₦airaland Forum

Christianity is a joke these days. From church members eating snakes, to rolling in the mud and now, they are receiving phone calls and WhatsApp messages from guy who died over 2000 years ago

Diademk07:
Lmao..

Messi bowed out of the CL because he was rubbish in decisive matches, all his padding in the group stages mean nothing if he can't do it when it matters most.

And nope, it's not by dribbling into the midfield. Left to me, I think he's disrupting the shape in the team by having to constantly drop into the midfield while leaving his wing open to the opposition to attack. It's even stupid to think it's because he couldn't get the ball on the wing when the team is all about the front trio. The truth is his off the ball movement is quite rubbish and that's why he has to always be in the centre...

BTW, dribbling in non-threatening areas is rubbish. Hence, let me point to you that goals isn't Cristiano strength but his off the ball movement which attest to his intelligence, that can't be said of Messi! Kapish!

There's a lot of idiocy up there but am going to deal with one -
Messi doesn't have off the ball movement.? Pray tell, how does he have 57 goals this season. A lot more than the chairman of off the ball movement has.?

Yonce:
Of course football is also about creating chances. . . . .but when these chances are not converted to goals. . . . . .is the aim of football not defeated?

I'm only pointing out that chances is not everything, and you can't undermine goal scoring and accuse Ronaldo of being only a goal scorer.

Smh... Who's undermining goalscoring?
The simple argument is that Messi is the best goalscorer and yet the most creative player

Yonce:
And I repeat, shut that àss in your face you call a mouth. Only undiluted shìt spews from it. . . . . . . .what is the aim of football?


To play for 90 minutes, create chances and not score goals?

Do chances win you trophies? Write your name in history books? Tell me, what the fùck is the aim of 22 grown àss men pursuing a leather ball for 90 minutes if all they have to show is chances created?

If he's specialty is scoring goals then we'll appreciate him for that and many other things he does to the beautiful game that you refuse to acknowledge.

But truly, he's the king of the pepper them gang

God! You're even more stupid than I thought.

If chance is not created how will the goal scorer score his goals?

Players like modric, kroos,, isco, ozil don't score goals, so that means they are totally useless,shey?

Maradona, one of the best players ever didn't score up to 400 goals

I can't believe someone who supposedly watches football made that type of slow comment.

malvisguy212:
see bro, because God is omniscient does not mean God will pretend All is fine with men when it not For example, in Genesis 6:6 , the Lord was sorry because of the rampant sin that mankind had fallen into. so, even though God knew what was going to happen, He was sad that human beings were thinking only about how to sin more and more. We basically have the same reaction to our own children. We grieve when they make bad choices, although if we had it to do over, we would still have brought them into the world.

This is nonsense. If God is omniscient, he can't repent of anything.

Felixomor, answer the simple question. Where did the Egyptians make an agreement with Yahweh

felixomor:
Firstly, i never said its ok.
I said it was an "agreement" (but u changed it to "it is ok" )
You thought i didnt see that?

And Mind you, this was before Jesus Christ's coming and era of grace.

Secondly, At the same time, you are asking me to show you the agreement?
Why are u asking me to show you the agreement?

Are u not supposed to have finished the bible and found out that there is no such agreement between God and people?
And then arrived at conclusion that God was "evil"?

This is what you do when you have messed up, you dumb down arguments

So the question is is it okay or not?

U are the one claiming there is an agreement, so show us where the agreement is. But I know that you will keep dodging because there is no where in the bible that an agreement like that was made.

felixomor:
You are trying to play emotional games with agreement ba?

The answer is Yes.

This is exactly the root of atheism, people not wanting to take responsibility for their actions and agreements.

This is the reason Christians are more likely to be racists than irreligious people. You're saying that its okay to kill children for the sins of their parents.

So if the Nigerian government starts imprisoning children of criminals, you'll support it

Still have not answered my question. Where in the bible did the Egyptians make an agreement with Yahweh

felixomor:
That was the agreement they made with God.
It was simply terms and conditions.
Or you dont know what "terms and conditions" mean?

Go read it.

1. So as long as there's an agreement BTW myself and someone, it's okay to kill the person's children for his offense. I need you to answer yes or no

2. Where in the bible did the Egyptians or amalekites make an agreement with God.

Seriously, there is Islamic terrorism. The first step in solving a problem is identifying that the problem exists.

felixomor:
Their death was done to wipe out the names of their parents who chose to disobey God.
They were warned before hand.

Besides, Babies dont have souls that are eternally liable.
So when they die they go back to their maker.

So you're saying it's okay to kill babies for the sin of their parents.?? Yes or no

One question about morality

Does God prohibit killing because it's bad or is killing bad because God prohibited it?

If it's the former, it means there is a higher reason or morality than God.

If it's the latter, it means God acts without reason or purpose i.e. insanity

felixomor:
God is a Judge.
It is the work of a judge to repay evil with evil.
Its called justice.
The evil you highlighted there comes after people commited evil and abominations they were commanded not to.

But unfortunately, you wont read those verses before it.
Why?, because you simply read the bible because of argument.

So the babies of the Egyptians and amalekites that were brutally murdered were guilty of what evil acts?

Yonce:
So this mòtherfucker decides to tag Barcelona a small club just to drag Ororo's name through the mud

Dude your brain should be donated for experiments.

It's obvious you don't understand English... I didn't tag barca a small club. I said they are a smaller club than Madrid.

If I say Ronaldo is shorter than Mandzukic, does it mean Ronaldo is short?

Your brain shouldn't even be used for experiment, it should be thrown to the dogs

Yonce:
So now it's called goal poaching?!

When the owner of your soul whose dìck you suck for wisdom scored 91 goals when he had the best midfield in the world feeding him the ball you creamed yourself and called it "master class"
Now Ororo is enjoying the same privilege and your dying brain cells call it "poaching"

I just can't. . . .*facepalm*

When Messi scored 91 goals, he was still very involved in chance creation. He was still taking on players but Ronaldo's only specialty is scoring goals. That's the difference but you're probably too slow to understand that

Nihilist:
who is this nutter?

That's the kind of thing you say when you have no counter

Krasid:
You lie! CR7 is the best at it! He had bested Messi in terms of goals scored for the past 4 seasons and was criticised for statpadding against small teams.This season he focused on top teams, and boy did they all felt his presence.It took just 20 minutes for C.baba to make a mockery of the 'world's best defence'. Messi on the other hand statpadded against weak teams, with his only goal in the K.O stages of the UCL coming via a p.k vs PSG; a match in which he looked lost and which took the reselience of Neymar to take Barca through.

Ronaldo has been playing as a goal poacher while Messi has been the creative fulcrum of the team in midfield. Despite that fact, Messi has a superior goal per match average, better accuracy and higher conversion rate...
Messi is the best goalscorer and chance creator in the world

Nihilist:
Messi was playing for what?

The lies you pharisees tell ehn...

You really want to argue that Madrid is a bigger club than barca

Nihilist:
The fact that Ronaldo has more goals than Messi and yet less team honours ultimately just proves how wack Madrid has been in recent times.

Ronaldo has done every single thing that Messi has done. Messi cannot say the same about Ororo. Ororo has won league titles in two different countries. Messi has not acheived anything without Iniesta and Xavi. Ororo has won Europen titles for his country. Messi cannot achive anything without Iniesta and Xavi.

For the vast majority of their careers, Messi has played with the better team mates. He has played alongside Balon Dor winners, Balon Dor Silver medalists, Balon Dor Bronze Medalists, and of course Iniesta and Xavi. Ronaldo has been playing with Fabio Coenrtrao and John Oshea.

Messi has been playing and failing with Di Maria, Higuain, Diego Millito, Sergio Aguero, etc. Ronaldo won the European trophy playing with Eder and Jose freaking Fonte.

Any non-hater would be ashamed to utter the bollocks you typed up ther, but you descendants of Pontius Pilate are without shame or honour. You are a hater, pure and simple. it's so obvious that you are pained and intensely bitter right now. Sadly for you, we Ororo fans pledge allegiance to the Pepperdemgang alliance.

I hope you feel the pain like aboniki balm on your sphincter bro. I hope it burns you real good.

https://www.ronaldo7.net/news/2014/03/806-benzema-and-cristiano-ronaldo-having-a-laugh.jpg

Ronaldo has played with the better teammates. Even in 2011,_ the peak of Barca's dominance, Madrid had better players.
Cassilas- valdes
Ramos- pique
Puyol was better than Pepe
Alves was better than arheloa
Marcelo> abidal
Alonso>. Busquets
Xavi and iniesta were better than ozil and khedira
Villa was better than benzema
And di maria was better than pedro
That's 5-5 .. Now if you consider the bench where Madrid had essien, varane, hihuain, etc , Madrid had better players and more money. The difference was Messi

Nihilist:
IMO Ronaldo has surpassed Maradona a long time ago. I personally believe hes on par or even beyond Pele when the the parameters are adjusted to factor in differences in era, but that's a different argument.

Messi is pushing him close, and has age on his side, but currently Ororo is the greatest footballer of the modern age...

Nice try but Messi is still superior to Ronaldo. He has a superior goal per match average, more assists, creates more chances, dribbles past more players and has won more trophies.

All these he has done while playing for the smaller club,and being two years younger

Has anyone ever wondered that with the number of pastors that we have in Nigeria, who claim to perform miracles, no popular disabled person has been healed. Cobhams, Ayefele etc. It's only unknown people whose testimonies cannot be verified

.. This is a comment on testimonies generally

Richirich713:
I don't think that's the whole reason god commanded that and I'm not even certain that "innocent" children were ever killed.

It's either you don't know the bible at all or you're being dishonest. Either way, that's disgraceful.
This is what the bible says
15 Samuel said to Saul, “I am the one whom the Lord sent to anoint you king of his people Israel. Now listen to what the Lord Almighty says. 2 He is going to punish the people of Amalek because their ancestors opposed the Israelites when they were coming from Egypt. 3 Go and attack the Amalekites and completely destroy everything they have. Don't leave a thing; kill all the men, women, children, and babies; the cattle, sheep, camels, and donkeys.”

Richirich713:
Yep, because I know God being omnibenevolent, omni etc, will always have sufficient and good reasons for anything he commands. It's like asking if I would follow the command of a being that has perfect knowledge and always prevents suffering and evil by a hundred fold, obviously I'll follow that being's command since he has perfect knowledge and has a good reason for all his commands, namely to prevent evil nd suffering a 100 fold (not a perfect example of what I'm getting to but it gets the gist of it). God is a being that will always have sufficient/good reasons for anything he commands due to his omni attributes.

So in the bible when God said Saul should kill all the amalekites because their ancestors prevented the Israelites from passing through their country, was that a benevolent reason?

Richirich713:
That's moving the goal post, he never said anything about omnipotence, he said under no circumstances will he kill an innocent child - implying that it is always immoral to kill an innocent child regardless of the circumstances.

if you agree with me that in those circumstances it's OK to shoot that plane down then u agree with me that there are situations in which taking an innocent life is not immoral. Meaning that it's not always immoral to take an innocent life.

Plus if you want to include omnipotence, you also have to include omniscience and omnibenevolence. Meaning, if God commanded one to kill an innocent child - he'll always have sufficient reasons for doing so due to his omni attributes. He would also have the right to do so since he's the creator and sustainer of that life.

So answer the question, if God told u to kill children, would you do it?

Richirich713:
Under no circumstances will he kill an innocent child, sounds like a lie - what if children were on a plane heading into to the twin towers? Pretty sure he' would try to stop that plane,even if it meant shooting it down, killing the children.

If he's truly an omnipotent god, then he should be able to stop the plane without killing the children. That's the meaning of omnipotence

KingEbukasBlog:
I didn't say that Christians can't be poor . But when Christians are poor or in need of help fellow Christians who are well to do help them out as Christ ordered , same thing the disciples did during the early times of Christianity .

Unlike the atheists who have no morality and wish evil even unto fellow atheists .

If this were true, then there would be no Christians going hungry or starving to death, but that's not the case

In fact, the countries which are most charitable are largely irreligious

KingEbukasBlog:
Christians are just 32 percent of the world's population and they have 55 percent of the world's wealth . That means the other 68 percent of the world's population will have to compete for 45 percent of the world's wealth . That's massive and very significant .

What percentage of the world's poorest people are Christians

dalaman:
Is there any recording of Jesus ascending into heaven on YouTube?

The guy is just dodging now, he knows he fumbled by saying the truth should be accepted on the basis of its merit only

KingEbukasBlog:
Where did I dodge ? I told you where you can find them on the internet . Its even on YouTube . Its everywhere

Guy, you're high on something, evidence that Jesus is lord is on YouTube?....

KingEbukasBlog:
The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Christ . You can read scholarly articles on the web for more information.

Lol..... I asked for evidence that Jesus is Lord..... Why are u dodging?

KingEbukasBlog:
Historical and archaeological evidences

Is this a joke?
Which historical or archeological evidence proves that Jesus is Lord and that he died for our sins

KingEbukasblog, you have not answered my question, on what merit do we accept the bible as the truth