₦airaland Forum

Only Ibe Kachikwu, the new Boss of NNPC and his second wife, Elizabeth know what it is about their union that drives them to perpetuate one of the most enviable and durable versions of love.

These are the kinds of moronic BS some cretins write about marriages they know nothing about.

mytime24:
Must she cover her head
U no dey mosque na

Fake life

You can't see the female students cover their head?

goodgate:
May GOD show you MERCY!!!

The psychotic God has no mercy o. It is his way or fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiire!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIto5mwDLxo

4stylz:
May GOd be with you " books and scientists have made you believe trashy things

There is a GOd to answer to; whether you like it or not. It's better to believe in God now than to die and see he is for real.. it will be too late then

Why do you believe there is a God to answer to?

Why is it better to believe in God now?

And which God are you believing in?

Pendusky come and see life and what a world-class hotel looks like o.

Your only chance too see such in life.

See what the "great" Akpabio is enjoying while Akwa Ibom civil servants are owed months of salary.

He built a "world class" stadium for you though.

GlorifiedTunde:




COWARD!!!

HIS JUDGEMENT WILL BE SEVERE!!!

You are a fuuktard!

His jugdement by whom?

Your psychotic, illogical, ignorant and irrational God?

EnlightenedSoul:
Lovely! Merriam-Webster arrives on the scene - you've no idea how over-joyed I am for you right now. Kinda like the proud parent kid of a not-so-bright child who's on the verge of his first click!/eureka! moment after days of obsessive, regurgitated questioning.

Now, peruse this and the other definitions of "business", and add the term "orient-ed" to your search.

You've a LinkedIn profile, and yet somehow don't know or understand how its business-oriented? Highly doubtful! Were you lying about that, or are you an incredibly insolent, insensible FOB yet to latch on and figure it all out? I honestly can't tell.

Instead of all this rant and defiance, just tell us your understanding of what "business-oriented" is, so we can assess if LinkedIn is one.



The Classic: "I have been caught out with logic. I cannot defend any of my positions, but sod it, I'll stick with them defiantly".

EnlightenedSoul:
Now this is beyond irritating.

The only understanding of it there is! I implore you to make use of your dictionary and/or data, and stop asking needless questions. You're not trying at all.

The Classic: "I have been caught out with logic. I cannot defend any of my positions, but sod it, I'll stick with them defiantly".

That is why I asked the question. I knew you would prove me right.

Sagamite:
Business is a commercial activity that involves the buying and selling of goods.

I defend my positions ALWAYS, girl.

EnlightenedSoul:
[s][/s]
Funny, the bold is exactly what you've been doing all along.

Since we're 'balancing equations'...

LinkedIn = a business-oriented, professional platform.
Complimenting someone's appearance on LinkedIn = inappropriate and unwarranted.

Maybe that'll help you!

Your delusion changes not the truth, however hard you'd wish it to.

What is your understanding of "business-orientated"?

hayorzzyzx:
Former Governor Godswill Akpabio of Akwa Ibom
State, who is a current Nigerian senator, today
faced serious embarrassment at Mandarin
Oriental Hotel, a luxury five-star hotel in the
Knightsbridge area of London. Mr. Akpabio’s credit
card was declined as the ex-governor tried to check
in.

Mr. Akpabio had been in London to receive medical
treatment after his car bullet proof G-Wagon
Mercedes Benz collided with an American Embassy
diplomatic vehicle in Abuja. The accident had
occurred after Mr. Akpabio’s driver reportedly failed to stop at a traffic light.

At the reception of Mandarin Hotel, a flustered
Senator Akpabio, who wore a blue sports jacket, was visibly embarrassed on being told that his credit card had been denied. Two unidentified persons were with the former governor at the reception desk as he looked worried and flummoxed about the credit card predicament.

In the thick of the fiasco, the former governor was
heard barking orders at an official at Eco Bank in
Lagos. He persistently asked why his card was not
working.

Mr. Akpabio remained at the reception for a while,
apparently at the insistence of the hotel’s
management, who later checked him in.
Mr. Akpabio, who as governor claimed that he had
built a multi-million dollar “world class” hospital in
Uyo, the capital of Akwa Ibom, chose to be flown to
the UK for treatment after his accident.
When SaharaReporters reached the former
governor, he admitted that his card was declined
because he had used the card to check out of the
Four Seasons luxury hotel earlier today. Akpabio
stated that his credit card had maxed out of its daily
spending limit.

Akpabio also told SaharaReporters when asked why
he didn't check into the "World Class" clinic he built
in his home state for treatment, he denied
accusations that he had neglected to equip the so-
called top-tier hospital in Akwa Ibom. The former
governor claimed he had not rented equipment that
were shown to the media during the official unveiling of the hospital, adding that the delay in opening the hospital was due to Immigration processing relating to the doctors to be brought to work at the hospital .

Mr. Akpabio has emerged as the leader of the
Peoples Democratic Party in the National Assembly.

www.saharareporters.com/2015/09/16/former-governor-akpabios-credit-card-declined-london-hotel

A man who has through out his life been an employee for 7 years and after a career civil servant is flying to London on private jet for private hospital care and then is now checking into a £1000 a night 5-star hotel.

How can he afford it?

CROOK!

Pendusky, has your mother ever smelt a 2-star hotel, talk less of 5-star?

jesusjewel1:
And this guy has family members... he is a son born out of a woman....such a disgrace! mmttcchheeewwwwww

The one that offends me is the cretins that like to self-described themselves as "liberals", "open-minded", "progressive" etc who are pro-homosexuality and would argue nothing is wrong with being a homosexual.

No sane and right-thinking person should see this and not think there is a mental issue disturbing this person somewhere.

For someone to decide to want to take this poses is sickening.

For them to feel the URGE to share it with the world must surely be signs of mental health issues.

Homosexuality needs a cure, not acceptance.

Coolboi05:
All these ones asking if Denrele Edun is gay are the kinda people you will tell answer in the exam hall, and they will ask you to spell it....

Goosebaba, you will not come and compliment your boyfriend?

xynerise:
Aggression in women is something that sounds unusual. I have seen many cases where women act a bit too forward in making decisions and actions.
Society enforces the idea that men are aggressive and women are passive, and, while there might be a kernel of truth to this, it hides the fact that any woman can be as aggressive as any man.

For a man raised to believe women are incapable of that kind of aggression, it can be very jarring to be confronted with an aggressive woman. As a man, How do you handle it? Should you treat her as you'd treat an aggressive man or do you need to be more delicate?

What is your definition of aggression?

A woman "too forward in making decisions and actions"?

That is nonsense!

You expect them to behave like dullards and serviles to qualify as women?

Pure nonsense!!!

If you are talking about aggressive being "belligerent", "argumentative" and "physical hitter" women, then that is a different argument.

For those kind of women, I don't handle it. I have no interest whatsoever in handling it. I just leave it.

EnlightenedSoul:
[s][/s]

Lolll. Looks like you're still muddy on the word "business-oriented" from hours and posts gone by, but alas I dont expect much from you at this point. Bottom line, LinkedIn is a professional, business-oriented platform, and Silk's actions were grossly inappropriate. BTW, I'd hardly define Mikey D's as a professional environment and the paradon of professional etiquette, lol. What a joke.

Oh!

You are giving me "The Classic"?

The Classic is: "I have been caught out with logic. I cannot defend any of my positions, but sod it, I'll stick with them defiantly".

Never argue with the God of Logic. You should know better.

Business is a commercial activity that involves the buying and selling of goods.

Bottom lines are ............................ {Shrieks in terror}

{He used "bottom"? ........................He is sexist!!! .............He is sexually objectifying me on a forum}



Alibaba = business

LinkedIn =not business

Complimenting people = normal

Complimenting people =not sexism

EnlightenedSoul:
Lecture, indeed. And with all your unleashed delusions, poor scope of reasoning, a curious sense of comparative analysis, and strong conviction for steaming BS firing at all cylinders - there's still doubt in me as to who to "thank", and god seems the unlikely candidate. There is no reasoning with you, and as such its best that one have your space rather than your company. Adieu.

A feminist will always struggle with logic. To them, having and employing one is like having a disease.

A feminist should never tell others they are talking BS. A feminist exempliers the live form of BS.

EnlightenedSoul:
[s][/s]

Facepalm, indeed. Stop circling. Look it up, and dare to expand your knowledge base.

Expand it for me na.

What is the definition of "business" in your world?

2 professionals sitting down in a bench in a park?

EnlightenedSoul:
Secrets, my ar.se. More like more irrelevant BS, and it's for this reason I must ask you to stop "sharing". IDC about the state of politics in the UK, or what you feel is the cause for Trump's lead. I can as well guess for myself. You try my patience with your ineffectual straying.

Expand your knowledge, sweetie.

I am just correcting you that someone saying "it is not politically correct" is not evidence of him saying "it is wrong".

EnlightenedSoul:
It isn't.

So that "a lot" of them do it makes it appropriate? Or did I in any way claim that none of the aforementioned ever happens? And so fvcking what, a lot of fvcking men do the same and worse without being faulted in the least, and yet you've this fantasy perception that they're all generally getting gassed or sacked? GTFO. Are you living in opposite world now, when just a while ago, the little I told you was brushed off as 'whining' on my part?

Still, co-workers can def develop personal relationships outside the workplace. Having been on leave the last couple of months, I still see plenty of my co-workers more than half the time I normally would. Quite a few of them are friends now as we've done a lot together, and developed friendships out on the town, and so forth. However, the professional setting calls for a muted, formal type of contact that leaves no room for "so are you in a relationship?" and all the other such BS you felt pressed to ask about. In a normal, professional clime, that type of interaction occurs outside the formal professional work setting, in breakrooms, pre/post shift hours, during lunch, and outside the workplace altogether.

Even the occasional office fling or what have you is cryptically hidden from others in the workplace, and all "hitting on" and nurturing of the 'relationship' occurs outside the doors of the establishment, and not within the professional setting itself. For someone who supposedly worked in professional environments, you seem to have a befuddled idea of them. Of course, I've no idea what your idea of a professional environment entails in the first place, or how the hell it is they do things over there anyhow. But being that the function of LinkedIn still eludes you, I can only guess.

I'm tired, and I'm off!

In your lunatic feminist world it is wrong to ask such questions as "so are you in a relationship?". In the sane, normal, everyday world, is informality and casualness that exist, is accepted and is appropriate in the work place.

Nonsense about occasional office fling occuring only outside the doors of the establishement.

Absolute nonsense!

From McDonalds to Goldman Sachs, people approach and chat each other up at the work place.

Thank God, I lectured you. I noticed you now don't use the term "business" anymore.

EnlightenedSoul:
[s][/s]

More arrant BS, and arguing for arguments sake.

If you still misunderstand the word "business-oriented", and/or doubt that LinkedIn is a business-oriented platform, I'd stongly urge you with the same suggestion I made earlier (yet AGAIN). Verify my words! End of.

I beg to be corrected.

My understanding of "business" is a commercial activity that involves the buying and selling of goods.

Do you have an alternative definition?

Or are you going to provide me with the Annual Sales figures of the commercial activities that take place on LinkedIn, madame?

Or are you going to admit you are chatting BS?



*Facepalm*: People that don't understand the meaning of words they use.

EnlightenedSoul:
Complimenting the picture is also an inappropriate act on the platform as she's neither a model, nor of any other profession wherein her appearance would be deemed relevant in the bringing up. It is evident in the way he worded the "compliment" that he too knew it to be inappropriate at the time. Any time you begin a sentence with the model, "I know this is terribly blah BUT/ I know I shouldn't say this blah BUT", it's apparent that you're subconsciously aware of the fact that you shouldn't be saying what it is you're about to say, but are saying it anyway.

Unfortunately for you, some of us have worked in professional environments.

And to expose your BS, let me let you into a secret: "It is quite normal and frequent to compliment people on their appearance in a professional setting".

Another secret! (Jeez, I am sharing a lot with you here) He is aware that there are many lunatics in the UK who are quick to be offended or find something sexist, that was why he used the term "Politically correct". We are dealing with an epidemic of minority but vocal liberal ediots in the UK who see every negative truth and fact stated as "offensive" or "politically incorrect" and attack people based on this, not addressing the fact a truth is being stated. People are now sick and tired of these ediots.

They are having that in America too, no wonder Donald Trump is exploiting it to rise to the top of presidential candidates. People now want plain and blunt speakers. They have seen the damage cretinous liberals can cause.

So don't take that statement as an admission of wrongdoing. It is a figure of speech or an acknowledgement of social madness.

EnlightenedSoul:
Nonsense! Re-read my former comment. You cannot compare hitting on people in the workplace to using light humor in a meeting! GTFO.

Again, you're veering from LinkedIn, which is the premise of our conversation and what this thread is based on. But no, it is not appropriate for a woman to ask male colleagues "So, are you in a relationship?" in a professional setting. What nonsense.

They are all informal and casual behaviour, something you initially argued was not for a professional setting.

Well, a lot of women do. And no one screams "sexist", ask them to apologise or be sacked. We just see it as normal, unoffensive human informal and casual interaction.

Informal and casual behaviour are okay in the professional setting.

EnlightenedSoul:
[s][/s]
Take a good look at your post.

Other than the grossly illogical comparison of hitting on someone in a professional setting to introducing humor (to which there are limitations galore in the workplace - call it 'formal/clean humor') into meetings to increase collegial morale, create an environment open to contribution and creativity, and offer the general pick-me-up the mode of humor is widely known to afford, what other new comment/observation/theory/etc is put forth in this here long-winded post of yours? Or is it a main objective of yours to either exasperate me to silence (as before), or bore me to death with regurgitate?? For were I a cat, I can easily tell you that, by now, I already would've died the requisite nine deaths fabled to be necessary for eternal rest.

I take it you have decided to drop (or rather dodge for now) the whole "business" argument.

As I said at the end of it: "Sorry, feminist, you can't beat that argument. No matter how much you struggle to".

That was the first lecture.

Now let me give you a second logical lecture.

He complimented her picture, it is presumptuous to say that is an act or the beginning of an act to "hit[ting] on her". By "hit on her", we both have the legal understanding that this means trying to woo her, not physically assault her. (Now you got me speaking legalese)

Whether the belief that he is hitting on her is right or wrong, it is "pressumptuous". It is not a confirmed fact he was hitting on her. The only fact there was that he complimented her picture.

Secondly, you are the one that insinuated informal and casual behaviours are not allowed in a professional setting. Now, all of a sudden, you already see a place for it to "increase collegial morale, create an environment open to contribution and creativity"?

Wow! You sure quickly change your unreasoned positions when analogies break down the logic to make your position look silly.

"Sweatheart", informal and casual behaviours are not an abomination in a professional setting. Actually majority of people prefer it because majority are sane people, not lunatic feminists.

The informal and casual behaviours that are unacceptable in the professional setting are the ones that make a business lose money or harass someone else. Or when it is overused at the detriment of the benefits of professionalism. (Lecture here, girl. I hope you are jotting it down)

He has not gone past any unreasonable boundaries with his informal and casual behaviour with his compliment.

PAUSE!!!

PAUSE there and let that sink into your brain.

That is a fundamental point!

It was not like if he said "I want to suck your boobs" or something like that.

All he said was "your picture looks nice".

Even if we accept the presumption that he was hitting on her (based on personal interpretation, not facts) are you telling me we have to sack all those women in the work place who are quick to ask young guys "So are you in a relationship?" because (based on sharp guys' interpretations) they are looking for guys that are available for them or their friends?

Are they not being informal and casual in a professional setting my asking that?

If that is acceptable for the professional environment and we should not sack them, why is hitting on women not, Ms Feminist?

Would you say that question is also "sexist"?






...... I know now you are stuck. You can't come back from this.

EnlightenedSoul:
1) You seem not to understand the meaning of the term "business-oriented". Yes, LinkedIn is a business-oriented professional networking platform used for recruitment, job offers to applicable candidates, sharing business information/articles, and connecting with a pertinent 'web' of professional contacts to help you along in your career. It is in NO way a "social Facebook" for professionals.

It is professional-orientated, not business-orientated.

Virtually no business is conducted on it. It you want to do business, go to Alibaba.

Because I share a business article in my class in university does not mean I am engaging in a business enterprise or activity.

Don't be confusing terms like the fuuktard who does not understand what "pervert" and "strange" means.

It is a Facebook for professionals, just like facebook is for friends and family. Facebook itself was not set up as a dating site, but we live in a real world where normal people can, and do, approach each other.

Sorry, feminist, you can't beat that argument. No matter how much you struggle to.

EnlightenedSoul:
2) No, it is neither appropriate nor professional to bring up comment(s) pertaining to the physical appearance/looks of a colleague in a professional setting. That is INFORMAL, CASUAL behavior.

So those that date at work should be sacked or are sexist (I mean the man is sexist, as I would expect in your view, the woman is just a victim even if she made the move)?

Someone told you it is an abomination to occasionally be informal and casual in a professional setting?

"Crack a joke while giving a presentation" "Oh, that is informal and casual, SHOOT HIM"?

EnlightenedSoul:
3) Don't put words in my mouth.

What words did I put in your mouth?

EnlightenedSoul:
4) There is no ounce of logic here from you, but a thick cloud of denial from which you desperately need to emerge, but hold onto plainly for the sake of arguing. Kindly, be on your way with this utterly befuddled 'grip' you have on reality.

Your thick cloud of illogicality and attempt to create a status (i.e. "business" ) that fits your argument is clouding your ability to see superior logic.

EnlightenedSoul:
The brains, or the patience for an endlessly repetitious rigmarole pertaining to a well-known and easily verifiable fact? LinkedIn is a professional business-oriented networking site, NOT a personal social connection site designed for the social networking behaviors typically associated with the likes of Facebook, Twitter, and various dating/hookup sites like Match and AshleyMad. You could as well conduct Google searches on how the previous and current CEOs of LinkedIn, Reid Hoffman and Jeff Weiner respectively, and its spokespeople continuously describe the platform for themselves (if you'd prefer to hear it from the horses' mouth). Point blank, there is no point of debate here.

Do yourself a favor and stop using it as a dating site. If you're truly so lonely, I'd suggest you sign up to the Facebook you so ridiculously liken it to. Now, if you're feeling the least bit adventurous, I'd suggest the 'wilder' option of letting your hair down and opening a Tinder account. *gasp*

First of all, LinkedIn is a professional's SOCIAL networking site, not "business-oriented".

I am sure hardly any business occurs on the platform. It is part of the e-platforms called social networks.

You seem to be confused understanding the difference that exists between the terms "professional" and "business".

Secondly, telling anyone they look good on ANY (a) social network or (b) any professional setting or (c) even any business, commercial, religious, rapture-with-jesus setting is not sexism or harassment and is an everyday occurence in the normal world of normal people.

The minute you agreed it was not wrong for people to meet and marry at work where BUSINESS occurs, then your argument was dead in the water. It fell flat on its face.

When Sagamite from the great SAGAMU (the Dubai of Africa) starts asking you questions and applying analogies, you by now yourself know it is inevitable your logic is going to be slaughtered and dead on arrival.

EnlightenedSoul:
Professional networking.

Be prepared to be answered with BS like "it is a social site, and furthermore its the Facebook of professional world", or similar horseshyt

My leg is getting better by the day now, thanks. Almost there.

The BS you don't have the brains to challenge?

xtervaganza:
LinkedIn is not nairaland or Facebook, it's a professional and corporate site.



The man should have at least shown a bit of class instead of being a knobheads

First of all, Linked in is not a professional or corporate site.

It is not owned by any corporation.

No corporate work is being done there.

The correct term to use is that "Linked in is a social network aimed at professionals".

Now secondly, how is telling a woman she looks good even in a professional or corporate setting "sexist"?

xtervaganza:
she's right but shes also a drama queen




overreaction theatre

What is she right about?

Who the hell are they calling that they are spending more than £6,000 a year on phone calls?

Even in the UK, it wil be a crime to spend £40 a year on phone calls?

And someone is budgeting more than £600 to make phone calls?

Are most of the people they speak to not going to be on the campus?

Why can't they have most conversation face to face?

I bet he also put aside a huge budget fro transport to meet people.

So he would travel to go and see them face to face but then sit in front of them and call them, abi?

Bloody criminals!

We are already seeing the traits at a young age and these cretins would want to move to public positions in future.

These fooools are so dumb they forget that we are now in the information age. This attempt at looting will forever be associated with their names till the end of the world when Jesu Christi comes and takes his followers and leaves me behind to enjoy my life on this Earth.

Let me contribute to the destruction of these crooks by posting their pictures. Anytime anyone googles their crooked arsse, they must see the kind of criminals they are.

Omotayo Akande

https://oauchristians.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/wpid-omotayo-akande1.jpg [img]http://1.bp..com/-rcniaO4eoSg/VROLrjMZ7OI/AAAAAAAADe0/RNC50zM_Vog/s1600/IMG_20150325_193420.JPG[/img]


Adebari Aare

[img]http://2.bp..com/-oZuUFdXN8YE/VeQvt1BwlCI/AAAAAAAAcGE/8j0BN-aJMUc/s1600/IMG_20150831_072241-782447.JPG[/img]

MrsChima:
Even hoes sue!

Sue for what?

I said they have a nice arsse and I wanna ride it like a pony?

alexistaiwo:
http://thenationonlineng.net/chibok-girls-now-boko-haram-fighters/

It is highly foolish of you and incredibly moronic of you to label the thread "Wife of Boko Haram commander .....".

Someone forced and raaped into an action is not a "wife", she is a "victim".

Have some sense when next you want to make a statement and be sensitive to atrocities, cretin.

It would have made sense if you said "Forced Wife of Boko Haram commander .....".

ayokunlei:
Commit your live to Jesus Christ today!
Rapture is real !!!

Commit you to a mental health asylum today!

Madness is real!!!

MrsChima:
I did not care about your thread nor was I was referring to your thread. I was responding to a chatter's question.

As I said, try my example in America and see what happens.

What will happen is that I will get some freaky action from a hoochie mama.

Nonybb:
Yes to a man who was worth billions but was claiming to be poor in other to get the applause of the gullibles. He sieze to expose his wealth in Port harcourt because he knows that we will help him find the property and expose him further. There is no peace for Buhari the wicked King of the North

You are a cretinous fuuktard!

How was he worth billions?

Cutehector:
The least buhari should do is to gv her children. Or grand children posts in d federal government...

You are a cretinous fuuktard!

Because of what?

Nnemuka:
According to this facebook user Idris Kuringafa, woman who donated 1 million to fund Buhari's campaign critically ill.......

Funny enough Mr president doesnt need the money afterall as we were told he has atleast 30million naira in his account plus assets......
Politicians i hail ooo

in his words....
THE 1MILLION NAIRA GMB PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN WOMAN FROM KOKO IN BAGUDO LOCAL GOVERNMENT OF KEBBI STATE IS CRITICALLY ILL, SINCE AFTER SHE CAME BACK FROM ABUJA FOR THE INAGURATION OF HER BELOVED SON, MUHAMMADU BUHARI, SHE BOW DOWN TO PARTIAL STROKE, HER LEFT SIDE BODY IS NO LONGER RESPONDING, SHE CANNOT MOOVE THE LEFT HAND OR LEG ON HER OWN, AND SHE CAN NO LONGER SPEAK WELL, INFACT, ONCE SHE ATTEMPT TO SPEAK, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT SHE SAYS, APART FROM THE SALIVA GUISHING OUT FROM HER MOUTH. I WAS INFORMED BY HER DAUGHTERS IN HER APARTMENT THAT THE KEBBI STATE GOVERNOR IS AWARE OF HER PLIGHT AND PROMISED TAKING HER TO DUBHAI FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT, BUT SINCE THEN NOTHING IS HEARD FROM THE FORMER SENATOR. COULD IT BE THAT THE GOVERNOR HAS FORGOTTERN ABOUT THE BRAVE WOMAN WHO GAVE HER HARD EARN MONEY FOR BUHARI TO CLINCH POWER? THIS IS SAD INDEED TO A GOVERNMENT THAT IS ADVOCATING FOR CHANGE.



https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=498044097030707&set=a.103668219801632.8350.100004753622562&type=1&theater

Idris Kuringafa is a moronic fuuktard!

Did anyone put a gun to her head to donate money?

Or is he saying she donated money for him to be president so as to buy herself a right to demand anything she wants in future?

Or this moronic fuuktard thinks the change that was promised should be when you grant special privileges to one person with public funds?

Cretinous product of a failed education system and their reasoning.