first. ![]() |
Gazzy88: ![]() Thats my biafran brother you dey yab so. Odingo no mind am jare. Pele. ![]() |
nku5:You are lying. You dont know where Palma is. You know Lekki but you dont know Palma. Palma has not existed in 100yrs. ![]() If you insist I will ask you to name the Baale of Palma and shame you here. ![]() Returning to the port issue.....your conjectures does not hold, written records and by eye witnesses in the age when Palma existed is sufficient proof. It is recorded that Palma is a port, it is owned by Kosoko and it was profitable for trade. The port was not owned by Nigeria or British and there is no record of it being developed by Nigeria or British but there is record that its owned by Kosoko....Britain accepted it as his property. So who else owned it? Abi this was another one of Ibo development in Lagos? ![]() |
nku5:There were no Nigerians sold to slave traders across the Atlantic. This article was written by a quack. You dont see any issue with it because you are a quack. ![]() There was nothing known as Nigeria prior to 1914. By which time Atlantic slave trade had ended half a century earlier. Stop quacking! ![]() |
joeyfire:PDP held a primary, Ekwueme was a contestant. He lost to Obasanjo. Which one be equity and fairness there? |
nku5:The British were not trading in Lagos in 1850. ![]() |
Masterkernel1:Maybe you didnt read my earlier post, that those landmarks were torn down to expand much of road network in Lagos. The Lagos Wharf was removed to expand Marina ring road. Iddo wharf was removed before Eko bridge was built. Ships cannot pass underneath that bridge. The port in Palma was demolished much after Kosoko returned to Lagos and trade with his foreign partners shifted. |
nku5:Did you not read that parliamentary paper? That was a British colonial officer on the ground in Lagos writing report back to Her Majesty. He is describing what he saw and knew. They accepted and called it a port. A private one at that. They first described their knowledge of Badagry port and then said Palma port is different....it belonged to that one man. Yoruba built and owned ports before British expanded with modernity. |
Maadoo:Lagos was taken without a whatt ![]() Mods, ban this guy for his show of ignorance. ![]() |
Igboid:Ogbeni, What is this card here ![]() ...and who signed it?
|
Maadoo:You relied on the colonial regime to make this statement. Before there was colonial regime there was Oba of Lagos regime and under that sovereingty Lagos had ports. British expanded on port facilities but Yoruba had operated ports and traded internationally ahead of the 1900 dates you are splashing. |
nku5:
|
Gazzy88:I dont think I ever seen a thread like this. It looked like mod was waiting, knew by the topic who will jump in and what to expect. He/She brought out the whip! Kaai, mod no show mercy at all. . Kilode! |
nku5:Read the Parliamentary Papers again. It acknowledged there was port in Palma. Who built the port? ![]() |
Igboid:NYM had been in existence before Zik came to Lagos and later joined. NYM was originally Lagos Youth Movement, LYM. See attached article. 1934 Zik was just finishing school in US and returned to Africa. He came to Lagos in 1936.....two years after the date referenced in the article. The whole event of NYM disintegration is around a vacancy in the council seat. Kofo Abayomi held the seat but he got a Rhodes Scholarship to study in UK and vacated the seat. New election was needed. This is what brought about the contest between Ikoli and Akinsanya. There were deep disagreements in the NYM party. Akinsanya was not Zik's candidate. Akinsanya left NYM to run as a Independent candidate. Zik also ran as independent candidate. Ikoli won, Akinsanya came second, beating Zik. Stop rewriting and fabricating new additions. Zik was not the owner of NYM or NCNC. He was not even a cofounder of any party in Lagos.
|
gidgiddy:Isn't that trend for the past 20yrs? Buhari contested repeatedly even when it was not the turn of North. In 2019 it was North's turn, Southerners were in the race. Abi Moghalu na Northerner, Sowore na Northerner? We have said it repeatedly that it is open. Even party primaries are open now. ![]() |
NGpatriot:The purpose of their struggle for littoral membership is to catch up to Yoruba. We have 50% of our states in the litttoral list - Lagos, Ogun Ondo. When they can't catch up then they throw venom at our ports and wish they would sink. Bad belle people. |
[quote author= post=89668111]Great Igbo nation that was hard for Nigeria to crack for three Its hard for you guys to swallow, Yorubas should go and protest and tell UN to change the name Imo River to Osun River[/quote]Aah, name change! That's a political curveball for FG....all rivers and waterways are federal jurisdiction. ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 (of 343 pages)



Really? So all the slaves they had been buying in exchange for mirrors and whiskey since the 1700s was not trade