₦airaland Forum

thegoodjoehunt:
Yobo should have been dropped for Ambrose. It is as Simple as that. Ambrose is a better central defender than Yobo. Secondly Omeruo's overlapping is fantastic. He is also good at holding the Left winger.

When Ancelotti used Ivanovic as a right back, Ferreira was injured and was very poor. As Chelsea now has Azpilicuetta, you can't see a coach dropping Azpili that easily and playing Ivanovic as a RB when he will do better as a defender.

Now Ambrose has a red card and we are stuck with Yobo. Keshi was wrong there.

esere826: So now I find myself wanting to settle down
to be a member of a church, a young church where I can guide the pastor
teach him to avoid folly; teach him to teach the flock that they all have access to God, and that he is only there as a convener, not a facilitator
teach him to avoid the pride of heart
whisper in his ears that he is but a mere mortal and not God, as was whispered to Ceaser

These learnings has to be shared.
... I see my church prost.itution days coming to an end.
Thank God for the experience

teskyg: So u prefer the Islamist to overrun Mali and put their Government in place?Would you also prefer such a Boko Haram to over run Nigeria in same way?

odumorun 1: The idea that an islamist takeover of Mali will spread terror across the region betrays a lack of real understanding of the dynamics of radical movements. Nothing tames radicalism as much as the responsibility imposed by power. Insurgents are dangerous because they have no fixed address. Blowing up buildings is easier than fixing pot holes in the roads or providing basic necessities to the people.

More importantly having a government with officials who have known addresses and can be targeted means once in power radical regimes tend to tone down their external interferences in order to avoid massive retribution, they can no longer escape by being permanently underground
Hamas in power is less dangerous than Hamas as opposition. The islamists in Libya spurned power for this very reason. The same will happen in Syria when Assad falls.
This is not about stopping the spread of so-called Jihadism in the region. It is about maintaining French colonial control over its West African client states. Nothing more. The Nigerian army is merely a pawn in this game.

Duru1: The above post is an illogical crap from renowned drunken fisherman. What a loser.

vicenzo: You are being as ignorant as possible, ijaws were members of the eastern house that voted for secession,i guess you don't know the meaning of representative democracy. Wasn't the name biafra chosen by an ijaw house member,frank opugo?

vicenzo: On whether ijaws would have ruled biafra,well,eyo ita was once a premier of the easter region,and he wasn't igbo. You boast about GEJ being the number one citizen today,but you have forgotten who gave him a strong base to build from,endorsed him even before he won the primaries,what made you think it would have been different in biafra? Wasn't adaka boro elected the SUG president in UNN,an igbo dominated university.

Ngodigha1: @Abagworo, you created a thread for the ijaw plight. Nigerians not only Ndigbo contributed here negatively or positively, yet Ndigbo are the ones being insulted now by the ijaws.
Please let the ijaws handle their problems. I know you mean well for them but in actual fact, they hate you (us) not because we are neighbours but because they know we are more prosperous.

vicenzo: Stop thinking with your anus, can you give me one instance where ndiigbo as a group, tried to annex non-igbo lands. I'm waiting.

vicenzo: "Igbos would always be avoided by all and sundry". Well,i don't think so,not long ago,igalla people were begging for igbos to come and invest in their land. You ijaws have to chill,it wasn't the igboman that poluted your lands while siphoning the wealth from there to their lands(lagos and abuja). Blame adaka boro for that,he gave it to them freely. Hahaha!

shadrach77: i remembered this topic appearing on the front page sometimes this year. I used to be a bit naive in thinking instrumentalists should not be paid since they are working for God. I now know better. The truth is THEY SHOULD BE PAID. We have two types of instrumentalists, proffesional and non proffesional. I am an instrumentalist in my church but i am not a proffesional so i don't expect to be paid. But if someone is a proffesional instrumentalist, that's where they are getting their daily bread so they should be paid. Moreso, we need to ask ourselves a question, is the pastor not getting paid? He is for doing God's work, so if the pastor is getting paid for working for God, why then should other church workers do it for free?

tommywise: GUYS, I SUGGEST U GO AND FIGHT D CORRUPT POLITICIANS AND LEAVE D PASTORS ALONE.....FULL STOP

OLAADEGBU: You have to put things in their rightful perspectives. Turning the other cheek is meant to be for our individual interpersonal relationships but when it comes to national issues the elected or unelected Government has a duty to protect its own citizens from its enemies, like the Jewish mother protecting her child from the enemies missiles in the pikshur above.

FXKing2012: itz obvious the author of this piece is either a muslim or an atheist.