Scholar8200's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Scholar8200's Profile › Scholar8200's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 (of 118 pages)
ArcToyin:The rationale is the same - having a conscience void of offence toward all men. |
OLAADEGBU:There lies there problem! They try to 'buy' the blessing by a long prayer by rote and not by heart!Jacob wrestled with the Angel all night; Jesus prayed all night to God; the early Church prayed until Peter was out etc The difference? They sought God as a Vital Necessity, a seeking God because of utter helplessness and there was no other option available. What does it mean to use vain repetitions in prayer?]But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions,as the heathen do: forthey think that they shall be heard for their much speaking(Matthew 6:7) It means to make use of timed chants like the following: 1.But when they knew that he was a Jew, all with one voice about the space of [size=16pt]two hours cried out, Great is Diana of the Ephesians[/size]. Acts 19:24 or 2. 26 And they took the bullock which was given them, and they dressed it, and called on the name of Baal from morning even until noon, saying, O Baal, hear us. But there was no voice, nor any that answered. And they leaped upon the altar which was made. 1 Kings 18:26 Prayer that does not involve the whole person, desire, heart but a lengthy, recital that expects to be worthy after a long session! Is repeating a prayer a vain repetition?No! Not all repetitions are vain, it may be importunity (re-petitioning as an expression of desire and faith); however, a repetition/prayer becomes vain if I mean to display its length before people(present or absent) for vain-glory and / or seek to impress men or God therewith. |
4kings:First, right from the time of Enoch in Genesis, there was a prophecy that a destruction was to come after the death of Methuselah. Enoch being a godly man too gave prophecies. The book of Enoch was written milleniums later after Enoch and it contains many outright, unscriptural errors. The author quoted Enoch's prophecy and named the book after him to endear it to the people It was referenced in one of the gnostic teaching videos I watched earlier. The book of Susanna.I doubt this. On the sermon on the mount, Jesus was establishing God's standards as against what had been generally accepted till that time that is why the people were astonished at the authority with which He taught. Just like saying hatred/anger is tantamount to murder was unknown in the OT. |
honourhim:Well, the Bible is silent on this. This much is revealed: God knows the end of either options available to us; He knows our hearts and the tendencies therein to either side. Does God know all Lucifer was going to do before creating him, this I cannot tell. |
WORDWORLD:ok |
honourhim:Sure He calls certain people to play certain roles according to His good purpose. But such call is what it is, a call. They may yield or not. For example, Moses's call was to lead the Israelites to the Promised land but he failed to accomplish it. Now, didnt Jesus know that Judas was to be the traitor? He did! After all Bible says concerning some that Jesus did not commit Himself to them because He knew what was in them.. Was anything done to prevent this, Yes! Bible says Jesus loved them all hence I believe He must have prayed for them all besides, Jesus spoke of being betrayed openly and he was there. However, notice the prayer point(faith fails not), and the role Jesus played in ensuring this after Resurrection. Peter was back to fishing but Jesus restored him; Judas, had over-reacted - killed himself. I perceive Judas had thought the worst will be that, like John the Baptist, Jesus would be imprisoned hence when Jesus warned that woe is he by which the Son of Man goes, his covetousness would have waved it aside! |
4kings:No thanks, Jude wrote that. Besides, Jude did not make reference to the book of Enoch. The book of Enoch was an attempt by error to ride on the back of generally known facts to gain acceptance. Jesus also made reference to one of the apocrypha(can't remember), where he talked about 'looking at a woman lustfully is a sin'.Until you remember, I would say that was a quote based on a speech that came before the Law, Job 31:1 31 I dictated a covenant (an agreement) to my eyes; how then could I look [lustfully] upon a girl? AMP |
ValentineMary:Interesting. Here lies the possible issue: where your faith stood! That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God. 1 Corinth 2:5 Here we see that the only basis that will ensure stability is that faith has a proper basis. Any other basis other than God's Power displayed in the Gospel would not hold up too long! l but reason took over and I began to doubt the Abrahamic God.I perceive this doubts arose from the issue of sin and God's attitude to it vis a vis the human nature, followed by intellectual studies that seemed to affirm the queries that were arising directly/indirectly. Am I right? Those experience people used to called spiritual were just physical stuffs that we did not know the explanation then.Can you give an example of such? |
ValentineMary:Before that time did you have an encounter with God, a spiritual experience that came through faith? Or were you just a nominal believer? |
donnffd:Where did I say it is figurative?Search and answer which of the days 1-7 was that which was without form and void created? Why are you keen on twisting my words?Nice analogy that differentiates mental assent/head knowledge from personal encounter! Besides, I would have seen his (Obama's) pictures so that claim of non-existence will fall flat. Consider this: A: Have you seen Obama before? B: No,but I have heard about him. A: Do you realise he doesnt exist? B: That cannot be!!! I saw his pictures! A: And how are you sure what you saw was not photoshopped? How are you even sure that the picture you saw was actually Obama? B: (confused) Then: A:Have you seen Obama before? C: Yes! A: Do you realise he doesnt truly exist? C: I was at the white house to conduct an interview with him (shows A videos and memoirs) so what are you talking about? A: (speechless) The first scenario depicts those who claim they know God simply because they gave mental assent to some statements. Someone comes and throws doubts and they are helpless. The second shows one who had an encounter hence no one can overthrow his faith but him(some have done this when they became angry with God perhaps because He wouldnt gratify a lust which He knew was not the best for them). No one can say he knows God based on a mental assent to some stated facts! It takes an encounter with Him made possible by His revealing Himself not to our senses (eyes, ears etc) but to us. How did you become a fervent Christian without an encounter with God?By just a mental assent to some religious statements? This is why I started the way I did but you attacked with 6000/4.6 Billion years! Without understanding where you are coming from, I would discuss based on an assumption of who you are which might be wrong! |
WORDWORLD:Serious allegation; what are your proofs? |
donnffd:Read that chapter again, there is nothing said about the day when that which was without form and void, was created! And from ur other post, if i ddnt know God, why did i fight so hard to not believe what i was finding out?Another hasty generalization! You said you were seeking for God and that you commenced by seeking for Him through reading the Bible .Then you said you were a fervent christian. Now you say you knew God!!!(Whom you were seeking through a 'long and tedious' but unproductive process!) Remember you said this: Yes, i canAm i not in order then? I suggest if there was a mistake in your previous posts, acknowledge it so we can move forward! |
donnffd:Correct! It was given basically to reveal God, not increase head knowledge! So a book that claims total and absolute truth was shown even to a small detail to hold some false claims! Does that book still holds to absolute truth status?...please be honest with your argumentsfalse claims such as? |
truthmans2012:I have been thinking about this thread as it relates to this passage: And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; ... 6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. Revelation 13:5,6 You find many that claim to be atheists here under similar influence! Their hatred of God and haste to blasphemy is palpable! Besides, of this same personality, it is said: And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods,... 37 [size=15pt]Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers,..., nor regard any god[/size]: for he shall magnify himself above all. Daniel 11:36,37 Without trying to bash anyone, it is obvious that behind every blaspheming NL/person is the spirit of this personality! |
donnffd:Sorry, i meant where the Bible records that age like you said. Note that Genesis starts with life on the Earth and the Earth being made suitable for Life, not the Creation of the Earth. |
lordnicklaus:They were simply primitive men and Inspiration doesnt confer Omniscence, besides, the part he referred to was a record in which the writer described what he saw as far as his enlightenment (and that of people of that era could.) |
donnffd:Cherry pick what from where? A person reads for knowledge when he reads the Bible not because he wants to know more about God and His ways. Now the bible is for Life not for Knowledge, but the bible makes lots of claims about the Natural world that can be tested and as been tested and proven to be wrong...why should i approach a book which foundation was on fiction in the first place?Now this is cherry-picking. It further underscores the truth in that which you are arguing against. Were you hoping to find God while you focused more on the creature rather than the Creator? Would you mind itemising the claims about the natural world that you have cherry-picked and show what tests were conducted? I am interested. Your logic: Anybody who stops being a christian wasnt a christian in the first place...Your conclusion seems to be a hasty generalization! Why? How would you stop being a Christian when you were still searching for God meaning you did not even know Him till that time! You had not found Him yet you just said to another NL here that you were a fervent christian? Kindly reconcile this! |
donnffd:And that was? |
donnffd:Is that all? Were you actually seeking God or academic correctness? Besides, why was the Bible given - revelation of God, or satisfaction of finite man's limited intellect for all time? It seems you approached the Bible for knowledge rather than for Life! I dug into history and researched about the origins of the bible and my findings werent too pleasant...What exactly were you looking for when you did all of this? And what were your references? Then i prayed for God to reveal himself, but as usual, he was silent...Did you have a predetermined way just how He should do this? And this prayer of yours, was it by faith based on His promise or just a subtle order , "God if you are there I adjure you to reveal yourself!" The process was long and tedious but cut long story short, i lost my faith...What had been the basis of this faith initially? If it was long and tedious then it seems you missed something and followed the wrong road! |
donnffd:Being spiritual would mean that you encountered God as the Bible reveals men encountered Him with the same results. Besides, kindly quote where that record is stated in the Bible. |
donnffd:How far had you gone as a theist before this time? (Your concluding statement suggests that you were not the spiritual type i.e theists with Christian, spiritual experiences.) |
Now Johnnydon here said all atheists here were once theists. Now, as an atheist, can you sincerely say that your journey to atheism started basically and solely as a result of intellectually discovery rather than an emotional/moral issue for which you later sought and got many intellectual resources to strengthen? |
Op, pls what's your topic? |
honourhim:Foreknowledge of events and as One that knows our hearts(which controls our choices), our responses thereto. Regarding Peter, Jesus knew this because, being filled with the Spirit, Jesus gave a Word of Knowledge (available to you and me too) that satan wanted to sift Peter and later detailed by what means satan intended but remember Jesus had to pray that his faith would not fail. |
malvisguy212:And he mistakenly(and contradicts his Quran) agrees due to hate! |
honourhim:Bible tells us , 'out of the heart are the issues of life" and God knows our hearts and its inclinations and leanings which decide what the will chooses. It further tells us that there are records in Heaven where our names are written and our deeds not pre-written but as they occur. Implying that there is nothing like, "God has already written all I will do and concluded it with where I will spend eternity even before I was born". This is wrong and erroneous. Else, what purpose do those records serve? Yes, God has a purpose for each life eg He told Jeremiah that before he was born He purposed that Jeremiah would be a prophet. However, this is not against Jeremiah's will. From Jonah, we see that Jeremiah could choose to follow this purpose or rebel against it. |
abduljabbar4:But your Quran agrees that Jesus is the Messiah? Is that true? |
honourhim:The highlighted shows that God's plan of redemption is the same as His purpose in Creation - Man being in His Image. And that purpose was meant for ALL men, not a select few. Saying therefore that God has pre-selected some and rejected others is to say there is an addition to that original purpose which is NOT true. The call comes to ALL those who respond therefore are the ones who enter His purpose determined from the Beginning. You can choose to join the chosen ones by responding or drop from that choice by backsliding. For example, after the Isrealites made the Golden Calf, Moses made a call and the Levites responded hence God chose them for Himself among the Israelites instead of the firstborn. Eli was a Levite and his family was specially chosen. But when he and his sons misbehaved, God gave a version of "Whosoever" in 1 Samuel 2:30 30 Wherefore the Lord God of Israel saith, I said indeed that thy house, and the house of thy father, should walk before me for ever: but now the Lord saith, Be it far from me; [size=15pt]for them that honour me I will honour, and they that despise me shall be lightly esteemed.[/size] AlsoMeaning God's Eternal purpose was what underpinned the plan of Redemption. That is why another passage talked about the Lamb slain from the foundation of the World pointing to the fact that it was an accomplished fact according to God's Eternal Purpose after the fall.(though it took time to be fulfilled). Now if you consider this passage, it is just an expatiation on Romans 8:29 of being conformed to His Image in accordance to His Original purpose in Genesis 1 for Adam and ALL his descendants. Does the above scripture imply that those who are born again now and those who will be born again in future are predestined for it? Which means those who are not predestined to be born again will never be no matter what? And those who are predestined to be born again will be no matter what? Kindly contribute for more understanding. Thanks.NO. Else this passages will be a LIE: 9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that [size=16pt]any[/size] should perish, but that [size=17pt]all[/size] should come to repentance. 2 Peter 3:9 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 1 Timothy 2:4 |
According to their catechism, he is in order: https://www.nairaland.com/2976433/islam-catholicism-unites-catechism |
abduljabbar4:You mean the op is correct? |
honourhim:i am busy now. |
honourhim: |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 (of 118 pages)


