lionel4power: am sure you have no idea that the americans you mentioned has decommisioned their most prominent recon group (long range surveillance-LRS) and merged them to a combat brigade team like stryker brigade. that means that those guys now has a primary role as fire team. although special forces or special operations forces has recon and scout as a secondary role. . secondly you failed to mention that the US has 'tons' of UAVs and drones too.
. also you dont realize that why deep scout mission is unfavourable is due to the fact that you cant count on naval or air support or even artillery indirect fire support.
lionel4power: bros calm down about the isreali issue. have you studied the Egyptian military lately? yes I agree that egypt performance on previous conflict with isreal was poor but im sure the relevant lessons has been learnt.
I also noticed that you south africans always highlights experience over other variables in warfare, variables like weapon platforms, training, allies, economy, terrain e.t. although experience gives a nice advantage but personally I rank weapons systems higher than all others.
isreal cannot (emphasis CANNOT) touch egypt in any conflict ever again considering the size of both countries military.
I conpared both countries military and I see isreal woefully lacking in major areas,
looking at the navy, egypt has . nine frigates, six corvette 45+ fast attack craft 8 submarines 12 landing ships 8 anti submarine ship 23 minesweepers (with such naval force,the mediteranian sea battle will be like a turkey shoot)
. while isreal has only three corvette six submarine eight missile boats.
looking at the airforce
Egypt
50,000 Total (As of 2014) 1,136 aircraft (As of 2016) . while isreal has. 626 aircrafts
the army egypt has 780000 troops 3800 assorted tanks (t-72, t-55, m1a1, m60 e.t.c) over 1000 rocket systems over 1000 artillery . while isreal has 133 000 active troops 380 000 reserved troops
with about 2180 MERKAVA tanks.
Also Note that Egypt has the ONLY (EMPHASIS 'ONLY') Recon satellite in the middle east. If anybody in the region sh!ts egypt can tell you the colour from miles away.
. although to be fair I'll say isreal has the best air defence cover in all the M.E due to her multiple well staggered anti air missile systems.
the only chance isreal has against egypt is pre-emptive attack which she is good at. and before you lecture me on isreal F-35 please note that not all country seem to agree that its a game changer such country is UK which has pulled out of the program and decides to pursue a naval version of her typhoon jet to put on her new queen elizabeth carrier. UK said that they are not impressed with the trillion dollar piece of scrap metal that THE US is forcing all of them to buy So they aren't buying anymore.
GreenandGold: Well, I want him to live so we get the chance to make child labour of him. Think about it, we could make him our dedicated EW or ISTAR platforms or even mount him with some radar and we have our improvised AWACS.
If the government fails to utilise him, they'll be terrible parents.
Thing is he's going to be expensive compared to aircraft we can acquire somewhere.
There are also many competitors around. But many great engineers will come out of this project the only problem is maintaining the skills and improving.
Similar: The Marlin missile allows SA to maintain critical skills. seeker design etc.
nemesis2u: u know between u and me lets say the company in question was targeted becz of its dealing with a hostile country , especially becz of the transfer of cruise missile know hows despite serious objections
all part of the great game unfortunately ,
IMO it was foolish becz said the said company could have earned 50-100 times more with india just like other SA companies r doing right now , personally i know 3 SA companies who have multi million deals with india right now all away from public view.
Besides that they were dancing with global giants.
The transfer of tech started before the offer was made to India. They would have made massive profits if they were a western big company.
chkil0: well so many errors (specialy about arab participation) Egypt syria, launch the attack precipitatly, and egypt stoped the war alone against what was planned , as the usa have bought them , for exemple the few Algerian solidiers that was sent arrived egypt only during the last days of the conflict and stay near cairo , the Egyptians did all alone in their front ,
for conscript we see all super soldiers israeli crying on video duront hiszb ellah war , or durong the Gaza flotilla raid when teir navy SF get their ass kicked by civilian funny old story
and second im not egyptian , and i said without US direct Support , one to one , egyptian could have kicked sionist ass and will kick them any time . . last post for me in this subject , return to post pics
It was a case of whether the Egyptian army should roll it's tail(logistics) and bring it closer to it's body and secure it's gains or continue the momentum with a longer tail which could expose the main body. For political reasons or pressure the latter was chosen.
It was to secure Cairo as the Israeli army was threatening the city after punching through a hole located by uncle sam's black bird. Their formations were about to be completely cut off in the Sinai.
frumentius: I'll see your Mirage and raise you a Cava !
Oh, what could've been had we finished this project .
PIC 1: in the modern scheme;
PIC 2: in the Mirage cammo scheme.
frumentius: From the lessons learned from the Good Friday Ambush in Afghanistan, the Germans have been showing some interest in Denel's retractable RCWS, the Meerkat. Basically, intense fire made it impossible to reload the overhead weapons of their Dingo and Fuchs APCs, removing the ability to support the dismounts. A problem neatly solved by the Meerkat. The annual SA-Algeria defence industry shindig is coming soon, maybe Denel will pitch the Meerkat for some of your Fuchs.
Hehehe would like to hear 61Mech's opinion on this system deployed in COIN ops.
ActivateKruger: All this effort just to kill a helicopter? Disappointed
Think about it, the A-Darter is such a great AA missile, it wouldn't matter where it's launched. It doesn't need a radar so Hawks can sneak in behind a target especially those old MiGs and Sukhoi Su's with older mechanical radars then bang.
Self-defence.
The tactics you are referring to here are used by 4th generation fighters.
Typically in missions the Gripens will escort the Hawks.
Again there more helis and transport aircraft than jets on the continent. Intercepting these with the Gripen would be useless.
frumentius: Again, no idea. But I'll tell you where the $40m came from: someone took the development costs, divided by the 12 that were made and said that's the price. Which you'll admit, is an unsound way to determine the price of the thing.
Seriously though, what aren't we trying to sell to the Pakistanis? A-Darter to their Air Force; Umkhonto to their Navy; T5 to their Army. Anything I left out?
I think Denel will supply them air munitions soon.
We were unable to complete development of systems offered to them like the T-Darter BVRAAM.
Just like Raptor III Denel dynamics displayed during AAD in 2012. If SAAF can fund the development PAF will likely acquire as an upgrade.
Most of the stuff Denel sells is acquired by the SANDF or highly funded.
Henry240: Multiple considerations go into buying a defence system, that's not to say one system is inferior to another. It simply means all considerations taken into account, perhaps my interest would be better served if i go for this defence system instead of that.
The Russians have the best ADS, but you don't see the world buying only Russian systems now, do you?
The Iranians showing interest in the South-African system is a good thing, however it is not enough reason to say a different system is inferior or trash. E.g, just like your Mokopa missing a pre-designated, static target at 8km, when it has a 10km effective range on it's brochures.
During tests.
Missiles do miss their targets in tests.
And what is "pre-designated static target"? Typical augubugubu inventing terms.
ActivateKruger: There's also a possibility that the US (under Trump) could actually launch Tomahawks on suspected nuclear sites. The S300 is not much of a use there, Umkhonto can actually handle such threats because of its ability to engage smaller and highly maneuverable objects.
The S300 is a system.
The Umkhonto will be intergrated into that air defence layered system.