₦airaland Forum

Rhodesia:
Still today most of you retain many primaeval and primitive behavioural traits of early man. Most Negroid sub-species are crude, aggressive unrefined, have a libido of a bunny rabbit in heat and have the physical prowess of early hunter gatherer man, they retain tribal customs that date back to the stone age and in live violent, tribal primitive state of human.

19th century pseudo scientific studies, you need to fast forward. Its like you just started reading Darwins Descent of man when we've blown light years ahead of that in terms of evolutionary science. Men you really are slow.

Don't you get it meat head. Both our ancestors supplied us with the same blue print to advance in the same fashion. The components for brain chemistry that combines to produce any variation in human populations is present in all humans which is why every so called race exhibits the same genetic order and disorders.  In other words there are dwarfs in every population as much as there are intelligent people. Sorry to tell you, your people do not possess any extra ordinary power over any other set of people apart from what you allude to above which is social engineering. You dodo head.

Rhodesia:
Even after being exposed to the white man's ways which the Negro seeks to emulate, he behaves in a most primitive and crude fashion akin the our own barbaric ancestors, he's demeanour and mannerisms are coarse, aggressive and harsh when compared to a refined Japanese individual.

They are often prone to outburst of primal rage and violence and violation ( especially of other homo sapien sub-species), ritually scarify and mutilate their own bodies in a fashion akin to stone age man. They retain a primitive animist-voodoo belief structure and display a keen lack of intelligence and ability to adapt to the white man's ways which they seek to emulate, yet also appear to be more connected to the animalistic urges and more of the early homo sapiens.

Where did you steal those lines from. Don't they teach you to respect intellectual property and quote your sources . Is that really your original thought. you really are a duance.

Rhodesia:
If you hate the white man so much why do you seek emulate his society, why have you not gone back to your pre-colonial roots if you hate European civilization so much?

I was just about to ask you that question too. How come your cave dwelling  ancestors didn't turn back to your Odin worshipping ways when the mediterenean romans were kicking your non european saxon azzes. Didn't you read asterix and obelix comics growing up . Sishhh!!

Rhodesia:
The out of Africa theory is debatable, multiple human origin theories are also highly plausible.

Ha ha ha!, you been hanging out on that website storm front for too long. Them fools over there are grasping at any thing that will seperate themselves from Ancient homo sapiens that migrated from Africa. Multiple human origin my Bottom. Ever heard of the human genome project. It is scentific consensus that Human beings are one and the same species with genetic mapping showing a 97.5% accurate sequencing. the remaining variations as a result of some of your ancestors miscegenating him Archaic Homo species ( the neanderthal) which you subsequently wiped out. Disgusting!On a confidence interval like that, it would mean I should believe that after taking a DNa test that shows a 98% conclusion, there is 3% chance you aint the child of your mother. That won't stand up in any court you duance. 

Your european ancestors were Children of Homo sapien Africans that polymorphed genetically, migrated out of the African continent around 60,000- 120,000 years old and changed physical appearance.  Sorry to burst your bubble.

Sub-Saharan Africa has the most human genetic diversity and the same has been shown to hold true for phenotypic diversity.[28] Phenotype is connected to genotype through gene expression. Genetic diversity decreases smoothly with migratory distance from that region, which many scientists believe to be the origin of modern humans, and that decrease is mirrored by a decrease in phenotypic variation. Skull measurements are an example of a physical attribute whose within-population variation decreases with distance from Africa. The distribution of many physical traits resembles the distribution of genetic variation within and between human populations (American Association of Physical Anthropologists 1996; Keita and Kittles 1997). For example, ~90% of the variation in human head shapes occurs within continental groups, and ~10% separates groups, with a greater variability of head shape among individuals with recent African ancestors (Relethford 2002).

Rhodesia:
whatever the case is the majority of black Africa was stuck somewhere between 9,000 and 6,0000 BC in terms of human civilization before the scramble for Africa in the 1880s.

Do you even know what period the iron age commenced. You truly are a daunce? Where did you read that gibberish, 9,000 years ago would put everyone in the world roughly at the beginnings of the bronze age and just emerging out of the stone age. Duance!

Rhodesia:
If everyone in brazil was fully African and all the whites left, it would quickly degenerate into a 3rd world shitip like Haiti.

yes just like if everyone was a pale faced cave man descedant we would all be suffering from massive waves of skin cancer.

Rhodesia:
I'm not European. I'm British by birth, English by the grace of god. Negroid savages out of my green and pleasant land!

You lucky your ancestors killed off them neanderthals.

Guess where they learnt how to throw them spears real good.

Yep!

You guessed right from their homo sapien ancestors from Africa.

Rhodesia:
please GTFO of the UK you can go to Israel or Spain or wherever but just stop coming here in droves turning England into a 3rd world poo tip.

Ah here you are still venting. was beginning to think you ran away. I'm still waiting for my questions to be answered on the other thread our high an mighty homo sapien european.

Rhodesia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Meyers_b11_s0476a.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negroid

Oh come now genius species. You can do better than post a couple of wikipedia links. I am not debating wikipedia. Can you not elaborate for us what constitutes a negro so we are fully aware of your intelletual prowess. Let us discuss this or is it that you are too much of a duance that you lack the cognitive ability to intepret complex information and can only repeat what you read.

Again based on your intelligence levels which you proudly boast can you define what constitutes a 'negro" and can you point out the negros in the pics with evidence to back up your findings.

Rhodesia:
Caucasian is not synonymous with white, in the UK Arabs are not regarded as white according to the census, neither are Pakistanis or Indians.

on the other hand in America Arabs are officially White. in Latin America someone who's white in America becomes Latino.

White is subjective. Black is also a subjective term, until the 70s black meant Indians,  and other dark skinned people of the world aswell a Negroes, up until the late the 19th century black in England meant someone who had dark hair and was slightly swarthy ie an Italian.

Black as a terminology for Negroes is a relatively recent thing. Many South Indians and Sri Lankans are as dark a west Africans, but they are not regarded as 'Black' people. Australian aborigines call themselves 'Black'but they are not Negroes, so what constitutes black and what constitutes white is subjective.

If the above bolded conclusion is subjective then the answers must lie in the definitions of Negro then. Therefore:

What is the origin of the word Negro?
What constitutes Negro?, origins in Africa, facial features, Genetics

Do enlighten me my oh so brilliant homo sapien.

Rhodesia:
ps go become a proffesor wi na Nobel Prize and then try and critidize dr James watson, that wasa meely stating the obvious that negroids are less delevpoed than other races.

I don't need to i already know the body of work and your professor is infering on the same data I am using.

In other words. Data is data until it is infered upon and it would seem "suspect" that a "white' scientist would produce conclusions that are not consistent with propping up his "race"

Dr Watson's social evolutionary science is skewed data and  does not support the evidence of biological evolution which is consistent with the inherited abilities of all human populations. That dribble is pseudo science at its best, nobel prize my AZZ!

Rhodesia:
East Asians are also more intelligent than us Europeans, do you see anybody screaming about it saying OMG that's racist you can't say that. Negroes are less evolved homonids.

Seeing that you are from the group of genius populations, could you map out the evolutionary process of the hominid in terms of genetics, anthropology and brain strucuture. In order words the hominid,  Homo sapien sapien divergence to Homo sapien sapien sapien( White people)

please classify

Please classify

please classify

Rhodesia:
Zidane looks almost European, but not quite. Go tell an Algerian he is a Negro, I think he will tell you he is either Arab or Berber which is not black. technically if you like yes they are Caucasoid, but not white.

Follow this logic you duance.

Are you both caucasian and white at the same time? If so then caucasian is synanymous with white right and designates an absolute set of phenotypicals features from which reference is drawn on. If so then anyone outside that definition cannot be caucasian but they can be  "caucasoid. Right?

The above would therefore imply that some how your "race' or features preced those of Zinadine's, meaning he is nearly a pure Caucasian/european or White but not quite, right. an "oid" is almost something but not quite.

If this logic follows and a one true specimen of caucasian exists then it can be applied the other way round and a one true specimen of negro exists as well and any one designated "Negroid" can only be almost negro and not quite falling within strict specimens. Right?

Classify these individuals for me according to your science then. Are they negro,caucasian, caucasoid or negroid?

Rhodesia:
He is an Algerian Berber.

Wrong answer. You and Dr. Watson are both duances

What race is Zinadine. Berber/Amazigh is an ethnic group.  You might as well call me a Nigerian yoruba using that designation.

Rhodesia:
Is Zindane a Negro? no. Is Nasser the Arab a Negro, No. they aren't white but they aren't negroes.

exactly my point

You are a duance.

If Zinadine is not negro. What is he?

BlackLibya:
Actually there are no Bantu native to Nigeria

Also, most of west Africa is not bantu

You picked the wrong site I guess

Please don't enducate this riff raff. He still subscribes to the old scientific classifications that categorise people into three distinctive "races" with most Africans he considers non -negro falling into th caucasoid Range,  Caucasoid meaning "almost White"

In reality DNA shows that "whites' are indeed 1/3rd African by DNA marking.

Leave him to his ignorance I beg you.

RSA:


Are you people going to continue talking,or are you going to take action,or you'll do nothing together with your uselss president? South African talk less and act more.That is why those corrupt official will hate the day they accepted their post in South Africa.
In South Africa there is no big men,people have voices in South Africa.

They also have xenophobia there too. Don't forget.