Splinz's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Splinz's Profile › Splinz's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 (of 152 pages)
MaxInDHouse:Thank you for your response. However, there's nothing like partakers of FAITH and partakers of KINGDOM RULE, supposedly two separate rewards or privileges. Also, naming kingdom rule (as you called it) as something supposedly promised or reserved for Christians, shows that you don't know the scope of the promises God made to Abraham. Take a look: For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God (Hebrews: 11:10).This is talking of Abraham, that he, of course like true Christians today, was looking forward to a city whose builder and maker is God. This city is non other than the kingdom of God. Here: For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world... (Romans 4:13).Again, this speaks of Abraham, to show that the promise was that of ultimately inheriting the world, i.e, the universe. This is why Christians are children of Abraham and heirs according to the promise. And then speaking of the household of faith, here's it: As we have therefore opportunity, let us do good unto all men, especially unto them who are of the household of faith(Galatians 6:10). So you see sir, whether in faith or in rulership, Abraham and other faithful servants of God through the ages, and those alive today, are partakers. Regards. PS: The gospel of the kingdom of God has been preached right from the foundation of the world: Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began(Acts 3:21). So like I said earlier, there's nothing new in Christianity. |
Hello sir, greetings. MaxInDHouse:Sorry, this is not right. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise (Galatians 3:29). Christians are also called children of Abraham and heirs of the same promise God made to him and his descendants. In other word, the very faith that Christians holds today is nothing new. In a sense, Abraham is the pioneer of Christianity, seeing that he's the father of the faithful (Romans 4:16). Actually, it is what was promised to Abraham that Christians are partakers of, and not the reversed. Regards. |
blueAgent:Good. That's the more reason why you should let it go. Does it matter whether you're right and he's wrong, or vice versa? No, it does not, the truth is unchangeable. Please let it go. We could be together on the same journey of finding the truth and embracing it. The only difference is that in a race, everybody cannot run at the same speed. However, it doesn't mean that they wouldn't catch up with others. It's just a matter of time. |
blueAgent:Sorry, I'm not one of them. blueAgent:Friend, they've been answered. Please take your time to go through your own questions again and then see my response to them, side by side. I took my time to make sure nobody misses it. But of course if you feel there's something I didn't cover, please don't hesitate to draw my attention. Let's reason it together. Regards. |
Hello friend, thank you for your response. blueAgent:Not really. I wanted us to have a foundation, starting with Christ's arrival. This is to make for easy understanding of events thereafter. I like it when it's one step at a time. So let's go... blueAgent:No. Here's the truth: "For the earnest expectation of the creation eagerly waits for the revealing of the sons of God. For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it in hope; because the creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God, For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now" (Romans 8:19-22). There you have it. The creation itself, i.e, the universe, awaits the glorious revealing of the sons and daughters of God, in order to be set free from its bondage and decay. This will happen when Christ sits on the "throne of his father David" and the saved are some sort of inaugurated or commissioned by Christ to begin the government of God or heaven on Earth. This period will spans for a thousand years in the first instance. It's God own pleasure to renew the face of the Earth through His glorified sons and daughters; the saved. blueAgent:Throughout the Bible, the word “heaven” is used to describe three locations: First, there is the atmosphere that envelops the earth; this is the first heaven. Next, the vast regions of outer space are collectively referred to as “heaven,” or “the heavens” (Psalms 115:16); this is the second heaven. Finally, the location of God’s throne is specifically called “the third heaven” by Paul (II Cor. 12:2). Since no one is going into the third heaven - God's throne, even David is not in heaven (John 3:13, Acts 2:34), only two possibilities remain; 1. Outer space 2. The atmosphere or clouds (1 Thes. 4:17). With our knowledge of physics, also note, clouds, as mentioned in 1 Thes. 4:17, are only a few miles above the earth. In fact, flying an airplane is in a sense, going to heaven. So then, I Thes. 4:17 does not picture people going to the third heaven, but the glorified saints ascending into the atmosphere. Consider: Christ arrives Jerusalem and is seated on His throne (Matt. 25:31-34). Next, He send out His angels to gather His elects from the four corners of the earth (Matt. 24:30-31). How else are the angels supposed to gather the saints if not through ascension and descension, what some people called the act of "disappearing and appearing"? Again, note that these glorified saints are to appear before Christ's judgement seat, and it has been established that this is not in heaven but right here on Earth: Jerusalem. blueAgent:The word in bold says it all; reserved in heaven. Simply put, a Christian's reward is kept or reserved in heaven, to be revealed or given to those that are worthy at the coming of Christ. That it is reserved in heaven does not mean the saved are to go to heaven in order to get it: Christ is bringing it. Here's it: "And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work" (Rev. 22:12). Did you see that? He is coming with His reward and not us going to get it. My friend, please let's talk another time. If there's anything I missed, please bring it forth. Many thanks. |
Hello bro, thank you for your response. blueAgent:Very good. We must also recognize that this is how it stands forever, without an exception in whatever form. blueAgent:Now, let's tie pieces of scriptures together to form a coherent whole. Of course as a rule, "For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little" (Isaiah 28:10). We'll start with Jesus arrival, as captured in Matthew 24:30 and elsewhere. It does appears like this is where a lot of people missed it, as the common thinking is that He is coming to take people to heaven or whisked them out of the earth. Matthew 25:31-34 contains vital knowledge and readily helps in our discussion here. Actually, Matthew 25:31-34 is a continuation of the truth in Matthew 24:30-31, 1 Corinth. 15:51-52 and 1 Thes. 4:15-16. All these events are interconnected. Remember, "...line upon line...". Let's take note of at least 3 cardinal points in Matthew 25; 1. Throne 2. Nations 3. Kingdom prepared... So verse 31 pictures Jesus arrival, and He sits on His glorious throne. Now, we don't have to speculate or assume where this throne will be. The bible will always interpret itself, and Luke 1:32-33 prophecy holds the answer. Yes, He will sit on the "...throne of His father David". And this is no other place but Jerusalem, where king David ruled in the past. A new Jerusalem is coming, where the tabernacle of God will be with man (Rev. 21:2-3). Next we see that the nations of the earth are gathered and those faithful ones are rewarded and are told finally, to "inherit the kingdom prepared from the foundation of the earth". Does this prepared place or kingdom rings a bell? Yes, it should! Remember the prepared place in John 14:2-3 which you quoted? Oh yes... As an addition, the word translated "mansion" does not refer to a literal one or a building. It means: offices, i.e, positions of authority. As a very good example, take a look at this: "And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel" (Matt. 19:28). Did you see that? The twelves apostles already have their positions of authority reserved by Christ, in the resurrection. Also, this truth flies against those coveting heaven, so to speak. The whole scenario, settings or events happens and revolves around no other place but the earth! Nobody is raptured anywhere, supposedly to the third heaven (John 3:13). My friend, take your time and go through it, do your own findings: prove it (1 Thes. 5:21). And please don't forget to bring back your findings. Many thanks. |
Kalatium:There's nothing Christian about Christmas. You may want to read history on how and where your Christmas was borrowed from. If Christmas is anything to go by, the rightful owners are pagans. |
blueAgent:Thank you. |
blueAgent:Thank you. Do you mind to expound on how this will work out? You did a great job with the hell topic. I trust you can do it again. Please prove it. |
Hello friend, longest time. ![]() Your topic brought me here. It's quite an interesting one and indeed, you've done justice to it. Your submissions are true; they can be proven from the Bible. Well done! But... blueAgent:As it concerns the above claims in bold. By making heaven, what do you mean exactly? Living or going to heaven to spend eternity? If yes, can you prove it from the Bible? Good to see you bro. |
This is an interesting one. OP I'm going on this journey with you. Ride on. ![]() |
Ihedinobi3:That truth does not only applies to the living but the dead as well. See verse 52. However, here's the order of event: 1. The dead in Christ will rise first (1 Thes. 4:16). 2. Secondly, those alive. In all of these, what matters is that both the living and the dead will undergo what the scripture called changed. But what changed? A change from perishable to imperishable, from mortal to immortal (verse 53). Put another way, our earthly body is nothing but dust/corruption which much be put off for that which is perfect - immortality - eternal life! Ihedinobi3:Right, the scripture rightly says so. However, it's a fact that for imperishable/immortal body to be attained, then there's of necessity for that which is perishable/corrupt to be put off (verse 50 & 53). Ihedinobi3:Okay. Please take a look at verse 50 & 53. Ihedinobi3:You do well sir. Ihedinobi3:Why not? You can always count on me to be like the Bereans (Acts 17:11). Please be assured. Ihedinobi3:There's no gain in deceit. It's simply not part of our work description. Here's what you said: Ihedinobi3:You should have simply come out straight and say: 'Oh look, Moses was actually buried on earth at first. But you see, his body was later exhumed and transferred to heaven for a second burial or preservation'. It's clearer this way. Or don't you think? However, the holy scriptures does not in anyway alludes, insinuate or even remotely say anything like that. It's purely a work of fiction. Sorry. Ihedinobi3:It depends. Will you also pluck out your eyes if it causes you to sin? You see, wisdom will always be profitable to direct. I expect you to know better. Ihedinobi3:Sorry friend, I can't. I wish I could agree with you: I wish it was the truth. But that's fine, we can't always agree. Regards. |
Ihedinobi3:Let's see an example of such limits: "So that by two unchangeable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie" (Hebrews 11:18). Also Romans 4:3. Since God cannot lie, we are unshakably assured that indeed, Moses, Elijah, Enoch and the rest of mankind that died have all seen corruption from whence they came - dust! Or is it not written, "For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality"? 1 Corinth. 15:53. Just what exactly is corruption, a perishable body doing in God's abode- a domain of perfection? Oh, preservation you said. You mean God is preserving the same thing He said was corruption/perishable? May God have mercy on us. Ihedinobi3:Very good! This is the truth sir. So then, be assured that God is bound to keep to His word. Have faith in His word that yes, it is appointed for every man to die once and see corruption, or for corruption to be put off before the incorruptible can be attained. Of course, nothing is forced on God. But remember, God cannot lie. Ihedinobi3:A lie. Ihedinobi3:This is a good one. It shows we are learning. Ihedinobi3:Oh no, sir we can't afford to take one step forward and two steps backward. This is not good. How can you just admit that yes, Moses was buried on earth in line with the holy scripture, and at the same time, alleged that God later exhumed his body and whisked it to heaven? Please c'mon, we are all learned people here. More disheartening is that, you're using Jude 9 as a cover or supposed proof text that Mose's body was taken to heaven for preservation. Sorry, this is you dangerously reading meanings to the scripture. We do not know for a fact what led to archangel Michael's disagreement with Satan over the body of Moses. God does not say it, and a good Bible student or lover of the truth will readily admit it. If that knowledge was of any benefit to us, be assured that God would have let us know. The key message in Jude 9 however is not the disagreement between Michael and Satan, but the lesson therein. Here's verse 8, "Yet in like manner these people also, relying on their dreams, defile the flesh, reject authority, and blaspheme the glorious ones". Which people? To understand, one simply have to read from verse 7 backward to be able to keep context in view. In essence, the core message that Jude is passing in verse 9 is that, even archangel Michael, with one-third of angels under his command, could not dare blaspheme God by taking upon himself to rebuke Satan directly. Michael understood that he had no such authority on the "god of this world " (Ephesian 2:2). It can only be Christ (Matt. 4:10-11). Remember Lucifer, now Satan, was once an archangel too with one-third of angels, now demons, equally under his command (Rev. 12:4). So dear friend, if God by His infinite wisdom chose to hide the tomb of Moses and Michael's quarrel with Satan, please respect that wisdom. Quit already from reading these meanings into scriptures. It's ridiculous, to say the least. Really. Ihedinobi3:An irony. Many thanks. |
Myer:What if I tell you that I was in heaven three days ago? Indeed, ignorance is a choice. |
ihedinobi2:Hello friend. ihedinobi2:Really? Okay, let's see. ihedinobi2:Good. ihedinobi2:How can you come up with such wild assumption right after quoting verses like Ecclesiastes 12:7? What's Elijah's body doing in heaven when it's supposed to returned to the dust? Is Elijah's body much more important than the Lord's own that descended into hell for three days and night? Hmm. ihedinobi2:Hello sir, are you kidding me now? Sorry, this is ridiculous! Please take a look at this again: ihedinobi2:Right there, the same scripture that you quoted, it is expressly stated where God buried Moses, in a valley in the land of Moab, opposite Beth Peor. Obviously, a location on Earth. So which of Mose's body was taken to heaven for preservation, and which one was buried in the land of Moab? Oh forgive me, I forgot that it was his spirit that was buried. Ridiculous! ihedinobi2:Really? Okay, let's find out if this thing is so. Acts 2:34, "For David did not ascend into heaven...". So where's David? "...David... he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us till this day", verse 29. Put another way, David is in his grave. Simple. This is Peter speaking after the Lord's resurrection and ascension. In essence, Peter is simply amplifying the word of God as stated by Christ in John 3:13. So how come sir? How could David, a man after God's heart not make it to heaven after the so-called release? Let God be true and every man a liar (Romans 3:4). ihedinobi2:Sorry, there's no such possibility. Your wild speculations does not just rubbished sound scriptural truths but even common sense. It's at best, a figment of the imagination, as far as the Bible is concerned. ihedinobi2:You wouldn't know of course. I mean, how can you know when you don't even know the author of the letter? Now we know who's speculating. ihedinobi2:You don't argue facts: they are stated; facts are facts. The irony here is that, you're not just distorting scriptural truths but doing so in a very dangerous manner. Regards. |
Myer:I understand. However, we are also enjoined to, "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth" II Timothy 2:15. So it's not enough to just quote the Bible. Are you quoting it rightly? Myer:Are you sure Elijah did not die? Can you prove it? After the "chariot of fire" incident, do you know where Elijah was taken to? Be careful not to make assumptions. PROVE IT! Whilst it is true that Elijah was indeed taken into heaven. The question is: WHICH HEAVEN? Throughout the Bible, the word “heaven” is used to describe three locations: First, there is the atmosphere that envelops the earth; this is the first heaven. Next, the vast regions of outer space are collectively referred to as “heaven,” or “the heavens” (Psalms 115:16); this is the second heaven. Finally, the location of God’s throne is specifically called “the third heaven” by Paul (II Cor. 12:2). Since no human being has ever ascended into the third-heaven - God's throne, even David is not in heaven (John 3:13, Acts 2:34), only two possibilities remain for Elijah; 1. Outer space 2. The atmosphere or clouds (1 Thes. 4:17) We also know for a fact that human beings can't breath in space, so then, we are left with the ATMOSPHERE OR CLOUDS as the only option for Elijah. This is the only logical conclusion considering the facts. Elijah was indeed taken into the atmosphere or clouds, supernaturally. Actually, he was transported to another location on earth, where he lived the remainder of his days in accordance with the Scripture. Also note, clouds, as mentioned in 1 Thes. 4:17, are only a few miles above the earth. In fact, flying an airplane is in a sense, going to heaven. Further proof that Elijah was transported to another location is this. Few years after he was taken away, Elijah wrote a letter to Jehoram, king of Judah, rebuking him for his evil ways (II Chron. 21:12). Of course, this can only happen on Earth, not in heaven! Regards. |
Dtruthspeaker:The Bible says, "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good" 1 Thessalonians 5:21. Have you proven that Enoch did not die, that he lives? Are you sure? Whilst I understand that accepting glaring evidence that Enoch, like every other person died, could cause devastating blow to your probably 'heaven-bound or rapture' belief, but come on... This shouldn't be a problem to The Truth Speaker- a defender and one who speaks the truth. Right? Okay, so let's be like the Bereans, and "...find out whether these things were so" Acts 17:11. Speaking of Enoch, the holy scripture says, "And Enoch walked with God; and he was not, for God took him" Genesis 5:24. Please take note of the italicized word- walked. Of course I wouldn't bored you with the definition. You're a learned person. Now, here's what you're telling us in essence: you're saying that 'Enoch is walking with God'. But the bible says "Enoch walked". Does it mean we don't know our tenses again? Whose report shall we believe, yours or that of the scripture? So then, if Enoch did not die and lives, he would still be walking (present tense) with God and not walked (past tense). I'm sorry friend, you're spreading falsehood and not the truth. Dtruthspeaker:Does this edifies anyone? I don't think so. Many thanks. |
"As the bird by wandering, as the swallow by flying, so the curse causeless shall not come"-- Proverbs 26:2. |
Kobojunkiee:By transgressing the Law (1 John 3:4). And this is the result: "For the wages of sin is death..." (Romans 6:23). Sir, I know we all know the meaning of the word, "WAGES". Every worker readily understands what it means. Here's what Christ is saying: "And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity" (Matt 7:23). So then, for this work of iniquity, the Bible says that what sinners earn, i.e, its wages- the paycheck of every worker, is death. Kobojunkiee:Thank you. Kobojunkiee:That's the crux of the matter, sir. The thing is, one either believe and obey- keep the commandments- and is called a believer/Christian/child of God etc, or not. There's no room for sitting on the fence. As a matter of fact, what differentiates a believer from Satan and his demons is simply obedience to God. Without keeping the Law, which we've seen to be sin, then the spirit of disobedience is the one at work. And that spirit is non other than Satan (Ephesian 2:2). So then, there's nothing like one believes and don't obey, and is still a Christian. Obedience is what sets one apart from workers of iniquities. Now let's complete the other half of Romans 6:23, "...but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord". Again, notice that death and life are named separately, two complete opposite. Also, notice that eternal life is a gift, of course, to those who obey God. Here's what it means. If you say that some people, or the goats will end up in hell for all eternity, obviously then, they too have eternal life. HOW? But the promise/gift of eternal life is to faithful servants of God, not to sinners. Death, not life is to sinners. Actually, it's what they (sinners) earned by their own works. So saying that God will give this everlasting life to both faithful and the unfaithful is not only an error but a grave one. Does it matter whether one spends his/hers in heaven whilst the other in hell? Eternal life is eternal life, whether in heaven or hell. Take a look at Matthew 25:46, "And these (goats) shall go away into everlasting punishment (obviously, death): but the righteous into life eternal". Very clear distinction! Also note, it is punishment not punishing. A punishment that lasts for all eternity but does not continue forever. Big difference! Finally, God does not promise anyone eternal life in hell. It's either eternal life or eternal death, not both. Simple. Or is life and death the same thing? Many thanks. |
Kobojunkiee:Thank you so much. However, I still don't get why you're so fixated on Adam's sin as if sin has changed or its penalty. You seems to make it look like the penalty of sin is only applicable to Adam, even when the Bible has said that all have earned its wages. Yes, eternal life is a GIFT, not what is earn. You don't earn eternal life but death. So sir, you should know that I'm not asking you who is the first man that sinned. I know how sin came into the world. By the way, I asked you a question earlier: what is sin? Kobojunkiee:Did anyone said that? I'm not aware of it. All of mankind have earned the wages of sin, the only reward that everyone can rightfully lay claims to. It was for this reason that Christ came, so that anyone who believes in Him, of course, not just to believe but keep His commandments, should not perish but have life. That is John 3:16 in essence. Note, it says, "should not perish..." Why? Because death was imminent anyway, it was already there; automatic. So then, John 3:16 bears two opposites: 1. Eternal life 2. Death or to perish, of course, eternally. Kobojunkiee:Exactly. Isn't that what we're saying? The penalty of sin still remains the same except for those who are being saved. Kobojunkiee:He didn't need to. Mankind had already earned it. Here's another way to get the message of John 3:16; "Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for if you do not believe that I am He, you will die in your sins.” John 8:24. In all, it's either eternal life which is a gift or the wages of sin, not both. What is life and death? Thank you. |
Kobojunkie:Let's get something straight, sir. The Bible says "the wages of sin is death", not the wages of Adam's sin. Also, "all have sinned...". By implication, it simply means all of us have earned the wages of sin, which is why eternal life is a gift. So it's no longer about Adam. We have all sinned. You asked where is "eternal death" in John 3:16? Okay. What does it mean to perish? Thank you. |
Kobojunkie:I understand you, sir. You keep talking of the sin of Adam. Are you in anyway implying that sin has changed? What about its wages? Does it still carries the death penalty today? Perhaps at this point, we may also consider what is sin. Kobojunkie:Don't you think if it were so, then even the devils are saved, seeing that they also believe? James 2:19. Do you think just believing is all it takes? Again, did you noticed that same John 3:16 carries two opposite promise: 1. Eternal life & 2. Eternal death or damnation? Also, we may have to consult the dictionary again for the meaning of life and death. Kobojunkie:But the promise is either eternal life or death, not both. What is the opposite of life again? Many thanks. |
Kobojunkie:Please prove that the goats have eternal life. Alongside it, what is the wages of sin? Thank you for your time. |
Kobojunkie:Thank you once again. Looking at the bolded, please you may consider reminding me what is the wages of sin again. Kobojunkie:Prove it. |
Kobojunkie:Thank you so much for your response. However, what I actually wanted to hear from you is your doctrine of punishment for believers and not unbelievers, who according to you will just die and that's the end. Please explain it. Thank you. |
Kobojunkie:Please expound. |
CVM is in business for real, and I don't see them stopping now or later. Go ahead and use them. |
UyaiIncomparabl:Thank you Uyai. |
LaReinaa:Please any proof? |
ggirl4real:Oh really? Now that's interesting. ggirl4real:Eziokwu! You did well, I must say. I mean if God is not the author of confusion, isn't it normal that where there's one, then it can be correctly said that God is not in such place(s)? But of course, you can understand the Bible and it's true teachings. |
ggirl4real:Prove that people are going to hell or are currently burning in hell fire. ggirl4real:Have you ever asked for prove? Perhaps it's time you find yourself a new teacher. |

