₦airaland Forum

People who served god and died... Bimbo Odukoya, Myles Munroe, the people who died when those churches collapsed last year, the Christians killed by boko haram terrorists

Should I continue

KAYD007:
Element of lesbo/gay relationship is what most of these movies are propagating these days.....not nice usually fast forward such scenes.

Yh, I fast forward the gay scenes but the lesbo scenes, I don't mind

Although, I don't support this theory about the whites trying to sell the idea of gayness to us.. These kinds of things are part of their lives there, the films are just a representation of that

dubylhover:
bruh,you cud say that you love the originals well,but how can you say its better than the blacklist...in the whole cast of TVs and originLs,they can't have d privilege of having the quality of Raymond reddington in their midst

Exactly, that's the only thing special about blacklist. The character of reddington . I actually started loving that guy from Boston legal- when he still had hair..
But apart from that, the series is just like the average action series

Edenoscar:
really?
Will i understand it without watching vampire dairies

Definitely.... I actually started watching originals before VD.

Edenoscar:
i watched vampire dairies movie and hated it so there's no way am going to try the series,when someone told me to try originals i found out that it was kind of a spin off from vampire dairies, so am curious to know what people find interesting in them that has almost 300 pages here,
As for the series i watch,
blacklist,arrow,gotham

Blacklist is not that dope now... I've not watched arrow and Gotham tho' but from what I've heard, they ain't dope, either.
Originals is better than the three of them joined together

Edenoscar:
top 3 tv series i will never watch
1.vampire dairies
2.vampire diaries
3.the originals
wetin una see for that show sef

You are missing.. vampire diaries is not that dope but originals is something else... If I may ask, what series do uwatch

At last, a lesbo relationship in the originals... But that wolf girl will just make Freya more vulnerable.. Like it tho', it seems the lesbo thing is a new experience for both of them

hensben:
Quit agree. But it didn't change the fact that on the field of play Lampard did more than iniesta.

Wait? What are awards like ballon d'or, MVP, Fifpro for? For activities done on the bed?
Players, coaches and pundits have recognized iniesta's contribution on the pitch many more times than they have recognized lampard.. That's the hard fact

hensben:
It still boils down to the more your team success the chances of a player climbing the podium.

.
Why are you giving excuses now? If it's all down to team success, then how come players like busquets and pique and alba didn't have the same individual honors...
Hide all you want, the fact remains that iniesta trumps lampard when it comes to individual achievements...

hensben:
we can't compare cos Barca as a team are better than Chelsea over the years so it is expected. Lampard dominated in a team Barca is better than.

The truth is any di.ck and Harry can win so many trophies while at Barca. Spot the difference.

Then let's talk about individual achievements.. Like ballon d'or podium or fifpro 11 or MVP awards

hensben:
Like Lampard don't have trophies and individual honors. Mtweeeww

Uhm, do you want to compare

Ibime:
I have no obsession with Iniesta. I only have obsession with frauds and Iniesta happens to be the most prominent one.

How do you explain the fact that Xavi scored or assisted exactly 50% of Spain's tournament knockout goals, and Iniestas only contribution was being in the right place at the right time vs Holland, and one assist in a whitewash of Russia, yet takes more credit.

I have been stating for the last 5 years that Iniesta had absolutely nothing to do with Barca's famed midfield dominance with his paltry 60 passes per match, and true to word, as soon as Xavi retired, Barca's stifling midfield dominance disappeared like the fart of a leprous witch. They have been blaming it on old age since Iniesta was 30.

I love seeing pained posts like this from shekpe fans... The sheer joy!
Actual pundits, not someone that is only the boss on the Chelsea thread on nairaland, have named him the best midfielder of his era.Easily trumping lampard. Let lampard keep his goals and assists while iniesta keeps his trophies and individual honors that actually matter

So general question to all barca fans... How many of you would like a sale of Neymar to PSG for #250 million to fund the purchase of verratti, hazard and probably an okay right back

Ibime:
Really? Even Barca fans won't call him the best midfielder in La Masia these days. But the parapo is strong on this one, so like I said, not to worry, he will still be voted UEFA midfielder of the season.

Keep crying foul while he keeps surpassing lampard in every parameter that matters

Ibime:
What is there to disgrace about 500 career goals + assists. The only disgrace is the carryalong Eunuch. At the age of 32 which Iniesta is now, Lampard was scoring 27 goals in a season with 20 assists.

At 32 iniesta is still recognized as the best midfielder in the world

mina16:
and also where is that written in the bible ??

Matthew 16:28

Praise god, Halleluyah!! Our God that can't provide food for the children dying of hunger daily has provided for his church...
I'm sure the man will be made a deacon or elder.

DoctorAlien:
"Go ye up unto this feast: I go not up yet unto this feast: for my time is not yet full come. When he had said these words unto them, he abode still in Galilee. But when his brethren were gone up, then went he also up unto the feast, not openly, but as it were in secret." Jn. 7:8-10

He probably didn't see the bolded word because he is a freethinker.

Don't be silly, I quoted verbatim from the Good News bible

space007:
I think you should read the whole verse, incase you don't know where, its JOHN 7:1-14 you'll find your answer

Read the whole thing.. Still looks like a lie to me

southniyikaye:
Change your name from randomperson to
Idiotperson
Illiterateperson
Uselessperson
Moronicperson
Nonentityperson
Stupidperson
Alainilariperson

I think you should have a better grasp of English language before you comment on a public forum like this... Your comment is just another indictment on the standard of education in Nigeria

So Christians say that Jesus lived without committing a single sin. However, these verses show that Jesus told a lie...
8 You go on to the festival. I am not going to this festival, because the right time has not come for me.” 9 He said this and then stayed on in Galilee.
10 After his brothers had gone to the festival, Jesus also went; however, he did not go openly, but secretly.

John 7: 8-10
So, basically Jesus said he wasn't going to the festival but later went secretly. So he lied or am I getting this all wrong

Saying god is beyond logic is lazy and dangerous...
If you evade questions about the logical impossibilities surrounding the Christian god by saying merely that he's beyond logic, then when we ask boko haram terrorists why their god needs so much death and destruction to make his point, or when we ask the next Andrea Yates why she killed her children, the easy answer is that God is beyond logic....
We have thousands of gods. If they are all beyond logic then by what method do you determine the right one

davtosh:
Do u mean it could have as well been created by aliens?

If that is the case you at least believe it was created by someone you only cant take it that God created it.

The point is to show that the idea of god makes as much or even less sense than the idea of aliens. So why should I subscribe to one and reject the other

ilynem:
Abundant imperfections you say? Like??

Like earthquakes and tsunamis

DoctorAlien:
Very ignorant post. Only a simple human being devoid of any shred of understanding doesn't know that death and infirmities are the curses of sin.

I'd advise you to spend more time on your books than you do trying to appear intelligent to a group of confused individuals.

If sinning is wrong and an omnipotent god created humans who are subject to falling into sin then god didn't do a perfect job

ilynem:
Hmmmm. So I guess this makes a lot more sense than everything we see today coming out of nothing? Wow

You're completely missing the point... It makes more sense than claiming a world with abundant imperfections was intelligently designed by an omnipotent being. It's just illogical

adepeter26:
Dr CatfishBilly done hook Dr Felix today....

Sleeping brain part 2....

Soon ehh, Felix go lose relevance on NL

Felixomor lost relevance a long time ago

Op conveniently ignored the part of the bible that says god chose Jacob over Esau even before they were born.


[b]11-12 But in order that the choice of one son might be completely the result of God's own purpose, God said to her, “The older will serve the younger.” He said this before they were born, before they had done anything either good or bad; so God's choice was based on his call, and not on anything they had done. 13 As the scripture says, “I loved Jacob, but I hated Esau.”
[/b]
God already chose Jacob before he was born, if that's not partiality, I don't know what is.

OLAADEGBU:
With today's satellite/Cable TV, is it possible to watch an event simultaneously around the world?

But not everyone will be watching TV or be on the internet at that time. In fact, not everyone has access to them

blueAgent:
All your percieved Bible contradictions are just misunderstood Bible verses taken out of context ,that can easily be harmonized when the Bible is carefully studied with an unbaised mind.

Lol .. The Christian claiming he's reading the bible with an unbiased mind

blueAgent:
Keep decieving yourself. The Evidence of God's existence is all around you. you choose not to see or acknownledge them.

If you don't believe in Evolution and bigbang,then how did the Universe came into existence?

I don't know how the universe came into existence... But I don't believe a book that has two conflicting accounts of creation...
How do you know it's your own bible that is correct and other religious books are wrong?

felixomor:
Of course, your first argument was to imply that the priests brought the money.
That is the rhetoric u were trying to push.

No... I merely said it was the priests' decision. Why cant u just admit u misunderstood me? It happens to everyone