₦airaland Forum

asunmoGGMU:
See this slowpoke calling me a coward. Did any RINALDO play for ARGENTINA? I don't know of any Rinaldo of Argentina descent. I don't answer foolish question.

Okay what are Ronaldo's individual achievements with Portugal?

asunmoGGMU:
Did I say it affect it? You just need some education as regards that man Ronaldo. Leave your cave where you twist stats and know more about Ronaldo.

Both of them are simply greats. Dnt pull down one for another.

Now u are cowering, am not pulling him down, just saying Messi is better

asunmoGGMU:
Lols... You are a stubborn ignorance. Did I say Maradona didnt play for Barca? So you agree Olympic isnt an official tournament to FIFA, yet you have the effrontery to tell me to get my fact right?

By the way, who is that Rinaldo that played for Argentina?

If you know me very well, you won't prolong this issue. I'll only expose your ignorance more.

Why are u avoiding the question, don't be a coward...

DoctorAlien:
Creation as narrated in the Bible. As a matter of fact, it is the only sensible account for the existence of life.

Sensible are u fvcking kidding me?? The creation story that says light was created before sun. Or which creation story are u talking about because there are two different ones in the bible

asunmoGGMU:
I don't feign brilliancy in ignorance. I know Messi has been more influential in El-Classico than Ronaldo until lately that he has gone anonymous in all of their most recent meetings. I won't refute the truth.

Meanwhile, go and find out the Real Madrid player with the highest goals in Nou Camp.

How does that affect Messi's influence in classicos

asunmoGGMU:
Brilliant, I can see you are ready for argument devoid of peddling false stats now.

Maradona joined Napoli as a mid-table team and won them the Serie A with his illustrious performances. He won Argentina the world cup.

Now let me educate you, Olympic medal is not a major tournament to FIFA and Euro tournament is. Meanwhile, Ronaldo won the Euro for Portugal. You wonder why he wept after their victory against France? Even with his numerous trophy at 31?

U don't know your football facts... Maradona also played for barca...
Olympic medal is not recognized by FIFA because it's not organized by FIFA...
And why are u avoiding my question... What are Rinaldo's individual achievements for Argentina??

asunmoGGMU:
So, you agree it is ridiculous from you with that 21 against 16? Now, I think you have receive sense.

Next time, dnt muddle up statistics to prove point.

The facts show Messi has been more influential in classicos than Ronaldo... Can u refute that fact

asunmoGGMU:
Who proclaim your idiotic analogy superior?

You are just ridiculous. I am only telling you if Messi is three times better than Ronaldo, then he is probably the greatest. Now I ask, how can he be that you ascribe to him when he cnt win a major trophy for Argentina. No be you talk sey na im dey win those UCL trophy for the coaches? Receive sense, Man!

Maradona didn't win champions league... That doesn't affect his legendary status in any way... Messi has reached four finals, won three individual awards with Argentina, has the highest goal and assists ever for Argentina and has an Olympic medal... What is Rinaldo's individual achievement with Portugal

ambassagod:
please stop insulting yourself.

help yourself with this.

Can u read?? Proof establishes, evidence indicates...

ambassagod:
are you afraid??

Afraid of what?? Am on the ballon d or thread, so I don't have the time to be repeating myself... Check my other comments but if you don't understand tell me.. I will create the time for u

asunmoGGMU:
Stop being half-smart. The idiocy was when you compare Ronaldo against Messi H2H as 16 to 21 goals. You only corrected yourself.

Should I send you the screen grab. Perhaps, you have forgotten you typed that poo.

Oh I see the problem now... U don't have any argument to make for Ronaldo so u are sticking to this ridiculousness... Well....peace!

Elxandre:
you obviously don't know that the voting has already being closed for a long time.

we all know messi has had a headstart this season, hence the seeming gap in yearly stat.


In the past, Pre Messi-Ronaldo era. what mattered was who finished the season stronger. Early season form meant nothing.

Stop being delusional... Even as at July Messi had better stats... Last year doesn't count. What part of this is too difficult to understand

asunmoGGMU:
We are comparing Ronaldo and Messi, not Nikoladis and Modric. Stop this idiocy.

I think Messi is three times better than Ronaldo? Tell him to go and win a major tournament for Argentina.

Pls, next time you will quote, dont bring your usual silly analogy or example again if you cnt let it be an example/analogy between Messi and CR7.

Rubbish... You are being floored by superior argument and u are looking for a way out...
Lemme explain the analogy to you... U are using international honor as an argument for Ronaldo and an showing u why its a silly argument... Gerrit now?

Elxandre:
ole!!!
last season Messi had 41 goals 23 assists
Ronaldo 51 goals 15 assists.

stop being dishonest. some of us watch football too.

Don't be stupid... Ballon d or is not for a season but for a calendar calendar year. There's watching and there's thinking

asunmoGGMU:
I thought you have evidence of 16 against 21? Hehehehe....

Is this idiocy real or are u feigning idiocy? Messi has more average wins, average goals, average everything... How many goals has Ronaldo scored against arsenal and in how many games??

asunmoGGMU:
Yes, Messi is 3 times better than Ronaldo in your own sentiment bruised thinking.

A player that cant win major trophy for his country is still a learner.

U know Nikoladis?? He has won the euros with Greece, that means he is better than modric and Rooney and bale? See how foolish your comment is?

ambassagod:
this guy is ignorant

The pics u posted only aid my argument. But I guess your powers of comprehension are terrible.
Read what u posted... Proof ESTABLISHES, Evidence INDICATES

asunmoGGMU:
The onus of foolishness is on you that peddle false statistics.

Is the H2H of CR7 and Messi in El-Classico 16 against 21 goals? NO!

So, what are you saying? Go on and receive sense.

The onus of foolishness is on you?? What the hell does that even mean??
Do u have any evidence to show that Ronaldo is better than Messi?

asunmoGGMU:
Man, I repeat, your analogy is warped laced with sentiment. That coaches haven't won UCL before coaching Barcelona and winning it doesn't automatically make Messi the best. Messi is brilliant, like Ronaldo, no doubt. What I frown at is shifting the goal post in argument to deify Messi.

Meanwhile, being the highest goal scorer is a mean feat. You think sey na beans?

Of course, no be beans... But being the highest goalscorer, the best dribbler and the most creative player at the same time... Now that's true genius... It's like having Ronaldo, hazard and Ozil all rolled into one. Messi is three times the player Ronaldo is

asunmoGGMU:
Olodo... Read your initial post. You were comparing 21 to 16, which Messi's 21 goals span through before Ronaldo's arrival. Stop being a dunce.

I am only correcting your idiocy.

It's foolish to point that out when Messi still has a higher g/m average and assists too... M

Elxandre:
Messi has been in La Liga for at least 5 years before Ronaldo.
KNow your facts.

Shey all of Una no fit read nii... Been explaining the same thing to all of you. Messi has higher goals per match average

ambassagod:
there is evidence of evolution but not proof of evolution?
LMAO

do you derive fun in being deluded? just asking.

tell me the difference between evidence of evolution and proof of evolution.

God!! I have to school you again?? Okay, listen very well.
Someone is charged for murder, evidence might include the fact that there was a possible motive, that the accused was at the scene of the crime, that there was a threat of murder from the accused. All these are evidence but they are not proof. Get it now?? U compile each and every evidence to show proof. That's why cases are won by preponderance of evidence

Anas09:
It's called Oral Tradition. Handing down information by word of mouth from generation to generation.

Oral tradition is not reliable. It's consistently altered and cannot be verified... Greek mythologies, African folklores are all passed down through oral tradition

asunmoGGMU:
Hehehehe.... And see person wey sabi use google. Messi has been playing El-Classico before Ronaldo's arrival. Stop muddling fact with your ignorance.

Olodo... Messi still has higher goals per match average not to mention assists

asunmoGGMU:
What are you saying in essence? You mean the coaches were the reason Real and Man Utd won UCL and not Ronaldo and that doesn't apply to Messi? This your analogy is warped.

A player that was highest goal scorer in all the years Real and Man Utd won the prestigious competition?

That's not the argument... If u don't understand analogy, then u ask me to explain.
If u claim the players Messi played with is the reason he's superior to Ronaldo. What about the managers who coached Ronaldo??
And highest goalscorer doesn't mean best player

HardMirror:
Stop mentioning me anyhow. Use your brain for once in your life madam. Doest atheism make me an evolution scientist? By the way the evolution theory makes far more sense than your fairytale creation story. That one I am very sure is bullcrap, I am willing to wait and learn from scientists that follow a book the jews plagiarized

That one does not know anything jare... Free am

4everGod:
evidence for evolution? Where? Have u forgotten you called it "suggested evidence"?

It's still evidence... I already schooled u on the distinction between evidence and proof... Why do u insist on reveling in ignorance?? Don't be deceived, ignorance is not bliss

4everGod:
The 2 bonobos up there who know nothing about genetics but copy and paste. Garbage in garbage out now thing they know better than leading geneticists who have called evolution a sham and a disgrace.

I suggest they read the OP.

Funny how u ignored the evidence for evolution and ignored the lack of evidence for creationism

ambassagod:
Then tell me how more credible it is. I am all ears.

you can tutor me now.

I already tutored 4evergod, and a good student is one who can teach others... So why not ask him

ambassagod:
faith is ignorance at it's peak?? I am done.

but wait, can you prove to me that the copy and paste you did here is true and reliable?

anybody can just write anything stupid as this and kids like you who are gullible of knowing the real thing would swallow them up.

have you researched what he said and found it to be true?

Have u researched what 4everGod posted and found it to be true... Hypocrisy at its peak

ambassagod:
they got nothing, they are now anti-evolution I guess.

Lenycool cloudgoddess Johnny... where are you?

your effort is needed here please.

U people don't understand English... Evolution is not proven but it's more credible than creationism... This is common sense now... Is it that scarce these days?

4everGod:
Your fellow atheist say evolution is a fact and you are saying same since you said there is evidence. can we see this evidence?..

Or are you now shifting from evidence to suggestions of evidence?

Seems u don't know the different between evidence and proof...
Am going to use a legal definition because it's concise:
A fact which by itself or in connection with other facts, the existence, non- existence, probability, nature or extent of another fact is proven.
The proven facts are the existence of fossils and the anatomical and chemical similarities. They make the idea of evolution more probable.
Evolution is not a fact because there's not conclusive proof of it... Buh there are evidence to suggest the existence of evolution.
Gimme one evidence that points to the world created by your god as claimed in the bible