Ranchhoddas's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Ranchhoddas's Profile › Ranchhoddas's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (of 307 pages)
Fareedahlee44:E pain am. Quota system education.
|
JixNation:Simple. They are not good enough. Kevin Anderson is South African though. Jaziri Malek is Tunisian. |
jk200:She no get sense. Her advisers self no get sense. |
Ishilove:Are you not overreacting? |
Do you need a dictionary or something? How did you arrive at feminist from any of that? She is paranoid at best and ret.arded at worst. I think a person is better off without those kind of people. Unless you are into bettering the country's image and that crap. |
Fareedahlee44:How can you use those two words together. You see what happens when you are a product of almajiri education? Oya take.
|
Mizwisdom:You must find a way to spoil it.
|
Nigerians no dey gree read. |
MuttleyLaff:I am sure a mad person think his madness is natural. You know me by now, what my religion is. I also have already shared my views on polygamy. There is nothing evil or disgusting in polygamy, but personally it is not my cup of tea. I wouldn't necessarily desire polygamy on my worst enemy. I am not sure whether I had responded to the earlier Isaiah 4:1 verse, but if I haven't, it is related to my reply here, that says, desperate times requires desperate measures. It was similar desperate times during the period of the wars to spread Islam, that necessitated Mohammed to declare Muslims can have up to 4 wives, because of the dearth of men, due to few men being about due to being casualties of war and too many widows as a result of the same reasonI am not familiar with your Mohammed narrative. I thought it had to do with the wife that bore him a child. We are free to do all things but not all things are profitable. Polygamy has more cons than pros.This is very debatable. In fact it is untrue. 1/ Will you be happy to share you partner with multiple men/women?I take the fifth Are you familiar with the phrase, "social smoker"?Yes Human being have the impulse to stray or have a fling. Some don't act out that impulse, some dontSo you agree that monogamy is unnatural then. Why we come dey argue since? Have you ever touched your partner in a particular part of her/his body, and suddenly discovered that your partner gets set off on ecstatic pleasure when touched at that particular part of the body. You never knew this before then but just stumbled upon it whilst exploring the body. That is just one simple instance of getting to know your partner, if you are all about just jumping in and going into your partner, you wouldn't notice the pleasure or take in anything like that. There are a gazillion and one things to find out and know. It will take you a lifetime to discover them allNa wa ooo... We need to explore many partners to discover many things. You haven't been able to specifically say what is evil and/or what exactly is disgusting in and/or with same sex relationships.Words fail me. Iranu, Abasha Iranu Abasha Do you know that song? Phyno, Olamide and Lil Kesh |
Symptoms of dementia ![]() |
post=74888773:Zombie! |
Expect them to come and start telling you that you are insecure.
Na so mumu people for this forum dey behave. Away match dey hungry your husband. |
MuttleyLaff:It is your position nonetheless. Give me some credit, remember what I typed: "I have no reservation on polygamy, considering that, the arrangement is between consenting adults, and the additional party is an adult, under no duress, no coersion and no disadvantage financial or otherwise, is in agreement to be part of a relationship that involves more than two original members and knowledge of the sexual relationship arrangement is mutually agreed upon by all parties involved."Is polygamy compatible with your religious views? That is not absolutely true or correct though, and you know itIt is. There was no code against polygamy as far as I know. I am listening if you have evidence otherwise. It is no digression, as I have already tred that part in my ealier post here, that God's original plan is genetic monogamy, but then, God in His wisdom and by design, just with sex same attraction impulse, has given human beings social monogamy impulses that when acted upon, can lead to having multiple sexual partners or end up in polygamous arrangements.Just so I am not mistaken, what does the bold mean? Keeping up appearances? Are you married? Are you in a steady relationship? If yes to either, do you already know everything about your partner? Even a lifetime is not enough to know about him/her, you each day know new things about him/her, you each day discover new things they didnt first know about him/her. Sorry Ranchhoddas, it has nothing to do with Jewish fablesMarried: No Second question: It's complicated. If you really believe in: There is no virtue in abstaining from something that is perfectly natural -- A wise man., please explain or tell how this means in relation to same sex relationship and multiple partner relationshipsThe operative phrase is highlighted. There is no evidence that such relationships (eeeeewwwww...) fit that phrase. |
MuttleyLaff:I doubt it was once. Be that as it may, the point remains -- use use That both should have not known better, as in the original poster sagitariusbaby and the original author, Chief Tola Adeniyi, a former MD of daily times, that pigeons are not just the only momogamous animals that exists but they really are socially monogamous creatures, that occassionally do sow their wild oats. The ignorance of the original author and poster that pasted his opinon here is a choiceYou must not miss the point -- The overwhelming majority of animals are philanderers. Thus, you must accept it or discard your view on homosexuality. You cannot have it both ways. I have spoken of two impulses, so how do you mean our ancestors did not have these "impulses" you speak of?. Both impulses are in every human being, before the advent of colonialism, Christianity, the Bible, Jesus Christ on earth and all the baggage. Each and everyone of us including our northern Alhajis, from the beginning and up till now have these impulses.They were all polygamous. Monogamy was imported. That's the long and short of my statement. By way of digression, could you tell was Isaiah 4:1 is about? If you know that is. |
MuttleyLaff:Are you denying that you use homosexual animals to further you pro-gay views? The original poster and his intro post couldnt even get the facts right. The information that the pigeon is the only monogamous creature, is not only just incorrect, but also the failure to realise that pigeons actually are socially monogamous creatures.And then? The fact is that the overwhelming majority of animals are not monogamous. Surely this is no accident. Now, if, Ranchhoddas, is passing the buck over MuttleyLaff, then I'll say that, God's original plan is genetic monogamy, but then, God in His wisdom and by design, just with sex same attraction impulse, has given human beings social monogamy impulses that when acted upon, can lead to having multiple sexual partners or end up in polygamous arrangements.Strangely, our ancestors did not have these "impulses" you speak of. The impulses came with colonialism, Christianity, the Bible, Jesus Christ and all the baggage. How come our northern Alhajis do not seem to have these impulses? Personally, handling and balancing one relationship is enough for me than trying to, with another, perfect the art of juggling. Genetic monogamy, as best as when can, at it, whether in a heterosexual relationship or same sex relationship, gives peace of mind, trust, assurance, is an expression of commitment and undivided faithfulness, declaration of undiving love and attention, expression of loyalty and faithfulness to one person, is a display of restraint and show of strong self discipline etceteraNa wetin you for don talk since. Your power no reach. What restraint abeg? There is no virtue in abstaining from something that is perfectly natural -- A wise man. I have no reservation on polygamy, considering that, the arrangement is between consenting adults, and the additional party is an adult, under no duress, no coersion and no disadvantage financial or otherwise, is in agreement to be part of a relationship that involves more than two original members and knowledge of the sexual relationship arrangement is mutually agreed upon by all parties involved.Hmmmmm... You no talk this one since o. Jedidiah mode. It takes a lifetime to know somebody, that is why genetic monogamy, in the first place and in the beginning, wasYou have no way of knowing what was in the beginning. Stop passing off Jewish fables as history. |
Chubhie:As anachronistic as this may seem, one can't help but think that marriages would work if both parties take his views to heart. |
GiantParrot:True man. People should always be made to understand that their actions have heavy consequences. Lesson to self: Never be the nice guy. |
Karatum:Madam na for where you see secret service? |
You said he's a principled (a nicer way of saying proud) man and he won't accept money from his daughter. I don't think he would like this at all. |
BLACKdagger:Muttleylaff you don hear? |
lordswill03:You and that guy na the same thing. Because you think having only female children is some kind of punishment. |
balingaonline:I actually bought and I've still not gone beyond the first few pages. Shakespeare has always done me in. |
The Brothers Karamazov. Dropped it after the first few pages.
Straight to Wikipedia for summary. |
Lizilicious:Hmm.. I actually enjoyed it. |
I have always said it that monogamy is unnatural. I did not know that pigeons are the only monogamous creatures. Since Muttleylaff likes to use animal homosexuality as a point when trying to defend the the anomaly that is same-sex relationships. I wonder what he would say here. Over to you Muttley.
|
Amandobolt:What's the importance of a male child? |
chris31:What's the importance of a male child? Because me I don't know. |
IamPlato:You dey quarrel with Google?
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (of 307 pages)


