Skepticus's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Skepticus's Profile › Skepticus's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 (of 119 pages)
luminouz:If she is not getting attention, she wouldn't be that delusional. On average, women understand social cues better than men. She'll get a few "valuable" ones who would worship the ground she walks on, and use others to "shine" as usual. She is almost like that cûnt who shared screenshot of nairaland SIMPs who littered her DM. Miserable fools. |
PrinxArthur1:Even as a delusional old hag who is probably post wall, she is still red pilled as fuuûck. Men may not see the game she is playing with that post. She is "hyping" her value for the next simp that will run after her. Men should learn from her post. Yourself first! |
Emotionss:You can keep articulating your point replying those whose response is not intended to troll, derail or mock your opinion. Once, you are respectful about your opinions and you are being disrespected, if you don't end it, you'll get sucked into the emotional, childish and insecure frame of the troll. Nothing gained. No message passed across. Just emotional-laden vitriol everywhere. Save your energy and opinions for who is ready to listen whether they agree or not, as long as it is related to the title of the thread. |
Emotionss:Chief, please know when to stop replying comments that are disrespectful as you may be be unknowingly encouraging silly acts that may end up getting this precious thread shut down. We can disagree respectfully but when name calling gets in, it may spell doom for the thread. No one buys data for anyone here nor owes anybody the right to share in their view or what they think about the red pill. We are at different stages of life and most of what we drop when it comes to argument on contentious issues like this, is our subjective bias. No one has it all figured out. It's necessary that we bring these issues up occasionally but some dudes lose their head, get emotional and childish about it. We can do better as men. Just lay the facts that support your position and respectfully disagree. We move. |
JESHAL:We are all on the same line. I'm replying, because your comments are respectful. Where the little difference is the path you chose to tow. I have no problems with the path you chose though I'm not playing the saviour complex. SIMPs and women don't care about me, so, I take my own destiny in my hands free of what the society, women and big daddy government is expecting and trying to take from me. I'm saving myself. Either way, our path would play a gradual role in sanitizing the system where women sit up and the government refuses interfering in marriage to the detriment of men. |
luminouz:Na there e go end las las ![]() We'll be alright. Everybody dey show himself as tough masculine men but when endsars reach for protest, dem no show. Na feminist coalition dey organize protest for a cause wey be say na men be the main victims. Nigerian men can be funny ehnn. They don't know what has hit them, attacking other men when women are silently making their moves getting senate to pass Legislation favouring them. In the end, we pick our choices and move on |
DEMZEE:I've not insulted you and it's good that you revealed your deeply-seated insecurity which has shown by you addressing other guys here who politely reply you as "LOW VALUE" and other tropes that reeks of a poor, weak frame. Anyway, before I end my conversation with you, I've always seen you around comment sections that made front page trying to explain "red pill" to the female monikers and how they egg you on till you give them the cheap attention they seek. Please, try to reduce it so they can see you as the tough patriarch you claim to be. Telling them the game is a lame move. Have a good day. |
Emotionss:The truth is we are all saying the same thing but like I said earlier, the ego of men will always get in the way of things and in that quest to get it stroked, they turn themselves into willing slaves which is the reality of the modern dating scene. Whether you are a patriarch, red pill, beta simp, as a man, you'll never escape the burden of performance. All men know this from early adulthood. So men, by nature take responsibility knowing that it's the only way they will be ranked in the society etc. There is nothing wrong chasing the role of a patriarch. Over the course of this thread, I have supported points that cater to patriarchy but I won't watch a man put himself at great risk of his life just to have his ego stroked. Part of the reasons going my own way was that I never wanted to slave for women all in the tag of proving to anything to women. I live for me and anyone coming in, come on my own terms. This doesn't make me less masculine or less red pilled. I'm trying hard performing in my own way. No man need to be told to perform, it's known instinctively whether you decide to perform or not (that's your personal decision). If she considers me as a prize and makes effort to prove it with her "loyalty" and "resources" on occasion, that doesn't make me less masculine in anyway. If she acts bad, she gets yanked off like a stranger, no two ways about it. as long as I'm on my own purpose and improving myself, there is nothing to worry about. |
JESHAL:You obviously don't understand the point I made in the comment you quoted outside the narrow-minded trope of your opinion. No disrespect intended. Just do you. |
DEMZEE:You are funny but it's okay. Just do you. No issues, tough guy ![]() Anyway your view not aligning with mine doesn't in anyway make me or those who share the same less masculine. There are levels to it. |
BLOODYSPERM:Anyway, chose your "pain" wisely. Some men take stupid decisions and play stupid games that has no relevance to their lives and uplifment calling it pain or being "manly". |
Emotionss:A lot of men might not understand your second paragraph because of the natural conditioning of men to be sole providers and the masculine ego fuelled by dominance, over centuries of existence as humans. In recent times, men are overreaching themselves and can not see themselves as worthy of a prize to a woman once in a while, outside being the work horse being rewarded with sex, food and a stroked ego which takes nothing and might mean nothing to a woman. In the light of feminism and other pro-female bullcrap permeating modern culture from developed countries to lesser developed countries, this has created a niche for a small fraction of men throwing the vanity of that ego away and taking the game to women directly, playing the same game that women play on men while still calling the shots. It shows there are loopholes in societies where feminism has been influential and these men are making a killing of it. Ubunja, has often hinted on it but I noticed folks struggle to understand him, as they are all caught up in the "trick" mentality. Emotionss you are on your own here. The ego of men are too big to make them see below the game. Just do you and take advantage of the benefits as long as you know the end game and your plan towards it. |
sojfarm:Imagine the ones that have passed through without being caught. This particular interception may also be a ruse to cover the ones that have passed through and to also look like the border patrols are working. Weapons wey dey enter Nigeria like water. Some fools are blaming shekau forgetting that they are ruled by ISIS, Alqaeda-linked elements in government. If Boko Haram wants to end today, it will but as long as you are being ruled by these bloodthirsty terrorists, Nigeria can never know peace. |
OnlyDeCapPlease:The United States of America have the shittiest police of the first world nations. Truly, they are overfed and stupid. That's why the US police is associated with junk foods (Doughnuts and Coke) |
DEMZEE:It's okay. Do what works for you. As long as you are the dominant partner whether fully or in a shared one, you are still on track. Good luck on your quest. |
DEMZEE:Contributing a fair share like buying food at home while the man takes care of the bigger share of the bills like rent, school fees etc doesn't make her less feminine either, especially for a woman who is earning income. It's called responsibility. Well, each one to its own. My happiness about arguments like this is that the facts are laid out for anyone reading to pick what suits is preferential bias. We move. |
luminouz:We are not mindless robots. In the end, everyman will do what aligns with his beliefs. The argument here is related to the red-pill which the thread was created for. Men here should be allowed to bare their mind as it is a contentious issue among those who are purple-pilled. Folks can pick what aligns to their own belief even if they disagree with some. Those who are married and those who aren't are dropping gems based on facts, realities and even unrealistic fantasies. It's open for everyone to learn. |
DEMZEE:It's okay. Just do you. At least you know what you are getting into. I'll leave another point for you. For a good number of modern women, if you give them an environment of comfortability so much that they never earned it, contributed for or only got because of their looks, they'll resent you, use your money to cheat on you with a so-called LOW VALUE dude as you like to say. You are projecting the values that men use in assessing each other, unto women. On a deeper level, women see wealth and status differently than men. |
Saviolamemphix:Saviolamemphix, it's the same thing Junnior and a few others are hinting on. There is no 50/50 equality in marriage. Anyone who believes that is very ignorant. One would exceed each other. In this case, it's my advise for men to take the highest share while the woman takes the a minimal portion to be "invested" except you are super-rich or being born into wealthy royalty where the woman doesn't even have to drop a kobo or do domestic duties (like a trophy wife) and won't also cheat as there are severe social consequences of she doing that. DEMZEE is talking about total dominance - Hard Patriarchy which is highly impracticable in the 21st century except you are going to pick a wife from some pre-modern society in the amazon or some hyper-rural parts of Africa. Even to the woman, he is still a HIGH VALUE SLAVE trapped in the insecurity of his ego. With the modern woman already exposed to tropes of women liberation and feminism, it's a waste of valuable time and unnecessary accumulation of mental stress for a man to seek total domination of a woman. It's possible though but you have to work yourself flat out to be mega rich which is not entirely within your control. Money makes a lot of thing easy for a man and men must strive to make it, though in reality, only a minimal percentage of men would make money to last his lifetime and death. There would always be rank and class among men. The basic thing for a man is to have his own space (SHELTER either yours or rented) and a means of earning income. If you are not there yet, strive to achieve this, from there, you can move into building bigger things within which time, chance and effort can afford you. That said, I'll clear things up here being red pilled means putting your own needs first as an individual whether rich, managing or flat out broke. I see people talk about making money and self improvement (which is very good) but those are not exclusive to the red pill. Miserable blue pilled SIMPs can find the motivation (like every other men) to make money and self improve. There are a lot more of these types, than rich red pilled dudes. I've also seen super-broke young men who don't seem to chase money or even self-improve but put themselves first among their peers and in their relationship with women - the core of the red pill. To the surprise of some men who think they are high value because they are super-educated and wealthy, they see so-called "low lives" run their own space with beautiful submissive women at their beck and call. It's the same thing that happens when some folks see motor park touts getting wealthy and being influential in society and think because they have PhDs, they deserve to be rewarded more. The reality of life doesn't work that way. Go for what you want and get it. Even though factors beyond your control may sometimes get in your way, at least you know that you tried. However, in what ever state you find yourself, try to be in control of what is within your limits (taking responsibility), try to get some influence among your peers and strive to get better. A man in charge of his life, space and pushing his needs regardless of what society thinks is HIGH VALUE. |
emmaodet:You are welcome, Chief. Life has been fair to me. I'm sorry but I'll prefer to keep my location private. I hope you are good? |
Ekg911: ![]() Good for you. A sucker (mumu) is born every minute - PT Barnum Scammer trying to scam another yahoo boy. |
DEMZEE:The person you tagged is not poor nor average by Nigerian standards plus he is married. Life teaches us all. I'm not a fan of permanently living with a woman and I have my own reasons for that from my personality to the unrealistic slavery standards set and the dangers lying in it for men in modern marriage. This is not to discourage others from marrying nor engaging with women in some form of permanent relationship. Just know what you are getting into and ways to minimize the risks. The "hard" patriarchy (Full dominance of the husband or father-figure) which you advocate (I also observe same with young, idealistic red pill converts on this thread and other forum espousing this idea) is highly impracticable in the 21st century (where women rights and emancipation has swept the globe like wildfire from highly conservative societies to the liberal ones) unless you go to some pre-modern society to pick a woman who would wholly worship your feet. One that emmaodet is very aware of being married in this modern age. DEMZEE, there is nothing beta about a woman contributing in marriage in this modern day. If you disagree, reality will teach you better. If you are meeting a woman in this age, you'll meet one with some form of education, or skill or even both. Where she lacks both, she probably has some exposure. Hard patriarchy was easy those days as survival was basic and at a subsistence level. Society was closed and women's hypergamy was highly restricted. There were consequences for a woman showing negative sides of her hypergamy, so she behaved herself and worshipped the man she was betrothed to. Today, growing population of humans and economic unpredictability and other factors beyond the capacity of an individual is putting so much stress on men as sole provider. With women entering the work force on merit and feminist quotas, it gets even tougher for men. In reality, Only a very low percentage of men around the globe are able to wholly provide in life and in death. Men are increasingly getting their wives to bring in income to support the family system. A man who don't have that much resources to be able to wholly provide as a hard patriarch in the modern day reality is only a "suffer-head slave" and the more he makes his woman not to "invest" in the relationship will make it easier for the woman to move on, enjoying her "loot" knowing that there is no law even in modern conservative society that will "punish" her for leaving her man (the liberal ones would even "celebrate" her for being a "strong independent woman who knows her right" ). For me, it is okay for men who seek to marry (or permanently cohabit with women) to do that to take the physical and psychological pressure that comes with a diminishing hard patriarchy and masculine ego in light of social and economic realities but make sure that they work hard to contribute the highest share of provisioning and leading with their partners in tow. I was raised by a dominant father who had that kind of arrangement with my mum. If my mum had not contributed in a way, she could leave at anytime without consequences as she has no "investment" worthy of securing in her relationship with my dad. |
JESHAL:JESHAL, this is grossly disrespectful to the two individuals you mentioned and other active and silent members following and maintaining this thread. You can pass your comments without attacking and insulting the next man. If you don't agree with them, keep your opinions to yourself or express what you feel about it without the need to insult which is your own insecurity (which makes you also, weak) playing out. If this thread had started on the background of every guy acting tough (a sign of insecurity and psychological inferiority), bullying other males, or all those silly dick-size contests typical of male spaces, this thread wouldn't have existed long enough for you to come here to blatantly disrespect other men. No one feeds anyone here or buys data for anyone to comment. You drop your opinion (must be related to the title of the thread, which is the red pill) and move on. Some may agree, others may not agree and some may feel the need to modify your wise opinion. Men have little support system in real life. You, emmaodet and Zabiboy agree on a lot than the very few, which you all disagree on. This is normal. We don't have to make it tougher for ourselves. |
Kriss216:It is obvious that you underestimate the delusion and desperation of SIMPs (Broke or Rich). Fake "surgery-enhanced" babe wey Burna Boy and some other dudes don chop tire. Forget, this is what you get when a career hoe meets a hopeless but rich simp trying to get status. |
ikillbrokegirls:"Strong women don't have attitudes, they have standards" just illustrated what has been said several times here, about most women being naturally red pilled (at the basics). Majid saying this is clearly promoting simp ideas. I only judge men's simping in what they do in their personal lives because I have observed that men with fame, money and social status are under great pressure to conform to the blue pill fantasy of modern liberalism so as not to lose their source of livelihood. Some actually simp and some fake it while being red pilled in their personal lives. Only a few like Donald Trump can go vocal about it. Even then, it affected his re-election as a second term president. |
okrikaboi:Dude looks pitiful in a funny and awkward way. Anyway, there are either 2 scenarios, possibly, playing out here: He might be truly a SIMP being her emotional tampon and friend-zoned confidante for the "29" years. He probably has never seen her panties or maybe seen it a few times. OR He is banging her steady all the while for less or nothing while masquerading as a "bestie". In this case, I pity the fool who has sold his commitment to her. |
Some of these memes are too heavy for the average red pilled dude. "Taking a detour" like the MGTOW symbol says is on another level of masculine discipline! |
Harrynight:The OP sef isn't active on NL anymore. |
sharpwriter:I'm curious too. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 (of 119 pages)

