Christianity Etc › Re: Why Wasnt Mary Stoned To Death by Scholar8200(m): 7:18am On Aug 23, 2016 |
EyeHateGod: Luk 1:35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.
I know U Are gonna try to escape this intelligently So I'll ask U a Question If I Tell U tat am Gonna come up Ur Wife What Do I Mean?? You know not the Scriptures and you are here making claims! 34 But the Spirit of the Lord came upon Gideon, and he blew a trumpet; and Abi-ezer was gathered after him. Judges 6:34 That is Bible language (come upon) showing that God's Power is at work in a person. Also see Acts 1:8 It doesn't matter the man wasn't available when they wanted to stone that woman to death b4 Jesus saved her
I explained this up there! That he wanted to but the angel come to him and to him he shouldnt bother meaning he didn't kept it private! i can see you are desperate to save your gasping thread! However, go read your op and see that Joseph kept it secret. It appears you dont understand the KJV. Here is the amplified: 19 And Joseph her [promised] husband, being a just and righteous man and not wanting to expose her publicly to shame, planned to send her away and divorce her quietly |
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Wasnt Mary Stoned To Death by Scholar8200(m): 7:05am On Aug 23, 2016 |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Wasnt Mary Stoned To Death by Scholar8200(m): 11:24pm On Aug 22, 2016 |
EyeHateGod: Why wasnt mary stoned to Death According to the Bible? In the gospel(good news) we have God in form of the holy spirit coming down from heaven to sleep with mary.(ahem i heard she was 12) No sleeping took place! It was a creative act: 5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; Jeremiah 1:5 My question to the Christians is Why wasnt mary stoned to death according to the law? lemme bring some instance: Deu 22:23 If a damsel [that is] a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her; Deu 22:24 Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, [being] in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour's wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you. But no man lay with her?! Now i dont wanna here excuse like ]It was kept secrete and nobody knew[ Then how did the story get into the gospel?? it must be a story known by all. Mat 1:18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost. Mat 1:19 Then Joseph her husband, being a just [man], and not willing to make her a publick example, was minded to put her away privily. Mat 1:20 But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, [u]fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost. did you see there that Joseph kept the matter private not public? joseph here wanted to hid her but the angle said he shouldnt but he should go ahed and marry her!! Now this is not about Joseph mary or the angels this is about the people in the community! Why didnt they Stone her to death. we also have this situation: Joseph was not willing to make her a public example and wanted to put her away PRIVILY, did you see that? Joh 8:3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst, Joh 8:4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. Joh 8:5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou? Joh 8:6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with [his] finger wrote on the ground, [as though he heard them not]. Joh 8:7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. Joh 8:8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground. Joh 8:9 And they which heard [it], being convicted by [their own] conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, [even] unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst. Joh 8:10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee? Joh 8:11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.[/b]
Now we see in this passage that this woman was nearly stoned to death, but was saved by Jesus. But who saved mary?? just show us where she was caught in the very act like the woman here. |
Christianity Etc › Re: How Can We Relate And Justify This? 1 Kings 17: 12-13 by Scholar8200(m): 7:43pm On Aug 22, 2016 |
anukulapo: This is a scene from the meeting of the prophet Elijah and the widow of Zarephath.
And she said, As the LORD thy God liveth, I have not a cake, but an handful of meal in a barrel, and a little oil in a cruse: and, behold, I am gathering two sticks, that I may go in and dress it for me and my son, that we may eat it, and die. And Elijah said unto her, Fear not; go and do as thou hast said: but make me thereof a little cake first, and bring it unto me, and after make for thee and for thy son.
This sounds simple because we are reading it. How would this be taken if it happens to you? How would you justify the request? Given that you don't know the out come. A pastor walks up to you and says "attend to mine first from the little that you have..." It will not be difficult to do if you read a little further: For thus saith the Lord God of Israel, The barrel of meal shall not waste, neither shall the cruse of oil fail, until the day that the Lord sendeth rain upon the earth. 1 Kings 17:14 These were spoken not by a covetous man of mammon but by one who stood before God hence his words were persuasive and faith-inspiring! |
Christianity Etc › Re: What Does It Mean To Use Vain Repetitions In Prayer? by Scholar8200(m): 12:10pm On Aug 15, 2016 |
Boomboost: I've never really understood this portion...How about praying loudly in a face me I face you apartment. When should we pray considering other people sleeping? You can do what Hannah did. Pray silently but fervently! Praying loudly appears to share the same self-advertising purpose as those Jesus denounced only in this case , "that they may be heard by men". |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did Moses See God Or Was Timothy Wrong About No One Being Able To see God? by Scholar8200(m): 6:39pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
kobosmalls: Are you for or against? Honestly I have no intentions of arguing this with anyone. Its as stupid as a kid telling you that he's a helicopter and ur response is "hey good for you kid". Christians are similar to those kids. Imagine an adult believing that a sort of food called manna once fell from heaven ad that a man turned water into wine and was equally born without sex. Where do I even begin . Religion is just plain stupidity. alright |
Christianity Etc › Re: Communist Leaders Killed 250 MILLION Because Of Atheism. ATHEISM motivated them by Scholar8200(m): 6:15pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
And the antichrist will also be an atheist (and a conceited one at that) to do all he will try to do:
[size=13pt]Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, ... nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.[/size] Daniel 11:37
Such are the devil's marksmen when he wants to execute his worse form of rebellion. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did Moses See God Or Was Timothy Wrong About No One Being Able To see God? by Scholar8200(m): 6:08pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
It was a Similitude and Moses had no issue with that because he knew (after all he wrote Numbers and the others). |
Christianity Etc › Re: Did Moses See God Or Was Timothy Wrong About No One Being Able To see God? by Scholar8200(m): 5:21pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
kobosmalls: Exodus 24:9-11New International Version (NIV)
9 Moses and Aaron, Nadab and Abihu, and the seventy elders of Israel went up 10 and saw the God of Israel. Under his feet was something like a pavement made of lapis lazuli, as bright blue as the sky. 11 But God did not raise his hand against these leaders of the Israelites; they saw God, and they ate and drank.
Compare..... ◄ 1 Timothy 6:16 ► New International Version who alone is immortal and who lives in unapproachable light, whom no one has seen or can see. To him be honor and might forever. Amen God being all invisible and a spirit, which one do we consider right here? Both are correct. Here's what God HImself told Moses: 20 But, He said, You can not see My face, for no man shall see Me and live.Exodus 33:20 And here He clarifies it: My servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all mine house. 8 With him will I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in dark speeches; and the similitude of the Lord shall he behold: wherefore then were ye not afraid to speak against my servant Moses? Numbers 12:7,8 |
Christianity Etc › Re: The God Of Old Testament And That Of New Testament Cannot Be The Same by Scholar8200(m): 2:26pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
Vendoor: The Bible God of Old Testament often command israelites his people to destroy their neighbors (Moabites, Philistines, e.t.c). Thus sayest thy Lord to the King through The prophet. Then, hundreds of Thousands of armies match into the battle field with heavy losses from both side. Sometimes, the israel God fortify his own with extra power to destroy their Neighbors. The reason because they are unbelievers and offcause, some other hidden motives. Did God at anytime empower these other nations too to fight the Israelites (His People)? If yes, why? This will help you get the rationale behind it all. The New Testament on the other hand suggest that God want us to love our neighbors just as we love ourselves, Thus a God of peace and love, not war. IS there any quote in the Ot that suggests God commanding His People to love strangers? And the act of killing must be avoided at all course. Well, the bringer of the second message was brutally murder because his words did not align with God of the Old Testament. Thus, his message became a threat to the existing priestly and prophetic ordinances of israel. Can you sincerely and Scripturally prove the highlighted text? Blending these two Gods together was the biggest blonder made by early christians and you trying to classify both as one today will be the most illogical conclusion you will ever arrived.
Just try it, I'm waiting! Why then were the Prophecies given by God in the OT fulfilled in the NT if your topic is correct? |
Christianity Etc › Re: We’re Not In Covenant With God - You Don't Have A Covenant With God by Scholar8200(m): 10:33am On Aug 13, 2016*. Modified: 1:05pm On Aug 13, 2016 |
Gombs: [size=18pt]We’re Children Of The Covenant [/size]
Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed (Acts 3:25).
One Bible character that’s been very popular and important through the ages is Abraham. What made him so relevant in God’s scheme of things? It’s the covenant God made with him. Abraham was God’s covenant friend. Now, I know there’re Christians who say they have a covenant with God. No, you don’t have any covenant with God. Abraham had a covenant with God, [size=18pt][b]but we’re not in that covenant.[/size] Who are we? What?! You are the children of those prophets, and [size=18pt] you are included in the covenant[/size] God promised to your ancestors. For God said to Abraham, 'Through your descendants all the families on earth will be blessed.' Acts 3:25 NLT What then? Remember Paul was here speaking to Israelites in a synagogue. Now your claims are contradicting both Paul and the Bible! Why would God enter into a covenant with Israel since they were supposedly 'children of covenant'  We’re the seed of Abraham: “For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise” (Galatians 3:26-29).
As Abraham’s seed, we’re the children of the covenant that God had with him. This is really amazing! Let me illustrate further. Imagine a husband and his wife in a marriage covenant. Would their child or children be part of their covenant? Absolutely not! Their child would be the product of the covenant.
Books have been written about our covenant with God, but really, we’re not in covenant with God. The danger of this misleading teaching is that while praying and trying to get results on the basis that you’re in covenant with God, you’re merely trying to get what you already have. And you’ll never get it that way. There’re things people pray and struggle for that shouldn’t be, if only they knew who they are, and their positioning in Christ. We’re [size=18pt]children[/size] of the covenant!
https://www.nairaland.com/393253/rhapsody-realities-daily-devotional/53#48349122 See, what of the OT and the Israelites (mind you they were biological descendants)? Did God not enter into covenant with them? Granted, the OT and NT are based on the Promise to Abraham, however, everyone had to play his part! 7 Then he took the Book of the Covenant and read in the hearing of the people; and they said, All that the Lord has said we will do, and we will be obedient.8 And Moses took the [remaining half of the] blood and sprinkled it on the people, and said, Behold the blood of the [size=18pt]covenant which the Lord has made with you[/size] in accordance with all these words.Exodus 24:7,8 Remember all that God did was because of His promise to Abraham? Yet we see the Israelites coming into a covenant here. Always test claims from a holistic perspective before running forward! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Questions To Theists Who Reject Evolution by Scholar8200(m): 8:34am On Aug 12, 2016 |
DeSepiero: Seriously??, I am really surprised to see this.
Ever heard of the following phrases? Tropic of cancer Tropic of Capricorn Equator Climate and seasons? Read what he said about the yoruba belief first: SirWere: What then; will you have to say; about the yoruba belief that Olodumare moulded everybody. And when the furnace was hot, they were dark. When it was cool, they were light. Bear in mind, this "theory" had been in play thousands of years before they met Europeans. Will you call it false |
Christianity Etc › Re: Questions To Theists Who Reject Evolution by Scholar8200(m): 8:17am On Aug 12, 2016 |
SirWere: Ahh, so sire, the theory that man was moulded from mud is less........mythical sire? And yes, melanin is the body's response to the sun; a literal glowing ball of fire. Sounds ridiculous! Why then are the whites and arabs not giving this response? Do you therefore mean that the furnace they refer to is the sun? Did they say that?? If so, when did the sun cool to allow the whites to be made?? The theory says that Olodumare used Clay. Clay does not change colour even in the kiln (furnace) Then ask them why the black and white variation? My point, sire is that everyone can claim to have competing theories on the origin of Man and each will have their own way of explaining anomalies. We are here talking of the races and the account I quoted is a verifiable history, I believe that settles it. If black and white came from a hot/cold furnace, where do the children get theirs from? The most sensible thing to do then, you would agree, is to pick each one and scrutinize it without sentiment. To literally attack the doctrine and see if it withstands the test. To place it in a crucible and see if it stands or shatters, hmm??
The Genesis creation story has been called, by kind words, a figurative description; by hard words, a myth and mere fable. Rare is the person that will try to explain this facts without running into headlong perplexites. It has gotten to the level that different people even have different ideologies about it.
Young earth Creationism Old earth Creationism Progressive creationism
errr........ Those were the three I could think of.
The more "logical" ( I put logical in quote because it seems to me, that Nairalanders use this words without understanding its meaning) of Christians try to balance up their faith and the fact through Theistic Evolution. There you will find a lot, a whole lot of mordern christian Scientists and brilliant ones as well.
What am I trying to say? Evolution is the generally accepted consensus. Creationism has been examined; and has fallen flat on its ass. so you think. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Peaceful Debate 2 by Scholar8200(m): 8:08am On Aug 12, 2016 |
4kings: Jesus quoted the book more than 7times, check mat5:5- Enoch5:7&6:9, John5:22-Enoch69:27, mat26:24-Enoch38:2. Pls google d rest!, note that the book was in existence b4 jesus birth and the bible said jesus read scriptures. At the time of Jesus, the constant reference was the Law, Psalms and the Prophets . Where does this book of Enoch fall? The very fact that this book contains glaring contradictions compared to the Bible automatically makes it null and void. Nope, the Jews(Judaism sect) have not rejected this book and some other apocryphas. This book was rejected in the council of nicea, by ur early church fathers. See http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/apocrypha.html. They were called pseudepigraphia since that time because every one knew there origin and purpose: "Books were attributed to [size=18pt]pagan authors[/size], and names drawn from the repertoire of biblical personalities, such as Adam, Noah, Enoch, Abraham, Moses, Elijah, Ezekiel, Baruch, and Jeremiah." Hence, it was one of the earliest attempts to infiltrate the Truth! Same efforts was done on the Gospels. Seriously, how does this explanation dispute my point 
How do YOU distinguish an inspired book from one not inspired? By a recourse to the Inspirer, and previous words spoken and revealed by Same! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Predestination: Christians Kindly Contribute On This Subject 4 My Understanding. by Scholar8200(m): 7:56am On Aug 12, 2016 |
honourhim: Ok bro.
Here are more biblical verses concerning God's foreknowledge and predestination that i recently came across.
Acts 15;18
18 Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world. Indeed, just as right from the beginning HE spoke of the Redemption to be accomplished, after the fall.And that redemption was to restore man to the original position and purpose conceived by God from the beginning. Acts 2;22, 23
22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:
23 Him, [b]being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain: Acts 4; 27, 28 27 For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together, 28 For to do whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined before to be done. [/b] MAy be we can ponder on this as well and see what lesson to be drawn from it.God bless you.[/quote]In the fulness of time, Genesis 3:15 was to be fulfilled and man, true to his depraved nature(just like they did to other prophets) killed the Seed of the woman. Here, the Divine part is not the influencing of the actions of the killers (God Forbid!) but a restraint in delivering the Righteous. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Peaceful Debate 2 by Scholar8200(m): 7:08pm On Aug 11, 2016 |
4kings: Google it. Since you said Jesus,Paul etc quoted therefrom, perhaps you should show where. But this prophecies were not written in another book. Besides, in those days of aloof cities and people, don't u think the person would have been easily caught considering the prophecies being well known. I believe this must be one of the reasons why even the jews rejected those books! Gosh, this is simply proof that he got the info from the Book, that existed before he was born. No! Like you have in many tribes, history , sometimes unwritten, is transferred orally down the line. Enoch's prophecy matched the message by , "Methuselah' that destruction was coming. Hence, as long as the name is remembered, the events surrounding it too will not be forgotten! Hence, the book of Enoch was an author grabbing that aspect and fleeing with his imaginations. Huh?, he just picked out an info from the book. your assumption. Pls, let's not deviate, my unanswered question still stands. Which? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Questions To Theists Who Reject Evolution by Scholar8200(m): 6:18pm On Aug 11, 2016*. Modified: 6:38pm On Aug 11, 2016 |
SirWere: What then; will you have to say; about the yoruba belief that Olodumare moulded everybody. And when the furnace was hot, they were dark. When it was cool, they were light.
Bear in mind, this "theory" had been in play thousands of years before they met Europeans. Will you call it false This is a myth. How come people could be made from cold furnace? Why not make all men therefrom? Besides, is there any discovery that links fire/burns with melanin? Besides, elements glow when they are hot and perhaps darken when they cool down, how does this fit in that theory? The one I quoted is a history of actual people who had descendants which can be verified: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom |
Christianity Etc › Re: Peaceful Debate 2 by Scholar8200(m): 6:08pm On Aug 11, 2016 |
4kings: Well I've read more than half of the book of Enoch and some points listed here are taken out of context; Lucifer was hardly mentioned, and I think that addresses the case of Job, Azazel was like a leader of the fallen angels on earth, and not the first of the fallen, he met with Enoch most of the time, but never really talked about the fall, he was just more powerful and Noah's flood was predicted. I don't want to go any further to argue about the veracity of the book of Enoch.( Mind u Jesus, Jude and Paul quoted that book ) I just asked how do u distinguish an inspired book from one that is not inspired?, writers could have easily come together to make things correlate, in order to gain control, Just like Eusebius was the first person to quote a forged paragraph, in order to gain control. Where ? The fact that a person milleniums later quoted Enoch's prophecy tells you that it was known by some. (in fact, "Methuselah" was a prediction of an imminent judgement). Hence, that you find that prophecy in Jude does not mean that it was a quote from the Book of Enoch. Moreover, since God inspired Enoch's prophecy, would it be anything if Jude was inspired to write what he wrote? Or was there any that would also claim to have supplied Jude with what transpired with Moses' dead body? We would miss a lot if we fail to understand that God that inspires men to speak of things to happen centuries later, can also inspire same for records of events long gone! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Peaceful Debate 2 by Scholar8200(m): 5:15pm On Aug 11, 2016 |
4kings: How do u distinguish in this context, a literary work from an inspired one? How do I? Well, a cross-examination with history and past prophecies on the subject matter is a good starting point. A strong dependence on the Inspirer will undergird this effort though. Besides, the writer lived milleniums after the real Enoch; he was neither an eye-witness nor a protege of the man whose name the book shares. Moreover, the book contains contradictions that are against the Bible; and major errors not in anyway congruent with the OT/NT/or immaterial based on pure infirmity : 1:1 Implies restoration during tribulation - not congruent with scriptures. 1:8 In conflict with the doctrine that peace was made at the cross. Also, in the last days tribulation will increase for the righteous - this "verse" seems to dispute that. 2:2-3 Appears to contradict 2 Pet 3:3-7 5:4 Is an admonition to some unknown party - this is very irregular relative to the scriptures (i.e. authentic ancient writings by God-fearing Jews) 6:3 Semjaza seems to be listed as the leader of the angels, which is not scriptural 6:3,8 None of these angels are mentioned in the Bible 8:1 Azazel isn't even listed in 6:8 as one of the angels that fornicated with women 8:3 Araqiel and Shamsiel aren't listed in 6:8 either 10:2 Enoch allegedly wrote about Noah, even though the Bible teaches that Enoch was taken up to heaven years before Noah was born. 10:4-6,12 Implies angels can be bound & hid in holes under rocks. This is contrary to scripture. 10:8 Ascribes all the sin of the fallen angels to one named Azazel - not scriptural. 10:15-11:2 Seems to imply that permanent restoration took place after the flood - clearly not true. It seems the true author of this book confused scriptures pertaining to the future restoration. 13:5-6,14:4-5,7 Implies fallen angels can't talk to God - this contradicts Job. Also implies that angels were repentant, but weren't received back by God - very strange doctrine. 14 Gives a very strange description of Heaven that conflicts with many scriptures 15:8-10 Very strange doctrine about "evil spirits" proceeding from unredeemable giants etc http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/8576/why-is-the-book-of-enoch-not-regarded-as-canonical |
Christianity Etc › Re: For Those Who Claim Bishop Adolf Hitler Was An Atheist by Scholar8200(m): 2:20pm On Aug 11, 2016 |
abduljabbar4: So if I tell you that it is wrong to lie, you must ask me where I quoted it from? Really?
Hitler [b]said that he is following the commandments of his God[/b]and I have quoted where your God said you should kill. Which of the commandments did he claim to be following? You are not his PRO so dont put verses in his mouth! |
Christianity Etc › Re: For Those Who Claim Bishop Adolf Hitler Was An Atheist by Scholar8200(m): 2:16pm On Aug 11, 2016 |
abduljabbar4: Don't mind him. He thinks we toddlers
Deuteronomy 13: 6 If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, “Let us go and worship other gods” (gods that neither you nor your ancestors have known, 7 gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of the land to the other), 8 do not yield to them or listen to them. Show them no pity. Do not spare them or shield them. 9 You must certainly put them to death. Your hand must be the first in putting them to death, and then the hands of all the people. 10 Stone them to death, because they tried to turn you away from the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. 11 Then all Israel will hear and be afraid, and no one among you will do such an evil thing again. I cant find the quote below up there: abduljabbar4: “I believe today that I am acting in the sense of the Almighty Creator. By warding off the Jews I am fighting for the Lord’s work.” [Adolph Hitler, Speech, Reichstag, 1936] |
Christianity Etc › Re: For Those Who Claim Bishop Adolf Hitler Was An Atheist by Scholar8200(m): 2:12pm On Aug 11, 2016 |
abduljabbar4: Don't mind him. He thinks we toddlers
Deuteronomy 13: 6 If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, “Let us go and worship other gods” (gods that neither you nor your ancestors have known, 7 gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of the land to the other), 8 do not yield to them or listen to them. Show them no pity. Do not spare them or shield them. 9 You must certainly put them to death. Your hand must be the first in putting them to death, and then the hands of all the people. 10 Stone them to death, because they tried to turn you away from the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. 11 Then all Israel will hear and be afraid, and no one among you will do such an evil thing again. Where did Hitler quote this? |
Christianity Etc › Re: For Those Who Claim Bishop Adolf Hitler Was An Atheist by Scholar8200(m): 1:57pm On Aug 11, 2016 |
abduljabbar4: “I believe today that I am acting in the sense of the Almighty Creator. By warding off the Jews I am fighting for the Lord’s work.” [Adolph Hitler, Speech, Reichstag, 1936] That is Mark 17 verse? |
Christianity Etc › Re: For Those Who Claim Bishop Adolf Hitler Was An Atheist by Scholar8200(m): 1:33pm On Aug 11, 2016 |
abduljabbar4: I can provide themn for you and secondly, he emulated Moses and David who fought in wars and killed many people! As quoted by him? Go ahead. Where did he say so? Besides, did he suggest that he was trying to propagate faith in Jesus Christ? |
Christianity Etc › Re: For Those Who Claim Bishop Adolf Hitler Was An Atheist by Scholar8200(m): 1:18pm On Aug 11, 2016 |
abduljabbar4: Pastor Adolf Hitler is more christian than most Christians because he has followed the commandments of yahweh and Jesus. Thank God he said it himself Not one scriptural quote from the Bible by him to back up his claims! What then? He never quoted any part as an inspiration to his actions, what then? Anyone can say these things! Just last week a muslim on facebook claimed that because muslims wore beards they were the real Christians!!!  . Also, not one single scriptural quote by him, to back that claim! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Questions To Theists Who Reject Evolution by Scholar8200(m): 11:00am On Aug 11, 2016 |
AnonyNymous: They were supposedly created at where we now refer to as Mesopmotamia, which is in Iraq/Turkey, closer to Europe. So it has been assumed in the majority of Christian artist depictions that they were Caucasians. I cannot explicitly state whatever race they supposedly were, but the fact remains that one race cannot magically give birth to another. YEARS of evolution based on environmental conditions are what caused the races of today But Cush and Edom disproves this? Magic? no. Creator at work? Yes! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Questions To Theists Who Reject Evolution by Scholar8200(m): 10:59am On Aug 11, 2016*. Modified: 12:13pm On Aug 11, 2016 |
Besides, the variation at those times tells you God was still at work! For example, do you realise that Cush, son of Ham, Noah's son must have been black hence that name? Genesis 10:6
How about Esau/Edom? He was so called because he was red, not white?:
23 And the Lord said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and [size=16pt]two manner of people[/size] shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.
24 And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb.
25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau Genesis 25:23-25
No wonder milleniums later, Paul said:
And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth Acts 17:26a |
Christianity Etc › Re: Questions To Theists Who Reject Evolution by Scholar8200(m): 10:51am On Aug 11, 2016 |
AnonyNymous: Never has it been recorded that a Caucasian couple gave birth to a Mongoloid/Negro baby. sire, can you prove that Adam and Eve were Caucasians? |
Christianity Etc › Re: What Does It Mean To Use Vain Repetitions In Prayer? by Scholar8200(m): 10:46am On Aug 11, 2016 |
OLAADEGBU: Thank you my brother and may God richly bless you.  Amen! |
Christianity Etc › Re: BREAKING NEWS! Fossil Supporting Evolution Theory Of Man Turns Out FAKE! by Scholar8200(m): 8:37am On Aug 11, 2016 |
Muafrika2: Isn't that the same person?
Science has been allowed to get away with unreasonableness and lies in the name of theories, peer reviewed studies etc. Christians have known that those bones were not human for decades. But the scientific community was just so intent on establishing it's evolution theory, they willfully looked the other way. Romans tell us the primitive men rejected God and worshiped animals and creeping things; It seems modern, sophisticated man rejected God and turned himself to an offspring of apes and creeping things! Same thought process, same inspirer, same goal, different setting! |
Christianity Etc › Re: BREAKING NEWS! Fossil Supporting Evolution Theory Of Man Turns Out FAKE! by Scholar8200(m): 8:30am On Aug 11, 2016 |
cloudgoddess: No I wouldn't.
Evolution is ongoing, man is not the "height", there is no "height" as the conditions for fitness are dependent on the specific environment of an organism.
As long as the environment changes, which is constantly occuring, and populations are reproducing, which is also always happening, then evolution - the change in heritable traits across generations - is happening. Every time a baby is born, a plant is sprouted, or a bacterial colony multiplies, with a different set of genetic information than it's parentals, evolution has occured. Its more of entropy now, not evolution(how then do we explain this?)! The current changes (climate etc) does not appear to promise to support life but to annihilate it. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Peaceful Debate 2 by Scholar8200(m): 6:21pm On Aug 10, 2016 |
4kings: The book of Susanna gave a story of two elders, to buttress that point, but I don't wanna go any further. ******** Scholars agree that the synoptic gospels were not written by eye witnesses(the disciples), but from a common source. But this gospels, are still in the bible, since it propagated the existence of christ, isn't this proof of cherrypicking done by the early church fathers. No. These apocryphas were there before Christ and they were commonly known as purely literary works, not Inspired. Most of them were written during the 400 years of Divine Silence. |