₦airaland Forum

MikelEleta:
Let's wait for official confirmation before we start throwing tantrums. If it is confirmed that the likes of Amaechi, Ngige, Fayemi, made the list then I think we are going back to the era of compensating politicians and not putting square peg in sqaure hole. This was what killed the previous administrations and Buhari seems to want to re write history. I pray the senate screens those nominees thorougly without fear OR bias and they should not hesistate to turn down anyone who fails the integrity amd competency test. By the way any governor who failed in 8yrs to deliver dividend of democracy has no business been a Minister. Fresh hands should be tried. I rest my case for now till he list is made official.

Epaul:
my friend, I don't often belabour trite points. But since it's clear as a pikestaff you are sort of grappling with incomprehension and come off as a fellow whose opinion is not eclectic but premised solely on a book rifed with very many errors, i will do you the favour.

If there is anyone who seem to have a patently glib misunderstanding of the word 'complete', it really should be you. You speciously think 'to complete' is akin 'to complement'. That's spurrious Oga. Let me help you with the difference:

To complement according to the oxford online dictionary means ''to contribute extra features to someone or something in such a way as to improve or emphasize their qualities"

To complete, on the other, according to cambridge dictionary means "to make whole or perfect"

whenever you say "marriage completes a man", you are actually saying "marriage makes a man whole and perfect" which is infernally wrong. It shows you know next to zilch about what you are talking. Marriage doesn't make us whole. The word 'whole' itself means "complete in itself". Man is whole. He is complete. He only needs people(friends) to complement him, to improve and emphasize his qualities that is.

All you have said about being complete - "she gave him hope and stability and provided him with all that could help him make a family of his own. She also acted as his strength by holding his hand when the times were tough and a beacon of hope when it was dark, she was his therapist when he failed and his councilor when he felt all was lost. She completed him..Husbands turn to wives when they need something or qualities that they might be short on and have experienced suffering due to the lack of it. Two good heads are better than one.", are actually to complement the man which can be enjoyed without getting married; which can be enjoyed outside wed-lock by having good friends and a supportive siblings in your life; not completing the man.

You don't need to get married to be complemented. Having good friends(either male or female) with good qualities will do. I am complete. I have good female chums who have complement me to bits. I don't need to get married to any of them to be whole.

You should be the one to listen! Marriage doesn't complete a man! You cannot complete something that is already complete. You can only complement the thing.

nma24:
Urine comes from a tiny opening just below d clit... you can check ur gf's own to confirm

Applaner:
dis is exactly wat happens wen one refuses to take his drugs.

charijee:
[color=#CD1076]May I ask why you're crying again? [/color]

nma24:
so u really think urine is passed from d vjay opening? You fall hand o

charijee:
[color=#CD1076]I'm a Queen[/color]

Epaul:
Oga, You really should be the one to understand that marriage does not and has never completed a man any more than being a nairalander completes you. We come complete. Everyone of us. We are no half men, half vacuum needed to be filled up by half women, half vacuum who themselves need similar gesture from us. To maintain otherwise is a big fib Oga. You should understand this and stop pole-vaulting crass twaddle under the flimsy facade of Religion. If the sky-porter that be had intended to design marriage as a 'without-which-not', everyone who opt not to tie the knot would be incomplete including Jesus, Paul et al. And that much is certain. No exceptions. Truth, however, is that marriage is very much optional not a sine qua non to our existence.
Your gift of celibacy drivel is pointless and doesn't prove the contrary. Your bible never said marriage is a 'must-do'. To use your bible to evidence that marriage is optional, here is what one of the lawyers turned authority and silver-tail of the spirit said:

1 Corinthians 7:8 New International Version (NIV)
"Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do"

Did paul say the unmarried and the widows need the gift of celibacy to stay unmarried like him? No!
If marriage completes a man as you are ignorantly making a last-ditch attempt to prove, why was apostle paul advising the unmarried to remain single as he did? Was Paul telling them to stay incomplete? Of course, not. As a matter of fact, Paul felt being single is a better option and makes one even more complete. Hence, his advice. Except you want to claim you are more drunk in the spirit than Paul to have come up with your absolute claim.
I know you would want to argue that the above scripture was Paul's personal conjecture. If that was Paul's personal conjecture, then it means 'all scriptures are not inspired by God' as the bible purported which makes your celibacy claim even more specious.

As a matter of fact, marriage has destroyed more men and woman than singlehood has done; marriage has rendered more people incomplete than being single has done.

Not everyone can cut it as 'married' and that doesn't make them incomplete.

I understand you needed likes to pump up your ego that was why you resorted to putting up your above reply in your initial front-page post rather than replying my post squarely.

Epaul:
Oga, You really should be the one to understand that marriage does not and has never completed a man any more than being a nairalander completes you. We come complete. Everyone of us. We are no half men, half vacuum needed to be filled up by half women, half vacuum who themselves need similar gesture from us. To maintain otherwise is a big fib Oga. You should understand this and stop pole-vaulting crass twaddle under the flimsy facade of Religion. If the sky-porter that be had intended to design marriage as a 'without-which-not', everyone who opt not to tie the knot would be incomplete including Jesus, Paul et al. And that much is certain. No exceptions. Truth, however, is that marriage is very much optional not a sine qua non to our existence.
Your gift of celibacy drivel is pointless and doesn't prove the contrary. Your bible never said marriage is a 'must-do'. To use your bible to evidence that marriage is optional, here is what one of the lawyers turned authority and silver-tail of the spirit said:

1 Corinthians 7:8 New International Version (NIV)
"Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do"

Did paul say the unmarried and the widows need the gift of celibacy to stay unmarried like him? No!
If marriage completes a man as you are ignorantly making a last-ditch attempt to prove, why was apostle paul advising the unmarried to remain single as he did? Was Paul telling them to stay incomplete? Of course, not. As a matter of fact, Paul felt being single is a better option and makes one even more complete. Hence, his advice. Except you want to claim you are more drunk in the spirit than Paul to have come up with your absolute claim.
I know you would want to argue that the above scripture was Paul's personal conjecture. If that was Paul's personal conjecture, then it means 'all scriptures are not inspired by God' as the bible purported which makes your celibacy claim even more specious.

As a matter of fact, marriage has destroyed more men and woman than singlehood has done; marriage has rendered more people incomplete than being single has done.

Not everyone can cut it as 'married' and that doesn't make them incomplete.

I understand you needed likes to pump up your ego that was why you resorted to putting up your above reply in your initial front-page post rather than replying my post squarely.

Babalegba:
Are Nigerians still this daft. Jonathan was a curse to Nigeria.

charijee:
[color=#CD1076]Which do you prefer?


Queen or princess?[/color]

Cutehector:
Na who dey send love messages dis days?

charijee:
[color=#CD1076]Abeg no do o....We no want another tsunami again [/color]

reminiscing:
That is way too extreme,my brother.

IsaacBuchi:


You have a beautiful way of sharing rich ideas with stories. Love that! Following You immediately

charijee:
[color=#CD1076]Ugly indeed ...you're just being funny as usual.....kontinu [/color]

charijee:
[color=#CD1076]Do you fall under that category? [/color]

charijee:
[color=#CD1076]Wipe those tears , there's hope for you

You funny o [/color]