Sanchez01's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Sanchez01's Profile › Sanchez01's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 (of 400 pages)
ammyluv2002:I'm not sure about that o ![]() |
kraftykc:This is really serious. Little wonder I spent almost an hour at a fuel station on Saturday. Worst of all, the queue was as long as a BRT lane. Electricity is erractic and barely around, our hopes of using generators are gradually been dealt a mild blow. |
EggovinMma: ![]() |
okiemuteokiss:Lolz... ![]() |
EmmySparky:It was an error. I'm sorry ![]() |
akinsadeez:I made a very grave mistake there... Sorry. You're right and I have no interest in 'twisting' the scriptures to support my claim. I'm really sorry about that. And thanks for the correction ![]() |
timmy2409:Permit me to say this, your argument seems strong but it's not because you eventually answered some of the questions yourself. Lemme explain Even your biology till tomorrow cannot tell me how the self-procreating Amoeba would split itself in two so as to birth a new life. Biology knows the process but not the origin. Such is the power of God. @the bolded, the concept of diversity is duly narrated in the Bible, "The Tower of Babel". God's plan for man, according to Genesis is that man should 'be fruitful and MULTPLY and SUBDUE the earth'. With that in mind, the descendants of Adam, to Cain, to Seth the other son of Adam, to Enoch the son of Cain, and to Noah et al, followed an order such that populating the earth seemed like their primary assignment. Back to the diversity, men went against God without knowing it; he wanted them at every nook and cranny of the world but they gathered themselves in a spot. Note that Gen 11:1-9 described the situation as "the whole world had a language and a common speech" until God caused great confusion among them, each one going the way of a fellow speaker. This explains the diversity in speech. To that of race and colour, your Biology possess the answer without hitch. genetics and the environment played an important role in making this possible. Just like there were no explicit details about this, you'd agree with me that certain factors in the human genetic code is capable of bringing about variations to an individual's body. Biologists believe man is the most destructive force in the world! Why do you think this is so? Simple! He has the ability to adapt, procreate and destroy other life source as a means of sustenance. Some other Christians have tried to resolve this issue by saying that Adam and Eve were not the only humans that Yahweh created, but only the first. This however also runs into its own problems. Since these other creations were not privy to the original sin event, that implies that the sin-from-birth doctrine does not apply to the entire human population, but to only those related by blood to both Adam and Eve. On a side note, the whole original sin story itself is just obtuse. If eating the forbidden fruit was really what gave Adam and Eve the ability to distinguish right from wrong, then it was unjust for God to punish them for actions taken before they had such knowledge, and assuming God is indeed omniscient and knows the end from the beginning, then it seems completely bizarre and cruel for God to have set up this strange game in the first place. Anyway I digress...Your first two sentences is unscriptural and pure heresy. God's first created being is Adam and the second is Eve. Other than these two, all others are unscriptural and false. God's statement reads, "Let us make MAN (not MEN) in our image." Hence, the need to explain 'these other beings' are not required. When the Bible describes us of possessing the Adamic nature, it solely implies we were conceived via sin and in sin. Via sin in this regard would be the inbreeding of the sons of our founding father (Adam). Of all births, this is why the Scriptures describe the birth of Christ as that which was done without sin. Sin never referred to sex but the fact that somehow, we share the same blood. Quite disturbing but true. You sound like an Atheist and I refused to be dragged into the formation of the tree in the garden. I would have gladly love to explain it though but I fear it could digress this thread. You said that inbreeding was fine because God had not made a law against it yet. OK. Recall that Jesus supposedly came to abolish the law right? (Ephesians 2:13-15, Hebrews 7:18-19). So why are you not steady banging your sister? It seems to me that Christians will sanction the most ridiculous things to maintain the piety of their God and ignore the glaring irrationality of their beliefs. Why did God kill 42 teenagers for calling a prophet bald (which he was, presumably)? "That was in those days.." Why did God sanction the murder of entire populations of humans that he created just because they weren't Israelites? "That was in those days.." How about all the ridiculous restrictions on foods, meats, clothing, as well as the laws allowing the burning, stoning and enslavement of others? "That was in those days.."Note, I did not say it was, I said it wasn't termed to be a sin since there was no law to tackle it. And to think that you typed that above that Jesus came to abolish the law is disturbing. Matt 5:17 "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil." With that noted, your claim of peitiness is dead on arrival. God DID NOT kill the teenagers you mentioned, Elisha did. Having gained the double portion of Elijah's power and being an easily angered man, he was swift to use the power bestowed on him by Elijah. The others you mentioned were what made the era of Law. The judgment was instant and God's judgement was instant. Christ came under the umbrella of Grace to put an end to that. Why? those who were cautious not to commit sin under the Law were not afraid of God rather they were afraid of the judgement. This was corrected under Grace as people worked out their Salvation in fear, all thanks to the Holy Spirit which was exclusive to just a number of people in the old testament. The truth is that the bible is a collection of millenia old Jewish myths, a lot of which were gathered through contact with various ancient peoples. The story of Noah's Ark, for example, was adapted from a Mesopotamian myth called the Epic of Gilgamesh, which was written centuries before anything in the bible ever was. These stories are no different from the stories of Oduduwa of the Yoruba tribe or what-have-you from other ethnicities. If you anchor your worldview on such specious stories, then you will continue asking questions like this, while your mates in other climes solve the complex scientific issues that ensure the survival of our species in this universe.If only you could yield in study then it would all come together. God cannot be reasoned out. That best explains why Science is way back when it comes to religious issues, particularly Christianity. Conclusively: The same inbreeding that took place during the time of Cain was also acted out during Lot's time. While it may not have been to populate the earth like that of Cain. Lot's daughters must have saw nothing wrong with the act and again, this best explains the assertion of the Law, sin and Grace as the daughters, as we were told repeatedly took turns in sleeping with their father I hope this makes sense to you. (Modified: EmmySparky and akinsadeez, thanks for the pointer. Again, I'm sorry about the mistake ) |
okiemuteokiss:Lolz... I'm not at all. Did I sound like one? |
ammyluv2002: ![]() |
AJOT99:Hahahaha! No ooo... None of the above, maybe for now. I'm just some guy given to study . |
thorpido:Thanks ![]() |
A Nation on its knees... This reminds me of how I spent almost an hour at a fuel station yesternight. We cannot just afford to endure this man for four more years. #NeverAgain #March 4 Buhari #May 4 Jonathan |
The Presidential Campaign of the All Progressives Congress on Sunday said the return of fuel queues at filling stations in Abuja and other parts of Nigeria is a confirmation that the policies of the Jonathan administration are founded on deceit and insincerity.Source: http://www.punchng.com/news/fuel-queues-confirm-jonathans-deceit-apc-campaign/ |
ammyluv2002:Hehehehe! The topic is somewhat tricky though... I pray God helps me out in trying to explain this. The Bible skipped many details for reasons known. These details included the growing up of some characters, the specific number of children, the number of years when something took place. Though not all but some... For example, the Bible never told us the developmental stage of Adam when he was formed by God, i.e, we were never told if he was formed to the teen level, youth level or adult stage. We assume he was formed straight into the adult stage. Also, the Bible never specified how long Adam and Even spent in Eden before eating from the tree which caused their downfall. These are just some of the details that were skipped, probably the need to include them was not necessary. However, the assumption seems to be that Cain and Abel were the first two children of Adam and Eve. Although Cain does seem to be the firstborn, the text is not clear that Abel was the second born, but only that he was the second son. Later, the narrative indicates that Adam and Eve produced "other sons and daughters." So, it is possible that Adam and Eve produced daughters between the births of Cain and Abel. It is also likely that others sons and daughters were produced after the birth of Abel. We don't know how old Cain and Abel were when Cain murdered his brother because that part was also skipped as many other parts in the Bible, but they seem to be at least young adults, since they are both engage in a trade for their living. The second thing one notices is Cain's seeming paranoia about being found and revenge being taken against his for killing Abel. The only way this makes sense is if the brothers and sisters of Abel were upset that Cain had killed their brother (you could remember that he was scared that Abel might be avenged). Although the period of time between the birth of Cain and the death of Abel is not given in the Bible, it would seem that this period was probably over 100 years, since the birth of Adam's next son, Seth is said to have occurred when Adam was 130 years old. Adam and Eve could have produced many daughters during that period of time. So, the Genesis narrative suggests that Cain had other brothers and sisters when he was exiled by God. One of those sisters married Cain (or more likely had already been married to Cain when he killed his brother), became pregnant and gave birth to Enoch somewhere east of Eden. The next problem that arises is the claim that Cain "built a city." To us, in the 21st century, this evokes images of skyscrapers and high density housing. However, the original Hebrew word, translated "city," merely had the meaning of a place that was guarded by a watch or with a wall. At its minimum, the Hebrew root referred to an encampment or post. So, it is entirely possible that Cain could have built such a "city." Skeptics have pointed out that the only viable solution to the problem of Cain's wife (Cain marrying his sister) suffers from theological problems, since close relations were not allowed to marry according to Jewish law. However, all of these events happened before the law was given. According to the Apostle Paul, when there is no law, there can be no violation of the law or sin. So, since the law against incest was not given until thousands of years later, there was no theological problem with Cain marrying his sister. Just like Cain took one of his sisters for a wife, it would have been possible that the other sons did the same and made for themselves a settlement which was described as a 'city' in the Bible. Just like I pointed out above, the 'city', according to Jewish traditions them, was a settlement of people which is fenced or properly defended from outsiders. So it could be right to say that was the say thing the Bible referred to but the use of the word 'city' is wrongly rendered, obviously, because it does not project the proper mental image of a city in our minds. Conclusively, inbreeding was not condemned until thousands of years later after the laws were made, and that best explain how the descendants of Adam were able to multiply. ![]() |
ammyluv2002:Geez! I was busted . I do it only to book space ooo. Funny you caught me . Happy Sunday ![]() |
Valentine's Day seems to be having disturbing effects among Nigerians. Almost every crime perpetrated in February was acted out on St. Valentine's Day. dre11, it seems you have embraced the ministry of reporting crime stories ... |
billyG:Lolz... I love the imagery of the hideous creature you created. The truth can never be hidden. Funniest part is, we all know the truth and no matter how hard the PDP tries to turn this, it can never cause us to believe that the president is indeed innocent in this scandal. I see no reason why the PDP should reject their emblem; rigging, thuggery and lies. |
The worse kind of thing to happen to a family is to see them lose their wards. Where would there parents have started from? So happy for them though, and may the good Lord protect us from terror. |
Taylor86:And what makes them fools? That majority of voters who voted for GEJ are now supporting GMB or that they decided to wake up from their cryo-sleep to endorse a candidate whom the believe is worth their time? ellechrystal:Honestly you have been posing as a nuisance so much that it's becoming annoying. Where were you when paid protesters planned on disrupting GMB's lecture in the UK? Politics is not restricted to the male folks but there's trouble if, as a youth, you cannot put common sense before sentiments. Your posts reek of hate and this could explain why you would gladly attack anyone who does not see things your way. You're a human and not a robot for Pete's sake! |
tempest01:Exactly my point! The military would have made the an official statement/announcement about the procurement. And if they haven't spoken up concerning newly purchased weaponry, how then was a blogger able to make an 'unofficial' announcement concerning the weaponry? Funningly enough, the topic on FP did not give details on what was bought (by this, I mean the spec cum model of the machines. No spokesperson spoke about the purchase and the machines. When the CS-VP3 MRAP aka Bigfoot were purchased in September last year, DHQ made it know that they had purchased about 5 of the beast and some pictures were released online with out soldiers posing with the machines. When then would this be any different? I could remember uncovering a fake story which was reported by Vanguard a somewhere last year, about US soldiers arresting a Boko Haram member. We were all excited that the US had come to help out but the picture gave them away as I, upon investigation, discovered that the picture was that of French soldiers who captured a man. Vanguard pulled the news from their website immediately the thread made FP, but it was obviously too late as I had captured their website in a screenshot. Nairaland was not criticized then because the story of the US soldiers on our shore had been reported while the OP of that thread gave Vanguard as his source. Who would be accountable for this awful news this time; the wacky blog the news was culled from, the OP who posted the thread or Nairaland who glorified a fake news? No one is saying NA did not purchase these weapons from these countries, but at least, let a credible source give us the information so that their integrity could be called to question the moment something otherwise surfaces. |
Lemme conduct another investigative, but this time, on you... papaejima1:No, we don't expect them to display it on Nairaland because it is not their official website. Satisfied? We all knew those images were not the ones brought in. Even the link at the botton of the image is a dead giveaway.Wrong, people swallowed the tale hook, line and sinker, myself included. Even Seun and his mods were not spared and that explains why the thread made FP. Ever heard of the Oplot Tank and the T-72 MBT?Yes, the Oplot is Manufactured and operated in Ukraine and is manufactured by Malyshev Factory Chai, where do you think the 2 cargo planes that brought in weapons on wednesday came from?[img]http://4.bp..com/-8JJfs4y2DCM/VBtFXRYgs8I/AAAAAAAAIE0/BqpXwUJV0D0/s1600/bigfoot%2Bmrap%2Bapc.jpg[/img] A Nigerian soldier posing with a CS-VP3 MRAP The Bigfoot were purchased in September after the US refused selling to us. The vehicle, according to Wikipedia is used by Croatia South Africa United States of America Pakistan International Security Assistance Force, and is NOT licensed/restricted or manufactured by Russia, rather the US and various others. Unfortunately, most of what you mentioned are not manufactured and operated by Russia. Funny how you know the name of the weapons that were bought by the NA last year but cannot tell which or what has been bought this time around. You claim DHQ wouldn't flood the internet with pictures, yet, they have flooded the internet with every previous purchase. Now, the main ish is this, the creator of the thread did so citing a blog as his source, whereas not a word from the DHQ, neither from the FG nor from any recognized print. And even when the previous weaponry were bought, the term 'send' was not used because we paid for them. My sole understanding of the word implies 'gifting' and in this regard, China and Russia gifted us the US weaponry which were snapped in 2006. You sure are one to rant. |
The thread is FAKE and the claims are UNTRUE. Uncovered! Read here https://www.nairaland.com/2172746/untrue-russia-china-did-not |
Seun Lalasticlala OAM4J Please do the needful... |
True, we all want the insurgence eradicated but not in lies. I'd say Nairaland is presently responsible even though the thread on FP says 'reported'. The Mods and the Super Mods should always investigate articles/sources before pushing them to the FP. The polity is well heated already and adding to the heat would be cruel. PS: Investigate is 'sweet' ![]() |
When the thread 'China And Russia Send Sophisticated War Weapons To Nigeria' grazed Front Page yesterday, I was excited that the insurgence would stand no chance, particularly when the likes of Russia and China have stepped in. However, the source to the story was questionable. I was forced to visit the 'source' to the story only to find a wacky introduction, the same as the one posted on the forum. I further queried Google by searching 'China And Russia Send Sophisticated War Weapons To Nigeria' but was disappointed because I found nothing on the story, both home and abroad. Fortunately, there was a clue; a website was glued to the edge of one of the pictures (see picture one below). I visited the website and found jaw breaking war planes, mine trucks, APCs and IFVs, Artillery, etc., and I searched the images carefully for hours until the puzzle was solved. Picture two below is the original picture posted by the OP of the thread in the other article. The name of the air craft, however, is Boeing B-52H Stratofortress with the direct link to the picture HERE. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ee/B-52H_static_display_arms_06.jpg/800px-B-52H_static_display_arms_06.jpg Summary Description A U.S. Air Force Boeing B-52H Stratofortress of the 2d Bomb Wing static display with weapons, at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana (USA), in 2006. Date 2 February 2006 Source U.S. Air Force photo 060202-F-6809H-100 Author U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Robert J. Horstman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:B-52H_static_display_arms_06.jpg The Boeing B-52H Stratofortress operator is the United States of America. How possible is it then for Russia and China to send us an aircraft that is exclusively operated and built by the US? I need not bother myself about the other two pictures because the link to the image is provided on one of the images. The number of blogs presently spreading this obvious lie is well over 10 presently. Happy New Month to everyone reading this ![]()
|
writejhn27:Will do so... Thanks. |
Perhaps some people don't know Feb 29 exist. It does! The problem, however, is that it surfaces only once in every 4 years. Having 29 days in February implies a 'Leap Year' - A year containing an additional day. While people are born everyday in every part of the world, some are 'lucky' to be born in a Leap Year - February 29. The next Leap year (29 days in Feb) comes up in 2016. How do they celebrate their birthdays? Do they do it annually like every common Birthday celebrations all over the world or do they wait to celebrate once in every four years I'm really curious. |
writejhn27: kevoh:I'm very grateful. Thanks. I've been frustrated with the process before now. On the local bet, what other card does bet9ja accept. My Visa isn't accepted on the site. I can only use it on the 1960bet site but then again, the site of the latter is wack as it gives to many problems. |
Hello guys, I have been the thread for a while but never used any of the games. I've been having issues funding both my bet365 account and bet9ja account, and seeing screenshots of games above me, I believe the website used is bet9ja. Problem is I'm not sure if bet9ja accepts the UBA Africard, and my other problem is the bet365 thing; the KYC process keep stalling and has possibly hindered me from funding the account. Someone please put me through this. Thanks |
medamillion: |
Initially I saw White and Gold and I thought I was safe after reading Don Jazzy's comment little did I know I'll see Blue and Black ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 (of 400 pages)




