₦airaland Forum

Obakoolex:
The rate at which they migrate to Southwest from the East is alarming already, by 2035 it's possible only old people would remain in potopoto area.

Holluwhakemmy:
Yes of course 100% sure because we in the South West are accommodative and loving people

Solitechworld:
In recent days, a flurry of misinformation has flooded various media platforms, particularly from Western outlets like CNN, BBC, and US Today, alleging that the UN has slashed the reported number of casualties in Gaza. These claims have been amplified on social media platforms such as Nairaland, with user Holiness2100 adding a dash of inflammatory rhetoric to the mix.

However, a closer examination of the facts reveals a different story. The United Nations has not reduced the casualty figures as purported by these sources. In fact, the UN stands by its initial reports on the tragic loss of life in Gaza.

It's crucial to rely on credible sources for accurate information, especially in times of crisis. Rather than spreading sensationalized narratives, let's turn to verified sources such as the UN for an authentic understanding of the situation.

In times of conflict, misinformation can exacerbate tensions and hinder efforts towards peace and resolution. Let's prioritize truth and responsible reporting to foster a more informed and empathetic global discourse.


Here is the video directly from the UN Source:-

https://twitter.com/Peaceinteract/status/1790540642541523158?t=kWUcmAYSPRiVWZsbb6wtuw&s=19[/quote]Please send more time on the many genocides happening around you. If African would stop going 10,000 miles to look for genocide but would look within maybe only then do we have a chance to grow and improve.

Kaa4:
Cannot US have a much younger and dynamic Presidential candidate? These foxes are not the types that shoyld be in hte saddle at this time. Check Europe!!!

DeepSight:
Oh, that's why IDF is always present to enforce right?
And how exactly does a private individual from anywhere else in the world just "move in" and settle on a foreign land if not with government imprimatur? Have you ever heard of the "right of return" as espoused for Jews?

Its obvious you dont know anything about the issue if you can claim not to be aware of people being kicked out of their homes forcefully to settle Jews there. And if you dont know that, or claim not to know that, then its one of two things - you are either an inveterate liar or you have been living under a rock. That rock could possibly be your fanatical religion though.

But on a serious note this sort of post which you just made has made me feel really really stupid.
I must be, to be countenancing this sort of conversation with a person who can say this.

Its like arguing with a person who says the second world war never happened.

DeepSight:
Oh, that's why IDF is always present to enforce right?
And how exactly does a private individual from anywhere else in the world just "move in" and settle on a foreign land if not with government imprimatur? Have you ever heard of the "right of return" as espoused for Jews?

Its obvious you dont know anything about the issue if you can claim not to be aware of people being kicked out of their homes forcefully to settle Jews there. And if you dont know that, or claim not to know that, then its one of two things - you are either an inveterate liar or you have been living under a rock. That rock could possibly be your fanatical religion though.

But on a serious note this sort of post which you just made has made me feel really really stupid.
I must be, to be countenancing this sort of conversation with a person who can say this.

Its like arguing with a person who says the second world war never happened.

DeepSight:
*Sigh*

Ok, here goes. Please open your ears and eyes this time oh. Because I am tired.
This is a take from the International Committe of the Red Cross which is explanatory.

"The ICRC's official position is that the West Bank has been occupied by Israel since 1967. Consequently, the ICRC has repeatedly stated that Israel settlements' policy goes against key provisions of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), specifically the law of occupation, and is contrary to its intent and spirit. The 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention (GCIV) prohibits an Occupying Power from transferring its own population into the territories under its occupation. Therefore, Israel's settlements policy in the West Bank contradicts the Fourth Geneva Convention. Settlement expansion – be it through formal expansion of existing settlements or through the largely unchecked spread of unauthorized outposts – is the key source of legal and humanitarian concerns in the West Bank. With its decades-long presence in the occupied Palestinian territory, the ICRC has been a witness to settlements' impact. They restrict Palestinians' freedom of movement and affect the social and economic fabric of entire communities. They can limit Palestinians' access to their agricultural lands, natural resources or medical services. They also contribute to violence between Israeli settlers and Palestinian communities."

https://www.icrc.org/en/document/ihl-occupying-power-responsibilities-occupied-palestinian-territories

Now understood?

I hope you will not be so daft as to continue in your ways by now asking me whether Israel is bound by the views of the ICRC. Because I will not put such an infantile question beyond you.

Now that is one. Two, let's quickly treat your confusion on the United Nations. The U.N is not a court. The question concerns borders. Israel was set up under the auspices of the U.N British Mandate for Palestine. This puts that organization in an eminent position to speak to the issues as they arise from the matter of borders. Its not about harping on and on about whether Israel is bound. Every sovereign state can choose how it conducts itself whether that be rougue conduct or responsible conduct. The International community is virtually unanimous on the question of the illegality of the West Bank Settlements. This is not a matter for dispute and is generally beyond cavil in the international coummunity.

DeepSight:
*Sigh*

Ok, here goes. Please open your ears and eyes this time oh. Because I am tired.
This is a take from the International Committe of the Red Cross which is explanatory.

"The ICRC's official position is that the West Bank has been occupied by Israel since 1967. Consequently, the ICRC has repeatedly stated that Israel settlements' policy goes against key provisions of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), specifically the law of occupation, and is contrary to its intent and spirit. The 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention (GCIV) prohibits an Occupying Power from transferring its own population into the territories under its occupation. Therefore, Israel's settlements policy in the West Bank contradicts the Fourth Geneva Convention. Settlement expansion – be it through formal expansion of existing settlements or through the largely unchecked spread of unauthorized outposts – is the key source of legal and humanitarian concerns in the West Bank. With its decades-long presence in the occupied Palestinian territory, the ICRC has been a witness to settlements' impact. They restrict Palestinians' freedom of movement and affect the social and economic fabric of entire communities. They can limit Palestinians' access to their agricultural lands, natural resources or medical services. They also contribute to violence between Israeli settlers and Palestinian communities."

https://www.icrc.org/en/document/ihl-occupying-power-responsibilities-occupied-palestinian-territories

Now understood?

I hope you will not be so daft as to continue in your ways by now asking me whether Israel is bound by the views of the ICRC. Because I will not put such an infantile question beyond you.

Now that is one. Two, let's quickly treat your confusion on the United Nations. The U.N is not a court. The question concerns borders. Israel was set up under the auspices of the U.N British Mandate for Palestine. This puts that organization in an eminent position to speak to the issues as they arise from the matter of borders. Its not about harping on and on about whether Israel is bound. Every sovereign state can choose how it conducts itself whether that be rougue conduct or responsible conduct. The International community is virtually unanimous on the question of the illegality of the West Bank Settlements. This is not a matter for dispute and is generally beyond cavil in the international coummunity.

DeepSight:
Jesus wept.
One can't make this level of mental retardation up. One honestly can't.

DeepSight:
Is Hamas a signatory to the Geneva?

DeepSight:
Admit it. Pride is the first sin you know. Eschew pride and admit you never heard of the Geneva until yesterday.

DeepSight:
Is the Geneva Convention a Treaty? Is Israel a party to it? Are treaties binding or not?

Worse, are treaties the same thing as U.N Resolutions? If a multi lateral body makes a pronouncement of legality based on the provisions of a treaty, does that that invalidate such a treaty?

You see, a little learning is a terrible thing. You have not even understood what is being discussed and with every post you make you make the sub standard nature of your education ever more obvious.

DeepSight:
Why don't you admit you never heard of the Geneva Convention before yesterday, as is already obvious.

DeepSight:
You educated me? Now that's beyond psychotic.
Just deal with the Geneva 1949. Focus on that. I cant do more than that. Speaking with you demeans me. Good luck.

DeepSight:
You educated me? Now that's beyond psychotic.
Just deal with the Geneva 1949. Focus on that. I cant do more than that. Speaking with you demeans me. Good luck.

Paraman:
How's Nigeria been destroyed?

Nigeria is on the right path. Every financial institutions and sane people around the world knows this.

DeepSight:
All this and not a word on the core rationale in the Geneva Convention 1949. I wish you good luck. I am done with you.

DeepSight:
I dont think you are sane. Just the other day we talked about Biafra, you asked me about it and I told you my views. I even told you about a book I am writing about the conflict in Darfur. You began to cite every other conflict in the world and ask what I am doing about them.

You need psychiatric attention.
Good night.

DeepSight:
I dont think you are sane. Just the other day we talked about Biafra, you asked me about it and I told you my views. I even told you about a book I am writing about the conflict in Darfur. You began to cite every other conflict in the world and ask what I am doing about them.

You need psychiatric attention.
Good night.

DeepSight:
I will send you a delegation of frogs and spiders tonight.
I bid you a tempestuous night of terrifying nightmares.

On a serious note though, you guys need to rediscover your humanity. You can deny as much as you want that you religion is a factor for you in this matter. You know in your heart it is.

There is a saying that with or without religion, good people will do good things and evil people will do evil things, but for good people to do evil things, that only takes religion.

PS: Needless to say, you completely, understandably, ignored the explanation of why the West Bank settlements are illegal. I referred you to the Geneva Convention 1949, to which Israel is a signatory. That Convention makes it illegal for an occupying power to advance settlement of civilian areas in occupied territory. Go figure.

Harnny:
"The Arabs captured the land in the time of the Mulads." did they send the people there packing? No!!! the "Jews" were still there, some remained as Jews, and some converted. However..." the people" there remained "the people" there. It was just a change of rulers... and some religions and a mix of some Arabs (who are also just as semite as the originals). Won't you say they were more lenient than the Christian Romans? Now the people there don't have a problem with the Jews as they lived together with Christians and Muslims. Then came those Jews expelled from Europe and the rest is history. Imagine the ifa worshippers in Brazil becoming more successful and richer than the Yoruba of SW Nigeria. They claimed slavery took them to America and they rightly own ile ife. Most local Yourba people already become Christians or Muslims. We still have Ifa worshippers amongst us with whom we all live in peace. But since Ile-Ife is the cradle of Ifa, the local Ifa worshippers teamed with the Brazilians, who mostly speak and appear differently now due to years abroad and inter-marriage but still claim Ifa identity, to take over Oyo, Osun, Ondo, and Kwara and left the current Yourba with Lagos and Kwara while still controlling what they do there including our waterways in Lagos. Will you say the Saro/Local Ifa guys were magnanimous in leaving the rest of the Yoruba with Kwara and Lagos state?

DeepSight:
You must be drunk. Just listen to yourself.

1. Israel was established under the mandate of the United Nations, C/o the British Mandate for Palestine. There is therefore no better authority to speak to what is legal and illegal in this matter.

2. I only raise religion because I know it is what is teleguiding you in this matter. No need to deny it, own it.

3. I am no kid, From the way you write I am almost certain I am some twenty years older than you are.

4. You say the UN decision on the West Bank is non binding. Pray tell, what then is Israel doing at the U.N - The same organization under whose auspices it was created. Those settlements have severally been declared illegal under international law and you say "technically Israel has not broken any rule." What school did you go to?

Please be schooled:

The international community considers the establishment of Israeli settlements in the Israeli-occupied territories illegal on one of two bases: that they are in violation of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, or that they are in breach of international declarations. The United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and the High Contracting Parties to the Convention have all affirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention applies to the Israeli-occupied territories.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law_and_Israeli_settlements

5. . . . . "and you will engage me . . . " Do you think I need your attention? Spending time talking with you is bound to reduce anyone's I.Q after a while.

DeepSight:
The United Nations (under whose auspices the State of Israel was created) has been clear that the settlements in the West Bank are illegal.
Repeatedly clear.

But your misplaced Christianity will addle your mind and tangle your tongue to think and say something incongruous in that regard.

God1000:
lol

God1000:
I will personally do that this time

alrahmanonline:
Another banger! You think Israel doesn't know what they're doing? Please do your research Isreal is the only country that sinks US ship without any repercussion lots of crew members dead. We all know what we are doing

YesDaddyTill203:
Apartheid terrorist state.

alrahmanonline:
How can you be so cruel, ok let's assume you justified killing of Palestinians, because they are terrorist according to you, you are still justifying UN staff killed and calling Isreal children of God? How do we end up being this pathetic.

alrahmanonline:
They kill people with impunity and you guys keep supporting them? are you guys alright?anybody supporting Israel, May you witness in full all what Palestinians are witnessing right now. Amen

God1000:
Too bad, Israel will be held accountable for all the atrocities they are commiting.

Indiscriminate bombing of civilian targets such as hospitals, refugee camps, world heritage sites, schools, Churches and mosques are serious war crimes, even cemeteries are not left out