Politics › Re: Port Harcourt, Bonny Ports At Stake If Igbos Choose Biafra Referendum by Noneroone(m): 11:07pm On Jun 22, 2017 |
ezeagu: As an intelligent poster said in another thread, an Igbo mind you, referendums happen once, they cost money, they won't just be popping up and down as any small city or village demands. The SE leaving will mean the SE leaving alone, when the Yugoslavia split, the ethnic communities outised of the main homeland where living behind walls, no such thing as re-referendum, look at Kosovo and Albania. The voice of the Igbo in Asaba and so on will be drowned out, there will be little they can do once a referendum has been signed and sealed, the whole debacle will not be opened again just so that Asaba can join the SE, the rest of Nigeria will make sure of that.
Port Harcourt is also a very tricky one because without any kind of Igbo consciousness among Ikwere people, Port Harcourt is gone, unless you want to go to war for Ikwere indigenous lands because of Igbo migrants.
As I've been saying, IPOB doesn't know what they are doing, I opened a thread on why the 'Biafra' movement should be centred on Igbo land and what people are realising now is exactly why that should be. Without Igbo consciousness outside of the SE you can kiss Port Harcourt and co goodbye because they will not go, the IPOB protesting there are mostly migrants, the people who occupied Igbo houses during the war still occupy them and you people are calling them Biafrans.
The idea that Kalabari or Ibibio, etc will demand to join the SE is far fetched, all of these groups are worried about Igbo domination, so why will they fall into the den of the Igbo people?
It's obvious most Igbo people do not wish to learn about their neighbours and what their neighbours think of the Igbo, because it will surprise you, not this foolish IPOB propaganda about Igwa Nga and Igala Biafrans. is like you have already made up your opinion.i never mentioned multiple referendums in my post but i only broke it down since u didnt get the first one. i clearly stated in my first post that 'once it is certain' that SE are leaving SS will go. every stage of an agitation evokes a different kind of reaction.i have made my assumption in clear terms so no need revisiting them. lol...IPOB dont know what they are? should we wait for you to get a blueprint in year 6000 |
Politics › Re: Port Harcourt, Bonny Ports At Stake If Igbos Choose Biafra Referendum by Noneroone(m): 9:49pm On Jun 22, 2017 |
ezeagu: Which SS ethnic groups will join the south east in a new country? read my post well. i never argued that SS minorities will just join SE in Biafra. my arguement is simple- SS Igbos may be comfortable in a seperate region as long as SE Igbos remain in Nigeria. They know the presence of SE gives them some kind of security and removes their fear, but when it comes to an issue as permanent as independence, SE exit will trigger some sort of chain reaction. eg Asaba pple who are hardcore Biafrans will be quite vocal in demanding to join BIAFRA and when they join, the IKA will join them for sake of Anioma unity. Again, Obigbo, etche and egbema areas in Rivers are more passionate about Biafra than the rest and of a fact, you dont mean to tell me the Ikwerres will stay behind when those who have been their neighbours throughout history are joining a whole new country. i cant really predict the non Igbo SS group that will join but when PH 'falls' to Biafra, many south south minority groups who see the place as their rallying point might opt to join.The urhobo and itshekiri are off my assumption therefore idont see them joining. therefore my assumption is that the reaction will follow this pattern--SE Igbos demand to exit-- SS Igbos join them-- SS minorities demand to join SS Igbos. i never said SS minorities will expressly join SE without SS Igbos joining. but the north's fear is that SS Igbos will certainly join SE b'cos of fear. |
Politics › Re: Port Harcourt, Bonny Ports At Stake If Igbos Choose Biafra Referendum by Noneroone(m): 9:02pm On Jun 22, 2017 |
ezeagu: Which SS groups, specifically, is going to join Biafra the south east? dont get your question. pls be specific |
Politics › Re: Port Harcourt, Bonny Ports At Stake If Igbos Choose Biafra Referendum by Noneroone(m): 6:51pm On Jun 22, 2017 |
op i appreciate your concern. we Igbos should be vigilant and smarter than our enemies. that is their fear, kwankwaso said the land held by Igbos in kano is bigger than south east, masari of katsina said that if the referendum is conducted it will only take place in the south east and northern youths even called for declaration of south east as Biafra. They are are only mentioning South east out of frustration and to suppress their fear- a historic fear for a pan Igbo nationalist consciousness that will come with the Biafran agitation.
That is why they want to agitation to go through the senate in order to reduce it to a south east geo political affair 'cos they know only south eastern senators can be bold to demand for it in the senate as a result of nigerian geopolitical stereotype which equates Igbo to South east, and with that they can retain the rest of Igboland outside southeast in their nigeria. their two greatest frustrations is the fact that we are in a democracy and the civil and referendum method adopted by ipob. under military they were able to use the opportunity offered by the civil war to commit atrocies and restructure the country to their perfect taste, ceding the two principally Igbo provinces of ahaoada and port harcourt to rivers and adding Obigbo in 1976.Now such unilateral decision can no longer apply in case of Biafran referendum under democratic dispensation.
Again, the northerners know those SS Igbos will only be happy to stay in Nigeria and answer 'SS people' so long as SE Igbos remain in Nigeria. They know that once the SS Igbos are certain that south easterners are leaving Nigeria, they will join, and when they join, be certain that many south south groups will opt to join Biafra. This is where the agitation is heading to and the north know they cant stop it, hence, their frustration. |
Politics › Re: No Referendum, No 2019 Election – Nnamdi Kanu Warns by Noneroone(m): 8:38am On Jun 22, 2017 |
oseka101: am just laughing by time federal government declare state of emergency send 1000 troops from maiduguri who are hungry and eager to go home.. Biafra will go into hibernation for another 30years... too many foreign movies on your head |
Politics › Re: Time For Igbos Intellectuals To Converge And Take Action..... by Noneroone(m): 3:40pm On Jun 19, 2017 |
johnserek: You can keep all the Yoruba properties in Biafra we don't want them back agbo wouldn't be very useful in Biafra |
Politics › Re: Time For Igbos Intellectuals To Converge And Take Action..... by Noneroone(m): 3:38pm On Jun 19, 2017 |
cumbak60: This thread is in response to the issue on board. Northerners wants Igbos out, and Yorubas are not hiding their disdain for the Igbos, either. Nnamdi Kanu was vocal on Biafra, but his method and antics, attracted lots of hate and resentment from Nigerians. Perhaps, that was exactly his overall objective, attract hate and make them push Igbos out of the federation. Respect to Nnamdi Kanu, even though I'm not in tune with his methods and ideology. Some of his ideologies on country formation is completely alien and ridiculous, especially on the "two wrapper" principle (IPOBs can relate better). These, among others makes me cringe on his idea of Biafra.
Going by recent events, and threats coming from Arewa Youths, I think its high time Igbo intellectuals converge and chart the way forward. Yes, I support the idea of crafting a new entity for the Igbo people. My entire existence, I have learnt to tell myself the truth, void of pretense. Base on historical data and events over the years, I can categorically say, the Igbos are the most hated group in Nigeria. So need to keep lying to ourselves that all is well. All is not well. Its only in Nigeria that a call for self-determination breeds hate and threat to existence. If not, why should the issue of referendum call for expulsion from Northern territory? Will Nigerians be stopped from owning properties and business in Biafra if its actualized? The answer is no. Nigerians will always be Nigerians.
Where are people like Charles Soludo, Pat Utomi, Ben Nwabueze.... etc? time to take the bull by the horn. The need to converge and create a new destiny for our future generation is now. Kanu has played his part. Visionaries and pragmatic minds need to take over and chart a new course for the Igbo nation. We need Biafra, and we need it on platter of peace and tranquility. #referendumLoading.
God Bless Ndi'Igbo God Bless Biafra.
cc: ngozi123, pazienza, igboid, nonaira, ikechukwu, freemancipation, afam4vever, joeprince123, hammer06, agumbakembu, and all Igbo son on this forum. Share build the momentum. Let it get our people to act now. these people you mentioned like Ben nwabueze, Ekwueme etc I am sure Kanu is in touch with them. infact i am sure that aside sit-at-home, one of the things that fueled northern frustration was Kanu's consultation with those Igbo leaders after his release. |
Politics › Re: I Am Worried by Noneroone(m): 2:53pm On Jun 19, 2017*. Modified: 3:20pm On Jun 19, 2017 |
op, if i say you are talking nonsense now they will say we are insulting. not one single point have you raised on why Nigeria should be preferred to Biafra yet you are worried. you even raised the issue of ohakim and priest. pls what has it got to do wit Biafra if not that you have ample time to engage in infantile diatribe against Biafra agitation. you even raise the unintelligent argument of developing our region our self. but in all your intelligence you've never pondered on the following;
more than 70percent of nigeria resources is gotten from the eastern region. the central govt controls more than half of the resources and dash the state peanuts the central govt control power supply, aviation, ports, and other critical infrastructure the central govt control security (police, army, civil defence dss navy etc) with this you can say that central govt determines which region to make conducive for investment and which region to stagnate, and you call it a federation.
Now, remove central govt and replace it with Hausa/ fulani then you will understand why we need independence in order to be able to maximize our potentials.
we also need a homogeneous country . greatness comes when a nation uses her patriotic, inspired and educated citizens efficiently to harness its resources and potentials. merging many unrelated and opposing groups together can never lead to greatness. only organized societies achieve greatness. what three organized people can achieve in one week, one thousand unorganized people wont achieve it in ten yrs.
what was the population of Britain when it controlled an empire where 'the sun never sets'; An empire more than 20 times her population? it was because she was more organized. A nation will be easily organized when the people share common values, speak one language and share common culture. homogeneity leads to nationalism and nationalism brings less corruption and more competition which brings innovation and development. this is why Europe leads. Nigeria's unity can never pass the test of logic. free Biafra! |
Politics › Re: Summary Of Acting Presient, Osinbajo's Meeting With Southeast Traditional Rulers by Noneroone(m): 1:43pm On Jun 19, 2017*. Modified: 2:05pm On Jun 19, 2017 |
- Our greatness lies in our being together and I believe very strongly that as our royal fathers, you will ensure the message is clear to all, that the greatness of any people lies in their ability to work together despite our differences, despite the types of offense that have been caused between each other, the greatness of any community lies in unity.
- I trust that you, our royal fathers, will give us the right directional advice to ensure that our country remains together.
http://www.newshelmng.com/2017/06/summary-of-acting-presient-osinbajos.html
cc lalasticlala mynd44 @ the bold look at the nonsense this fake pastor is spewing. how many times are we going to tell these people that just being together doesn't bring greatness. greatness comes when a nation uses her patriotic, inspired and educated citizens efficiently to harness its resources and potentials. merging many unrelated and opposing groups together can never lead to greatness. only organized societies achieve greatness. what three organized people can achieve in one week, one thousand unorganized people wont achieve it in ten yrs. what was the population of Britain when it controlled an empire where 'the sun never sets'; An empire more than 20 times her population? it was because she was more organized. A nation will be easily organized when the people share common values, speak one language and share common culture. homogeneity leads to nationalism and nationalism brings less corruption and more competition which brings innovation and development. this is why Europe leads. Nigeria's unity can never pass the test of logic. free Biafra! |
Politics › Re: Northern Youths Write Osinbajo, Beg Him To Allow Igbo Go With Biafra by Noneroone(m): 12:47pm On Jun 19, 2017 |
Even though the long epistle reeks of frustration, Arewa youths must be commended for for their new stance on self determination. however, they seem confused- holding carnival with Igbo attire today and next they want support Biafra.
Btw, i hope they know we notice the way they have been trying so hard to associate Biafra with south east geo political zone. we wont get tired of reminding them that south east zone neither represents the entire Biafra nor even the complete Igboland.
their fear just started. |
Politics › Re: Update On National Unity Meeting by Noneroone(op): 12:38pm On Jun 19, 2017 |
Even though the long epistle reeks of frustration,Arewa youths must be commended for for their new stance on self determination. however, they seem confused; holding carnival with Igbo attire today and next they want support Biafra.
Btw i hope they know we notice the way they have been trying so hard to associate Biafra with south east geo political zone. we wont get tired of reminding them that south east zone is neither represents the entire Biafra nor even the complete Igboland.
their fear just started. |
Politics › Update On National Unity Meeting by Noneroone(op): 12:37pm On Jun 19, 2017 |
Youths from the Northern part of the country have appealed to Acting President Yemi Osinbajo to allow a complete separation of the Southeast states presently agitating for biafra republic from the federal republic of Nigeria through a peaceful political process.
According to them, taking steps to facilitate the actualisation of the biafran nation in line with the principle of self-determination and as an integral part of contemporary customary international law is the solution to incessant agitation from that part of the country.
This is contained in a letter by a coalition of Northern youths to the acting president signed by Ambassador Shettima Yerima, Joshua Viashman, Aminu Adam, Abdul-Azeez Suleiman and Nastura Ashir Sharif.
In the letter, the Northern youths contended that the principle of self-determination has since world war II become a part of the United Nations Charter, which states in Article 1(2) that one of the purposes of the UN is “to develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples”.
They submitted that this protocol envisages that people of any nation have the right to self-determination, adding that even though the Charter did not categorically impose direct legal obligations on member states, it implies that member states allow agitating or minority groups to self-govern as much as possible.
Commending Osinbajo’s efforts towards finding a lasting solution to the lingering Igbo-induced crises, which they is undoubtedly overheating the polity, the youths acknowledged the acting president’s good intentions as shown by his prompt and genuine actions towards ensuring peace and stability in holding talks with leaders of the North and the South-East.
They said, “Though we do not doubt Your Excellency’s bona fide concerns for the peaceful resolution of the crises, we nevertheless have reservations as to the efficacy of this approach in ensuring lasting solutions. Our doubts are informed by the following historical antecedents that have characterized the behavior and conduct of the Igbo in Nigeria and previous efforts at containing them.
“The Igbo of Eastern Nigeria manifested their hatred for Nigeria’s unity barely five years after we gained our independence from the British when on January 15, 1966, their army officers carried out the first-ever mutiny that marked the beginning of a series of crisis which has profoundly altered the course of Nigeria’s history.
“By that ill motivated cowardly and deliberate action, the Igbo killed many northern officers from the rank of lieutenant colonel upwards and also decapitated the Prime Minister and the political leadership of the Northern and Western regions but left the zenith of Igbo leadership at the Federal level and the Eastern region intact”.
In the missive made available to LEADERSHIP yesterday, the Nothern youths continued: “In line with the Igbo plan, General Aguiyi-Ironsi took advantage of the vacuum and, instead of returning power to the remnants of the First Republic government, he appropriated the coup and attempted to consolidate it for his people.
“Army officers of the Northern Region were eventually compelled to execute a counter coup on July 29, 1966 following a coordinated series of brazen provocations from the Igbo who taunting northerners on northern streets by mocking the way leaders of the region were slain by the Igbo. This unfortunately resulted in mob action which resulted in the death of many Igbos.
“And when Lt. Col. Yakubu Gowon, from the North took over as Head of State following the counter coup, the Igbo through Lt. Col. Ojukwu, characteristically refused to recognize Gowon. Ojukwu declared the secession of the Igbo people from Nigeria and the formation of the republic of Biafra on May 30, 1967 resulting in a civil war that led to the tragic deaths of more than 2 million Nigerians”.
They reminded the acting president that the Igbo eventually capitulated and conceded defeat in an unconditional surrender and not an armistice, which renders any talk about biafra at any other time a repudiation of the terms of that surrender signed by Phillip Effiong and other biafran leaders.
The northern youths regretted that in a shot out of the blues, the Igbos have in the past two years regrouped and fiercely and openly discussed biafra again under Ralph Uwazuruike of the movement for the actualization of the sovereign state of biafra (MASSOB).
According to them, this was given greater impetus by a more furious Igbo rogue group called the Indigenous People Of Biafra (IPOB) under Nnamdi Kanu who also operated an illegal radio station spreading hate and war messages across the nation, as well as calling other ethnic groups all sorts of names and threatening them with violent extermination.
They argued that the activities of the Igbo under Kanu’s IPOB had grown from ordering people of other regions out of the Southeast , particularly the Yorubas and Hausa /Fulani from the South West and the North respectively to an open declaration of the amassing of arms and forceful total shutdown of the entire Southeast.
The Northern youths told Osinbajo that, while Kanu and IPOB have declared full allegiance to a so called “Republic of Biafra” and have continued to preach hatred and war on a daily basis, no Igbo leader has call them to order for once.
They said rather, many of the leaders, including the deputy Senate president, Ike Ekweremadu who is the most senior elected Igbo paid Kanu courtesy calls to prove that he is speaking for the entire Igbo.
According to them, it is becoming clear to all that Kanu has serially breached all the terms of his stiff bail conditions in total disregard to the sanctity of Nigeria’s justice system.
They warned that given the unrepentant antecedents exhibited by the Igbos, they strongly believe that the gruesome picture that the biafran agitation represents is beyond a few people showcasing to the acting president that the Igbos will eventually heed the call for peace and desist from their dangerous campaign against Nigeria.
They said the seed of hate planted in the name of biafra was evidently so deep that the ongoing interaction between the acting president and the leaders from the Southeast cannot address the underlying problems.
The stated: “Concerned by the fact that the Biafrans have confessed to arming themselves for a violent breakup, we feel that it is risky for the rest of the country particularly the North to go on pretending that it is safe for us to co habitate with the Igbos given how deeply they are entrenched in our societies .
“And since evidently the Igbo have not been sufficiently humbled by their self imposed bloody civil violence of 1966, we are strongly concerned that nothing short of granting their Biafran dream will suffice.
“ And since the Igbo have virtually infiltrated every nook and cranny of Northern Nigeria where they have been received with open arms as fellow compatriots, we strongly believe that the region is no longer safe and secure in the light of the unfolding threats and the fact that for a long time, the Igbo have gone to extra ordinary lengths to ensure that in their domain in the South East, Northerners and Westerners are as much as possible disenfranchised from owning any businesses whereas in Kano alone, they own not less than 100, 000 shops across all the business districts.
“That since the younger generation of Nigerians makes up for more than 60 per cent of the nation’s population, it is our hope that they inherit this country in better shape so that they can build a much better future for themselves and their offsprings in an atmosphere that is devoid of anarchy, hate, suspicion and negativity that characterize the polarized, and clearly irreconcilable differences forced on us by the Biafran Igbos”.
Urging Osinbajo to let the Igbos go, the Northern youths said, “As the Igbo agitations persist and assume threatening dimensions, we submit that there is need to ensure that they are given the opportunity to exercise the right to self-determination as entrenched under the aforementioned international statutes to which Nigeria is a signatory.
“Aware that the right of self-determination in international law is the legal right for a “people” that allows them to attain a certain degree of autonomy from a sovereign state through a legitimate political process, we strongly demand for a referendum to take place in a politically sane atmosphere where all parties will have a democratic voice over their future and the future of the nation.
“The Igbo from all over the country and in the Diaspora should be advised to converge in their region in the South-East for a plesbisite to be organized and conducted by the United Nations and other regional bodies for them to categorically to decide between remaining part of Nigeria or having their separate country. That government should at the end of the plesbite implement whatever is agreed and resolved in order to finally put this matter to rest.
“Lastly, we pray His Excellency to study the references forwarded with this letter dispassionately and decide who is more in the wrong between those who openly pledge allegiance to a country other than Nigeria backing it up with persistent threats of war and those of us whose allegiance remains with the Nigerian state but simply urge that the secessionists be allowed to actualize their dream peacefully throw universally entrenched democratic options”.
Osinbajo Meets With S’East Traditional Rulers
Meanwhile, Acting President Yemi Osinbajo has regretted that enough blood had been spilled for Nigeria’s unity and many hundreds of thousands of lives have been lost already for any anyone to think of starting another violent crisis.
Osinbajo who stated this while making his opening remarks at the consultation meeting with traditional rulers from the Southeast noted that many have paid for the unity of this country with their lives and it will be wrong for people in the present generation to toy with those sacrifices that have been made.
He said agitations for secession and the ultimatum to leave the Northern states are also wrong and a violation of the Nigerian constitution.
Last week, the acting president had met with leaders of thought from the North and South East respectively.
Addressing the royal fathers yesterday, Osinbajo stated that in planning these meetings, he was conscious of the fact that he should have a separate set of meetings with traditional rulers because of the peculiar and the unique positions that they hold, especially in their relationship with those that live in their kingdoms.
According to him, this was the reason why he chose to have two separate meetings, one with the Southeast traditional rulers, while tomorrow evening he will be having one also with traditional rulers from the North.
He emphasised that it was the unique position that traditional rulers occupy that is behind separate consultations and that government wants to take much advantage of it as much as possible.
Osinbajo said, “Most of us are aware especially for those who have been following the consultations, we have worked very hard to ensure that the representations across the two zones that we are interested in consulting with initially is as wide as possible and we have tried to inculcate that even in our traditional rulers today.
“As you are aware, there has been agitation from some of our youths in the south east urging secession, the creation of Biafra. In apparent response young people in the Northern states, under the aegis of Arewa youths have purportedly issued an ultimatum where they have said set a date for the eviction of persons from south east region who live in the northern states.
“Those agitations, the manner of those agitations, the method and objective are wrong, unlawful and the violation of the laws of Nigeria and the constitution of Nigeria. I want to repeat that both the agitations for secession and the ultimatum to leave the northern states are wrong and a violation of our constitution.
“Our constitution says in Section Two that Nigeria is one indivisible and indissoluble sovereign state to be known by the name the federal republic of Nigeria”.
He warned that anyone who violates the law in the manner such as they are seen all over the place will be met with the full force of the law.
He stated: “And the reason why it is so is because for Nigeria’s unity, enough blood has been spilled and many hundreds of thousands of lives have been lost. Many have paid for the unity of this country with their lives and it will be wrong of us as men and women of goodwill in this generation to toy with those sacrifices that have been made.
“This is why men of goodwill in our generation must not tolerate any tendency that drags us in the direction of yet another civil conflict”.
…Blames Political Elite For Tension In Nigeria
Meanwhile, Acting President Yemi Osinbajo has attributed the current ethnic and regional tensions in the country to the handiwork of some political elites.
Osinbajo made this known at a meeting of regional youth leaders organised by the office of the special assistant to the president on Youth and Student Affairs at the Transcorp Hilton, Abuja.
Osinbajo, who was represented by Senator Babafemi Ojudu, the special adviser to the president on political matters, urged the youth to shun such questionable personalities in the interest of peace and progress of the country.
He noted with concern that the elites were only using the youth to score cheap political goals.
He, therefore, advised the young people to shun any act capable of polarizing the country along ethnic, sectional and religious lines.
He said, “It will be worst for us if we allow some selfish people to push us to unnecessary war. Nigeria holds a lot of promises for all of us. I know and we all know that a lot of you have been excluded from the good things of this country and of course we can trace that to poor and bad governance over the years.
“But again, what we should be clamouring for is good governance, not separatism, not secession. his is all about elite competition. The youth are only being used as tools to promote socio-political disorder. Only God knows how much some elites, who hid behind the curtains, paid those who made that declaration in Kaduna.
“Okay, if I don’t want to be importing things from Singapore, I can use this idea of Biafra to make money and some people are making huge money from it. Those, who were agitating and calling for Biafra before, are now singing another tune after building their palaces”.
Nnamdi Kanu Not Southeast Leader – Presidency
Meanwhile, the Presidency yesterday explained why the leader of the indigenous peoples of biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, was not part of the ongoing consultations with leaders of the Southeast.
It said the main reason for his absence is that he was not considered as a leader of thought in the Southeast region.
Acting President Yemi Osinbajo had last week started series of conversation meetings with leaders of thought, politicians, traditional rulers and the clergy over rising ethnic tensions in parts of the country.
The special adviser to the president on political matters, Senator Babafemi Ojudu, in a statement said that the IPOB leader was not invited because the presidency does not regard him as a leader of thought in the Southeast.
According to him, a window of possibility would be opened for Kanu to meet with the federal government for discussion should the need arise in the future.
He said, “Well, the thing is that we were looking for leaders of the people, leaders of thought and we do not see him as a leader of thought in the East. Maybe opportunity will come at one time or the other for him to be engaged.
“But so far, what we have done is to look at people who have influence in the communities, whether it is religious, whether it is traditional, whether it is political, social or governance. These are the people we brought in for discussion”. http://leadership.ng/2017/06/19/allow-igbos-biafra-northern-youths-tell-osinbajo/LALASTICLALA OBINOSCOPY |
Politics › Allow Igbos To Have Biafra- Northern Youths Tell Osibanjo by Noneroone(op): 12:25pm On Jun 19, 2017 |
Youths from the Northern part of the country have appealed to Acting President Yemi Osinbajo to allow a complete separation of the Southeast states presently agitating for biafra republic from the federal republic of Nigeria through a peaceful political process.
According to them, taking steps to facilitate the actualisation of the biafran nation in line with the principle of self-determination and as an integral part of contemporary customary international law is the solution to incessant agitation from that part of the country.
This is contained in a letter by a coalition of Northern youths to the acting president signed by Ambassador Shettima Yerima, Joshua Viashman, Aminu Adam, Abdul-Azeez Suleiman and Nastura Ashir Sharif.
In the letter, the Northern youths contended that the principle of self-determination has since world war II become a part of the United Nations Charter, which states in Article 1(2) that one of the purposes of the UN is “to develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples”.
They submitted that this protocol envisages that people of any nation have the right to self-determination, adding that even though the Charter did not categorically impose direct legal obligations on member states, it implies that member states allow agitating or minority groups to self-govern as much as possible.
Commending Osinbajo’s efforts towards finding a lasting solution to the lingering Igbo-induced crises, which they is undoubtedly overheating the polity, the youths acknowledged the acting president’s good intentions as shown by his prompt and genuine actions towards ensuring peace and stability in holding talks with leaders of the North and the South-East.
They said, “Though we do not doubt Your Excellency’s bona fide concerns for the peaceful resolution of the crises, we nevertheless have reservations as to the efficacy of this approach in ensuring lasting solutions. Our doubts are informed by the following historical antecedents that have characterized the behavior and conduct of the Igbo in Nigeria and previous efforts at containing them.
“The Igbo of Eastern Nigeria manifested their hatred for Nigeria’s unity barely five years after we gained our independence from the British when on January 15, 1966, their army officers carried out the first-ever mutiny that marked the beginning of a series of crisis which has profoundly altered the course of Nigeria’s history.
“By that ill motivated cowardly and deliberate action, the Igbo killed many northern officers from the rank of lieutenant colonel upwards and also decapitated the Prime Minister and the political leadership of the Northern and Western regions but left the zenith of Igbo leadership at the Federal level and the Eastern region intact”.
In the missive made available to LEADERSHIP yesterday, the Nothern youths continued: “In line with the Igbo plan, General Aguiyi-Ironsi took advantage of the vacuum and, instead of returning power to the remnants of the First Republic government, he appropriated the coup and attempted to consolidate it for his people.
“Army officers of the Northern Region were eventually compelled to execute a counter coup on July 29, 1966 following a coordinated series of brazen provocations from the Igbo who taunting northerners on northern streets by mocking the way leaders of the region were slain by the Igbo. This unfortunately resulted in mob action which resulted in the death of many Igbos.
“And when Lt. Col. Yakubu Gowon, from the North took over as Head of State following the counter coup, the Igbo through Lt. Col. Ojukwu, characteristically refused to recognize Gowon. Ojukwu declared the secession of the Igbo people from Nigeria and the formation of the republic of Biafra on May 30, 1967 resulting in a civil war that led to the tragic deaths of more than 2 million Nigerians”.
They reminded the acting president that the Igbo eventually capitulated and conceded defeat in an unconditional surrender and not an armistice, which renders any talk about biafra at any other time a repudiation of the terms of that surrender signed by Phillip Effiong and other biafran leaders.
The northern youths regretted that in a shot out of the blues, the Igbos have in the past two years regrouped and fiercely and openly discussed biafra again under Ralph Uwazuruike of the movement for the actualization of the sovereign state of biafra (MASSOB).
According to them, this was given greater impetus by a more furious Igbo rogue group called the Indigenous People Of Biafra (IPOB) under Nnamdi Kanu who also operated an illegal radio station spreading hate and war messages across the nation, as well as calling other ethnic groups all sorts of names and threatening them with violent extermination.
They argued that the activities of the Igbo under Kanu’s IPOB had grown from ordering people of other regions out of the Southeast , particularly the Yorubas and Hausa /Fulani from the South West and the North respectively to an open declaration of the amassing of arms and forceful total shutdown of the entire Southeast.
The Northern youths told Osinbajo that, while Kanu and IPOB have declared full allegiance to a so called “Republic of Biafra” and have continued to preach hatred and war on a daily basis, no Igbo leader has call them to order for once.
They said rather, many of the leaders, including the deputy Senate president, Ike Ekweremadu who is the most senior elected Igbo paid Kanu courtesy calls to prove that he is speaking for the entire Igbo.
According to them, it is becoming clear to all that Kanu has serially breached all the terms of his stiff bail conditions in total disregard to the sanctity of Nigeria’s justice system.
They warned that given the unrepentant antecedents exhibited by the Igbos, they strongly believe that the gruesome picture that the biafran agitation represents is beyond a few people showcasing to the acting president that the Igbos will eventually heed the call for peace and desist from their dangerous campaign against Nigeria.
They said the seed of hate planted in the name of biafra was evidently so deep that the ongoing interaction between the acting president and the leaders from the Southeast cannot address the underlying problems.
The stated: “Concerned by the fact that the Biafrans have confessed to arming themselves for a violent breakup, we feel that it is risky for the rest of the country particularly the North to go on pretending that it is safe for us to co habitate with the Igbos given how deeply they are entrenched in our societies .
“And since evidently the Igbo have not been sufficiently humbled by their self imposed bloody civil violence of 1966, we are strongly concerned that nothing short of granting their Biafran dream will suffice.
“ And since the Igbo have virtually infiltrated every nook and cranny of Northern Nigeria where they have been received with open arms as fellow compatriots, we strongly believe that the region is no longer safe and secure in the light of the unfolding threats and the fact that for a long time, the Igbo have gone to extra ordinary lengths to ensure that in their domain in the South East, Northerners and Westerners are as much as possible disenfranchised from owning any businesses whereas in Kano alone, they own not less than 100, 000 shops across all the business districts.
“That since the younger generation of Nigerians makes up for more than 60 per cent of the nation’s population, it is our hope that they inherit this country in better shape so that they can build a much better future for themselves and their offsprings in an atmosphere that is devoid of anarchy, hate, suspicion and negativity that characterize the polarized, and clearly irreconcilable differences forced on us by the Biafran Igbos”.
Urging Osinbajo to let the Igbos go, the Northern youths said, “As the Igbo agitations persist and assume threatening dimensions, we submit that there is need to ensure that they are given the opportunity to exercise the right to self-determination as entrenched under the aforementioned international statutes to which Nigeria is a signatory.
“Aware that the right of self-determination in international law is the legal right for a “people” that allows them to attain a certain degree of autonomy from a sovereign state through a legitimate political process, we strongly demand for a referendum to take place in a politically sane atmosphere where all parties will have a democratic voice over their future and the future of the nation.
“The Igbo from all over the country and in the Diaspora should be advised to converge in their region in the South-East for a plesbisite to be organized and conducted by the United Nations and other regional bodies for them to categorically to decide between remaining part of Nigeria or having their separate country. That government should at the end of the plesbite implement whatever is agreed and resolved in order to finally put this matter to rest.
“Lastly, we pray His Excellency to study the references forwarded with this letter dispassionately and decide who is more in the wrong between those who openly pledge allegiance to a country other than Nigeria backing it up with persistent threats of war and those of us whose allegiance remains with the Nigerian state but simply urge that the secessionists be allowed to actualize their dream peacefully throw universally entrenched democratic options”.
Osinbajo Meets With S’East Traditional Rulers
Meanwhile, Acting President Yemi Osinbajo has regretted that enough blood had been spilled for Nigeria’s unity and many hundreds of thousands of lives have been lost already for any anyone to think of starting another violent crisis.
Osinbajo who stated this while making his opening remarks at the consultation meeting with traditional rulers from the Southeast noted that many have paid for the unity of this country with their lives and it will be wrong for people in the present generation to toy with those sacrifices that have been made.
He said agitations for secession and the ultimatum to leave the Northern states are also wrong and a violation of the Nigerian constitution.
Last week, the acting president had met with leaders of thought from the North and South East respectively.
Addressing the royal fathers yesterday, Osinbajo stated that in planning these meetings, he was conscious of the fact that he should have a separate set of meetings with traditional rulers because of the peculiar and the unique positions that they hold, especially in their relationship with those that live in their kingdoms.
According to him, this was the reason why he chose to have two separate meetings, one with the Southeast traditional rulers, while tomorrow evening he will be having one also with traditional rulers from the North.
He emphasised that it was the unique position that traditional rulers occupy that is behind separate consultations and that government wants to take much advantage of it as much as possible.
Osinbajo said, “Most of us are aware especially for those who have been following the consultations, we have worked very hard to ensure that the representations across the two zones that we are interested in consulting with initially is as wide as possible and we have tried to inculcate that even in our traditional rulers today.
“As you are aware, there has been agitation from some of our youths in the south east urging secession, the creation of Biafra. In apparent response young people in the Northern states, under the aegis of Arewa youths have purportedly issued an ultimatum where they have said set a date for the eviction of persons from south east region who live in the northern states.
“Those agitations, the manner of those agitations, the method and objective are wrong, unlawful and the violation of the laws of Nigeria and the constitution of Nigeria. I want to repeat that both the agitations for secession and the ultimatum to leave the northern states are wrong and a violation of our constitution.
“Our constitution says in Section Two that Nigeria is one indivisible and indissoluble sovereign state to be known by the name the federal republic of Nigeria”.
He warned that anyone who violates the law in the manner such as they are seen all over the place will be met with the full force of the law.
He stated: “And the reason why it is so is because for Nigeria’s unity, enough blood has been spilled and many hundreds of thousands of lives have been lost. Many have paid for the unity of this country with their lives and it will be wrong of us as men and women of goodwill in this generation to toy with those sacrifices that have been made.
“This is why men of goodwill in our generation must not tolerate any tendency that drags us in the direction of yet another civil conflict”.
…Blames Political Elite For Tension In Nigeria
Meanwhile, Acting President Yemi Osinbajo has attributed the current ethnic and regional tensions in the country to the handiwork of some political elites.
Osinbajo made this known at a meeting of regional youth leaders organised by the office of the special assistant to the president on Youth and Student Affairs at the Transcorp Hilton, Abuja.
Osinbajo, who was represented by Senator Babafemi Ojudu, the special adviser to the president on political matters, urged the youth to shun such questionable personalities in the interest of peace and progress of the country.
He noted with concern that the elites were only using the youth to score cheap political goals.
He, therefore, advised the young people to shun any act capable of polarizing the country along ethnic, sectional and religious lines.
He said, “It will be worst for us if we allow some selfish people to push us to unnecessary war. Nigeria holds a lot of promises for all of us. I know and we all know that a lot of you have been excluded from the good things of this country and of course we can trace that to poor and bad governance over the years.
“But again, what we should be clamouring for is good governance, not separatism, not secession. his is all about elite competition. The youth are only being used as tools to promote socio-political disorder. Only God knows how much some elites, who hid behind the curtains, paid those who made that declaration in Kaduna.
“Okay, if I don’t want to be importing things from Singapore, I can use this idea of Biafra to make money and some people are making huge money from it. Those, who were agitating and calling for Biafra before, are now singing another tune after building their palaces”.
Nnamdi Kanu Not Southeast Leader – Presidency
Meanwhile, the Presidency yesterday explained why the leader of the indigenous peoples of biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, was not part of the ongoing consultations with leaders of the Southeast.
It said the main reason for his absence is that he was not considered as a leader of thought in the Southeast region.
Acting President Yemi Osinbajo had last week started series of conversation meetings with leaders of thought, politicians, traditional rulers and the clergy over rising ethnic tensions in parts of the country.
The special adviser to the president on political matters, Senator Babafemi Ojudu, in a statement said that the IPOB leader was not invited because the presidency does not regard him as a leader of thought in the Southeast.
According to him, a window of possibility would be opened for Kanu to meet with the federal government for discussion should the need arise in the future.
He said, “Well, the thing is that we were looking for leaders of the people, leaders of thought and we do not see him as a leader of thought in the East. Maybe opportunity will come at one time or the other for him to be engaged.
“But so far, what we have done is to look at people who have influence in the communities, whether it is religious, whether it is traditional, whether it is political, social or governance. These are the people we brought in for discussion”. http://leadership.ng/2017/06/19/allow-igbos-biafra-northern-youths-tell-osinbajo/ |
Christianity Etc › Re: Man Reading Punch Newspaper In Church During Service In Lagos (Photo) by Noneroone(m): 11:55am On Jun 19, 2017 |
I am sure its about BIAFRA. it give so much headache |
|
|
Politics › Re: OPINION: Biafra’s US Suit And The Limits Of Idiocy - By Richard Murphy by Noneroone(m): 1:25am On Jun 15, 2017 |
OP print this your pointless and bombastic write-up. out and give it to burantai's defence team. they need it rather than disturbing our peace here. |
Politics › Re: Breaking: New Group Emerges, Calls For Secession Of Niger Delta From Nigeria by Noneroone(m): 8:10pm On Jun 08, 2017 |
pazienza: Well, What do we have here?
Not bad, as long as no iota of Proudly Igbo speaking group would be coerced into the Niger Delta republic.
But the truth is that the Niger Deltans (Whatever that term means) don't want secession from Nigeria, they want resource control, which would be granted in the year 4017 by Arewa dominated NASS.
So, there you have it. lol...well said. I suspect edwin clark |
Politics › Re: Does Secession From A Country Make an Individual Lose His Personal Property? by Noneroone(m): 7:54pm On Jun 08, 2017 |
seunmsg: Don't get it twisted at all, the day Biafra secedes legally, all Igbos living in any part of Nigeria will be doing so illegally. Government may round up all of them and throw them into prison or dump them at the Onitsha bridge depending on how the break up occurred. Nigeria's breakup will either be violent or on very hostile terms if violence is not involved. You people will be entitled to absolutely nothing once you succeed in breaking up the country. I will advice you all start selling your belongings now and relocate the ones that can be relocated to the east before it is too late. Igbos will not be allowed to own a pin in Nigeria once Biafra secedes. You cannot eat your cake and still have it. the same govt that will still come and beg Biafrans for foreign investment lol...Biafra dey pain una well well. Anyway sha u sound like a kid. Your elders will know better. |
Politics › Re: Does Secession From A Country Make an Individual Lose His Personal Property? by Noneroone(m): 7:50pm On Jun 08, 2017 |
jpphilips: C OF O is a tenancy agreement between the bearer and the Nigerian Government. If you denounce Nigeria, no previous legal agreement you have with Nigeria is binding, so the moment you accepted to Join Biafra, you have officially annulled your C of O. The land use act of Nigeria placed land ownership solely in the hands of the State government, every Nigerian landowner is a tenant of the Government, the law only recognizes a form of compensation should the government have need for your land. The law equally recognize that you can inherit lands and it is transferable as well, so definitely igbos with properties in the south east are so keeping theirs because Biafra is suppose to dissolve the existing state governments of its territories.
You will ask; what about foreigners who own landed properties in Nigeria? Most of them do so through Nigerian proxies except when such a person has been granted citizenship, though not illegal for foreigners to own properties here directly, in a breakaway situation, both sides are no longer friends as such they may change their laws to suit purpose, one of it is making land ownership or tenancy a citizen right, at that point, most Biafrans will kiss their properties goodbye!!
It is extremely f00lish to think Biafra is coming because a lvnatic said it over the radio, that is the only truth in the OP's question.
emotion emotion emotions without reason thats all i see in your comment |
Politics › Re: Why Adaka Boro Did Not Include Ikweres In His Niger Delta Republic by Noneroone(m): 12:41pm On Jun 06, 2017 |
Our problem as Igbos is that we easily get emotionally aroused and such is capable of affecting rational thinking atimes. This Ikwerre topic has appeared more than 500 times on this forum and on each occation, the same silly point of view and back and forth argument of 'whether ikwerres are Igbos' is expressed.
All over the world there is no ethnic group or nation where all the citizens or sub groups express the same level of nationalist identity. There is always an area where such feeling is most intense and areas where it is low, yet they are still considered as one nation and live peacefully as independent countries. Self determination applies to people of same culture, language etc
the igbo boundary has been known and documentend since precolonial times. Every british document and colonial gazzette recognise portharcourt as igboland. Attempting to support nigeria in claiming the opposite is a huge task that britain cannot afford to undertake in such a big issue as self determination. Having said so, No igbo sub group has any seperate right to self determination. This is what pple like hopeathand dont know. Igbos will be recognized as one blog in case of referendum and will vote as such. The Five south eastern states are only the hot bed of Igbo nationalist activities and that is why global attention focused on them on may 30. This doesnt mean they dont recognize igbos across the niger or those in rivers as igbos. Infact most international media that report about biafra acknoledge them as igbos. Even in elections, peoples and parties or ideologies have strongholds. That doesnt mean that the winner will not govern the entire state including his stronghold if he wins. 'Ikwerre identity' ends in Nigerian political lexicon. They are still reconized as part of the igbo race internationally and that is what matters. Lets stop dignifying nigerians with these rantings. The agitation has passed this level. |
Politics › Re: Chai See How A Ghanaian Finished Nigeria On Twitter by Noneroone(m): 5:39pm On May 02, 2017 |
Smack down |
Culture › Re: Oba Akiolu Drops Bombshell On Who Really Owns Lagos by Noneroone(m): 3:27pm On May 02, 2017 |
YonkijiSappo: lol, don't worry, the Ijebu watersiders of Lekki and Ode Omi, Remos of Ikorodu, Ilajes of Aiyetoro and mahin, and Aworis of Ebute Meta will soon reveal that they are Igbo. Same way the people from Ijebu Igbo are Igbos. 
mumu!  are u obsessed with Igbo? Pls dont vent ur anger on me. Go to akiolu. |
Culture › Re: Oba Akiolu Drops Bombshell On Who Really Owns Lagos by Noneroone(m): 3:23pm On May 02, 2017 |
YonkijiSappo: lol, you dont even know that Yorubaland has lovely beautoful coastlines in Three different states, while Igbos have coaslines on the Beijing and Mumbai beaches of Asia. the original owners of those ones will soo e revealed. Btw just leave Igbo out of this. |
Culture › Re: Oba Akiolu Drops Bombshell On Who Really Owns Lagos by Noneroone(m): 3:21pm On May 02, 2017 |
YonkijiSappo: Tell that to Obi Achebe who said the Founders of Onitsha were Benin folk, not me. Igbos later came from the hinterland and outnumbered the Real Onitsha Benins. Till today, real Onitsha indigenes are still craving for their Benin origins. 
Infact All Igbo Obis are all children of Oduduwa via Benin. lets face topic now |
Culture › Re: Oba Akiolu Drops Bombshell On Who Really Owns Lagos by Noneroone(m): 3:17pm On May 02, 2017 |
YonkijiSappo: Just letting you know that Obi Achebe TRACED the FOUNDING and SETTLEMENT of Onitsha back to Benin. Unlike Lagos Island (Islae Eko) that remains 100% Yoruba property of the Aworis. yes binis has influence in onitsha traditional institution but settlement is a different thing. How can it have early bini settlement when all the adjacent lands including Asaba are Igbos. The most important thing is that the custodian of lagos history and culture just state that lagos is actually not yorubaland. Yorubaland is landlocked! |
Culture › Re: Oba Akiolu Drops Bombshell On Who Really Owns Lagos by Noneroone(m): 3:11pm On May 02, 2017 |
YonkijiSappo: See lies. Some Yorubas spoke out against him, some supportd his statement, mostly in light of the support for APC in Lagos state. Just like in Every rational population of the world, the Yorubas either chided the Oba or supported his statements.... that's only normal.
You people can start sucking Baale of Idumota's balls like Agbalumo for all I care. I hope you know the Obi of Onitsha is a purely Benin institution. this one don shift to Onitsha. Lol |
Culture › Re: Oba Akiolu Drops Bombshell On Who Really Owns Lagos by Noneroone(m): 2:45pm On May 02, 2017 |
Destined2win:

Oba Akiolu on the loose. Is he trying to establish his stool by justifying that Lagos is a 'no man's land'? what did he say that is not true? Can u lay claim to a land that doesnt have a yoruba name 'eko' is edo not yoruba, while lagos is portuguese. Portharcourt is english while Igweocha is Igbo. Name is the strongest proof of indigeneous ownership of a land. |
Culture › Re: Oba Akiolu Drops Bombshell On Who Really Owns Lagos by Noneroone(m): 2:38pm On May 02, 2017 |
Chai Nnamdi kanu is always right.
Lalasticlala this deserves fp |
Politics › Re: Nnamdi Kanu With Nsibidi Encryptions On His Dress by Noneroone(m): 11:16pm On May 01, 2017 |
Notice that the nsibidi characters look like hebrew. Igbo jewish connection could be real. |
Politics › Re: See How Prison Wardens Shook Nnamdi Kanu Hands As If He Is God by Noneroone(m): 4:35am On Apr 30, 2017 |
I watched it. he actually bowed. No African presently has a combination of bravery, intelligence and vision like Kanu now. |
Politics › Re: I Promised To Kill Myself Over Nnamdi Kanu See Poison by Noneroone(m): 4:32am On Apr 30, 2017 |
Awolowo your mentor will be pleased to welcome you |