Skepticus's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Skepticus's Profile › Skepticus's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 (of 119 pages)
![]() |
Jerry Gana. If you know, you know! |
princepee:How was his background in Mende? |
SOZINN:Your analogy misrepresent MGTOW totally but I do get your point. Not all simped, suffered heartbreak or even angry at women. Those in perpetual anger phase are incels or incel-types. |
TheUndercover:If i ever had a wife and caught her cheating on me, on the spot, I'll encourage the guy to go on and move on like nothing happened. Her conscience will do the work. No emotional drama. I'll ask her to leave and separate from her. It's stupid to trust anyone, talkless of women. |
Martinez39s: ![]() Las las, you can't beat the ignorant at their game of delusions, especially males filled with oestrogen, unwilling to learn and understand. If it walks, talks and acts like a clown, it's a clown. Please, starve the trolls. |
CaveAdullam:While I do agree with your point about testosterone putting some men on edge, it's not an excuse for emotional immaturity and being openly stupid. I mean, we criticize this behaviour in women and we are well aware that testosterone is not the cause of it. If all men on this thread were allow to show effects of their testosterone, you are going to have a chaotic scene of insults fuelled by psychological insecurities and masculine inferiority which is the definition of being a SUPER BETA. The thread won't last this long. The Mods against this thread would have all the excuse in this world to shut it down which will be a loss for men folks that may have their lives saved by this thread. Baiaon was on your case earlier on this thread, using insultive words on you for no justifiable reasons, only because he disagreed with you, despite the fact that you agree on a lot (as it concerns the Red Pill), more than the few points where men would naturally tow their divergent bias. He was given the silent treatment and he went inactive on the thread. The thread moved on progressing more in ideas. I know nairaland gives some form of anonymity to folks, who take the "advantage" to openly deride each other in an open argument that should have some decorum. This thread has a title and a purpose. Anyone active here probably agrees with the red pill, though on various levels, so some level of decency in engagements and arguments is to be expected. This is not your average Front Page thread where you have people saying all sort of nonsense to each other and is encouraged by the mods for internet traffic. Also, those who leave the sphere of arguments and engage in ad-hominem/straw man attacks on their personality won't dare say it out in person. You are likely to get punched in the face by another man. That said, emotional maturity even in the face of betas showing their insecurity and inferiority is what every decent man should strive to have. I've been on online forums where blue-pilled is being encouraged and advocated. Though I don't agree with it, I know that insulting a stranger (online) and getting myself worked up over personal choices/decisions of another man (especially a stranger) that has no relevance to my life is worthless and a sign of weak, beta behaviour. Do what you want. No one cares. Those who blend with your style will pair with you. It's that easy. If you seem to have a bad day, was raised poorly, emotionally immature or suffer from some form of masculine inferiority complex, I'll advise you to take your problems elsewhere. You won't find anyone to stroke your fragile ego here and even if you do, folks will see you as nothing but a toxic, bitter individual (beta) with time and avoid you altogether. |
IronGalaxy:I thought "SOWETO" might be of interest to you( By the way, heard from my Xhosa bunny? |
Nusaibart:The rebirth of Digmygold. Interesting. |
DonX001:Your analysis was on point. No. 2 happened! |
OjukuwuHusband:In the past, arranged marriages worked because women who were picked for marriages were often raised right, in closed conservative societies where their hypergamy was controlled with dire consequences, if she fell out of line. In the few cases, where it turned out bad was when the lady given out, was badly raised or super entitled ladies in marriages done solely for political and business connections. To be clear, engaging with women in permanent living arrangement would involve some level of "simping" as you'll be expected to provide as a man to get sex, companionship and your bloodline passed on. Realistically, you can't always hold frame 100% of the time but at least, be smart enough to recover when you seem to be losing it. Regarding arranged marriages, I can't say same for today, where modern women have been exposed to too much feminist ideas that promote freedoms over responsibilities. In my own opinion, I feel it work in some ways and some men are lucky especially when those who "vetted" her for you, did right This "vetting" can be very hard though. Today, a woman's past is hard to figure out and her potential as a good complementary partner for the future is equally hard. For a man, it's like buying goods in the dark. You don't know what you'll get - a risk. I've seen a good number (arranged marriages) turn out really bad with super damaged/unmarriageable women. |
Junnior:True. Some mothers are super-entitled and manipulative of their loving sons. Mother-worship is also another bad side of it. Generally though, the only woman (or women) from whom, most men would experience true love or a semblance of it, is mothers and female siblings. |
Junnior:I don't have it all figured out, as an imperfect being but I'll share my knowledge as regards that. |
leksite120:A man in love is a big fool. Even when you see them in reality, they often look miserable and stupid. 2 guys fighting in love fighting over a slût, are the biggest fools ever. |
RedpillAnalyst:Good points made. It's not just boredom alone that makes them unleash their whoredom. The financial rewards and the gradual acceptance of women degeneracy is the one fuelling these monkeys branching in marriages. If there was no government legislation to favour married women who divorce their husbands, there won't be a high rate of divorce witnessed in those societies now. At most, separation would be the case as it is common in the Nigerian system. In my opinion, I doubt if marriage would go extinct in the next 5 years. An institution that old (began at almost the time humans ended cave dwelling and began in settling into societies at the advent of agriculture) won't just go off like that. People still get married every Saturdays, even in societies where the men know that the probability of divorce is as high 80 percent with them also losing more. That said marriage rates are falling worldwide (Nigeria included) when the rate of those married were compared with folks (men and women) who were eligible for marriage. |
Drenimarcus:Now they are called "304s" Type 304 on your calculator or some other digital device and turn it upside down. What you get is H.O.E. no be me talk am ![]() |
Jessepaid:If you are a man of faith, may the deity you believe reward you for your kind gesture (pardon me but I'm not religious, though). Men don't have to be nice. Being kind is okay, though it must be done within limits where you aren't taken advantage of, at the level of mockery. The man you extended your act of benevolence to, reminds me of how sad it is when I see men being harsh on each other for no reason because some have it "easy" than others (with factors beyond their control like privilege, time and chance contributing to their success), ignorant of the facts of life (shît can go wrong, even if you think you are fully prepared for the better) or stupid dick contests that reeks of psychological insecurity, emotional immaturity and mental inferiority. When I went fully red-pilled, I started appreciating men striving to make life meaningful for themselves and their families if they had one (from those at the bottom like manual labourers, truck pushers to those at the top like CEOs, MDs top political leaders etc. Whether we like it or not, class and rank (Hierarchies) will always exist among men. Even, the ranking criteria is relative (subjective) and can vary within environments/strata etc. In Nigeria where it's common to rank men with fiat cash (money) and financial networth, even, the networth of Nigeria's (and Africa's) richest man is some other men's "tax" money and "chicken change". Life happens to all. It's a reason why I have stopped broke-shaming men or mocking them for being in certain low economic class which is typical of Nigerian men. Most of those who broke-shame or mock others for being "low-value" are either ignorant or coping psychologically online. Also, the modern romantic scene is not static universally. A lot of broke, poor men end up having a lot of sex and are even "reproductively successful" than some rich high value men could ever imagine. Men need to start looking deeper and read between the lines. Justformen can relate. This is not to say that men should not strive to get better or not be "encouraged" to get better. It's not "broke-shaming" in my opinion. For those stuck on the "Burden of Performance" thing, do you think the guy who goes out there to push his wheel barrow to survive and probably feed his family, and the guy who who gets up early, earning millions monthly, working extra hard, as the MD/CEO of a multinational firm, don't understand the burden of performance saddled on a man, and are not working towards lifting the burden that their "muscles" can "afford to lift"? Do you think they are working for the fun of it other than earn money to survive and solve their basic problems like food, shelter and clothing? You don't have to agree with me. Just understand my point. Life is different for every man. Let's not make it harder for ourselves. We only have a life to live. |
Akfrenzy: ![]() Their record of habitual lying is haunting them. It's a very disgraceful fact that Boko Haram are believable than the army as they record video evidence of their offensive on the military and civilians. Also, they back up their threats with action, most of the time. The army might be right though, not because of this rubbish video they put up, but because, Boko Haram didn't put out any statement or video on the Damasak attack. |
DPsychologist I have no intention to derail your thread though. I just want to clear things up. No vex. For the first photo, MGTOWs is the guy chilling in the top left corner.
|
TheUndercover:Okay. I edited my earlier comment, though. Just to correct your earlier comment about MGTOW being in marriage. The MGTOW is red pill to its core but where they differ from the other elements that constitute the red pill is abstaining from permanent relationship with women endorsed by the state (legal marriage) or permanent cohabitation (regarded by a lot of governments including Nigeria's, as Common Law Marriage). MGTOWs can have platonic, romantic, business relationships with women as long as it doesn't pose a serious threat to their health, money, resources, freedom and life. Women are not worth the stress of proving your worth (ego stroking). Live life on your own terms. |
TheUndercover:Thank you. I understand the cons of going my own way. I've assessed it properly and confirmed that I can bear its consequences. I have an aversion to the issues that constitute the transactional institution called modern marriages and cohabitation (from the nature of the modern woman to the influence of the state at the detriment of men). However, I'm not against men getting married. Men should do, if they want to. The red pill at least makes them know what they are getting into, and lessen the risks. For your question, I intend to have a kid at some point in time and I have a lady who we have some form of agreement towards this. The terms are perfect for both us. |
Dpsychologist:The thread is fire. Some comments there give compelling reasons to avoid the institution of marriage or other forms of permanent cohabitation with women which I know that you and some of your followers here, are not fond of. Even the arguments of those who still believe in the illusion of ancient dominant patriarchy was ripped to shreds considering modern women and present social realities, by the moniker, Justformen and a few others. The good thing is that on the thread, the facts are laid bare for men to know what they are getting into, when married or staying away from it. Pick your poison. |
Pappilo said it all.
|
JustforMen:Justformen, you burst my brain here. Some just pack some narrow minded theories in their brain and think life works just like that. The ignorant ones with no experience of life works will start parroting the nonsense of Burden of Performance, or a man running from responsibilities because he refused to marry. Do you think the guy who pushes wheelbarrow in the market for crumbs isn't carrying his burden of performance or you think the guy on his purpose chasing his dream and refused to be sucked into the slavery of marriage is dumb? |
SOZINN:There is a reason why Esther Vilar is the only woman held in high esteem in the manosphere. At the peak of second wave feminism where women were getting attention, complaining about being oppressed by men and men were too pussified, distracted by the lure of pûssy to see what was going on, Esther was the first to notice and challenge these feminist tropes of male oppression proving that WESTERN WOMEN were in fact, not oppressed and brought out statistics to show (at the time the book was first published in the 70s) that more women were in school than men. Women were favoured in divorce courts and got resources from men without bringing anything to the union other than their smelly pûssies etc. She even made a phrase describing MARRIAGE as an institution where men "DELIGHTED IN THEIR OWN SLAVERY". She did it at a great risk as she faced death threats from her fellow women and feminists. |
ikillbrokegirls:That "Thottery and Consumerism" part got me. I know say our men and women don cast. I didn't know we would be "worldwide" famous for it. |
Peaceyw:What do you expect from an article written by a woman, quoting other women's opinion about MGTOW. I've read several articles from men and women criticizing the philosophy but this one of the lamest I've seen. No MGTOW has been accused of beating or hurting women. They are saving their lives, investment and mental sanity by avoiding "unnecessary" contact with women (Remember the "Me Too" movement). I was glad when he mentioned it that even the former Vice President of the United States, Mike Pence avoids personal contact with women other than his wife because as a man of value, he knows the risk. Women brought this on themselves but typical of their inbuilt solipsism, men are to blame. The MGTOW Vlogger with 90 Million views on Youtube mentioned in the article, is the Serbian-born Canadian, Sandman who the author of the article cleverly avoided mentioning not to give him much attention. Sandman has dropped his rebuttal. The article is just typical "misogynist-shaming" which is familiar to those in the red pill. We move. |
Martinez39s:Goddammniit! It is finished!! |
IronGalaxy:Uthanda Inkathazo ![]() |
luminouz:Sure the wall is undefeated. It may be delayed but it's inevitable. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 (of 119 pages)

